Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Discussion

I read on www.displayspecifications.com that the UF9500 and the UF8600 have exactly the same...

1
0
-1
0
0
I read on www.displayspecifications.com that the UF9500 and the UF8600 have exactly the same panel model EQF-DHF1. So these settings work best for the UF8600 (which I own) and better like your settings from the UF8500, right?
Sort by:
oldest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I think you should either disqualify or lower the score if the app requires some sort of registration, needs to be online at least once for it to function (and thus collect user data), a double all the negatives if settings arenโ€™t stored on the headphones directly (meaning the app is required again). Sony, for instance, advertises a set of features, most of which require the app which requires to agree to number of things and an account for others to use the features that were allegedly sold to you already. \

    I donโ€™t know any other example, I never get the apps because theyโ€™re often kind of junky but I was curious and got to Sony one which only served to reinforce my belief that Sony is not such a good brand anymore, that sucked.

    Also, though not related to apps, could you update, or add to your future reviews if headphones can be used while being charged? Neckband-style in-ears specially, since they have a charging port like regular on-, and/or over-ears.

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hi senseivita,

    Thanks for taking the time to share with us what you would like to see added to our review. We can definitely consider adding more details about the specifics around the app. While we currently do not have plan to adapt the score based on this information as of now, Iโ€™ve taken note of your suggestion as well as your request to look for usability while being charged. Thanks again!

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide