Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Sound
- Isolation
- Microphone
- Active Features
- Connectivity
- Comments
Samsung Galaxy Buds Truly Wireless vs Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Samsung Galaxy Buds
Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless
Tested using Methodology v1.4
Updated Jan 16, 2024 02:00 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.5
Updated Jan 15, 2024 07:54 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
TypeIn-ear
EnclosureClosed-Back
WirelessTruly Wireless
TransducerDynamic
Noise CancellingNo
MicYes
TypeIn-ear
EnclosureClosed-Back
WirelessTruly Wireless
TransducerDynamic
Noise CancellingNo
MicYes
Variants
- Galaxy Buds (Black)
- Galaxy Buds (White)
- Galaxy Buds (Yellow)
- Pixel Buds 2 (Almost Black)
- Pixel Buds 2 (Clearly White)
- Pixel Buds 2 (Oh So Orange)
- Pixel Buds 2 (Quite Mint)
Our Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Buds Truly Wireless
Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless
The Samsung Galaxy Buds Truly Wireless are better truly wireless headphones than the Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless. The Galaxy Buds have a better-balanced sound profile and isolate much more background noise. On the other hand, the Pixel Buds pair to Android devices almost instantly, and have a much easier-to-use control scheme. Their companion app is also compatible with both Android and iOS, though it doesn't offer much in terms of customization options.
Check Price
Black
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeAlmost Black
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeClearly White
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeYellow
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeOh So Orange
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeQuite Mint
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeNotice: Two or more of the products selected have been tested with different test methodologies, so some of the results below aren't directly comparable. Learn how our test benches and scoring system work, and read more about the latest changes to our headphones test methodology.
Main Differences for
Threshold
Mixed Usage
7.5
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Design Picture 2
Type
In-ear
In-ear
Enclosure
Closed-Back
Closed-Back
Wireless
Truly Wireless
Truly Wireless
Transducer
Dynamic
Dynamic
Comfort
7.5
7.5
Comfort Picture
Weight
0.02 lbs
0.02 lbs
Clamping Force
0 lbs
0 lbs
Controls
5.4
6.9
Controls Picture
OS Compatibility
Not OS specific
Not OS specific
Ease Of Use
Decent
Great
Feedback
Okay
Good
Call/Music Control
Yes
Yes
Volume Control
No
Yes
Microphone Control
No
No
Channel Mixing
No
No
Noise Cancelling Control
No
No
Talk-Through
On/Off
No
Additional Controls
Voice Assistant
Voice Assistant
Breathability
9.2
9.2
Breathability After Picture
Avg.Temp.Difference
0.8 °C
0.8 °C
Portability
9.6
9.3
Portability Picture
L
2"
1.4" (3.6 cm)
W
1"
1.5" (3.8 cm)
H
0.5"
1.0" (2.5 cm)
Volume
1 in³
2.10 in³ (34.41 cm³)
Transmitter Required
No
No
Case
8.0
8.5
Case Picture
Type
Hard case
Hard case
L
2.8"
2.5" (6.4 cm)
W
1.5"
1.7" (4.3 cm)
H
1.1"
1.0" (2.5 cm)
Volume
4.6 in³
4.30 in³ (70.46 cm³)
Build Quality
7.5
7.5
Build Quality Picture
Stability
8.0
8.0
Stability Picture
Headshots 1
Angled Picture
Side Picture
Headshots 2
Front Picture
Rear Picture
Top
Top Picture
In The Box
In The Box Picture
Sound
Sound Profile
Frequency Response
Bass Amount
1 dB
-3.53 dB
Treble Amount
-0.75 dB
-2.66 dB
Frequency Response Consistency
9.8
9.1
Consistency L
Consistency R
Avg. Std. Deviation
0.04 dB
0.18 dB
Raw Frequency Response
Bass Accuracy
9.3
7.4
Std. Err.
0.99 dB
3.36 dB
Low-Frequency Extension
10 Hz
89.8 Hz
Low-Bass
0.95 dB
-5.83 dB
Mid-Bass
1.36 dB
-3.15 dB
High-Bass
0.53 dB
-1.55 dB
Mid Accuracy
9.0
9.3
Std. Err.
1.4 dB
0.95 dB
Low-Mid
0.03 dB
0.17 dB
Mid-Mid
-2.12 dB
0.31 dB
High-Mid
-0.45 dB
0.4 dB
Treble Accuracy
8.9
7.5
Std. Err.
1.41 dB
3.74 dB
Low-Treble
-0.01 dB
-0.56 dB
Mid-Treble
0.02 dB
-4.23 dB
High-Treble
-4.85 dB
-10.82 dB
Peaks/Dips
8.7
8.5
Peaks/Dips Graph
Peaks
0.97 dB
1.06 dB
Dips
0.57 dB
0.65 dB
Imaging
9.3
8.5
Phase Response
Phase Response Mismatch
Weighted Group Delay
0.16
0.11
Weighted Phase Mismatch
2
1.62
Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
0.07
1.7
Weighted Frequency Mismatch
1.29
1.62
Passive Soundstage
0.9
2.1
PRTF
PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
N/A
N/A
PRTF Size (Avg.)
N/A
N/A
PRTF Distance
N/A
N/A
Openness
3.2
6.6
Acoustic Space Excitation
0.8
2.7
Virtual Soundstage
0.0
0.0
Virtual Soundstage
Head Modeling
No
No
Speaker Modeling
No
No
Room Ambience
No
No
Head Tracking
No
No
Virtual Surround
No
No
Weighted Harmonic Distortion
7.8
7.2
Weighted Harmonic Distortion
WHD @ 90
0.211
0.504
WHD @ 100
0.134
0.170
Test Settings
Firmware
R170XXU0ATA2
225
Power
On
On
Connection
Bluetooth 4.2
Bluetooth 4.2
Codec
SBC, 16-bit, 48kHz
SBC, 16-bit, 48kHz
EQ
Off
No EQ
ANC
No ANC
No ANC
Tip/Pad
Silicone (small)
Silicone (small)
Microphone
Integrated
Integrated
Isolation
Noise Isolation
6.8
3.6
Noise Isolation
Isolation Audio
Overall Attenuation
-18.62 dB
-8.98 dB
Noise Cancelling
No
No
Bass
-3.65 dB
-0.51 dB
Mid
-18.7 dB
-6.73 dB
Treble
-34.99 dB
-20.18 dB
Leakage
9.3
7.6
Leakage Audio
Overall Leakage @ 1ft
25.12 dB
35.89 dB
Microphone
Microphone Style
Integrated
Yes
Yes
In-Line
No
No
Boom
No
No
Detachable Boom
No
No
Mic
Yes
Yes
Recording Quality
6.4
5.3
Microphone Frequency Response
Recorded Speech
LFE
403.18 Hz
630.82 Hz
FR Std. Dev.
5.27 dB
3.87 dB
HFE
4,902.93 Hz
3,272.31 Hz
Weighted THD
0.403
5.814
Gain
11.03 dB
2.73 dB
Noise Handling
5.9
6.0
SpNR
10.36 dB
34.13 dB
Noise Gate
Always On
Speech + Pink Noise Handling
7.0
Speech + Pink Noise Audio Sample
Speech + Subway Noise Handling
4.5
Speech + Subway Noise Audio Sample
Active Features
Battery
7.0
5.9
Battery Type
Rechargable
Rechargable
Continuous Battery Life
7.5 hrs
6.7 hrs
Additional Charges
1.0
5.0
Total Battery Life
15 hrs
40.2 hrs
Charge Time
1.6 hrs
1 hrs
Power-Saving Feature
Standby mode
No
Audio While Charging
Yes
No
Passive Playback
No
No
Charging Port
USB-C
USB-C
App Support
7.0
6.5
App Picture
App Name
Samsung Wearable
Google Pixel Buds
iOS
No
No
Android
Yes
Yes
macOS
Yes
No
Windows
Yes
No
Equalizer
Presets
No
ANC Control
No
No
Mic Control
No
No
Room Effects
No
No
Playback Control
No
No
Button Mapping
Yes
No
Surround Support
No
No
Connectivity
Bluetooth
6.6
6.6
Bluetooth Version
5.0
5.0
Multi-Device Pairing
No
No
NFC Pairing
No
No
Line Of Sight Range
100 ft
156.00 ft (47.55 m)
PC Latency (SBC)
372 ms
370 ms
PC Latency (aptX)
N/A
N/A
PC Latency (aptX HD)
N/A
N/A
PC Latency (aptX-LL)
N/A
N/A
iOS Latency
72 ms
178 ms
Android Latency
51 ms
189 ms
Non-Bluetooth Wireless
0.0
0.0
Non-BT Line Of Sight Range
N/A
N/A
Non-BT Latency
N/A
N/A
Wired
0.0
0.0
Cable Picture
Analog Audio
No
No
USB Audio
No
No
Detachable
No
No
Length
N/A
N/A
Connection
No Wired Option
No Wired Option
Analog/USB Audio Latency
N/A
N/A
PC Compatibility
Analog
No
Wired USB
No
Non-BT Wireless
No
PC / PS4 Compatibility
PC/PS4 Analog
No
No
PC/PS4 Wired USB
No
No
PC/PS4 Non-BT Wireless
No
No
PlayStation Compatibility
PS4 Analog
No
No
PS4 Wired USB
No
No
PS4 Non-BT Wireless
No
No
PS5 Analog
No
PS5 Wired USB
No
PS5 Non-BT Wireless
No
Xbox Compatibility
Xbox One Analog
No
No
Xbox One Wired USB
No
No
Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
No
No
Xbox Series X|S Analog
No
Xbox Series X|S Wired USB
No
Xbox Series X|S Non-BT Wireless
No
Base/Dock
2.2
2.2
Type
Charging Case
Charging Case
USB Input
No
No
Line In
No
No
Line Out
No
No
Optical Input
No
No
RCA Input
No
No
Dock Charging
Yes
Yes
Power Supply
USB-C
USB-C
Check Price
Black
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeAlmost Black
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeWhite
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeClearly White
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeYellow
Galaxy Buds
Searching
Finding storeOh So Orange
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding storeQuite Mint
Pixel Buds 2
Searching
Finding store
Samsung Galaxy Buds Truly Wireless
Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless
Comments
Samsung Galaxy Buds vs Google Pixel Buds 2020 Truly Wireless: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.