Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Coway Airmega AP-1512HH Mighty Air Purifier Review

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1
Reviewed May 13, 2024 at 01:24 pm
Latest change: Test bench update Oct 31, 2024 at 11:22 am
Coway Airmega AP-1512HH Mighty Picture
7.7
Pets
7.7
Bedroom
7.7
Particle Filtration Rate
8.2
Particle Concentration

The Coway Airmega AP-1512HH Mighty is an air purifier intended for medium-sized rooms. It features a three-stage filtration system and an ionizer. While there's no way of controlling the device remotely via a smartphone companion app, it does have a built-in particle sensor that allows it to monitor air quality in real-time and adjust its fan speed to match. There's also a dedicated 'Eco' mode, which automatically turns the fan off to save energy if the particulate count in the air remains below a certain threshold for 30 minutes.

Our Verdict

7.7 Pets

The Coway Airmega AP-1512HH is very good for pet owners. It does a reasonably good job of trapping fine particles like cat dander and has a reasonably fast cleaning rate, which is good for larger rooms. While you can't control the air purifier remotely using your smartphone, its particle sensor enables it to adjust its fan speed automatically depending on current air quality. Unfortunately, it might not be the best option if your pet is highly sensitive to loud noises, as it is a little noisy at higher fan speeds.

Pros
  • Automatic fan speed adjustment and 'Eco' setting.
  • Very good overall purification performance.
Cons
  • Noisy at higher fan speeds.
  • No companion app.
7.7 Bedroom

The Coway Airmega AP-1512HH is a good option to put in your bedroom. It won't fit on a dresser or shelf, but it still has a fairly compact footprint for a machine capable of cleaning medium-sized rooms. While there's no ability to control the device using a smartphone app, the 'Eco' mode helps minimize noise and power consumption by turning the fan off if air quality stays above what it deems acceptable. You can also easily turn off its display light, so you won't have to cover it up when you're trying to get some sleep.

Pros
  • Automatic fan speed adjustment and 'Eco' setting.
  • Very good overall purification performance.
  • Display light shutoff.
Cons
  • Noisy at higher fan speeds.
  • No companion app.
7.7 Particle Filtration Rate

Pros
  • Automatic fan speed adjustment and 'Eco' setting.
  • Very good overall purification performance.
Cons
  • Noisy at higher fan speeds.
  • No companion app.
8.2 Particle Concentration

Pros
  • Automatic fan speed adjustment and 'Eco' setting.
  • Very good overall purification performance.
Cons
  • Noisy at higher fan speeds.
  • No companion app.
  • 7.7 Pets
  • 7.7 Bedroom

Performance Usages

  • 7.7 Particle Filtration Rate
  • 8.2 Particle Concentration

Changelog

  1. Updated Oct 31, 2024: Converted to Test Bench 1.0.1.
  2. Updated May 13, 2024: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

The Coway Airmega AP-1512HH is available in two color variants: 'Black' and 'White'. We tested the 'Black' variant.

Let us know in the comments if you come across another variant.

Compared To Other Air Purifiers

This is a relatively well-rounded air purifier. While it might not have the same breadth of fully automatic functionality as the similarly priced and similarly-sized Levoit Vital 200S, which you can control remotely using the VeSync companion app, the Coway is certainly worth a look if you don't want or need those kinds of features. Its 'Eco' setting can help save on energy costs and reduce noise, which is good since, at higher fan speeds, it's noisier than other alternatives.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Body
Height 18.2" (46.3 cm)
Width 17.6" (44.8 cm)
Depth 10.6" (27.0 cm)
Weight
12.9 lbs (5.9 kg)
Power Cord Length 79.3" (201.5 cm)
Wheels
No
Design
Display And Control
Filter Change Indicator
Yes
Air Quality Sensor Auto Mode
Yes
Remote Control
No
App
No
Display On/Off
Yes
Timer Function
Yes
Number Of Fan Speeds
4

The 'Air Quality' indicator light changes color based on current particle count:

  • Blue: Clean
  • Dark Purple: Polluted
  • Red: Highly Polluted

You can turn off the lights on the display by pressing and holding the 'Ionizer' button for three seconds.

Design
Filter Configuration
Filtration Layers
3 Stage
Activated Carbon
Sheet

While the manufacturer advertises this air purifier as having a four-stage filtration system, its actual filter has only three physical layers: a pre-filter for trapping larger particles, a True HEPA filter, and a Carbon filter for minimizing odors. The fourth 'stage' is the device's built-in ionizer. This system releases negative ions into the air that impart an electrical charge to small particles, causing them to clump together and fall to the ground or any other flat surface, where you can easily clean them up. The downside of an ionizer like this is that it also produces ozone as a byproduct, which can irritate your respiratory system through prolonged exposure. If you don't want to use the ionizer, you can turn it off.

You'll need to clean the pre-filter under water or vacuum off any stuck-on debris and dust every two to four weeks.

You'll need to replace the True HEPA/Activated Carbon filter every 12 months and the carbon filter every six months. These two filters are sold in a single pack and can be purchased here.

Performance
7.7
Performance
Particle Filtration Rate
See details on graph tool
Air Cleaning Rate
568 m³/Hour
8.2
Performance
Particle Concentration
See details on graph tool
Average Final 0.3 µm Concentration
66 particles/L
7.7
Performance
Noise
Noise @ Lowest Fan Speed
33.5dBA
Noise @ Highest Fan Speed
60.3dBA

Comments

  1. Product

Coway Airmega AP-1512HH Mighty: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I appreciate you guys using target brightness on your x axis. I don’t think anyone else does that and it makes interpreting their graphs difficult imho. Kudos.

    Thanks for the support! Don’t hesitate if you have any other suggestions.

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I appreciate you guys using target brightness on your x axis. I don’t think anyone else does that and it makes interpreting their graphs difficult imho. Kudos.

  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    any plans to test EOTF tracking in game mode? S95C has bad game mode tracking despite good tracking outside of it

    Yes, this is something we’re looking into for our next methodology update, which we’re starting work on now.

  4. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    any plans to test EOTF tracking in game mode? S95C has bad game mode tracking despite good tracking outside of it

  5. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why does a low end TV like the CU7000 have better PQ EOTF tracking than much better TV’s with better HDR? I thought the CU7000 has mediocre HDR?

    Our PQ EOTF scoring is based off of how well a TV follows the curve until it reaches its maximum brightness. This means that TVs that don’t really get bright enough for proper HDR can still score very well here. I hope that helps!

  6. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why does a low end TV like the CU7000 have better PQ EOTF tracking than much better TV’s with better HDR? I thought the CU7000 has mediocre HDR?

  7. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Why doesn’t Rtings use a more linear scale when displaying EOTF tracking? The jump from 244 to 155 (where roll off/tonemapping/clipping often occurs) makes it difficult to appreciate the differences between displays using the graph.

    That’s a great question. The reason behind this is that EOTF itself isn’t a linear function due to the way the human eye sees brightness. We’re far more sensitive to dim lights than bright ones, so the EOTF function is designed to provide more gradation at lower brightness levels. The difference between 50 and 100 nits, for example, is far more noticeable than the difference between 1000 and 2000 nits, even though both cases are twice the brightness.

  8. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why doesn’t Rtings use a more linear scale when displaying EOTF tracking? The jump from 244 to 1555 (where roll off/tonemapping/clipping often occurs) makes it difficult to appreciate the differences between displays using the graph.

    Edited 8 months ago: Changed 155 to 1555
You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider