Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Build Quality
    2. User Maintenance
    3. Recurring Cost
    4. Storing
    5. Dirt Compartment
    6. In The Box
    7. Range
    8. Portability
    9. Battery
    10. Quality Of Life Features
    11. Tools And Brushes
    12. Alternative Configuration
  5. Performance
    1. Hard Floor Pickup
    2. High-Pile Carpet Pickup
    3. Low-Pile Carpet Pickup
    4. Pet Hair Pickup
    5. Suction
    6. Airflow
    7. Noise
    8. Maneuverability
    9. Pet Hair Furniture Performance
    10. Air Quality
    11. Cracks
    12. Stains
    13. Water
  6. Comments

Samsung Jet 60 vs LG CordZero A9 [A916, A916BM]

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

Samsung Jet 60
LG CordZero A9 [A916, A916BM]

Tested using Methodology v1.3

Updated Apr 28, 2025 07:30 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.3

Updated Jan 31, 2025 06:37 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Samsung Jet 60 Picture
LG CordZero A9 [A916, A916BM] Picture
  1. Recommended in 2 articles:
  2. Cordless For Pet Hair
  3. Stairs

Variants

  • Jet 60 Pet (Gold)
  • Jet 60 Fit (Gray)
  • Jet 60 Pet (Rose Gold)
  • Jet 60 Flex (Rose Gold)
  • Jet 60 Pet (Silver/Black)
  • Jet 60 Turbo (Violet)
  • CordZero A9 (A916BM)
  • CordZero A9 Charge (A905RM)
  • CordZero A9 Charge Plus (A906SM)
  • CordZero A9 Ultimate (A907GMS)
  • CordZero A9 Limited (A908VMR)
  • CordZero A9 (A912PM)
  • CordZero A9 (A913BM)
  • CordZero A9 Kompressor (A925KSM)
  • CordZero A9 Kompressor (A926KSM)
  • CordZero A9 Kompressor (A927KGMS)
  • CordZero A9 Kompressor (A927KVMS)
  • CordZero A9 Kompressor (A929KVM)

Our Verdict

Samsung Jet 60

LG CordZero A9 [A916, A916BM]

The LG CordZero A9 is better than the Samsung Jet 60. The LG is better for longer cleaning sessions thanks to its longer runtime. It also delivers better performance on bare floors and can be bundled with a more effective miniature turbo brush attachment. Conversely, the Samsung incurs lower recurring costs, weighs even less, and has a higher-capacity dustbin.

0