Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.

Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Running Shoe Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Picture
6.9
Marathon Racing
7.4
5K/10K Racing
7.1
Energy Return
7.0
Cushioning
7.9
Lateral Stability

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is a plated tempo trainer. It features a nylon 'SpeedVault' plate in the midsole and has a pronounced forefoot rocker that makes it a good fit for speed training, though it isn't the most lightweight shoe. Its moderately high-stack cushioning and breathable mesh upper make for a stable, comfortable ride.

Our Verdict

6.9 Marathon Racing

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is intended to be a trainer rather than a race day option, but it's best suited to training for moderate to longer distances. It offers a decently cushioned ride, though it isn't the most protective for high-performance racing. It's also overly heavy and lacks the responsiveness needed for efficient racing, though its rockered geometry helps with smoother transitions. The nylon plate also adds structure and stability to your distance efforts, where form can begin to break down.

Pros
  • Nylon plate adds stability.

  • Forefoot rocker.

  • Decent overall cushioning.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

  • Not the most impact absorption for longer efforts.

  • Heavy.

7.4 5K/10K Racing

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 isn't intended for racing at shorter distances. It's too heavy to really be efficient for races, and its energy return is only decent. However, its nylon plate adds some stiffness that makes for snappier transitions at faster paces.

Pros
  • Forefoot rocker.

  • Nylon plate adds stiffness.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

  • Heavy.

7.1 Energy Return

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has decent energy return. It's fairly responsive for a trainer, but it's not propulsive enough for high-performance efficiency.

Pros
  • Energy return is well-balanced across the heel and forefoot.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

7.0 Cushioning

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is decently cushioned. Though its forefoot doesn't absorb as much impact as its heel, it's fairly protected underfoot, if a bit less than ideal for very long runs.

Pros
  • Decent overall cushioning.

Cons
  • Not the most impact absorption for longer efforts.

7.9 Lateral Stability

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has very good lateral stability. Its relatively firm foam and nylon plate add stability to the midsole, and the shoe doesn't have an overly high stack height, giving it a more grounded feel. However, the outsole is slightly narrow in the heel.

Pros
  • Nylon plate adds stability.

  • Feels fairly firm underfoot.

  • Moderate stack height.

Cons
  • Narrow outsole heel.

  • 6.9 Marathon Racing
  • 7.4 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 7.1 Energy Return
  • 7.0 Cushioning
  • 7.9 Lateral Stability
  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We bought and tested the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 in men's US size 9 in the Crystal Seas/Diva Pink/Black colorway. Here's the label for our pair. Depending on your region, you can also buy the shoe in other colorways, including Illusion/Coral/Black, Cobalt/Green Gecko/Limpett, White/Peach/Coral, and Black/Gold/Pink.

This shoe is only available in standard width in men's and women's sizing. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is a plated super trainer suited to up-tempo and longer runs. Despite the 'Max' in its name, it's not a maximalist shoe, with a moderate stack height and decent cushioning. Like other models in the Hyperion lineup, like the lightweight, lower-stack Brooks Hyperion 2 and the more performance-oriented Brooks Hyperion Elite 4, it features a breathable mesh upper and is intended for faster paces. However, it's still heavier than other shoes in its class, and its nitrogen-infused DNA Flash v2 foam doesn't offer the most responsive ride compared to more performance-oriented foams on the market. While this shoe tries to balance comfort and speed, lighter and more efficient plated trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 outpace it in most areas, while higher-stack options like the HOKA Mach X 2 offer superior cushioning for long runs. If you prefer an unplated option that can still pick up the pace, check out the ASICS SUPERBLAST 2.

See the best running shoes we've tested to find the best shoe for your needs.

Brooks Hyperion 2

Both the Brooks Hyperion 2 and Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are intended for faster-paced workouts, but they approach that goal in different ways. The Hyperion 2 is a more traditional shoe with a lighter weight and lower stack height that makes it well-suited to faster and shorter runs. Meanwhile, the Hyperion Max 2 has a less traditional geometry and falls a bit more into the super trainer category, with a pronounced rocker and nylon plate. It's notably more cushioned than the Hyperion 2, making it the better option for longer efforts.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 4

While they're both plated trainers, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is better overall than the Brooks Hyperion Max 2. The Saucony is notably lighter and delivers better energy return thanks to its PEBA-based midsole, making it a bit more versatile and more efficient at faster paces.

Brooks Glycerin Max

Despite sharing a 'max' moniker, the Brooks Glycerin Max and the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are quite different models. The Glycerin Max is a maximalist high-stack daily trainer, while the Hyperion Max 2 is a plated super trainer. The Hyperion Max 2 is notably lighter, with a lower stack height that delivers a more stable and responsive ride that's better for training at faster paces. By contrast, the Glycerin Max offers more cushioning but lacks the bounciness needed for uptempo runs, making it a better fit for easier miles and recovery runs.

ASICS SUPERBLAST 2

The ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 is a better option for long runs than the Brooks Hyperion Max 2. It has significantly better cushioning and offers more underfoot protection. It's also a bit lighter. However, some may prefer the Brooks' lower stack and firmer foam, which offers a bit more stability.

adidas Adizero Boston 12

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 and the adidas Adizero Boston 12 are both plated super trainers, but each has distinct strengths. The adidas features full-length carbon rods and a firmer forefoot, making it more snappy and better suited for shorter races. The Brooks, on the other hand, uses a nylon plate combined with a softer, more cushioned midsole, offering a more forgiving and comfortable ride for your interval sessions.

 

PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

The PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 and Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are both plated super trainers built to handle faster training sessions. The Puma has a carbon plate, which is superior for racing short distances. This plate offers a stiffer, more aggressive feel. The Hyperion Max 2, meanwhile, uses a nylon plate—less aggressive but paired with a midsole that provides greater energy return, offering a bouncier ride.

+ Show more

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
5.8
Design
Weight
Weight
263.7 g (9.30 oz)

This shoe is quite heavy, with the addition of a nylon plate adding some weight compared to its predecessor. It's not ideal for those who prefer lighter trainers.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
36.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
29.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
82 mm (3.2")
Outsole Arch Width
72 mm (2.8")
Outsole Forefoot Width
112 mm (4.4")
Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
61 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Performance
7.1
Performance
Heel Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Heel Energy Return
81.3%

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has decent energy return in the heel. However, its DNA Flash v2 foam doesn't deliver the bounciest experience, especially compared to more efficient plated trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4.

7.1
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Forefoot Energy Return
81.3%

The forefoot provides similar energy return to the heel. While you won't get the most propulsive toe-offs out of it, it still returns enough energy for a fairly lively feel, especially for a trainer.

7.3
Performance
Heel Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.66 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.43 J

The heel is decently cushioned, offering especially effective impact absorption at higher forces. Overall, it offers a balanced level of cushioning, comfortable enough for longer runs without feeling overly plush.

6.6
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.85 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.58 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
4.62 J

The forefoot cushioning is okay, but it isn't quite as protective as the heel. It doesn't provide as much comfort for those who land higher up on the foot, but it's cushioned enough to prevent bottoming out.

6.5
Performance
Heel Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
42.5 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
51.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
81.7 N/mm

The heel is fairly firm, providing some stability. Though the feel is softer at higher intensities, such as when picking up the pace or under heavier loads, it still offers a bit more firmness and stability at these intensities than other highly cushioned models like the Brooks Glycerin Max.

8.8
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
50.3 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
78.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
110.4 N/mm

The forefoot is very firm, making it feel more stable and controlled. That said, if you prefer a softer feel under the forefoot, you might find it a bit harsh.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

Brooks Hyperion Max 2: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider