Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.

HOKA Mach X 2 Running Shoes Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
HOKA Mach X 2 Picture
7.4
Marathon Racing
6.7
5K/10K Racing
7.1
Energy Return
8.9
Cushioning
7.0
Lateral Stability

The HOKA Mach X 2 is designed for runners seeking a plated super trainer for their intensity sessions. With a combination of a breathable woven upper, a PEBA-topped midsole, and a Pebax plate, the shoe can handle both daily training miles, when you need an extra boost, as well as quicker runs. Compared to the original HOKA Mach X, it features a higher stack height, providing even more cushioning while managing to reduce the overall weight.

Our Verdict

7.4 Marathon Racing

The HOKA Mach X 2 provides decent overall marathon performance, balancing satisfactory energy return with excellent cushioning, making it a reliable choice for marathon runners who prioritize comfort over outright speed. While it may not have the sharpest responsiveness or lightest weight, it remains dependable and sufficiently bouncy for sustained efforts, offering a smooth ride throughout extended mileage.

Pros
  • Plush cushioning.

  • Energy return is decent overall.

  • Pebax plate.

Cons
  • Lighter than its predecessor, but not light enough for racing.

6.7 5K/10K Racing

For shorter, quicker races such as the 5K and 10K, the HOKA Mach X 2 underperforms slightly due to its weight and insufficient energy return. Runners aiming for fast times or personal bests will find it limiting, as the shoes lack the aggressive bounce and nimble efficiency needed for optimal short-distance performance.

Pros
  • Energy return is decent overall.

  • Pebax plate.

Cons
  • Lighter than its predecessor, but not light enough for racing.

  • Very soft foam underfoot.

7.1 Energy Return

The HOKA Mach X 2 delivers decent energy return and is suitable for efficient, steady-paced runs, but it lacks the impressive bounce and explosive responsiveness desired for shorter, quicker races. It's well-suited to longer efforts where moderate, consistent energy return complements its excellent cushioning rather than dynamic, fast-paced scenarios.

Pros
  • Good forefoot energy return thanks to PEBA in this area.

  • Energy return is decent overall.

Cons
  • EVA foam in the heel is much less bouncy.

8.9 Cushioning

Outstanding cushioning makes the HOKA Mach X 2 exceptionally comfortable for prolonged use. Its plush heel cushioning absorbs impact incredibly well, while the forefoot cushioning also provides great comfort, effectively protecting runners from fatigue and discomfort over extended distances. It's ideal for athletes seeking maximal protection without compromising too much efficiency.

Pros
  • Plush cushioning.

  • High stack height makes for ultra protective feel.

Cons
7.0 Lateral Stability

Overall, the HOKA Mach X 2 has decent lateral stability, making it ideal for runners needing reliable support during long-distance races when fatigue begins to affect form. Its broad outsole dimensions significantly enhance stability, although it's slightly compromised by a notably soft heel and ultra-high stack.

Pros
  • Big and wide outsole platform.

  • Pebax plate.

Cons
  • Very soft foam underfoot.

  • High stack height leaves you perched high above the ground.

  • 7.4 Marathon Racing
  • 6.7 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 7.1 Energy Return
  • 8.9 Cushioning
  • 7.0 Lateral Stability
  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Nov 13, 2024: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the HOKA Mach X 2 in men's US size 9, as noted on the label. The color shown here is Black/Electric Aqua. This model is also available in Grapefruit/Electric Coral, Frost/Citrus, and Frost/Electric Aqua. Wide versions are offered for both men and women. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

The HOKA Mach X 2 is positioned as a versatile super trainer, offering an ideal blend of maximal cushioning and energetic responsiveness. On the broader market, this versatility makes it one of the most compelling options for runners who prefer a single shoe to handle virtually every aspect of their training. Other versatile trainer options include the adidas Adizero Evo SL and the ASICS NOVABLAST 5.

Within HOKA's lineup, the Mach X 2's refinements from the HOKA Mach X clearly establish it as the go-to super trainer for almost everyone. While the HOKA Skyward X remains an excellent maximalist alternative specifically suited to recovery runs, the Mach X 2 is a better all-arounder that offers more effective cushioning, so it's a better choice for most runners. It sits comfortably above trainers like the HOKA Clifton 9, a daily workhorse, and the lightweight HOKA Mach 6, but below the brand's true racing flats, like the HOKA Cielo X 2.0, which is built with race day in mind.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes to find the perfect pair.

HOKA Mach 6

The HOKA Mach 6 and the HOKA Mach X 2 share a name but cater to distinct running experiences. The Mach 6 is a lighter, lower-to-the-ground daily trainer that remains bouncy for its category. In contrast, the Mach X 2 is a more versatile super trainer. It features significantly greater cushioning and a plastic plate, allowing it to handle a wider variety of workouts and paces effortlessly. Overall, runners seeking versatility and maximum comfort for both daily training and faster sessions will prefer the Mach X 2, whereas those looking for a simpler, lighter daily option will find the Mach 6 appealing.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 4

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the HOKA Mach X 2 are both versatile super trainers, but each excels in different scenarios. The Saucony is lighter and more stable and offers a snappier, more responsive feel. In contrast, the HOKA is more heavily cushioned and plush. While both shoes are versatile enough for training and some racing, the Saucony shines brightest in shorter events, whereas the HOKA is the preferred option for those prioritizing cushioning and comfort over extended distances.

HOKA Mach X

The HOKA Mach X and the HOKA Mach X 2 offer a completely different experience—think of the Mach X 2 as a rare sequel that significantly outshines the original. While the Mach X is a decent super trainer, the Mach X 2 takes things to a whole new level, providing a far more cushioned experience, a higher stack height, and significantly better energy return, all while being nearly 20 grams lighter. This combination makes it the preferred option for almost everyone unless you prioritize stability, in which case the original Mach X still offers a more secure feel.

HOKA Skyward X

The HOKA Skyward X and the HOKA Mach X 2 both sit in the high-cushion performance trainer category, but their execution differs. The Skyward X prioritizes plush comfort with an extreme stack height and carbon plate, making it feel more like a max-cushioned cruiser than a performance shoe. The Mach X 2, on the other hand, refines the formula of its predecessor, offering an even more cushioned ride but with better energy return and a more natural transition. Despite its slightly increased cushioning, the Mach X 2 remains lighter and more stable than the Skyward X, making it a stronger choice for those who want a dynamic yet comfortable daily trainer. The Skyward X works best for easy runs where protection is key, while the Mach X 2 offers more versatility across different paces and workouts.

Mizuno Neo Vista

The HOKA Mach X 2 and the Mizuno Neo Vista are both versatile, plastic-plated super trainers designed to blend cushioning and performance, but each has distinct strengths. The Mach X 2 stands out for being even more cushioned, lighter, and more responsive, giving it greater versatility across various workouts and paces—from daily runs to faster efforts. The Neo Vista, while heavier and less energetic, still excels as a protective, comfortable option, particularly suited for recovery miles where leg preservation is key.

+ Show more

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
6.6
Design
Weight
Weight
244.6 g (8.63 oz)

The shoe has an acceptable weight—not exceptionally lightweight but notably improved from its predecessor, the HOKA Mach X, shaving off a substantial amount of grams. This is especially impressive given the significant increase in stack height and cushioning underfoot, benefiting runners seeking enhanced comfort without the penalty of excessive heaviness.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
44.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
37.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.0 mm
Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
73 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
109 mm (4.3")

HOKA reduced weight in the upper for this version. Some runners in the online community and other reviewers noted discomfort in the heel area linked to the shoe's upper material. However, feedback is mixed—while some experienced irritation, others had no issues, aligning with our own observations.

Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Performance
5.8
Performance
Heel Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Heel Energy Return
77.5%

The heel energy return is better than the original HOKA Mach X, though it remains relatively modest. The largely EVA-based foam at the heel dampens the shoe's potential, creating a muted and somewhat flat experience upon landing. As a result, heel strikers seeking an energetic sensation might feel let down despite the improvements from the previous version.

7.7
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Forefoot Energy Return
83.8%

The forefoot is lively, offering a distinctly more enjoyable ride than the original HOKA Mach X. Midfoot and forefoot strikers, in particular, will appreciate the shoe's capacity for a fun, energetic toe-off, provided they naturally land in the shoe's PEBA-based sweet spot.

9.1
Performance
Heel Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.55 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
4.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
7.96 J

This shoe's heel cushioning is outstanding, placing it in the top tier for underfoot comfort. It stands out significantly compared to other shoes and offers exceptional protection, redefining what can be expected from maximum cushioning. Those prioritizing supreme comfort, particularly during longer efforts, will find this heel cushioning impressively plush and protective.

8.7
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.23 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.34 J

The forefoot cushioning is excellent, providing plenty of comfort that surpasses the original HOKA Mach X by a wide margin. This greatly benefits runners seeking luxurious cushioning at toe-off.

4.1
Performance
Heel Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
28.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
42.7 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
68.9 N/mm

The heel is notably soft—perhaps excessively so—which negatively impacts stability. Runners prone to instability or who prefer a stable, secure heel strike may find the softness problematic, especially in longer distances where maintaining consistent form becomes critical.

6.3
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
34.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
54.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
84.7 N/mm

The forefoot is moderately firm, striking a balance between stability and softness. It's noticeably softer than its predecessor but retains enough firmness to ensure a controlled ride. This primarily results from the integrated plastic plate, which effectively holds the softer PEBA foam together. This design boosts stability and delivers a dynamic toe-off.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

HOKA Mach X 2: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider