The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is a battery-powered immersion blender with a charging stand, a 24-ounce beaker, and a whisk attachment. The blending arm is detachable for easier cleaning, and it's dishwasher-safe. The motor body is grooved to make it easier to hold when you're blending.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender isn't intended for multi-purpose use. Since it's an immersion blender, it's mainly intended for blending hot ingredients directly in a pot or pan for recipes like soups and sauces. However, it doesn't make a very smooth blend with stubborn ingredients like kale or broccoli. Like most immersion blenders, it's not good for more difficult blends like nut butter or crushed ice. However, it comes with a 24-ounce beaker, so you can easily make a small batch of dip or sauce, as well as a whisk attachment for emulsions like hollandaise sauce.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is disappointing for single-serve smoothies. Since it's an immersion blender, you need to hold onto the blender while it's running, so personal and full-size blenders are usually more convenient for smoothies. It also struggles to fully blend fibrous elements in blueberry skins or kale, which results in a grainy drink. The beaker is a good size for a personal smoothie, and the blender is easy to clean when you're done with it.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender isn't good for multiple servings of smoothies. You can blend in any container because it's an immersion blender, meaning it can process big batches, but it doesn't fully blend common smoothie ingredients like leafy greens and fruits, which results in grainy smoothies. The included beaker has a 24-ounce capacity, so you need a bigger container of your own if you want to make multiple servings. It fails to crush ice cubes, so it can't process ice cubes or big chunks of frozen fruit in the recipe.
Like many immersion blenders we've tested, the Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender's blades can't get a grip on ice cubes and cannot make crushed ice.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is excellent for soups. The blending arm is meant for blending in a pot or pan, so it's easy to use to puree a soup or sauce once the ingredients are cooked. It's very easy to clean the blending arm by hand, and it's dishwasher-safe. However, it struggles with fibrous elements, so recipes with kale or broccoli won't be completely smooth. Softer, cooked ingredients are easier to blend, however.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is alright for professional use. The motor body has grooves that make it quite comfortable to hold, even if you're blending for a few minutes. It's also cordless, which is nice if outlets are in short supply near your stove. However, it doesn't smoothly blend tough ingredients like kale or broccoli. Like most immersion blenders, it's not very versatile, and unfortunately, its accessories, like the whisk and charging stand, feel more cheaply made than the blender itself. Since it's battery-powered, it's easy to move around the kitchen with it, but your blending time is limited by the battery life.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Blender comes in one variant currently only available at Bed Bath & Beyond. You can see the label for the unit we tested here. If you come across another variant or yours is different, please let us know in the discussions, and we'll update the review.
The Cruz Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is battery-powered, like the Cuisinart EvolutionX RHB-100 and the Cuisinart Smart Stick Cordless Hand Blender. Its design is a bit different since it comes with a charging stand instead of a cable that plugs into the motor body directly. It makes the unit less compact when it's charging, but it holds the blender upright on your counter. This model doesn't make the smoothest blend with fibrous ingredients, so it's not ideal if you want the smoothest broccoli or kale soups. However, its motor body design is comfortable to hold onto, and it comes with a beaker for blending and a whisk attachment for whipping cream or making salad dressing.
If you're looking for other blenders, try our recommendations for the best immersion blenders, the best blenders, and the best budget and cheap blenders.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is battery-powered, and the Braun MultiQuick 5 is a conventional plug-in immersion blender. The Braun is better for most uses since it makes a smoother puree with fibrous fruits and vegetables. It's also quieter and sturdier. However, you might like the Crux if you want to be able to easily move around your kitchen since it's cordless. It also has a smaller motor body that can be more comfortable to hold.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is better than the Cuisinart Smart Stick Cordless Hand Blender. It makes a smoother blend with bigger batches of fibrous ingredients, which is helpful when you're blending in a deep pot, and the blender is a little lighter. The motor body's design makes it easier to hold onto. It's also a bit more able to handle thick mixes like nut butter, although neither blender is ideal for that. On the other hand, the Cuisinart has five speed settings instead of just one, which is nice if you want to start at a low speed to reduce splatter.
The KitchenAid KHBBV53 and the Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender have different strengths. Both are battery-powered, but the KitchenAid can produce a smoother puree with fibrous ingredients like broccoli or kale. It's quieter and easier to clean, and it does a passable job with thicker recipes like nut butter. However, it's not very well-built, and the Crux feels much sturdier. The Crux also comes with a whisk attachment for making things like salad dressing or hollandaise sauce.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender is a better battery-powered immersion blender than the Cuisinart EvolutionX RHB-100 for most purposes. The Crux has a much better build quality, it's quieter, and its blending arm is dishwasher-safe. It's more comfortable to use since the Cuisinart's power button makes it awkward to hold. However, the Cuisinart makes a much smoother blend with stubborn ingredients like leafy greens, so you may still prefer it if you want to make smoother soups and smoothies.
The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender is a better battery-powered immersion blender than the Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender. It has a better overall performance, especially for blending fibrous ingredients for recipes like soups and sauces. It's quieter when it's running. However, the Crux comes with a whisk attachment for mixing salad dressing or making whipped cream.
The Crux Artisan Series Immersion Blender has a charging stand that holds the blender up so you can store it on your counter. If you want to store it in a drawer without the stand, it has similar dimensions to other immersion blenders. The blender itself is also quite a bit lighter than some other battery-powered models we've tested, including the KitchenAid KHBBV53 and the Cuisinart Smart Stick Cordless Hand Blender, which is nice since you need to hold it constantly while you're blending.
Here are the blender dimensions without the charging stand:
The motor body handle is grooved to make it more comfortable to hold. The power and unlock buttons are near each other, so it's not hard for people with smaller hands to start the blender. The mechanism that connects the motor body with the blending arm is made of plastic, but it's easy to attach and detach the arm, and overall the blender itself feels well-built. However, the charging base, whisk, and jar are made of generic plastic that doesn't feel as sturdy as the blender itself, which brings down its overall build quality.
The beaker has a 24-ounce capacity, but you can also use the blend directly in a pot, pan, or another container, so you're not limited by the size.
The jar is made of plastic and is dishwasher-safe along with the storage lid. This information isn't in the manual, but you can find it on the manufacturer's website. You can see a screenshot of the details here.
Since it's cordless, the Crux Artisan Series Immersion Blender doesn't have a power cord, and unlike most other battery-powered immersion blenders, you don't plug the charging cable into the motor body. Instead, it comes with a stand that has a built-in charging cable, and you charge the blender by docking it on the stand. The manufacturer advertises that a full charge provides 15 minutes of continuous blending. Most of the cord, except the A/C adapter, can be hidden away under the charging stand.
The Crux Artisan Series Cordless Immersion Blender isn't very good for processing small batches of fibrous ingredients. Since it's an immersion blender, you need to hold the blender for the whole process, and it doesn't fully liquify the ingredients. If you use something like raw kale in a smoothie, it will have grains and leafy bits left over. Other cordless models like the Cuisinart EvolutionX RHB-100 and the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender make a smoother puree. That said, most immersion blenders we've tested don't fully blend fibrous vegetables and will have an easier time with softer ingredients.
If you're working with a bigger batch, the results are similar. It doesn't completely process fibrous ingredients, meaning it can't make a smooth puree with something like kale. Bits of kale can also get stuck on the blade bell. Like with smaller batches, some vegetables, like cooked carrots or potatoes, are easier to process smoothly.
It's not good for making nut butter. It's hard to use an immersion blender for thick mixtures since you need to hold the blender constantly and move it up and down to keep the ingredients moving, which can be tiring. However, this model has a comfortable grip that makes it a little easier to use. It unevenly processes the nuts, so you end up with partially smooth, spreadable nut butter with unprocessed chunks. Still, it's a better result than you can get with the Cuisinart EvolutionX RHB-100.
It's not particularly loud for a hand blender, but the noise can get irritating if you're blending for a while. There are quieter battery-powered immersion blenders, like the KitchenAid KHBBV53.
The manufacturer doesn't indicate the blender's motor's power, but they advertise that it uses an 8.4V lithium battery. There's only one speed setting, unlike variable-speed immersion blenders like the Cuisinart Smart Stick Cordless Hand Blender.
The safety button (with a lock icon) on top of the motor body needs to be pressed at the same time as the power button for the motor to start. Since it's cordless and doesn't need to be plugged in to run, this acts as a safety feature to make it harder to start unintentionally. After the blender is running, you can release the safety button and just hold the power button to blend. You can simulate a pulse mode by pressing and releasing the power and unlock buttons.
It's very easy to clean. Running the blender in the beaker with soap and water can help remove sticky residue. You also need to wipe the outside of the blade bell and scrub the blades—this part can be a bit tricky because the blades are very sharp, so you need to use a brush to avoid cutting yourself.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
comment deletedBut he has been leading in the highest positions for a long time, and he was leading as first for a month, and you did not test it, I am disappointed with your ranking of votes, it is unfair, also because I see that you have bought the Dell Alienware AW2524H monitor, the day March 21, but this model was not even in the top 10 positions of the vote list, and you still bought it. It is very unfair to make people wait like this and buy monitors like Dell Alienware AW2524H without being in the top 10 votes.
It’s possible that monitors may be leading for part of the month, but if they aren’t in the top position at the end of the vote period, then it doesn’t count as winning the vote. Also, the voting is only one of the ways we buy and test products, which is why we may buy and test products that aren’t at the top of the voting. All that being said, we’re considering new ways to determine which products we buy and test, so we’ll definitely keep this in mind!
hey rtings, none of us will complain about “censorship” if you just ban toxic ppl, pls get them out
It’s possible that monitors may be leading for part of the month, but if they aren’t in the top position at the end of the vote period, then it doesn’t count as winning the vote. Also, the voting is only one of the ways we buy and test products, which is why we may buy and test products that aren’t at the top of the voting. All that being said, we’re considering new ways to determine which products we buy and test, so we’ll definitely keep this in mind!
I think the cycle needs to be much shorter to like 2 weeks to a month max and have a more transparency on what criteria a certain product being bought. Or maybe top 3 of each cycle should be bought instead of just the top one.
A lot of new products may be released in 2 to 3 months. Beside this monitor, the current leader, the 27M2V also lost the last cycle in the last day of the voting, I mentioned the detail in another forum post.
The lack of transparency on when and why some product jump the queue and some stuck in the voting stage for multiple cycles just waste/lock people’s vote on older products.
Good to see the 4chan/Reddit mentality can now ruin this site as well, I feel bad for the Rtings staff, I knew as soon as the new systems went in place, drama would stir up no matter what. But hey, let’s ask them to shorten buy periods, I’m sure the site has just millions to buy and purchase at a single whim! What a joke.
This is true, look at this Asus ROG Strix XG27UQR monitor has been in the highest ranks for about 5 months and on top of that they don’t choose it, telling me that it has to be first blah blah blah, it has always been in the top 3 for 5 months, and that, Because they don’t test it anymore, I personally am already disappointed with this Rtings page, not that the tests are bad, but how they treat their fans, like garbage. In addition to that, my vote expired and I had to vote for it again, this is unacceptable.
why the hell would you even vote for the XG27UQR anyway, it’s a basic edge lit IPS 144hz 4k display, we already have tones of good models reviewed and available, reviewing the Asus would unironically just be a waste of resources from the team’s part tbh. There are much more enticing models waiting to be reviewed such as the innocn, which actually present something interesting to the market and not just “hey guys we just released our 57th edge lit IPS display this year, it does exactly the same as 10 other models already available for a similar price, hope you like it” :|
why the hell would you even vote for the XG27UQR anyway, it’s a basic edge lit IPS 144hz 4k display, we already have tones of good models reviewed and available, reviewing the Asus would unironically just be a waste of resources from the team’s part tbh. There are much more enticing models waiting to be reviewed such as the innocn, which actually present something interesting to the market and not just “hey guys we just released our 57th edge lit IPS display this year, it does exactly the same as 10 other models already available for a similar price, hope you like it” :|
I think that’s just old vote that has been here since this monitor launched. This is now the leader after losing so many rounds (2 months per round).
The product has won our suggestion poll, so we’ll buy and test it soon. Follow this thread for updates!
It is the best monitor to play, I love Asus and their 27 inch 4K monitors, I do NOT understand how people want 32 or 42 inch monitors, this is stupid, the best of the best is 27 inch 4k with its 163 ppi, This for gaming is impressive.
It is the best monitor to play, I love Asus and their 27 inch 4K monitors, I do NOT understand how people want 32 or 42 inch monitors, this is stupid, the best of the best is 27 inch 4k with its 163 ppi, This for gaming is impressive.
It is the best monitor to play, I love Asus and their 27 inch 4K monitors, I do NOT understand how people want 32 or 42 inch monitors, this is stupid, the best of the best is 27 inch 4k with its 163 ppi, This for gaming is impressive.
even 4kd players wouldnt understand, so i dont blame you, but saying is stupid with your limited knowledge on why is better, and not knowing what preference means, is craaazy
The only thing worse than voting bots is real humans voting for this pathetic monitor. Y'all IQ as average as this monitor.
even 4kd players wouldnt understand, so i dont blame you, but saying is stupid with your limited knowledge on why is better, and not knowing what preference means, is craaazy
https://www.techtoyreviews.com/asus-rog-strix-xg27uqr-review/ there is already a review of this panel, which I didn’t know, and it only makes the situation look worse
The backlight type is exactly the same as any other KSF backlight display (so about the same color characteristics as the innolux 28inch panels), looking at the pixel structure, this is very likely the 27inch LGD panel found in the 27gn950 and 27gp950.
The response times are pretty standard, but it locks you to a stupid overdrive setting in ELMB making the setting basically useless.
Unfortunately this damned monitor uses the semi-glossy finish that comes with the LGD display, which basically takes the disadvantages of glossy and matte and sticks them into one, so you can expect reflection handling to be pretty horrific, however I will give you that it results in less grain than usual matte screens, which is pretty nice if you use your monitor in the dark, constantly.
Feature wise it doesn’t really present anything the others don’t have.
Basically a 27gn950 in a different body.
Congrats on getting the 8th 27inch 4k IPS edge lit KSF backlight monitor reviewed guys, we were really needing it.
Now this monitor has dropped a bit in price, with the features it offers it is a gift from God, but if it were 8k it would be even better, let’s see when it comes out 27 inches with 8k resolutions, it will be incredible.
We’ve purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.
I already suggested it, I talked to Dylan, to ask that now if they can do flicker tests on a monitor but with HDR activated, I have seen on YouTube how a Chinese did monitor tests and some with HDR activated began to use PWM Dimming, too I asked Dylan to test the level of blue light emitted by a screen, but Dylan tells me that they are not going to do this. I would like to at least see if this monitor and the following ones that you are going to test if they flicker when HDR is activated, that is all. Thank you and have a good day.
I already suggested it, I talked to Dylan, to ask that now if they can do flicker tests on a monitor but with HDR activated, I have seen on YouTube how a Chinese did monitor tests and some with HDR activated began to use PWM Dimming, too I asked Dylan to test the level of blue light emitted by a screen, but Dylan tells me that they are not going to do this. I would like to at least see if this monitor and the following ones that you are going to test if they flicker when HDR is activated, that is all. Thank you and have a good day.
idk if you mean the staff, but if you did, pls ask them about ULMB2 and what are they going to do with the PG27AQN that they already reviewed, cuz now it changed drastically :c
idk if you mean the staff, but if you did, pls ask them about ULMB2 and what are they going to do with the PG27AQN that they already reviewed, cuz now it changed drastically :c
We added it to our retest queue and we plan on updating our review with any relevant changes to our results in light of this feature being added!
Early access to our full test results is now available for Insiders! Become an insider to check it out here.
Does it have nvidia g sync and freesync on the monitor?
The full review has been posted here. Let us know what you think!
Thanks Rtings, you are the best I love you
Let’s see when 27-inch oled monitors with 4k start to look like
IT IS CLEAR that it is top of the range, although with a barely perceptible HDR, I wish it was DisplayHDR 1000
Is its panel very similar to the model that is no longer sold anywhere, the Asus ROG PG27UQ, this was very good with hdr 1000 and gsync ultimate, do you think that XG27UQR is a cut of the same panel, but worse and without HDR 1000?
Is its panel very similar to the model that is no longer sold anywhere, the Asus ROG PG27UQ, this was very good with hdr 1000 and gsync ultimate, do you think that XG27UQR is a cut of the same panel, but worse and without HDR 1000?
Because we didn’t test the PG27UQ we can’t comment on any differences in performance between the monitors, but they do seem to be fairly different and even come from different lineups (ROG Strix and Swift), so the results for the XG27UQR aren’t valid for the PG27UQ.
Update: Added that the ASUS ROG Swift PG27UQR is another option with HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
ok
is the xg27uqr better than pg27uqr in backlight bleed ?
is the xg27uqr better than pg27uqr in backlight bleed ?
Hello! Help with personalized buying advice is something our experts offer only via our insider forums. However, we do have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that may be helpful as well.
I NEED A free opinion please
no firmware updated without pwm dimming ?