Why is the SRAV good but under sensor specifications high sensor inconsistency is mentioned?
Hi eggggggggg,
Thanks for reaching out
Youโve spotted a mistake on our end. This text was written when this mouse was first reviewed on an older test bench. Weโve since updated this review on a newer bench methodology, which has a more in-depth way of testing all sensor performance metrics, including SRAV at some of the most commonly used CPI settings of 1600, 800, and 400 CPI.
Youโre absolutely right; our current text is misleading as it suggests inconsistency across all CPI settings when, in reality, we only detected problematic SRAV inconsistency using an 800 CPI setting on our new test bench.
Weโll be updating our text to clarify this and fix our mistake as soon as possible.
Thanks again for pointing this out.
In Discussion:
โข Posted 10 months ago
Update: Weโve corrected the text in several areas that referred to old test results left over from an earlier test bench, notably in the Sensor Specifications and Click Latency sections.
Why is the SRAV good but under sensor specifications high sensor inconsistency is mentioned?
Hi eggggggggg,
Thanks for reaching out Youโve spotted a mistake on our end. This text was written when this mouse was first reviewed on an older test bench. Weโve since updated this review on a newer bench methodology, which has a more in-depth way of testing all sensor performance metrics, including SRAV at some of the most commonly used CPI settings of 1600, 800, and 400 CPI.
Youโre absolutely right; our current text is misleading as it suggests inconsistency across all CPI settings when, in reality, we only detected problematic SRAV inconsistency using an 800 CPI setting on our new test bench.
Weโll be updating our text to clarify this and fix our mistake as soon as possible. Thanks again for pointing this out.
Update: Weโve corrected the text in several areas that referred to old test results left over from an earlier test bench, notably in the Sensor Specifications and Click Latency sections.