Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Weight
    2. Stack Heights
    3. External Shape
    4. Internal Shape
    5. Other Features
  5. Performance
    1. Heel Energy Return
    2. Forefoot Energy Return
    3. Heel Cushioning
    4. Forefoot Cushioning
    5. Heel Firmness
    6. Forefoot Firmness
  6. Comments

HOKA Skyward X vs Brooks Glycerin Max

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

HOKA Skyward X
Brooks Glycerin Max

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:49 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Apr 01, 2025 08:09 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
HOKA Skyward X Picture
Brooks Glycerin Max Picture

Variants

  • Skyward X (Men - US 9) (Cosmic Grey/Silver)
  • Glycerin Max (Men - US 9) (Grey/Black/Nightlife)

Our Verdict

HOKA Skyward X

Brooks Glycerin Max

The HOKA Skyward X and the Brooks Glycerin Max are both ultra-high-stack, max-cushioned trainers, but they take different approaches to achieving comfort and performance. The HOKA is the more cushioned of the two, offering an even softer and more protective ride while providing significantly more energy return—something the Brooks shoe lacks entirely. Additionally, the HOKA is noticeably more stable, making it more versatile. The Brooks, while slightly lighter, is a straightforward, no-fuss max-cushioned trainer that excels at one thing: providing soft, consistent comfort for easy runs. Also, while both shoes have substantial stack heights, the Brooks' stack is less exaggerated, making it feel a bit more traditional.

0 

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

6.8
4.0

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.5
1.7

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
None

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.1
2.3

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.0
4.1

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

HOKA Skyward X Right Shoe Weight Photo
Brooks Glycerin Max Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

HOKA Skyward X Left Shoe Weight Photo
Brooks Glycerin Max Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

306.9 g (10.82 oz)
304.9 g (10.75 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

HOKA Skyward X Stack Height Photo
Brooks Glycerin Max Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

50.4 mm
47.4 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

43.6 mm
42.1 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.8 mm
5.3 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

5.0 mm
6.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

HOKA Skyward X 3D Model Full Shoe
Brooks Glycerin Max 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

95 mm (3.7")
88 mm (3.5")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
85 mm (3.3")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

119 mm (4.7")
114 mm (4.5")
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

HOKA Skyward X 3D Model Internal
Brooks Glycerin Max 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

274 mm (10.8")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
66 mm (2.6")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

HOKA Skyward X Other Features Photo
Brooks Glycerin Max Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
None
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.1
2.3

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Heel Energy Return 
 

81.5%
73.7%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.5
1.7

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

82.9%
72.8%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.9
7.6

Heel Cushioning Picture  

HOKA Skyward X Heel Cushioning Picture
Brooks Glycerin Max Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Energy Absorbed At 300N 
 

1.10 J
1.09 J

Energy Absorbed At 600N 
 

3.97 J
3.80 J

Energy Absorbed At 900N 
 

7.63 J
7.21 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.7
7.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

HOKA Skyward X Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Energy Absorbed At 300N 
 

1.08 J
0.94 J

Energy Absorbed At 600N 
 

3.68 J
2.91 J

Energy Absorbed At 900N 
 

6.88 J
5.56 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.2
5.6

Heel Firmness  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Average Firmness 0 To 300N 
 

39.0 N/mm
39.8 N/mm

Average Firmness 300 To 600N 
 

46.6 N/mm
49.3 N/mm

Average Firmness 600 To 900N 
 

61.3 N/mm
66.5 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

5.9
7.8

Forefoot Firmness  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Average Firmness 0 To 300N 
 

39.9 N/mm
45.0 N/mm

Average Firmness 300 To 600N 
 

51.6 N/mm
67.8 N/mm

Average Firmness 600 To 900N 
 

70.4 N/mm
85.9 N/mm
Show Text 

HOKA Skyward X

Brooks Glycerin Max

Comments

  1. Comparison

HOKA Skyward X vs Brooks Glycerin Max: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones