Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Performance
- Comments
HOKA Mach 6 vs HOKA Mach X 2
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
HOKA Mach 6
HOKA Mach X 2
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:40 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:32 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Heel-To-Toe Drop5.9 mm
PlateNone
Heel-To-Toe Drop7.0 mm
PlatePlastic
Variants
- Mach 6 (Men - US 9) (White/Solar Flare)
- Mach X 2 (Men - US 9) (Black/Electric Aqua)
Our Verdict
HOKA Mach 6
HOKA Mach X 2
The HOKA Mach 6 and the HOKA Mach X 2 share a name but cater to distinct running experiences. The Mach 6 is a lighter, lower-to-the-ground daily trainer that remains bouncy for its category. In contrast, the Mach X 2 is a more versatile super trainer. It features significantly greater cushioning and a plastic plate, allowing it to handle a wider variety of workouts and paces effortlessly. Overall, runners seeking versatility and maximum comfort for both daily training and faster sessions will prefer the Mach X 2, whereas those looking for a simpler, lighter daily option will find the Mach 6 appealing.
Main Differences forMarathon Racing
Marathon Racing
Threshold
Marathon Racing
6.2
7.4
Plate
None
Plastic
Forefoot Energy Return
6.9
7.7
Heel Cushioning
6.2
9.1
Weight
7.0
6.6
Heel Energy Return
6.7
5.8
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.0
6.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Weight
233.6 g (8.24 oz)
244.6 g (8.63 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Heel Stack Height
37.1 mm
44.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
31.2 mm
37.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.9 mm
7.0 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.0 mm
5.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Outsole Heel Width
88 mm (3.5")
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
61 mm (2.4")
73 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
108 mm (4.2")
109 mm (4.3")
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Internal Length
271 mm (10.7")
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
59 mm (2.3")
58 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
92 mm (3.6")
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
Plastic
Performance
Heel Energy Return
6.7
5.8
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Heel Energy Return
80.0%
77.5%
Forefoot Energy Return
6.9
7.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Forefoot Energy Return
80.5%
83.8%
Heel Cushioning
6.2
9.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Heel Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.95 J
1.55 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.99 J
4.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
5.60 J
7.96 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.4
8.7
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Forefoot Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.98 J
1.23 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.73 J
3.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
4.83 J
6.34 J
Heel Firmness
7.7
4.1
Heel Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
44.9 N/mm
28.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
65.7 N/mm
42.7 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
86.1 N/mm
68.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
8.5
6.3
Forefoot Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
43.1 N/mm
34.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
76.3 N/mm
54.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
107.7 N/mm
84.7 N/mm
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
HOKA Mach 6
HOKA Mach X 2
Comments
HOKA Mach 6 vs HOKA Mach X 2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.