Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
"The stand is cheap. It is almost all made of plastic and the TV wobbles when you push it." ...
1
0
-1
0
0
"The stand is cheap. It is almost all made of plastic and the TV wobbles when you push it."
I'm seconding this. Please, everyone using the stock stand, double check and be extra careful that the TV is stable, especially when you move it. I learned this the hard way. I rotated mine (40" model) about 30 degrees to check the rear panel, and though one leg of the stand was sticking 2-3 inches off the edge of the surface, the TV looked stable. I turned around for just a moment to grab something, and I heard the dreaded 'bang' - it had tipped over and fell to the floor, and the screen was gone. I'm not really blaming the TV base - it WAS my fault, I was careless and didn't double check - just a word of warning to hopefully prevent someone from making the same expensive mistake I did.
Sort by:
- 10-100We just did a comparison of the Samsung J6300 50", 55" and 60" panels to see their differences and the results are interesting. You can see the full comparison here. There is a few corrections to be made in the Amazon post you refer to. First, the 60" J6300 version MS01 is a Sharp panel as seen in the service menu of the TV. And both this panel and the 50" (version DH02 by AUO Optronics) that we have tested had better contrast than the Samsung 55" panel (version TH01). Blacks were the same for the Samsung and Sharp panels but the 50" AUO Optronics got slightly better/deeper blacks. As far as motion, both the Sharp and AUO Optronics had faster response time (less blur) than the Samsung panel. The Samsung panel also got beaten when it came to input lag. That said, the differences between the three panels weren't big and at a level where it is nearly impossible to differentiate just by looking at the TVs. In the end, from the tests we have done, the panel lottery isn't something to worry about.