Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We're proud to introduce Test Bench 2.0, which overhauls our audio measurements, with new tests and usages. There's even a brand new multi-target graphing tool! You can read all about this in our changelog, featuring commentary from our Test Designer, Pierre.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Sound
- Isolation
- Microphone
- Active Features
- Connectivity
- Comments
AfterShokz Aeropex Bone Conduction vs Sony Float Run Wireless
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
AfterShokz Aeropex Bone Conduction
Sony Float Run Wireless
Tested using Methodology v1.5
Updated Apr 19, 2024 07:02 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.5
Updated Apr 19, 2024 06:58 PM
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
TypeBone Conduction
EnclosureOpen-Back
WirelessYes
TransducerBone Conduction
Noise CancellingNo
MicYes
TypeOn-ear
EnclosureOpen-Back
WirelessYes
TransducerDynamic
Noise CancellingNo
MicYes
Variants
- Aeropex (Blue Eclipse)
- Aeropex (Cosmic Black)
- Aeropex (Lunar Grey)
- Aeropex (Solar Red)
- Float Run (Black/White)
Our Verdict
AfterShokz Aeropex Bone Conduction
Sony Float Run Wireless
The AfterShokz Aeropex Bone Conduction and the Sony Float Run Wireless perform similarly. Both headphones are equally stable on-ear, but the AfterShokz are more comfortable, better built, and have a longer continuous battery life than the Sony. However, the Sony have a more consistent frequency response and better mid and treble accuracy. Both headphones also deliver next to no bass-range sound.