Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up, so stay tuned as we continue to improve our testing.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Performance
- Comments
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 vs Mizuno Neo Vista
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4
Mizuno Neo Vista
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 09:51 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Apr 01, 2025 08:13 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Heel-To-Toe Drop6.4 mm
PlatePlastic
Heel-To-Toe Drop8.9 mm
PlatePlastic
Variants
- Endorphin Speed 4 (Men - US 9) (Navy/Spice)
- Neo Vista (Estate Blue/River Blue (5YRB))
Our Verdict
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4
Mizuno Neo Vista
The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the Mizuno Neo Vista are both plated trainers but excel in different areas. The Saucony is a lighter, more responsive super trainer, better suited for picking up the pace and racing shorter distances, making it a great option for workouts, intervals, or even competitive events. The Mizuno, on the other hand, is a plated premium trainer that provides a more cushioned, comfortable experience with greater protection, which is ideal for runners seeking plushness on recovery runs.
Main Differences forMarathon Racing
Marathon Racing
Threshold
Marathon Racing
7.3
6.4
Forefoot Energy Return
8.2
4.5
Heel Energy Return
8.1
5.0
Weight
6.7
5.9
Heel Cushioning
6.4
8.9
Forefoot Cushioning
6.2
8.5
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.7
5.9
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Weight
240.6 g (8.49 oz)
260.8 g (9.20 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Heel Stack Height
37.2 mm
42.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.8 mm
33.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.4 mm
8.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Outsole Heel Width
92 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
67 mm (2.6")
83 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
113 mm (4.5")
116 mm (4.6")
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Internal Length
275 mm (10.8")
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
59 mm (2.3")
67 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
98 mm (3.9")
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Plastic
Performance
Heel Energy Return
8.1
5.0
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Heel Energy Return
86.1%
76.5%
Forefoot Energy Return
8.2
4.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Forefoot Energy Return
87.0%
76.0%
Heel Cushioning
6.4
8.9
Heel Cushioning Picture
Heel Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.90 J
1.52 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.22 J
4.52 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.05 J
7.86 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.2
8.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Forefoot Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.85 J
1.17 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.51 J
3.46 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
4.38 J
6.08 J
Heel Firmness
7.1
4.2
Heel Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
47.7 N/mm
27.9 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
57.8 N/mm
44.7 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
79.5 N/mm
67.7 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.0
6.8
Forefoot Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
51.0 N/mm
36.5 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
80.4 N/mm
58.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
120.4 N/mm
86.3 N/mm
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4
Mizuno Neo Vista
Comments
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 vs Mizuno Neo Vista: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.