Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Discussion

Normalization and graph comparison

3
2
1
2
0

Hi,

I have feedback to new normalization and graph comparison:

  1. Although I like new normalization algorithm, because it’s better at showing amount of bass and treble, it’s not at showing amount of midrange. Now I have to guess if mids are boomy, neutral or recessed. I’d like to see both graphs or option to choose the algorithm.
  2. You should do something about graph comparison of 2 headphones. It can get really messy, especially in raw freq response comparison. And why there are 2 curves for target response if they’re same and why there is dashed curve used for headphones and not the target. Also it would be much cleaner if we could just compare averaged curves, one for each headphones. BTW you could also add shortcut to headphone graphs into tools header.

Thank you for reading. :)

Sort by: 
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello!

    Any recommendation settings we have can be found in our review or our settings page for the TV. Otherwise, most of this stuff comes down to personal preference, so it’s probably best to play around with the settings and see what you think looks best!

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello! Any recommendation settings we have can be found in our review or our settings page for the TV. Otherwise, most of this stuff comes down to personal preference, so it’s probably best to play around with the settings and see what you think looks best!

    I see, For low quality content smoothing on Sony tv , I used smooth gradation.. How about nosie reduction? Is it necessary I used noise reduction / digital noise reduction setting for low quality content smoothing?

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide