Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Performance
- Comments
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 vs Nike Alphafly 3
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
Nike Alphafly 3
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 11, 2025 03:21 PM
Searching
Finding storeTested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 11, 2025 08:37 PM
Searching
Finding store
Weight239.9 g (8.46 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop4.7 mm
PlateCarbon Fiber
Weight200.7 g (7.08 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop6.4 mm
PlateCarbon Fiber
Variants
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 (Cyber Jade/White/Black - (Men - US 9))
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 (White/Angora/Hot Mango - (Women - US 7))
- Alphafly 3 (Sail/Crimson Tint/Guava Ice/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Alphafly 3 (Volt/Dusty Cactus/Total - (Men - US 9))
Our Verdict
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
Nike Alphafly 3
The Nike Alphafly 3 and New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 are both racing shoes, though each prioritizes different aspects of performance. The Nike is lighter and built specifically for elite-level marathon racing, offering maximum energy return, making it ideal for runners aiming for peak performance. The New Balance, while heavier, provides more stability and more cushioning, making it a versatile and comfortable choice suitable for a broader range of runners targeting personal bests.
Main Differences for
Threshold
Marathon Racing
7.8
8.3
Weight
6.7
8.2
Forefoot Energy Return
8.0
8.5
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.7
8.2
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Weight
239.9 g (8.46 oz)
200.7 g (7.08 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
39.8 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
35.9 mm
33.4 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.7 mm
6.4 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Outsole Heel Width
86 mm (3.4")
91 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
74 mm (2.9")
68 mm (2.7")
Outsole Forefoot Width
111 mm (4.4")
91 mm (3.6")
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Internal Length
270 mm (10.6")
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
59 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
95 mm (3.8")
90 mm (3.5")
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Energy Return
8.1
8.1
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Heel Energy Return
86.0%
86.0%
Forefoot Energy Return
8.0
8.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Forefoot Energy Return
85.5%
88.4%
Heel Cushioning
8.1
8.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Heel Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.26 J
1.33 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
4.00 J
4.06 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.84 J
6.75 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.3
7.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Forefoot Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.08 J
0.87 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.35 J
2.93 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
5.77 J
5.27 J
Heel Firmness
5.6
5.6
Heel Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
34.4 N/mm
32.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
49.0 N/mm
49.2 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
79.2 N/mm
83.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.3
8.1
Forefoot Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
39.8 N/mm
49.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
58.9 N/mm
65.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
92.5 N/mm
95.7 N/mm
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
Nike Alphafly 3
Comments
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 vs Nike Alphafly 3: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.