Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
ArtemMoshkovich
2 Upvotes |
2 Comments |
0 Discussions
Comments
Discussions
Sort by:
newest first
Why is the SRAV good but under sensor specifications high sensor inconsistency is mentioned?
Hi eggggggggg,
Thanks for reaching out You’ve spotted a mistake on our end. This text was written when this mouse was first reviewed on an older test bench. We’ve since updated this review on a newer bench methodology, which has a more in-depth way of testing all sensor performance metrics, including SRAV at some of the most commonly used CPI settings of 1600, 800, and 400 CPI.
You’re absolutely right; our current text is misleading as it suggests inconsistency across all CPI settings when, in reality, we only detected problematic SRAV inconsistency using an 800 CPI setting on our new test bench.
We’ll be updating our text to clarify this and fix our mistake as soon as possible. Thanks again for pointing this out.
Update: We’ve corrected the text in several areas that referred to old test results left over from an earlier test bench, notably in the Sensor Specifications and Click Latency sections.