Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.

HOKA Skyward X Running Shoe Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
HOKA Skyward X Picture
6.8
Marathon Racing
6.0
5K/10K Racing
7.4
Energy Return
8.3
Cushioning
7.3
Lateral Stability

The HOKA Skyward X is a max-cushioned running shoe that promises comfort, stability, and a smooth ride for long-distance training. Featuring a combination of PEBA and EVA foam, along with a convex H-shaped carbon plate, this staggeringly tall shoe delivers a plush yet controlled experience. It's built for those who prefer an ultra-high stack height for their easy sessions, and it provides a smooth heel-to-toe transition. However, the shoe is quite heavy compared to most super trainers.

Our Verdict

6.8 Marathon Racing

The HOKA Skyward X offers adequate performance for marathon racing, with great cushioning and decent energy return. This could make for quite a comfortable marathon for heavier runners looking for a protective plated shoe, though it may not be the best choice for competitive runners looking for a lighter, more responsive shoe.

Pros
  • Amazing forefoot cushioning.

  • EVA-PEBA mix balances energy return and cushioning well.

Cons
  • Really heavy.

  • Not as responsive as other marathon racers.

6.0 5K/10K Racing

The HOKA Skyward X is suitable for shorter races but will feel heavy and less agile compared to lighter racing shoes. It could provide decent performance for casual runners, but its bulkiness would make it far from ideal. The soft foam in the forefoot will also make it feel less dynamic than true super shoes.

Pros
  • EVA-PEBA mix balances energy return and cushioning well.

Cons
  • Really heavy.

  • Foam isn't firm underfoot.

7.4 Energy Return

The HOKA Skyward X features decent energy return thanks to its premium PEBA-based foam in the top layer. This foam absorbs and returns a satisfactory amount of energy, creating a bouncy and lively underfoot feel—though it's slightly firmer than some other PEBA formulations. However, this energetic ride is somewhat muted by the shoe's overall weight and construction, which dampens the full potential of the foam's responsiveness.

Pros
  • EVA-PEBA mix balances energy return and cushioning well.

Cons
  • The bulky build dulls the ride's potential.

8.3 Cushioning

The HOKA Skyward X is impressively cushioned, providing a plush and comfortable ride. This makes it suitable for long-distance training and recovery runs, offering a soft and protective underfoot feel when fatigue sets in.

Pros
  • Amazing forefoot cushioning.

  • EVA-PEBA mix balances energy return and cushioning well.

Cons
7.3 Lateral Stability

The HOKA Skyward X offers decent lateral stability. It has a wide base and an H-shaped carbon plate to hold the two layers of foam together. However, its towering stack height and soft foam underfoot prevent it from being truly stable, making it only moderately secure, especially when the form begins to break down or during sharp turns.

Pros
  • Very wide outsole.

  • EVA-PEBA mix balances energy return and cushioning well.

Cons
  • Foam isn't firm underfoot.

  • Exaggerated stack height.

  • 6.8 Marathon Racing
  • 6.0 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 7.4 Energy Return
  • 8.3 Cushioning
  • 7.3 Lateral Stability

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the HOKA Skyward X in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label. The colors shown here are Cosmic Grey & Silver. This model currently comes in two additional colorways for men (Luna Moth/Black and Blanc de Blanc/Virtual Blue) and three additional colorways for women, including Cosmic Grey/Rose Gold, Lemonade/Sunlight, and Blanc de Blanc/Swim Day. Wide versions are not available for this model. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

The HOKA Skyward X defies traditional running shoe categories, blending elements rarely found in a trainer, such as a PEBA-EVA mix foam and a convex carbon plate. However, these high-tech features don't make it a super trainer, and even less so a racing shoe. Instead, this shoe is best suited for runners who appreciate extreme stack heights and want a premium, maximalist option for daily training, particularly for recovery runs where underfoot protection is key. If you're looking for more premium trainer options, check out the Mizuno Neo Vista and Brooks Glycerin Max.

Within HOKA's lineup, the HOKA Mach X and HOKA Mach X 2 fit more into the classic super trainer mold, offering a lighter, more energetic ride with greater stability. The Mach X 2 is even more cushioned than the Skyward X, proving that you don't necessarily need the highest stack height to get better cushioning. For runners seeking a carbon-plated shoe for speed work or racing, the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0 would be a far better choice.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes to find the perfect pair.

Brooks Glycerin Max

The HOKA Skyward X and the Brooks Glycerin Max are both ultra-high-stack, max-cushioned trainers, but they take different approaches to achieving comfort and performance. The HOKA is the more cushioned of the two, offering an even softer and more protective ride while providing significantly more energy return—something the Brooks shoe lacks entirely. Additionally, the HOKA is noticeably more stable, making it more versatile. The Brooks, while slightly lighter, is a straightforward, no-fuss max-cushioned trainer that excels at one thing: providing soft, consistent comfort for easy runs. Also, while both shoes have substantial stack heights, the Brooks' stack is less exaggerated, making it feel a bit more traditional.

HOKA Clifton 9

The HOKA Skyward X and HOKA Clifton 9 are both high-stack, cushioned running shoes, yet they cater to different preferences and training needs. The Clifton 9 is lighter and offers superior lateral stability, partly due to its substantial yet lower stack height compared to the Skyward X. This design provides a more grounded feel and makes it suitable for runners seeking a stable daily trainer. In contrast, the Skyward X delivers more cushioning and significantly higher energy return, making for a more dynamic running experience.

HOKA Mach X

The HOKA Skyward X and HOKA Mach X are both premium trainers, but they cater to different types of runners. The Skyward X is all about maximum cushioning and underfoot protection, making it a great option for recovery runs or those who prefer an ultra-soft, high-stack experience. However, its towering design doesn't translate into a particularly energetic ride. The Mach X, on the other hand, fits more into the super trainer category. It's significantly lighter, more stable, and delivers a snappier feel underfoot. While both shoes incorporate advanced foam blends, the Mach X offers a more versatile ride that works well for both daily miles and uptempo efforts.

HOKA Mach X 2

The HOKA Skyward X and the HOKA Mach X 2 both sit in the high-cushion performance trainer category, but their execution differs. The Skyward X prioritizes plush comfort with an extreme stack height and carbon plate, making it feel more like a max-cushioned cruiser than a performance shoe. The Mach X 2, on the other hand, refines the formula of its predecessor, offering an even more cushioned ride but with better energy return and a more natural transition. Despite its slightly increased cushioning, the Mach X 2 remains lighter and more stable than the Skyward X, making it a stronger choice for those who want a dynamic yet comfortable daily trainer. The Skyward X works best for easy runs where protection is key, while the Mach X 2 offers more versatility across different paces and workouts.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
4.0
Design
Weight
Weight
306.9 g (10.82 oz)

This shoe is on the heavier side, which is one of its main drawbacks. The added weight makes it feel less agile than super trainers like the HOKA Mach X 2.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
50.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
43.6 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.8 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.0 mm
Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
95 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
82 mm (3.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
119 mm (4.7")
Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
274 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
60 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Performance
7.1
Performance
Heel Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Heel Energy Return
81.5%

The heel of this shoe offers decent energy return, primarily due to the PEBA-based foam in the top layer. Heel strikers will experience this bounciness, but the energy return isn't as pronounced as in lighter, more aggressive racing models like the adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3.

7.5
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Forefoot Energy Return
82.9%

The forefoot delivers good energy return. The foam decompresses well under force, offering a noticeable bounce that benefits forefoot strikers looking for a responsive ride.

7.9
Performance
Heel Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.10 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.97 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
7.63 J

This shoe is very cushioned at the heel, offering a plush experience. It absorbs impact really well, compressing smoothly to deliver a forgiving ride. This cushioning, combined with the shoe's towering stack height, provides a very comfortable ride, perfect for easy miles and long runs.

8.7
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.08 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.68 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.88 J

The forefoot cushioning is excellent, providing a well-cushioned and squishy feel. The high level of energy absorption ensures a soft underfoot experience, making each stride feel smooth and protective.

5.2
Performance
Heel Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
39.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
46.6 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
61.3 N/mm

The HOKA Skyward X is generally not very firm in the heel. However, due to the shoe's structure, forefoot strikers might perceive it as quite firm. Midfoot and heel strikers, on the other hand, are less likely to find it rigid, as the cushioning allows for a softer, more forgiving landing.

5.9
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
39.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
51.6 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
70.4 N/mm

While the forefoot isn't very firm overall, lighter or smaller runners may still find it fairly firm. The shoe's softness becomes more noticeable when greater force is applied, meaning heavier runners will experience more softness, while lighter runners might still perceive some rigidity.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

HOKA Skyward X: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider