Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless  Headphones Review

Reviewed Jan 31, 2019 at 10:33 am
Latest change: Test bench update Feb 04, 2020 at 03:03 pm
Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless
7.2
Mixed Usage 
6.9
Neutral Sound 
7.7
Commute/Travel 
8.2
Sports/Fitness 
7.0
Office 
5.7
Wireless Gaming 
5.5
Wired Gaming 
6.5
Phone Calls 
Tested using methodology v1.4 
 1

The Jaybird Tarah Pro are great wireless sports in-ears that are fairly versatile for everyday casual use. They are an upgraded version of the regular Tarah model with better battery life, lower latency, slightly better sound quality, and new magnetic earbuds. They are also compatible with the Jaybird MySound app that lets you EQ the sound to your liking. Jaybird kept the same overall design of the Tarah, meaning the Pro version is also very portable and breathable for sports. Unfortunately, they have a new proprietary charging cradle that is cumbersome and restrictive, and for some reason, the Pro version can't connect to two devices simultaneously, while the regular Tarah and Jaybird X4 Wireless can. On the upside, they have an amazing wireless range and isolate a good amount of ambient noise.

Our Verdict

7.2
Mixed Usage 

Decent for mixed usage. The Jaybird Tarah Pro have good sound quality for in-ears and are fairly comfortable thanks to their earbud-like design. They have decent noise isolation performance and barely leak, making them a good option for commuting and at the office. However, these are great sports-oriented headphones that have a stable and breathable design. Unfortunately, they won't be ideal for watching TV or gaming due to their high latency.

Pros
  • Stable and portable design for sports.
  • Decent and customizable sound.
  • Good battery life.
Cons
  • Cumbersome and restrictive charging cradle.
  • Doesn’t offer multi-device pairing like previous Jaybird headphones.
6.9
Neutral Sound 

Decent for neutral listening. The Jaybird Tarah Pro have a deep, consistent, and well-balanced bass, an even and clear mid-range, and a great treble. However, their bass is slightly boomy, their mid-range is a bit recessed, which nudges vocals and lead instruments to the back of the mix. Also, their treble may be sibilant for some people, and the dip in this range is also going to make vocals lack a bit of detail and brightness. You can also EQ them with the Jaybird app. However, the in-ear fit might not be comfortable enough for long listening sessions.

Pros
None
Cons
None
7.7
Commute/Travel 

Good for commuting and traveling. The Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless have a good isolation performance and barely leak, so you'll be able to mask a decent amount of background noise. Their wireless design is portable, but the in-ear fit might not be comfortable for everyone, especially for long rides and flights. On the upside, they have great battery life that should last you about 13 hours of continuous playtime.

Pros
None
Cons
None
8.2
Sports/Fitness 

The Jaybird Tarah Pro are great sports-oriented headphones with an IPX7 rating for sweat and water resistance. Their wireless design is very portable and breathable, which is great. You shouldn't sweat more than usual while using them during your workouts. They also have a great control scheme that offers quick access to simple and useful functionalities. Their great battery life will also last you a few workouts.

Pros
None
Cons
None
7.0
Office 

Above average for the office. The greater battery life compared to the normal Tarah will let you enjoy your music during your whole workday without a problem. Their fit also blocks a good amount of ambient chatter and A/C system noise, so you’ll be able to concentrate on your tasks. They also barely leak so you won’t bother your colleagues with your music. Unfortunately, they don’t connect to two devices simultaneously, which would be useful if you’d want to switch between your phone and office computer. Also, the in-ear fit won’t be the most comfortable to wear for many hours.

Pros
None
Cons
None
5.7
Wireless Gaming 

Sub-par for gaming. The Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless are sports-oriented and shouldn't be used for gaming due to their high latency and mediocre microphone. Even if you don't play online and don't need a mic, these headphones won't be a good option for this use case.

5.5
Wired Gaming 
6.5
Phone Calls 

Pros
None
Cons
None
  • 7.2
    Mixed Usage
  • 6.9
    Neutral Sound
  • 7.7
    Commute/Travel
  • 8.2
    Sports/Fitness
  • 7.0
    Office
  • 5.7
    Wireless Gaming
  • 5.5
    Wired Gaming
  • 6.5
    Phone Calls
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Feb 05, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.4.
    2.  Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
    3.  Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.
    4.  Updated Jun 25, 2019: We've updated the Build Quality score to better reflect how durable the Tarah Pro are.

    Compared To Other Headphones

    Comparison picture

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro are great sports headphones that are versatile for most use cases. They are very similar to the normal Jaybird Tarah Wireless model, but are an upgrade in some ways. The main difference is the better 13-hour battery life on the Pro version. They have a decent sound profile, and you can customize their sound to your liking thanks to their great companion app. They can also be used for commuting and at the office, thanks to a decent noise isolation performance. However, they can't connect to two devices simultaneously, which is disappointing since most recent Jaybird headphones can do it. See our recommendations for the best earbuds, the best closed-back headphones, and the best earbuds for running.

    Jaybird X4 Wireless

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless are better headphones than the Jaybird X4 Wireless in pretty much every single aspect. They have lower latency, have a slightly more accurate treble range, and have a way better battery life. Their designs are very similar, other than the fact that the Tarah Pro have magnetic and rotating earbuds and have a braided cable. However, the X4 support multi-device pairing, offer more fit options, and are less expensive.

    Jaybird Tarah Wireless

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless are an upgrade over the normal Jaybird Tarah Wireless model. The main difference is battery life, as the Tarah Pro lasts twice as long on a single charge. The Tarah Pro have rotating and magnetic buds and a braided cable. They also have much lower latency, which is good for watching videos. On the other hand, if you only use these for workouts and don’t necessarily need long battery life, the less expensive Tarah model could be a better option.

    Anker SoundCore Spirit X Wireless

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless are better headphones than the Anker Soundcore Spirit X Wireless. The Jaybird are better-made, and you can also customize their sound to your liking thanks to their companion app. The Jaybird's amazing wireless range is also better, and you get better default sound quality, even before EQ'ing them. On the other hand, the Anker are very comfortable in-ears and come with plenty of fit options. They also come with a nice hard case and have good sound quality for their price point, which might offer better value for most users.

    Bose SoundSport Wireless

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro WIreless are better sports headphones than the Bose SoundSport Wireless. Also, due to their closed-back design, they isolate more and leak less, making them more versatile for everyday casual use as well. The Tarah Pro feel better made, and their fit is more stable than the bulkier and heavier design of the SoundSport Wireless. They also have better battery life and have a companion app to EQ their sound. On the other hand, the Bose are more comfortable and don't need a proprietary charging cradle. They also have a slightly better default sound quality.

    Show more 

    Video

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Filter:
    All
    Design
    Style
    TypeIn-ear
    EnclosureClosed-Back
    WirelessYes
    TransducerDynamic

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro have a very similar style to the normal Tarah model, with slight variances. They still have a more sport-oriented look, the in-line remote is now curved, and they have a braided, black and white cable. You can also wear the headphones with a normal fit or put the cables over your ears since the earbuds rotate to help you get a better fit. These headphones come in three different color-accent schemes: black-flash, mineral blue-jade, or titanium-glacier.

    7.0
    Comfort
    Weight0.04 lbs
    Clamping Force
    0 lbs

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro are decently comfortable headphones, but like most in-ears, the fit might not be for everyone. They have the same eargels as the Tarah, but the size equivalences are smaller (the medium-sized tip of the Tarah Pro is the same size as the small-sized tip of the Tarah). They have an earbud-like fit that doesn’t enter your ear canal as deeply. Ear tips and stability fins are still mixed in one unit, giving you fewer fit options as you can’t mix and match different sizes together.

    6.8
    Controls
    OS Compatibility
    Not OS specific
    Ease Of UseGood
    FeedbackGood
    Call/Music ControlYes
    Volume ControlYes
    Microphone ControlNo
    Channel Mixing
    No
    Noise Cancelling ControlNo
    Talk-Through
    No
    Additional ControlsVoice Assistant

    Update 08-21-2019: The Tarah Pro are compatible with voice assistants like Google Assistant and Siri for voice-enabled controls. The review has been updated. The in-line remote is very similar to the previous Jaybird X-series and Tarah model. The remote is now slightly curved, but the available controls are still the same. You get common functionalities like call/music management, volume control, and track skipping. You can also trigger your device voice assistant with the multipurpose button. The remote feels more clicky than the Tarah, and you also get audio feedback during the pairing procedure. You’ll also have a voice prompt telling you how much battery is left (rounded to the nearest 20%), which is nice.

    9.2
    Breathability
    Avg.Temp.Difference0.8 °C

    Like most in-ears, their design doesn’t trap heat inside your ears, and you shouldn’t notice a difference in temperature while using the headphones. They are a good option for sports as you won’t sweat more than usual.

    8.8
    Portability
    L2.5"
    W2"
    H1"
    Volume5 in³
    Transmitter RequiredNo

    Like most wireless in-ears, these can easily fit in most pockets or a bag. They can be rolled into a more compact format easily without damaging the cable. They also come with a small pouch that doesn’t add too much bulk, and should be able to fit in pockets. For even more portable headphones, take a look at the Beats Flex Wireless or the Jaybird Run XT Truly Wireless.

    6.0
    Case
    TypePouch
    LN/A
    WN/A
    HN/A
    VolumeN/A

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro come with a small pouch, unlike the previous Tarah model. This pouch is very similar to the X4's pouch, which slightly protects the headphones from scratches and minor water exposure. Unfortunately, this isn’t as protective as the Jaybird X2 hard case. On the upside, the pouch is fairly small and portable.

    8.0
    Build Quality

    Update 06/25/2019: We revised the Build Quality score of the Tarah Pro as we feel they are one of the better-built sports headphones available right now. The text has been adjusted to reflect this.

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro are well-made wireless in-ears that have a few differences with the Jaybird Tarah Wireless model. First, their cable isn’t flat but is braided. They have new magnetic earbuds which is great for easier cable management. They also have rotating earbud casings for how you want to wear the headphones. They are still IPX7 for sweat and water resistance, but we do not currently have a test to measure this accurately. They have an overall high-end feel and don't feel like they'll break during physical activity.

    8.0
    Stability

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro are very stable for most physical activities. Unfortunately, like the Tarah, they only come with 3 eargels options so you can't mix and match fins and tips sizes like the Jaybird X3. On the upside, the Tarah Pro have what Jaybird calls the “Switch Fit” which allows you to rotate the earbud, helping you in finding the best fit for you. You can wear the headphones’ cable under or over your ears, which is a bit more stable. Their wireless design also means the chance of getting a wire hooked on something is lesser than wired headphones, and it won’t yank the headphones out of your ears. If you want more stable earbuds, check out the Bose Sport Earbuds.

    Headshots 1
    Headshots 2
    Top
    In The Box

    • Jaybird Tarah Pro headphones
    • 3x eargels
    • Carrying pouch
    • Charging cradle
    • Shirt clip
    • Manuals

    Sound
    Sound Profile
    See details on graph tool
    Bass Amount
    1.05 dB
    Treble Amount
    -1.8 dB
    9.0
    Frequency Response Consistency
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Avg. Std. Deviation
    0.2 dB

    The frequency response consistency of the Jaybird Tarah Pro is excellent. If the user can achieve a proper fit and an air-tight seal using the assortment of tips that come with the headphones, then they should be able to get consistent bass and treble delivery every time they use the headphones.

    Raw Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    8.3
    Bass Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    2.37 dB
    Low-Frequency Extension
    10.15 Hz
    Low-Bass
    0.03 dB
    Mid-Bass
    2.02 dB
    High-Bass
    3.87 dB

    The bass performance is great. Their LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 10Hz, which is excellent. Low-bass and mid-bass are flat and within 0.5dB of our neutral target, which results in a deep and punchy bass with just the right amount of thump and rumble. However, the high-bass, which is responsible for warmth, is overemphasized by about 3dB, bringing a bit of muddiness to the bass.

    8.7
    Mid Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    1.72 dB
    Low-Mid
    1.49 dB
    Mid-Mid
    -2.06 dB
    High-Mid
    -0.01 dB

    The mid-range performance is also great. The range is fairly flat and even, which is important for the clear and well-balanced reproduction of vocals and instruments. However, there’s a 4dB dip in the mid-range around 800Hz that will slightly nudge vocals and lead instruments to the back of the mix.

    7.2
    Treble Accuracy
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Err.
    3.67 dB
    Low-Treble
    -1.49 dB
    Mid-Treble
    -0.88 dB
    High-Treble
    -4.19 dB

    The treble performance is also great. The range is fairly even, but there’s a dip around 4-5KHz which is going to negatively affect the detail and brightness of vocals and lead instruments. Also, some sibilances (S and T sounds) can feel a bit sharp for some users, but not everyone will hear it as intensely. This will be most noticeable on cymbals and vocals.

    7.3
    Peaks/Dips
    See details on graph tool
    Peaks
    1.67 dB
    Dips
    1.42 dB
    8.8
    Imaging
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted Group Delay
    0.08
    Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
    1.08
    Weighted Frequency Mismatch
    1.74
    Weighted Phase Mismatch
    1.45

    The stereo imaging of the Tarah Pro is great. Their weighted group delay is at 0.08, which is among the lowest we have measured so far. The group delay graph also shows that the entire response is well below our audibility threshold. This ensures a tight bass and a transparent treble reproduction. Also, the L/R drivers of our test unit were very well-matched in frequency, amplitude, and phase response. This is important for the accurate placement and localization of objects (voices, instruments, video games effects) in the stereo image. These results are only valid for our unit, and yours may perform differently.

    0.6
    Passive Soundstage
    PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
    N/A
    PRTF Size (Avg.)
    N/A
    PRTF Distance
    N/A
    Openness
    2.9
    Acoustic Space Excitation
    0.2

    The soundstage of the Tarah Pro is poor. This is because creating an out-of-head and speaker-like soundstage is largely dependent on activating the resonances of the pinna (outer ear). The design of in-ears and earbuds is in such a way that fully bypasses the pinna and doesn't interact with it. Also, because these headphones have a closed-back enclosure, their soundstage won't be perceived to be as open as that of open-back earbuds like the Apple AirPods (1st generation) Truly Wireless or the Bose SoundSport Free Truly Wireless.

    0.0
    Virtual Soundstage
    Head Modeling
    No
    Speaker Modeling
    No
    Room Ambience
    No
    Head Tracking
    No
    Virtual Surround
    No
    7.5
    Weighted Harmonic Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    WHD @ 90
    0.273
    WHD @ 100
    0.161
    Test Settings
    Firmware
    Unknown
    Power
    On
    Connection
    Unknown
    Codec
    SBC, 16-bit, 48kHz
    EQ
    Default
    ANC
    No ANC
    Tip/Pad
    Silicone (small)
    Microphone
    In-line
    Isolation
    7.1
    Noise Isolation
    See details on graph tool
    Isolation Audio
    Overall Attenuation
    -19.39 dB
    Noise CancellingNo
    Bass
    -6.47 dB
    Mid
    -19.4 dB
    Treble
    -33.57 dB

    The isolation performance of the Tarah Pro is about average. In the bass range, where the rumble of airplane and bus engines sits, they achieved 6.5dB of isolation which is mediocre. In the mid-range, important for blocking out speech, they reduce outside noise by more than 19dB, which is very good. In the treble range, occupied by sharp S and T sounds and fan noises like A/C systems, they isolate about 34dB, which is good.

    9.8
    Leakage
    See details on graph tool
    Leakage Audio
    Overall Leakage @ 1ft
    22.25 dB

    The leakage performance is excellent. These in-ears practically do not leak, so you don't need to worry about disturbing people around you unless you are blasting your music in a very quiet room. With the music at 100dB SPL, the leakage at 1 foot away averages at 22dB SPL and peaks at 36dB SPL, which is noticeably quieter than the noise floor of an average office.

    Microphone
    Microphone Style
    Integrated
    No
    In-Line
    Yes
    Boom
    No
    Detachable Boom
    No
    MicYes
    6.4
    Recording Quality
    See details on graph tool
    Recorded Speech
    LFE
    343.96 Hz
    FR Std. Dev.
    2.47 dB
    HFE
    3,179.16 Hz
    Weighted THD
    5.021
    Gain
    44.44 dB

    The mic has a mediocre recording quality. The LFE of 344Hz results in a recorded/transmitted speech that is relatively thin. The HFE of 3.2KHz is poor and suggests speech that is muffled and lacks detail. Overall, the intelligibility of speech on this microphone will still be decent in quiet environments.

    6.1
    Noise Handling
    See details on graph tool
    Speech + Pink Noise
    Speech + Subway Noise
    SpNR
    13.2 dB

    The in-line microphone of the Tarah Pro is mediocre at noise-handling. In our SpNR test, they achieved a speech-to-noise ratio of 13dB, indicating they are best suited for quiet environments and will struggle to separate speech from ambient noise in moderate and loud situations.

    Active Features
    7.4
    Battery
    Battery Type
    Rechargable
    Continuous Battery Life
    13.3 hrs
    Additional Charges
    0.0
    Total Battery Life
    13.3 hrs
    Charge Time
    1.9 hrs
    Power-Saving Feature
    Auto-Off Timer
    Audio While Charging
    No
    Passive Playback
    No
    Charging PortProprietary

    The main difference between the Tarah Pro and Tarah is a way better battery life on the Pro version. They offer about 13 hours of continuous playback, while the regular Tarah have about 6 hours, and they take about the same time to charge. They also have a useful quick charge feature that gives you 2 hours of battery life for only 5 minutes of charging, according to Jaybird’s specs sheet. Also, they automatically turn off after 15 minutes if the magnetic buds are snapped together, saving battery life. Unfortunately, they come with a proprietary charging cradle, and it is very restrictive as you’ll always need to carry it around to charge the headphones and the cradle's cable is very short.

    8.0
    App Support
    App NameJaybird MySound
    iOSYes
    AndroidYes
    macOSNo
    WindowsNo
    Equalizer
    Parametric + Presets
    ANC Control
    No
    Mic ControlNo
    Room Effects
    No
    Playback Control
    Yes
    Button MappingYes
    Surround Support
    No

    Update: 03/05/2019: We've updated the review since a software update now gives you new features like button mapping for the multi-purpose button, customizable audio cues and you can now set the Auto-off timer to 15 or 60 minutes, or completely turn it off. We also incorrectly listed that the app didn't have an in-app player, but you can connect through Spotify if you have a Jaybird account as well.

    Update: 08/03/2019: We've updated the app score of the Jaybird MySound app to reflect the customization level of their Equalizer. Unlike most phone apps, they have a parametric EQ compared to a typical 5-band graphic one like on the Jabra Elite 65e.

    Like most recent Jaybird headphones, the Tarah Pro are compatible with the MySound app which offers good customization options like an equalizer and lets you access sound profiles created and shared by other Jaybird owners. The app doesn’t offer room effects but has an integrated Spotify in-app player for Premium accounts. The app is a good tool to find the best sound profile for your mood and music genre.

    Note: The Personal EQ setting was used to demonstrate how the available customization options looked like and was not used to measure the frequency response of these headphones.

    Connectivity
    7.0
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth Version
    5.0
    Multi-Device Pairing
    No
    NFC Pairing
    No
    Line Of Sight Range
    238 ft
    PC Latency (SBC)
    151 ms
    PC Latency (aptX)
    N/A
    PC Latency (aptX HD)
    N/A
    PC Latency (aptX-LL)
    N/A
    iOS Latency
    208 ms
    Android Latency
    122 ms

    The Tarah Pro support Bluetooth 5.0, so you might experience even better results in wireless range and connection stability than what we’ve measured with our Bluetooth 4.2 dongle. We do plan to upgrade this in our next test bench. Unfortunately, they only connect to one device at a time, which is disappointing since previous Jaybird headphones could connect to two simultaneously.

    Their latency is slightly too high for watching videos and gaming. However, they perform better than most Bluetooth headphones so you might not notice the delay as badly as with other headphones unless you’re gaming. Also, some video content apps like Netflix and YouTube offer some sort of compensation depending on your device so you may not notice it at all.

    0.0
    Non-Bluetooth Wireless
    Non-BT Line Of Sight Range
    N/A
    Non-BT Latency
    N/A
    0.0
    Wired
    Analog Audio
    No
    USB Audio
    No
    DetachableNo
    LengthN/A
    ConnectionNo Wired Option
    Analog/USB Audio Latency
    N/A

    These Bluetooth-only headphones cannot be used with a wired connection.

    PC / PS4 Compatibility
    PC/PS4 Analog
    No
    PC/PS4 Wired USB
    No
    PC/PS4 Non-BT Wireless
    No
    Xbox One Compatibility
    Xbox One Analog
    No
    Xbox One Wired USB
    No
    Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
    No
    0.0
    Base/Dock
    Type
    No Base/Dock
    USB Input
    No
    Line In
    No
    Line Out
    No
    Optical Input
    No
    RCA Input
    No
    Dock Charging
    No
    Power Supply
    No Base/Dock

    The Jaybird Tarah Pro do not have a dock or a base, like most sports-oriented headphones.

    Recommended Articles

    Comments

    1. Product

    Jaybird Tarah Pro Wireless: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I’m just commenting to inform you of a new color scheme for the Anker Soundcore liberty 4 which is the pair I’m currently using and they’re an absolutely fantastic pair of earbuds. Between the liberty 3 pro and the life p3, I really enjoy the massive different EQ presets that are up to 22 different genres (with the current version of the app and the Liberty 4, unsure of the Liberty 3 pro and the life p3 at this time) I’m currently using the hear ID feature paired with the rock EQ preset which creates a perfect balance of vocals, highs, phenomenal treble and just the right amount of bass, comfortability and overall stability. The color scheme of the pair I have are “cherry red” and can be found on Amazon. They were limited in quantity and received them on prime day so just like the latter two models, I believe they are being phased out by the models that you have listed in your current listing of “best Anker earbuds for 2024” section. I just wanted to update you as you asked in this article. Keep up the awesome content! I’d like a comparison between Anker Soundcore and Technics earbuds if you have any recommendations. Specifically the MAH-AZ60M2 compared to the Soundcore earbuds I have listed in this comment and the Sony LinkBuds S earbuds. I have had the original Az-40 but found the ambient mode always getting hit hard in my ears when a loud noise comes through the mics. Just trying to justify the price point of the Technics and if they’re really worth the price, even on sale.

      Thanks for letting us know! We’ve updated our review variants to include the sky blue color, but can’t seem to find the cherry red at this time. If that changes, we’ll include it in our review as well!

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I’m just commenting to inform you of a new color scheme for the Anker Soundcore liberty 4 which is the pair I’m currently using and they’re an absolutely fantastic pair of earbuds. Between the liberty 3 pro and the life p3, I really enjoy the massive different EQ presets that are up to 22 different genres (with the current version of the app and the Liberty 4, unsure of the Liberty 3 pro and the life p3 at this time) I’m currently using the hear ID feature paired with the rock EQ preset which creates a perfect balance of vocals, highs, phenomenal treble and just the right amount of bass, comfortability and overall stability. The color scheme of the pair I have are “cherry red” and can be found on Amazon. They were limited in quantity and received them on prime day so just like the latter two models, I believe they are being phased out by the models that you have listed in your current listing of “best Anker earbuds for 2024” section. I just wanted to update you as you asked in this article. Keep up the awesome content! I’d like a comparison between Anker Soundcore and Technics earbuds if you have any recommendations. Specifically the MAH-AZ60M2 compared to the Soundcore earbuds I have listed in this comment and the Sony LinkBuds S earbuds. I have had the original Az-40 but found the ambient mode always getting hit hard in my ears when a loud noise comes through the mics. Just trying to justify the price point of the Technics and if they’re really worth the price, even on sale.

    3. Update: Added a comparison to the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC Truly Wireless in the Noise Isolation box.

      Show More Updates