Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Fitbit Flyer Wireless  Headphones Review

Reviewed Mar 09, 2018 at 05:09 pm
Latest change: Test bench update Nov 21, 2019 at 11:25 am
Fitbit Flyer Wireless
6.9
Mixed Usage 
6.5
Neutral Sound 
7.3
Commute/Travel 
7.9
Sports/Fitness 
6.8
Office 
5.1
Wireless Gaming 
5.0
Wired Gaming 
6.5
Phone Call 
Tested using methodology v1.3.1 
 0
The Fitbit Flyer are good sports headphones that are also decent for most use cases. They have a fairly straightforward wireless design that feels well-built and durable. They're also stable enough for running, and come with a variety of tips and stability accessories to help you find a good fit. Unfortunately, they have a slightly overpowering bass and they lack a good app for added customization options.

Our Verdict

6.9
Mixed Usage 

Decent for mixed usage. The Fitbit flyer are best used for sports, but they're portable and isolate enough for more casual uses like commuting and traveling. They also barely leak, so they're a good option for noise sensitive environments like being at the office. However, they have quite a bit of latency which will not be suitable for watching movies or gaming.

Pros
  • Stable design for sports.
  • Very low leakage.
Cons
  • Poor latency performance.
  • Mediocre battery life.
6.5
Neutral Sound 

Average for neutral listening. They have a lot of bass which unfortunately sounds a bit boomy and overpowers some of the instruments and vocals in the mid-range. Their treble range is also somewhat recessed but has a few spikes that makes sharp sounds a bit piercing, especially, on already bright tracks. They won't be the best headphones for more neutral listeners and have a small soundstage due to their in-ear closed back design. However they should sound good enough for most.

Pros
None
Cons
None
7.3
Commute/Travel 

Above-average for commuting. They isolate decently well against ambient noise, they're portable and have an easy-to-use control scheme. They should be suitable for most commuters but would be better if they had a longer battery life with better power saving features.

Pros
None
Cons
None
7.9
Sports/Fitness 

The Fitbit Flyer are good sports headphones. They have a breathable in-ear fit, with multiple stability fins and wings that make them stable enough for working out and running. They're also wireless, they have a simple and efficient control scheme, and they're compact enough to fit into most pockets which make them easy to have on you at all times.

Pros
None
Cons
None
6.8
Office 

Average for office use. They block a decent amount of noise and barely leak, so you will rarely distract your colleagues even if you like to listen to your music at higher volumes.

Pros
None
Cons
None
5.1
Wireless Gaming 

Below-average for gaming. They have an average-at-best microphone, but way too much latency to be suitable for gaming. They're also not as customizable as most gaming headsets since they have no app support

5.0
Wired Gaming 
6.5
Phone Call 

Pros
None
Cons
None
  • 6.9
    Mixed Usage
  • 6.5
    Neutral Sound
  • 7.3
    Commute/Travel
  • 7.9
    Sports/Fitness
  • 6.8
    Office
  • 5.1
    Wireless Gaming
  • 5.0
    Wired Gaming
  • 6.5
    Phone Call
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
    2.  Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.
    3.  Updated Mar 09, 2018: Review published.
    4.  Updated Mar 07, 2018: Our testers have started testing this product.

    Check Price

    Compared To Other Headphones

    Comparison picture

    The Fitbit Flyer are good sports headphones that have a fairly common wireless in-ear design. They're decently premium-looking headphones and feel durable enough to last you a while. They also come with a variety of tips and stability accessories that make them stand out when compared to competing models. However, they have a fairly weak battery performance with no power saving features, and they do not have a very customizable sound unlike some of the models below. 

    Jaybird X3 Wireless

    The Jaybird X3 Wireless are better wireless in-ears than the Fitbit Flyer Wireless. The Jaybird have a better isolating in-ear fit and come with a couple more tip options than the Fitbit. They also have a better default sound that you can customize via the Jaybird app and a longer battery life. On the other hand, the Fitbit have a more premium look and feel, and come with a few more stability fin options, which may be more comfortable for some ears. They also have a much easier to charge design that does not require a proprietary charging clip like the Jaybird, which can be very limiting.

    Bose SoundSport Wireless

    The Bose SoundSport Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Fitbit Flyer. The Bose have a more comfortable earbud fit that most will prefer over the in-ear fit of the Fitbit Flyer. They also have a better-balanced sound quality and a better battery performance overall, thanks to their auto-off feature. The Fitbit Flyer, on the other hand, have a more isolating in-ear fit that's more suitable for noisy environments. They also leak a lot less so you can play your music at higher volumes without distracting the people around you. On the upside, both headphones are stable enough for sports and most physical activities.

    Apple AirPods (1st generation)

    If you prefer the compact format of a truly wireless design, then the Apple AirPods (1st generation) will be a better choice. However, if you want a typical wireless in-ear for sports, go for the Fitbit Flyer Wireless instead. The Apple have an excellent 25-hour battery life, thanks to their compact and portable charging case. They also have an earbud design that most will find more comfortable than the FitBit. On the other hand, the FitBit have a more isolating in-ear fit, which makes them more suitable for noisy environments and commutes. The FitBit are more stable thanks to their multiple tips and stability fins sizes, and they have a lot more bass and will sound more exciting than the AirPods.

    Bose SoundSport Free Truly Wireless

    If you prefer the compact format of a truly wireless design, then the Bose SoundSport Free Truly Wireless will be a better choice; however, if you want a typical wireless in-ear for sports go for the Fitbit Flyer Wireless instead. The Bose have a better sound quality than the Fitbit. They're also a bit more comfortable to wear thanks to their earbud design. The Bose are also a bit more portable, thanks to their truly wireless design, although their case is rather bulky. On the other hand, the Fitbit have a more isolating in-ear fit, which makes them more suitable for noisy environments and commutes. They're also more stable thanks to their multiple tips and stability fins sizes. The Fitbit also have a longer battery life on a single charge.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Filter:
    All
    Design
    Style
    TypeIn-ear
    EnclosureClosed-Back
    WirelessYes
    TransducerDynamic

    The Fitbit Flyer have a simple and straightforward design that looks good and feels high-end. They feel a lot more premium than the Plantronics BackBeat Fit but do not benefit from the extra stability of an ear-hook design. They look somewhat like the Jaybird X3 but with slightly bigger earbuds, and fortunately, they do not stick out of your ears like the Bose SoundSport Wireless. They come in two color schemes, Nightfall Blue and Lunar Gray. The latter is a bit more flashy but still looks great for outdoor use. The special stability wings make them stand out from the other similarly designed wireless in-ears, but overall they do not feel very different from those models, especially when using the normal stability fins.

    7.0
    Comfort
    Weight0.05 lbs
    Clamping Force
    0 lbs

    The Fitbit Flyer have a typical in-ear fit that's decently comfortable but won't be for everyone. They come with 3 sets of gel tips of varying sizes and a couple of different stability wings and fins. The fit isn't altered much by the additional stability accessories though, so if you're not a big fan of in-ear designs you will have some of the same issues with these headphones.

    7.2
    Controls
    OS Compatibility
    N/A
    Ease Of UseGood
    FeedbackOkay
    Call/Music ControlYes
    Volume ControlYes
    Microphone ControlNo
    Channel Mixing
    N/A
    Noise Cancelling ControlN/A
    Talk-Through
    N/A
    Additional ButtonsBass Effect

    These headphones have a decent control scheme that's easy to use but not as responsive. They provide call/music, track skipping, and volume controls. The buttons are well spaced out and intuitive but feel a bit mushy. On the upside, they give you a lot of auditory feedback and you can even change the language or switch to just tones. They also have a special EQ mode called power boost that you can enable by pressing the volume up and down buttons at the same time.

    8.9
    Breathability
    Avg.Temp.Difference1.1 °C

    The Fitbit Flyer are very breathable headphones. They do not cover the ears so they won't make you sweat more than usual. The stability wings cause a slightly higher temperature difference since they have more points of contact with the notch of your ear than the fins but it's a very noticeable difference and shouldn't change much to your work out routine.

    8.6
    Portability
    L2.1"
    W1.3"
    H2.2"
    Volume6 in³
    Transmitter RequiredN/A

    Like most wireless in-ears, these headphones are very portable. They're compact and will easily fit into your pockets or bags. The carrying pouch also doesn't add much bulk, so they won't be much of a hassle to have on you at all times.

    6.0
    Case
    TypePouch
    LN/A
    WN/A
    HN/A
    VolumeN/A

    The Fitbit Flyer come with a carrying pouch that will protect the headphones from scratches and minor water exposure. It's also fairly easy to carry on you at all times and will store all the accessories that come in the box. The pouch is very similar to the Jaybird X3 but its a bit easier to open without all the accessories tumbling out.

    7.5
    Build Quality

    The Fitbit Flyer have a good build quality that feels decently high-end. The cable is flat and rubberized and feels durable enough to last you a while. The earbuds and the in-line remote also look well-made with a polished design and dense plastic that won't get damaged if you accidentally drop the headphones once or twice. They're also sweat proof and which makes them decently durable headphones, however, since the earbuds are not detachable if the cable snaps or the remote breaks you will have to get a new pair.

    8.0
    Stability

    The Fitbit Flyer are stable sports headphones. They come with both stability fins and a wing design that some may prefer. In our test, the fins were a bit more stable than the wings but as long as you can get a secure fit they will be stable enough for exercising and working out.

    Headshots 1
    Headshots 2
    Top
    In The Box

    • Fitbit Flyer Headphones
    • Earbud tips (x3 sizes)
    • Stability fins  (x2 sizes)
    • Stability wings (x2 sizes)
    • USB charging cable
    • Carrying pouch

    Sound
    Sound Profile
    See details on graph tool
    Bass Amount
    0.99 dB
    Treble Amount
    -3.58 dB
    8.9
    Frequency Response Consistency
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Avg. Std. Deviation
    0.23 dB

    The frequency response consistency of the Fitbit Flyer is excellent. If the user is able to achieve a proper fit and an air-tight seal using the assortment of tips that come with the headphones, then they should be able to get consistent bass and treble delivery every time they use the headphones.

    Raw Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    6.8
    Bass Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    4.59 dB
    Low-Frequency Extension
    17.31 Hz
    Low-Bass
    -0.1 dB
    Mid-Bass
    7.02 dB
    High-Bass
    2.37 dB

    The Fitfit Flyer have an average bass. Their LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 17Hz, which is excellent. Accordingly, low-bass is within 0.1dB of our target, which ensures a deep and thumpy bass, which is important for bass-heavy genres such as EDM, Hip-hop and film scores. However, the 6dB dip around 40Hz has a negative effect on the punch of low/sub-kick drums. The wide 10dB peak that covers mid-bass, adds excess body to bass guitars and kick drums at the expense of overpowering vocals and other lead instruments. Overall, their bass has just the right amount of thump and too much body, but without sounding too boomy.

    8.8
    Mid Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    1.58 dB
    Low-Mid
    1.61 dB
    Mid-Mid
    -1.35 dB
    High-Mid
    1.11 dB

    The mid-range performance of the Flyer is great. The response is quite even and consistent, with the only remark being the 5dB dip centered around 700Hz. This nudges vocals and lead instruments towards the back of the mix, making it a bit recessed.

    6.5
    Treble Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    4.73 dB
    Low-Treble
    -0.68 dB
    Mid-Treble
    -5.22 dB
    High-Treble
    -4.57 dB

    Average treble range performance. The asymmetrical dip between 3KHz and 9KHz, negatively affects the detail and presence of vocals and lead instruments. However, since the bigger part of the dip is around 9KHz, most of the negative effect will be perceived as a lack in sharpness (S and T sounds).

    6.5
    Peaks/Dips
    See details on graph tool
    Peaks
    2.25 dB
    Dips
    1.91 dB
    7.3
    Imaging
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted Group Delay
    1.37
    Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
    0.47
    Weighted Frequency Mismatch
    2.29
    Weighted Phase Mismatch
    5.52

    The imaging performance of the Flyer is about average. The weighted group delay is 1.37, which is quite high, and among the worst we have measured so far. The GD graph shows that the problem area is in the lower bass, especially around 40Hz, which corresponds to the 40Hz dip in the frequency response. This suggests that the bass of the Flyer won't be very fast and tight, which will negatively affect its punchiness. On the plus side, the L/R drivers of our test unit were decently matched, which helps with the accurate placement and localization of objects (voice, instruments, footsteps) in the stereo image. The phase mismatch in the treble range although audible, won't have a significant negative effect on localization.

    0.6
    Soundstage
    PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
    N/A
    PRTF Size (Avg.)
    N/A
    PRTF Distance
    N/A
    Openness
    3.0
    Acoustic Space Excitation
    0.2

    The soundstage of the Fitbit Flyer, like most other in-ears, is poor. This is because creating an out-of-head and speaker-like soundstage is largely dependent on activating the resonances of the pinna (outer ear). The design of in-ears and earbuds is in such a way that fully bypasses the pinna and doesn't interact with it. Also, because these headphones have a closed-back enclosure, their soundstage won't be perceived to be as open as that of open-back earbuds like the Apple AirPods (1st generation) Truly Wireless or the Bose SoundSport Free Truly Wireless.

    7.2
    Weighted Harmonic Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    WHD @ 90
    0.379
    WHD @ 100
    0.229
    Isolation
    7.0
    Noise Isolation
    See details on graph tool
    Isolation Audio
    Overall Attenuation
    -19.76 dB
    Noise CancellingNo
    Bass
    -4.29 dB
    Mid
    -19.65 dB
    Treble
    -36.83 dB

    The isolation performance of the Flyer is decent. In the bass range, where the rumble of airplane and bus engines sit, they achieve 4dB of isolation, which is inadequate. In the mid-range, important for blocking out speech, they reduce outside noise by almost 20dB, which is great. They also have a a very good performance in the treble range, which is important for cutting out sharp sounds such as S and Ts.

    9.8
    Leakage
    See details on graph tool
    Leakage Audio
    Overall Leakage @ 1ft
    22.03 dB

    The leakage performance of the Flyer is excellent. These in-ears do not leak in the bass and mid ranges at all, and the entirety of the leakage is in the treble range. The overall level of the leakage is also extremely low, making the leakage of these headphones practically non-existent.

    Microphone
    Microphone Style
    Integrated
    No
    In-line
    Yes
    Boom
    No
    Detachable Boom
    N/A
    MicYes

    The in-line microphone of the Fitbit Fliyer is mediocre. In quiet environments, speech recorded/transmitted with it would sound relatively full, but noticeably muffled and lacking in detail, which could make speech a tad difficult to understand at times. In noisy environments, they will struggle to separate speech from ambient noise in even in moderately loud situations like a busy street.

    6.2
    Recording Quality
    See details on graph tool
    Recorded Speech
    LFE
    226.27 Hz
    FR Std. Dev.
    4.03 dB
    HFE
    2,560 Hz
    Weighted THD
    1.181
    Gain
    23.42 dB

    The recording quality of the Fitbit Flyer's mic is about average. The LFE (low-frequency extension) of 226Hz, is decent, indicating that speech recorded or transmitted with it would sound relatively full. The HFE (high-frequency extension) of 2.6KHz however, is mediocre and results in a speech that lacks detail and presence. This would have a small but noticeable negative effect on the intelligibility of speech.

    6.3
    Noise Handling
    See details on graph tool
    Speech + Pink Noise
    Speech + Subway Noise
    SpNR
    15.31 dB

    Below-average noise handling. In our SpNR test, the in-line microphone of the Fitbit Flyer achieved a speech-to-noise ratio of 15dB, suggesting their microphone is best suited for quiet environments, and may struggle to separate speech from background noise in moderate and loud situations.

    Active Features
    5.1
    Battery
    Battery Type
    Rechargable
    Continuous Battery Life
    6.5 hrs
    Additional Charges
    0
    Total Battery Life
    6.5 hrs
    Charge Time
    1.7 hrs
    Power Saving Feature
    No
    Audio While Charging
    No
    Passive Playback
    No
    Charging Portmicro-USB

    These headphones have a mediocre-at-best battery performance. They lasted about 6.5 hours of continuous playtime at moderate volume, which should be okay for most listeners as long as you remember to turn them off. Unfortunately, they do not have an auto-off timer when inactive (unless you disconnect your Bluetooth source) and you can't use them while they are charging. On the upside, a quick 15-minute charge gives you an hours worth of playback.

    0.0
    App Support
    App NameN/A
    iOSN/A
    AndroidN/A
    macOSN/A
    WindowsN/A
    Equalizer
    N/A
    ANC Control
    N/A
    Mic ControlN/A
    Room effects
    N/A
    Playback Control
    N/A
    Button MappingN/A
    Surround SoundN/A

    They are not compatible with the Fitibit app as they have no sensors or trackers, and the app does not offer customization options like an equalizer.

    Connectivity
    8.2
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth Version
    4.2
    Multi-Device Pairing
    2 Devices
    NFC Pairing
    No
    Line of Sight Range
    122 ft
    Default Latency
    220 ms
    aptX Latency
    N/A
    aptX(LL) Latency
    N/A

    These headphones have multi-device pairing but no NFC support. On the upside, their hold-to-pair procedure is fairly easy to use and pairs easily with most Bluetooth devices.

    These headphones have quite a bit of latency at 220ms. This makes them poorly suited for watching videos and gaming and is a bit on the higher side for Bluetooth headphones.

    0.0
    Non-Bluetooth Wireless
    Non-BT Line of Sight Range
    N/A
    Non-BT Latency
    N/A
    0.0
    Wired
    Analog Audio
    N/A
    USB Audio
    N/A
    DetachableNo
    LengthN/A
    ConnectionN/A
    Wired Latency
    N/A

    They have no wired option. If you want a good sounding wired in-ear, check the 1More Triple Driver In-Ear.

    PC / PS4 Compatibility
    PC / PS4 Analog
    No
    PC / PS4 Wired USB
    No
    PC / PS4 Non-BT Wireless
    No
    Xbox One Compatibility
    Xbox One Analog
    No
    Xbox One Wired USB
    No
    Xbox One Wireless
    No
    0.0
    Base/Dock
    Type
    N/A
    USB Input
    N/A
    Line In
    N/A
    Line Out
    N/A
    Optical Input
    N/A
    RCA Input
    N/A
    Dock Charging
    N/A
    Power Supply
    N/A

    The Fitbit Flyer do not have a dock. If you want a headphone that's versatile and has a dock, try the SteelSeries Arctis 7. However, it won't be as compact or as portable as the Fitbit Flyer.

    Recommended Articles

    Comments

    1. Product

    Fitbit Flyer Wireless: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    No comments yet, refresh to see new ones