Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Build Quality
    2. User Maintenance
    3. Recurring Cost
    4. Storing
    5. Dirt Compartment
    6. In The Box
    7. Range
    8. Portability
    9. Battery
    10. Quality Of Life Features
    11. Tools And Brushes
    12. Alternative Configuration
  5. Performance
    1. Hard Floor Pick-Up
    2. High-Pile Carpet Pick-Up
    3. Low-Pile Carpet Pick-Up
    4. Pet-Hair Pick-Up
    5. Suction
    6. Airflow
    7. Noise
    8. Maneuverability
    9. Pet Hair Furniture Performance
    10. Air Quality
    11. Cracks
    12. Stains
    13. Water
  6. Comments

Black+Decker 16V MAX dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum vs Shark WANDVAC

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

Black+Decker 16V MAX dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
Shark WANDVAC

Tested using Methodology v1.3

Updated Nov 14, 2024 06:58 PM

SEE PRICE
Walmart.com

Tested using Methodology v1.3

Updated Nov 18, 2024 04:55 PM

Amazon.com
Black+Decker 16V MAX dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum Picture
Shark WANDVAC Picture
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Car
  3. Handheld
  4. Budget And Cheap
  1. Recommended in 2 articles:
  2. Handheld
  3. Handheld For Pet Hair

Variants

  • CHV1410L32 (White)
  • CHV1410L (White/Blue)
  • WV201BLBRN (Cove)
  • WV201GDBRN (Gold)
  • WV200 (Graphite)
  • WV201RGBRN (Rose Gold)
  • WV201 (Slate)

Our Verdict

Black+Decker 16V MAX dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum

Shark WANDVAC

The Black+Decker 16V MAX dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum and the Shark WANDVAC have different strengths. The Black+Decker is better on bare floors, has a much larger dirt compartment, and has a longer continuous runtime. Conversely, the Shark does a better job capturing fine allergens, has virtually no recurring costs, is smaller and lighter, and performs better on low-pile carpet. It also recharges much faster.

0