Thanks to innovations in design and build materials, vacuum cleaners have become lighter over time. A lightweight machine can help reduce the strain on your body as you clean, and it can be easier to take with you up and down a flight of stairs. It should have both a low total weight as well as a manageable weight in your hand. However, to improve their portability while lowering their weight, many lightweight vacuums tend to be very plasticky, and their build quality can suffer.
We've tested over 100 vacuum cleaners, and below are our recommendations for the best lightweight vacuums you can buy. These picks were selected based on their weight and performance on different types of surfaces, feature sets, battery life, and price. If you're looking for more vacuums, check out our recommendations for the best cordless vacuums, the best budget and cheap vacuums, the best stick vacuums, and the best cordless vacuums for pet hair.
The best lightweight vacuum we've tested is the Dyson V12 Detect Slim. At just over five pounds, it's one of the lightest models in Dyson's lineup, but it still offers a wide variety of features. It can automatically increase its suction power on carpet or whenever it's on an area with a large concentration of debris. It also has a built-in particle sensor that gives you a real-time estimate of the allergen quantities it's picking up. In addition to its primary multi-surface floorhead, it comes with a floorhead that includes a soft roller and a laser light to help identify fine debris and pet hair on hard floors. The battery lasts up to an hour, which is pretty lengthy for this type of vacuum. Its performance on bare floors is exceptional, and it does a very good job of handling debris on low- and high-pile carpets.
Unsurprisingly, given the vacuum's small size, its dirt compartment is tiny and needs frequent emptying. If that's a problem, consider the pricier Dyson V15 Detect; it has a larger dustbin and a more powerful suction motor. However, at almost 6.5 pounds, it's noticeably heavier than the compact V12. The Samsung Jet 90 Complete is another good alternative to the V12, with a bigger dustbin and only a slightly heavier body, but it lacks the Dyson vacuum's automatic power adjustment system.
The Samsung Jet 60 is the best lightweight vacuum cleaner we've tested at the mid-range price point. Compared to our top pick, the Dyson V12 Detect Slim, this cordless stick vacuum has a less powerful suction motor and uses a smaller-capacity battery pack with a max runtime of about 40 minutes. Otherwise, it's pretty similar; it also comes in at just over five pounds, making it remarkably easy to pick up and carry from room to room. Despite its lightweight construction, it's made of solid-feeling plastic and sports a relatively high-capacity dustbin that won't need regular emptying.
This vacuum's five-stage filtration system is also very effective in trapping allergens. Unfortunately, while the Jet 60's Jet Fit floorhead provides good debris pickup on low- and high-pile carpets, it isn't as effective on hard surfaces like tile or hardwood as the Dyson.
If you're looking for a relatively affordable cordless model, check out the Wyze Cordless Vacuum. As you get to this price point, build quality tends to diminish, and the Wyze is no exception; it has a cheap-feeling plastic chassis that scratches easily. But if you are okay with this compromise, there's a lot to love here. The Wyze is just as portable as the mid-range Samsung Jet 60, with a curb weight of just over five pounds. It also performs well on surfaces like linoleum or hardwood and does a good job on carpets, too. Rare for a cordless vacuum in this price range, it comes bundled with a HEPA filter that's fairly effective in sealing allergens.
However, like any bagless vacuum, you must be careful when emptying its dustbin. Its battery performance isn't bad either; it can run for almost an hour in its most energy-efficient configuration, which exceeds the pricier Samsung vacuum's max runtime. Unfortunately, this vacuum has been discontinued; you may still be able to find it online from Walmart, though. While we haven't tested it, Wyze has another paired-down option available, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S. It's advertised to have a smaller battery that takes longer to charge and doesn't quite last as long, as well as a less powerful motor and fewer accessories.
If you want to spend as little as possible on a lightweight vacuum, check out the BISSELL Featherweight Stick. At just about three pounds in total weight, this basic vacuum is even lighter than the vast majority of cordless stick models like the Wyze Cordless Vacuum, making it one of the best lightweight vacuum cleaners for elderly users. However, unlike the Wyze and most pricier alternatives, it isn't cordless, and you'll need to swap outlets often when cleaning larger areas due to the power cord's short length. It also has a small, weak suction motor and a rudimentary pure suction floorhead, so it struggles to lift debris from carpets and crevices, especially as its tiny dustbin fills up. Thankfully, it does an excellent job dealing with pet hair and other lightweight debris on hard surfaces.
If you prefer the added debris capacity of an upright vacuum, consider the BISSELL PowerForce Helix. Right off the bat, it's crucial to note that this vacuum feels cheap and toy-like, but its materials help keep the total weight down, making this a fine option for carrying up and down stairs. While it's a little heavier than a conventional stick vacuum like the Samsung Jet 60, it's still much lighter than many other traditional corded uprights. Also rare for a budget device, it has a floorhead with five levels of height adjustment, enabling you to adapt rapidly to various carpet-pile heights, which is a rare feature at this price point. It's also powerful enough to lift away debris embedded deep within low- and high-pile carpeting with ease.
Unfortunately, there's no brushroll off switch, so be careful when cleaning around obstructions like rug tassels, which can get wrapped around its brushroll and trapped in its floorhead quite easily. Taking out its brushroll for regular cleaning is also a bit of a hassle since you'll need to remove a few screws to pull it out. It's also far from the best option for allergy sufferers, as fine allergens can easily escape from gaps around its dustbin. If you are looking for something that's better in this regard, consider the Dyson Ball Animal 3 Complete. It's not nearly as portable, weighing twice what the BISSELL weighs, but it has a carry handle, and it's still relatively lightweight in your hand when you use it. It's also much more expensive overall.
The Eureka Mighty Mite is a good choice if you're looking for a lightweight corded canister vacuum. While it doesn't have the grab-and-go convenience of a cordless vacuum and is heavier than the BISSELL Featherweight Stick, it's considerably lighter and smaller than most other canister vacuums, meaning you can pull it around, pick it up, and carry it with minimal effort. It also does a better job with bigger messes than the BISSEL, thanks to its debris-pickup performance. Its straightforward design makes it easy to swap out its filters or put in a new dirtbag. Unfortunately, its power cord is short, so you'll probably need to swap outlets when cleaning larger areas.
This vacuum does a fantastic job of cleaning even surfaces and is effective on low- and high-pile carpets. While its floorhead doesn't have a motorized or air-driven brushroll for improved surface agitation, it does have bristles that you can retract to help generate a tighter seal on rugs and carpets. If you prefer using a bagless option and don't mind the less hygienic debris disposal that comes with shaking out a dustbin, the Eureka Whirlwind Bagless Canister is a similarly performing alternative that's very portable, though it does have an even shorter power cord.
Due to availability, we've replaced the Hoover ONEPWR Evolve Pet with the BISSELL PowerForce Helix as our recommendation for the 'Best Lightweight Upright Vacuum.' We've also made small edits for clarity throughout.
Oct 02, 2024 : Due to current product pricing, we've removed the 'Best Upper-Mid Range' category and streamlined the Notable Mentions accordingly. We've also made small edits for clarity and concision.
Jun 19, 2024 : Minor text changes for clarity. Added the Shark Detect Pro as a Notable Mention.
Mar 06, 2024 : Replaced the Samsung Jet 75 with the Samsung Jet 75+ variant in the 'Best Upper Mid-Range Lightweight Vacuum' pick due to current availability.
Feb 09, 2024 : Minor in-text adjustments to further clarify product information.
Our recommendations above are based on what we think are currently the best lightweight vacuum cleaners. We don't just base our results on overall performance but also on factors like availability, price, and reader feedback.
If you would like to do the work of choosing yourself, here is the list of all lightweight vacuum reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. While no vacuum is perfect for every use, most are good enough to please almost everyone, and the differences are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.
What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
Was deciding between this headset to replace my Cloud IIs, the Bose QuietComfort 35 II Gaming ($350 AUD) and the Sundra Closed ($209 but would require buying a mic). Managed to get these for $80 as it was hard to ignore the cost saving. As for why those 3, I need some noise isolation so open back wouldn’t work (my old Cloud II with replacement pads didn’t block anything and acted like open backs which was annoying). Despite the Alphas being rated pretty poorly for noise isolation for closed, it blocks a lot more than I was expecting and pretty much all the pink noise from my air purifier which I run at high settings. There may have been better wireless solutions however I absolutely didn’t want to deal with wireless (the Bose could run both).
As for the audio quality out of the box, I’m honestly a bit disappointed, not sure how this gets a 7.9 on neutrality, likely because treble only makes up 15% when I honestly feel like it should be weighted much higher considering it seems to make the most difference and the hardest for closed backs from my experience. On one hand it’s a tonne better than the Cloud IIs when it comes to sibilants which would be painful and I couldn’t entirely fix with EQ without completely ruining everything else. On the other hand, drums just sound… terrible… Especially the cymbal which is mostly noticeable in Eminem - Not Afraid. The bright side is it can be mostly fixed with EQ, though it can be tough with poor/low band EQs like Foobar’s. I’m currently using this: https://i.imgur.com/Ws7QTXX.png which is rather tame but could use some improvements if anyone can help. I know I could improve things by using Equalizer Apo but I’m worried about overhead/latency in gaming.
I’m currently using the USB soundcard that came with my Cloud II but ordered a Fosi Audio DS2 since my motherboard audio is gross and I don’t have anything else. I don’t know if that affects anything so I’ll have to wait and see.
The mic isn’t as good as the Cloud IIs but it isn’t bad, I was actually hoping to use the mic from the Cloud II as I read that it’s possible, however unless I cut a heap of the plastic (is it all plastic there?) off, it won’t fit due to the insertion angle….
EDIT: Fosi DS2 arrived and uggh, I don’t know why I though it would but it doesn’t also do mic like the HyperX dongle and using a splitter and plugging the mic into the motherboard isn’t possible as it produced noise on playback even not using the mic… Ended up using the old HyperX dongle and headset for just it’s mic when I need it, annoying for desk space but at least it has better mic quality.
As for the quality difference… Many reviews said this DAC/AMP was very neutral so it could be that the HyperX had a very unneutral profile as it seemed to increase the bass quite a bit and without EQ was rather muddy whereas previously I didn’t really have any issues with it. It also seemed to increase the treble further which improved drums but made it a little bright and certain sounds around 12khz-13.5kHz were very pronounced. I found this rather odd considering in your testing it showed a rather large dip in that range… It did, however seem to make it’s soundstage a bit better or at least it feels that way and it definitely handles volumes between L and R for the songs that have that sort of effect, much better. Overall, without EQ I’d say it actually sounds worse… With EQ it sounds better than had to be a bit more aggressive.
I also tried setting Windows to higher frequencies so it upsamples and it sounded a little better actually, bass felt like it was rumbling and shaking the headset but didn’t feel like it was overpowering at all. However it felt like air was constantly blowing in my ear and was extremely annoying so I had to change it back.
A review for the HP version would be nice ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Update: We’ve made minor changes to this review’s text to bring it up to date and ensure accuracy.
After my Havit h2002d (good headphones for the price btw) broke, i bought a cloud alpha and the sound is very, VERY good but the best is the feelings from listening in those. The imagining is perfect and for that price (i bought for 63$) its the best option what is possible
Update: We’ve converted this review to Test Bench 1.6, which updates how we measure latency. We’ve updated and renamed the following test groups: Wired Connection, Bluetooth Connection, and Wireless Connection (Dongle). We’ve also added new codec latency measurements and provided an audio sample of recorded latency.
will there be tests on the hp model?
Update: We’ve added a note regarding different two model variants produced by HP to the introduction of our review and Differences Between Variants.