Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Sharkoon Light² 200 vs ROCCAT Kone Pro Air
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Sharkoon Light² 200
ROCCAT Kone Pro Air
Tested using Methodology v1.0
Updated Apr 25, 2022 08:14 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.3
Updated Oct 11, 2022 03:50 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
ConnectivityWired
TypeStandard
ConnectivityWireless
TypeStandard
Variants
- Light² 200 (Black)
- Light² 200 (White)
- Kone Pro Air (Black)
- Kone Pro Air (White)
Our Verdict
Sharkoon Light² 200
ROCCAT Kone Pro Air
The ROCCAT Kone Pro Air and the Sharkoon Light² 200 are both excellent ultra-light gaming mice, but the ROCCAT performs better overall. The ROCCAT feels better built, its paracord-like charging cable is more flexible, and you can use it wirelessly via Bluetooth or its USB receiver. Also, its click latency is much lower, and the mouse has more programmable inputs thanks to its Easy-Shift[+] button that enables a second layer of commands. On the other hand, the Sharkoon has a honeycomb cutout pattern on its top and sides that makes it much lighter, and it also comes with an alternative solid palm rest if that's what you prefer.
Check Price
Black
Light² 200
Searching
Finding storeBlack
Kone Pro Air
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Light² 200
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Kone Pro Air
Searching
Finding storeMain Differences forOffice/Multimedia
Office/Multimedia
Threshold
Office/Multimedia
7.4
7.9
Wireless Versatility
0.0
9.6
Comfort Of Use
8.5
8.0
Build Quality
8.5
9.0
Number Of Programmable Inputs
8
13
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Type
Standard
Standard
Lighting Color
RGB
RGB
Shape
3D Model
Length
4.8" (121 mm)
4.9" (126 mm)
Height
1.7" (43 mm)
1.6" (40 mm)
Width
2.6" (66 mm)
2.8" (72 mm)
Grip Width
60 mm
66 mm
Portability
5.5
7.5
Portability picture
Volume
20.93 in³ (343 cm³)
22.27 in³ (365 cm³)
Cable/Receiver Storing
No
Yes
Build Quality
8.5
9.0
Build quality picture
Weight
7.0
8.1
Minimum Weight Picture
Lowest Weight
65 g
72.1 g
Default Weight
101 g
72.1 g
Weight Distribution
Centered
Centered
Extra Weights
No
No
Maximum Weight Without Wire
68 g
Comfort Of Use
8.5
8.0
Right-handed
Yes
Left-Handed Friendly
No
No
Ambidextrous
No
No
Coating
Matte
Matte
Finger Rest
No
Thumb
Palm Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
Palm Grip Picture
Small Hand
Yes
Yes
Medium Hand
Yes
Yes
Large Hand
Yes
Yes
X.Large Hand
Yes
Yes
Claw Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
Claw Grip Picture
Small Hand
No
Yes
Medium Hand
Yes
Yes
Large Hand
Yes
Yes
X.Large Hand
Yes
Yes
Fingertip Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
Fingertip Grip Picture
Small Hand
No
No
Medium Hand
No
Yes
Large Hand
Yes
Yes
X.Large Hand
Yes
Yes
Wireless Versatility
0.0
9.6
Bluetooth
No
Yes
Maximum Of Paired Devices
2
Receiver
No
Yes
Battery Type
No Batteries
Rechargeable
Use When Charging
No
Yes
On/Off Activation
None
Auto Off And On/Off Switch
Receiver Extender
No
No
Battery Indicator
No
Yes
Cable
8.5
9.0
Cable Video
Connectivity
Wired
Wireless
Cable Length
6.1 ft (1.9 m)
5.9 ft (1.8 m)
Cable Type
Paracord-like
Paracord-like
Permanent Kink
Yes
Yes
Port Type: Mouse End
No Port
USB-C
Port Type: PC End
USB
USB
Mouse Feet
8.5
8.5
Mouse Feet picture
Gliding Experience
Good
Good
Material
Virgin Grade PTFE
Virgin Grade PTFE
Extra Included
Yes
No
In The Box
In the box picture
Control
Additional Buttons
6.9
7.4
Buttons Picture
Buttons Activation
Mechanical
Total Number Of Buttons
6
6
Number Of Side Buttons
2
2
Number Of Programmable Inputs
8
13
Profile Switching Button
No
Yes
CPI (DPI) Switching Button
Yes
Gesture Support
No
No
Click Latency
6.9
9.0
Latency Testing While Gaming
Latency Data
Expected Connection
3.9 ms
Wired
22 ms
4.3 ms
Receiver
N/A
3.9 ms
Bluetooth
N/A
14.3 ms
CPI
8.7
CPI Video
CPI Graph
SRAV Close-Up
SRAV @ 1600 CPI
0.38%
SRAV @ 800 CPI
0.37%
SRAV @ 400 CPI
0.92%
SRAV @ Fixed CPI
N/A
Precision Error Between Speeds
0.61%
Precision Error Between CPI
0.57%
Worst Tracking Error
-1.13%
Minimum CPI
50 CPI
50 CPI
Maximum CPI
16,000 CPI
19,000 CPI
CPI Adjustment Steps
50 CPI
50 CPI
Sensor Latency
8.7
Sensor Latency Demonstration
Sensor Latency Transition Graph
Sensor Latency CPI Graph
Delay To Start Of Movement
17.0 ms
Delay At Half Movement
3.9 ms
Delay To End Of Movement
3.9 ms
Sensor Specifications
Sensor Technology
Optical (LED)
Optical (LED)
Sensor Model
PixArt PMW3389
Owl-Eye
Works On Glass
No
No
Minimum CPI (DPI)
50 CPI
50 CPI
Maximum CPI (DPI)
16,000 CPI
19,000 CPI
CPI (DPI) Adjustment Steps
50 CPI
50 CPI
CPI (DPI) Variation
3%
Minimum Lift Off Distance
1.2 mm
1.2 mm
Maximum Polling Rate
1000 Hz
1000 Hz
Mouse Wheel
Mouse wheel picture
Scroll Wheel
Notched Wheel
Notched Wheel
Scroll Wheel Steps
24 Steps
24 Steps
Scroll Wheel Tilt
No
No
Thumb Wheel
No
No
Thumb Wheel Steps
No Thumb Wheel
No Thumb Wheel
Noise
Noise Video
Click Noise
Loud
Quiet
Operating System And Software
Compatible Software Option
7.8
8.0
Software settings screenshot
Software Name
Sharkoon Light² 200
ROCCAT Swarm
Software Windows Compatibility
Yes
Yes
Software macOS Compatibility
No
No
Account Needed
No
No
On-Board Memory
Yes
Yes
CPI (DPI) Adjustment
Yes
Yes
Polling Rate Adjustment
No
Yes
Profile Configuration
Yes
Yes
RGB On/Off
Yes
Yes
Mouse Compatibility
10
10
Windows Compatibility
Fully
Fully
macOS Compatibility
Fully
Fully
Check Price
Black
Light² 200
Searching
Finding storeBlack
Kone Pro Air
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Light² 200
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Kone Pro Air
Searching
Finding store
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
Sharkoon Light² 200
ROCCAT Kone Pro Air
Comments
Sharkoon Light² 200 vs ROCCAT Kone Pro Air: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.