Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Weight
    2. Stack Heights
    3. External Shape
    4. Internal Shape
    5. Other Features
  5. Performance
    1. Heel Energy Return
    2. Forefoot Energy Return
    3. Heel Cushioning
    4. Forefoot Cushioning
    5. Heel Firmness
    6. Forefoot Firmness
  6. Comments

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 vs Nike Alphafly 3

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3
Nike Alphafly 3

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Apr 11, 2025 08:37 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Apr 11, 2025 08:37 PM

Amazon.com
adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Picture
Nike Alphafly 3 Picture
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Running Shoes

Variants

  • Adizero Adios Pro 3 (Cobalt Blue/Zero Metalic/Lucid Lemon - (Women - US 7))
  • Adizero Adios Pro 3 (Core Black/Zero Metalic/Spark - (Women - US 7))
  • Adizero Adios Pro 3 (Crystal White/Night Metallic/Linen Green - (Men - US 9))
  • Adizero Adios Pro 3 (Pink Spark/Aurora Met./Sandy Pink - (Women - US 7))
  • Alphafly 3 (Sail/Crimson Tint/Guava Ice/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • Alphafly 3 (Volt/Dusty Cactus/Total - (Men - US 9))

Our Verdict

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3

Nike Alphafly 3

The Nike Alphafly 3 and the adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 are high-performance super shoes offering similar energy return and overall cushioning. Their cushioning distribution differs, making them better suited for different foot strike styles. The Nike has more cushioning in the heel, providing a more forgiving landing for heel strikers, while the adidas has greater forefoot cushioning, favoring runners who land further forward. The Nike outshines the adidas shoe in lateral stability, thanks to its wider base. The adidas features a very narrow arch width, which can make it feel less stable. Also, the adidas is stiffer in the heel, while the Nike offers a softer feel. Runners preferring a firmer heel for more structure may lean toward the adidas, while those seeking a more cushioned landing may find the Nike more comfortable.

0 

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

8.1
8.3
No major differences between these running shoes for marathon racing. See full list of tests below.

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

0.0
8.2

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Nike Alphafly 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Nike Alphafly 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

200.7 g (7.08 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Stack Height Photo
Nike Alphafly 3 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.1 mm
39.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

31.7 mm
33.4 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

7.4 mm
6.4 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.5 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 3D Model Full Shoe
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
91 mm (3.6")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

59 mm (2.3")
68 mm (2.7")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

114 mm (4.5")
91 mm (3.6")
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 3D Model Internal
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

276 mm (10.9")
273 mm (10.7")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
59 mm (2.3")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

93 mm (3.7")
90 mm (3.5")

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Other Features Photo
Nike Alphafly 3 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber Rods
Carbon Fiber
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.4
8.1

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Heel Energy Return 
 

88.1%
86.0%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.4
8.5

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

88.3%
88.4%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.7
8.2

Heel Cushioning Picture  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Heel Cushioning Picture
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Energy Absorbed At 300N 
 

1.17 J
1.33 J

Energy Absorbed At 600N 
 

3.78 J
4.06 J

Energy Absorbed At 900N 
 

6.62 J
6.75 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.0
7.5

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Energy Absorbed At 300N 
 

1.05 J
0.87 J

Energy Absorbed At 600N 
 

3.10 J
2.93 J

Energy Absorbed At 900N 
 

5.27 J
5.27 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

6.1
5.6

Heel Firmness  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Average Firmness 0 To 300N 
 

37.8 N/mm
32.4 N/mm

Average Firmness 300 To 600N 
 

51.4 N/mm
49.2 N/mm

Average Firmness 600 To 900N 
 

79.3 N/mm
83.1 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.0
8.1

Forefoot Firmness  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Average Firmness 0 To 300N 
 

41.0 N/mm
49.0 N/mm

Average Firmness 300 To 600N 
 

65.5 N/mm
65.0 N/mm

Average Firmness 600 To 900N 
 

103.4 N/mm
95.7 N/mm
Show Text 

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3

Nike Alphafly 3

Comments

  1. Comparison

adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 vs Nike Alphafly 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones