Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Product

Fujifilm instax mini Link 2: Main Discussion

All updates to this product will be posted below. Click 'Follow Product Status' to receive notifications when there are updates for this product.

  • Product Purchased
    Jun 24
  • In The Lab
    Jun 28
  • Testing
    Aug 3
  • Writing Review
    Aug 24
  • Editing
    Aug 30
  • Final Review
    Jun 22
    Full Review
Posted 2 years ago

Our full review is now available.

Sort by:
oldest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why is the SRAV good but under sensor specifications high sensor inconsistency is mentioned?

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why is the SRAV good but under sensor specifications high sensor inconsistency is mentioned?

    Hi eggggggggg,

    Thanks for reaching out You’ve spotted a mistake on our end. This text was written when this mouse was first reviewed on an older test bench. We’ve since updated this review on a newer bench methodology, which has a more in-depth way of testing all sensor performance metrics, including SRAV at some of the most commonly used CPI settings of 1600, 800, and 400 CPI.

    You’re absolutely right; our current text is misleading as it suggests inconsistency across all CPI settings when, in reality, we only detected problematic SRAV inconsistency using an 800 CPI setting on our new test bench.

    We’ll be updating our text to clarify this and fix our mistake as soon as possible. Thanks again for pointing this out.

  3. Update: We’ve corrected the text in several areas that referred to old test results left over from an earlier test bench, notably in the Sensor Specifications and Click Latency sections.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide