Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up—if you're passionate about this, we're hiring!
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Performance
- Comments
HOKA Mach X vs HOKA Mach X 2
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
HOKA Mach X
HOKA Mach X 2
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:59 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:32 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Heel-To-Toe Drop6.6 mm
PlatePlastic
Heel-To-Toe Drop7.0 mm
PlatePlastic
Variants
- Mach X (Men - US 9) (Ocean Mist/Lime Glow)
- Mach X 2 (Men - US 9) (Black/Electric Aqua)
Our Verdict
HOKA Mach X
HOKA Mach X 2
The HOKA Mach X and the HOKA Mach X 2 offer a completely different experience—think of the Mach X 2 as a rare sequel that significantly outshines the original. While the Mach X is a decent super trainer, the Mach X 2 takes things to a whole new level, providing a far more cushioned experience, a higher stack height, and significantly better energy return, all while being nearly 20 grams lighter. This combination makes it the preferred option for almost everyone unless you prioritize stability, in which case the original Mach X still offers a more secure feel.
Main Differences forMarathon Racing
Marathon Racing
Threshold
Marathon Racing
7.0
7.4
Weight
5.9
6.6
Heel Cushioning
7.3
9.1
Heel Energy Return
5.0
5.8
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.9
6.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Weight
260.2 g (9.18 oz)
244.6 g (8.63 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Heel Stack Height
41.0 mm
44.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
33.4 mm
37.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.6 mm
7.0 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.5 mm
5.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Outsole Heel Width
90 mm (3.5")
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
71 mm (2.8")
73 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
110 mm (4.3")
109 mm (4.3")
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Internal Length
273 mm (10.7")
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
63 mm (2.5")
58 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
93 mm (3.6")
92 mm (3.6")
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Plastic
Performance
Heel Energy Return
5.0
5.8
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Heel Energy Return
76.5%
77.5%
Forefoot Energy Return
7.5
7.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Forefoot Energy Return
82.9%
83.8%
Heel Cushioning
7.3
9.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Heel Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.16 J
1.55 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.49 J
4.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.24 J
7.96 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.2
8.7
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Forefoot Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.09 J
1.23 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.22 J
3.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
5.46 J
6.34 J
Heel Firmness
6.6
4.1
Heel Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
36.4 N/mm
28.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
57.5 N/mm
42.7 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
81.5 N/mm
68.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.8
6.3
Forefoot Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
39.1 N/mm
34.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
62.9 N/mm
54.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
100.6 N/mm
84.7 N/mm
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
HOKA Mach X
HOKA Mach X 2
Comments
HOKA Mach X vs HOKA Mach X 2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.