Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Comfort
    3. Controls
    4. Breathability
    5. Portability
    6. Case
    7. Build Quality
    8. Stability
    9. Headshots 1
    10. Headshots 2
    11. Top
    12. In The Box
  5. Sound
    1. Sound Profile
    2. Frequency Response Consistency
    3. Raw Frequency Response
    4. Bass Accuracy
    5. Mid Accuracy
    6. Treble Accuracy
    7. Peaks/Dips
    8. Imaging
    9. Soundstage
    10. Weighted Harmonic Distortion
  6. Isolation
    1. Noise Isolation
    2. Leakage
  7. Microphone
    1. Microphone Style
    2. Recording Quality
    3. Noise Handling
  8. Active Features
    1. Battery
    2. App Support
  9. Connectivity
    1. Bluetooth
    2. Non-Bluetooth Wireless
    3. Wired
    4. PC / PS4 Compatibility
    5. Xbox One Compatibility
    6. Base/Dock
  10. Comments

Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016 vs JBL Everest Elite 700 Wireless

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016
JBL Everest Elite 700 Wireless

Tested using Methodology v1.3.1

Updated Mar 14, 2024 05:38 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.3.1

Updated Dec 23, 2022 06:15 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016 Picture
JBL Everest Elite 700 Wireless Picture

Variants

  • QuietComfort 35 (Black)
  • QuietComfort 35 (White)
  • Everest Elite 700

Our Verdict

Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016

JBL Everest Elite 700 Wireless

The Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016 are better noise cancelling headphones than the JBL Everest Elite 700 Wireless. The Bose are better more comfortable over-ear fit and isolate a lot more in noisy conditions than the JBL. They also have a longer battery life and a better default sound that works with most genres but that you can't EQ like the JBL. This makes the JBL a bit more customizable than the Bose. They also have a slightly better latency performance and wireless range, but their tight fit may not be for everyone.

0