Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.

Nike Vomero 17 Running Shoe Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
Nike Vomero 17 Picture
5.5
Marathon Racing
6.5
5K/10K Racing
6.5
Energy Return
6.6
Cushioning
7.4
Lateral Stability
Notice: This running shoe was replaced by Nike Vomero 18

The Nike Vomero 17 is a premium daily trainer. Sitting above the Nike Pegasus 41, this iteration of the Vomero includes a top layer of PEBA-based ZoomX foam in the midsole atop a bottom layer of Cushlon 3.0 EVA foam, offering a more cushioned feel and a tad more efficiency. With a relatively high stack, high drop, and a comfortable upper, it's a relatively stable, balanced workhorse for everyday running at a range of paces.

Our Verdict

5.5 Marathon Racing

The Nike Vomero 17 isn't well-suited to marathon racing and isn't intended to be a racing shoe. While it has a fair amount of cushioning, it's not quite protective enough for running the full length of a marathon. Beyond that, it's simply too heavy and lacking in energy return for performance racing at longer distances.

Pros
  • Fairly cushioned.

Cons
  • Heavy.

  • Energy return is lacking for racing.

6.5 5K/10K Racing

The Nike Vomero 17 isn't intended for high-performance racing at shorter distances. It's too heavy for racing and doesn't offer the most energy return. While it has a firm forefoot, its bulky build prevents it from feeling truly snappy as a daily trainer.

Pros
  • Firm forefoot.

Cons
  • Heavy.

  • Energy return is lacking for racing.

6.5 Energy Return

The Nike Vomero 17 has okay energy return. The heel is less responsive than the forefoot, which does return a reasonable amount of energy. While it doesn't offer the same level of rebound as more performance-oriented shoes, it still offers some bounce when toeing off.

Pros
  • Adequate forefoot energy return.

Cons
  • Disappointing energy return in the heel.

6.6 Cushioning

The Nike Vomero 17 is fairly cushioned. Its heel does a good job of absorbing energy, making for fairly plush and protected landings for heel strikers. However, its forefoot doesn't offer the same level of cushioning.

Pros
  • Well cushioned in the heel.

Cons
  • Forefoot absorbs less impact.

7.4 Lateral Stability

The Nike Vomero 17 has decent lateral stability. Despite its high stack height, its softer ZoomX foam is balanced out by a bottom layer of EVA foam, which adds a bit of firmness and stability. It also has a fairly wide outsole, especially around the heel, creating a pretty stable platform.

Pros
  • Wide heel outsole.

  • Dual-layer foam is relatively firm.

Cons
  • High stack height.

  • 5.5 Marathon Racing
  • 6.5 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 6.5 Energy Return
  • 6.6 Cushioning
  • 7.4 Lateral Stability

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We bought and tested the Nike Vomero 17 in men's US size 9. Our pair is the Black/Anthracite/White colorway, and you can see the label here. The shoe comes in a wide range of different colorways, depending on the region and gender, including but not limited to White/Black/Pure Platinum-white, White/Royal Pulse/Glacier Blue-white, Hyper Violet/White/Laser Orange/Black, and Hyper Violet/Black-white.

You can buy this shoe in standard, wide, or extra wide. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

The Nike Vomero 17 is a middle-of-the-road daily trainer. Though it doesn't stand out in any one area, it combines relatively premium materials and a dual-layer foam for a fairly versatile training experience. It's a bit less boring and more cushioned than the firmer Nike Pegasus 41, but it isn't nearly as bouncy or responsive as the Nike Invincible 3, which has a full ZoomX midsole. As far as daily trainers go, the Vomero 17 offers a balanced mix of cushioning, stability, and responsiveness in a durable, comfortable package. However, those seeking a more exciting max-cushioned experience will get more by stepping up to a more versatile option like the ASICS SUPERBLAST 2, while others might prefer lighter options like the HOKA Mach 6.

For more options, check out our picks for the best running shoes.

Nike Invincible 3

The Nike Invincible 3 and the Nike Vomero 17 are both daily trainers in Nike's lineup, but they have different strong suits. The Invincible features a full PEBA-based ZoomX midsole, giving it notably better energy return and making for a softer, bouncier ride. The Vomero, on the other hand, uses a mix of ZoomX and firmer EVA foam, making for a firmer and more controlled ride overall, at the expense of some energy return.

Nike Pegasus 41

The Nike Vomero 17 is like a more premium, built-up Nike Pegasus 41. With more responsive ZoomX foam in its midsole, the Vomero provides a bit more energy return and feels noticeably more cushioned, giving it a softer, plusher feel that makes it a better option for easier paces and longer runs.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
5.1
Design
Weight
Weight
280.1 g (9.88 oz)

The Nike Vomero 17 is quite heavy, though about similar to other daily trainers in Nike's lineup, including the Nike Pegasus 41.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
39.9 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.3 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.6 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
91 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
64 mm (2.5")
Outsole Forefoot Width
110 mm (4.3")
Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
276 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
63 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
Performance
5.9
Performance
Heel Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Heel Energy Return
77.9%

The heel has mediocre energy return. It's a tad bouncier than the Nike Pegasus 41 but ultimately lacks the liveliness of the Nike Invincible 3.

6.7
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Forefoot Energy Return
80.1%

The forefoot has slightly better energy return, thanks in part to the higher concentration of ZoomX foam in that area. While it's still somewhat muted compared to more exciting options, there's enough rebound for a fairly smooth ride when pushing off.

7.5
Performance
Heel Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.20 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.62 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.14 J

The heel is well-cushioned, offering a good amount of protection underfoot across a range of forces. It has notably better impact absorption in the heel than some other daily trainers, like the Nike Pegasus 41 or the adidas Supernova Rise, which helps prevent the heel from bottoming out.

5.7
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.87 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.34 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
3.90 J

The forefoot cushioning is sub-par. It does a decent job at lower forces, offering enough protection in the forefoot for easier paces. However, it lacks sufficient cushioning for heavier runners or runners who apply a lot of force in the forefoot, which can cause the forefoot to bottom out.

6.6
Performance
Heel Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
34.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
55.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
89.7 N/mm

The heel is reasonably firm. It's softer than many other daily trainers, including the Nike Pegasus 41, but not so soft that it becomes unstable.

9.3
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
48.3 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
91.2 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
144.5 N/mm

The forefoot is very firm, providing remarkable stability and control when toeing off. However, you'll likely find it overly rigid if you prefer a softer forefoot.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

Nike Vomero 17: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider