Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We've just launched Running Shoes! Dive into our R&D article to discover how we measure energy return and cushioning. We're just getting warmed up—if you're passionate about this, we're hiring!

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Running Shoe Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Picture
3.8
Marathon Racing
4.9
5K/10K Racing
0.8
Energy Return
7.3
Cushioning
8.3
Lateral Stability
Notice: This running shoe was replaced by ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a cushioned daily trainer that's been a staple in ASICS' running shoe lineup since the '90s. As the name suggests, it's designed for cloud-like comfort, with a high stack height, moderate heel-to-toe drop for smooth transitions, and PureGEL technology in the midsole for softer landings at the heel. It also features a fully gusseted tongue, an engineered upper, and a grippy AHARPLUS™ rubber outsole. While it isn't the lightest shoe, as one of ASICS' highest-stack daily trainers, it's a safe bet for runners who want a plush, everyday cruiser for easy miles and recovery runs. Just don't expect its EVA-based midsole foam to provide the responsiveness needed for faster paces.

Our Verdict

3.8 Marathon Racing

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a poor option for marathon racing. It's designed primarily for comfort rather than speed, with firm foam and heavier weight that make it less suited for picking up the pace. While its decent cushioning and high-stack design are good for longer distances, it doesn't have enough bounce and responsiveness for high-performance racing.

Pros
  • Decent cushioning.

Cons
  • Bad energy return.

  • Heavy.

4.9 5K/10K Racing

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a disappointing option for 5K/10K racing. It's primarily designed for easy runs and daily comfort rather than high-speed performance. It provides a good amount of firmness in the forefoot, which allows for more controlled toe-offs. However, the shoe is heavy, and its overall energy return is poor, lacking the springiness needed to compete at shorter distances.

Pros
  • Foam is quite firm overall.

Cons
  • Bad energy return.

  • Heavy.

0.8 Energy Return

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has terrible overall energy return. Its foam absorbs a lot of energy, especially in the heel, making for a less responsive ride.

Pros
Cons
  • Bad energy return.

7.3 Cushioning

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 provides a decent amount of cushioning. It's especially well-cushioned at the forefoot and the heel at higher forces, making it a good option for heavier runners.

Pros
  • Decent cushioning.

Cons
8.3 Lateral Stability

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has great lateral stability. The shoe has a very wide outsole that provides a stable platform, and its fully gusseted tongue and secure upper allow for good lockdown. The foam is also quite firm, especially in the forefoot, offering more stability and control. That said, its high stack height can take some getting used to if you're not familiar with more substantial models.

Pros
  • Wide outsole platform.

  • Fully gusseted tongue creates solid lockdown.

  • Foam is quite firm overall.

Cons
  • High stack height.

  • 3.8 Marathon Racing
  • 4.9 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 0.8 Energy Return
  • 7.3 Cushioning
  • 8.3 Lateral Stability

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We bought and tested the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 in Men's US size 9 in the Celadon/Light Celadon colorway, as viewable on the label.

Depending on your region, the shoe comes in several other color options, including Black/Graphite Grey, White/Birch, and Sheet Rock/Thunder Blue. At the same time, the women's version includes additional colorways like Blue Expanse/Aurora Green and Mint Tint/Pale Mint.

There are wide versions available for both men's and women's models. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a cushioned and comfortable shoe that's especially well-suited to longer, recovery, and easy runs. ASICS has redesigned the upper and the rubber outsole grip compared to the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 25, as well as updated the midsole with a firmer iteration of its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO foam. It isn't particularly lightweight but provides a stable, comfortable ride for those who prefer a higher stack height. Runners seeking a high-stack premium trainer for easy miles might also consider more extreme options in this category—like the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX, Nike Pegasus Premium, or Brooks Glycerin Max—which offer an even greater level of protection.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes.

HOKA Clifton 9

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 and the HOKA Clifton 9 are both popular, well-cushioned daily trainers, but each has its own advantages. The HOKA is lighter and offers better energy return, making it a bit more versatile. The ASICS, meanwhile, has a higher stack height and offers somewhat better cushioning, making it a bit more tailored to easy miles and recovery runs.

ASICS NOVABLAST 4

The ASICS NOVABLAST 4 and the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 are both solid daily trainers in ASICS' lineup, but they excel in different areas. The NOVABLAST 4 is more versatile and better at picking up the pace, with better energy return and a notably lighter weight. However, the GEL-NIMBUS 26 is firmer overall, offering more stability and making it a good fit for easy runs at slower paces.

ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31

The ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31 and ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 are both popular and long-standing models in ASICS' lineup, but they suit different needs. The GEL-KAYANO 31 is aimed at runners who need more stability, with dedicated support elements and a slightly wider outsole. The GEL-NIMBUS 26, on the other hand, is a more neutral daily trainer designed for maximum comfort, with a slightly higher stack height and more balanced cushioning in the heel and forefoot.

Saucony Triumph 22

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 and Saucony Triumph 22 are both premium daily trainers built for comfortable, easy runs. Both are on the heavier side, but the Triumph 22 uses a higher-end midsole that delivers more energy return and cushioning. The GEL-NIMBUS 26, on the other hand, offers a more stable ride. If you want max softness, go with the Triumph; if you value a bit more stability, the Nimbus is the better pick.

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is like a slightly more elevated (literally and figuratively) ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26. While both are designed with high-stack, max comfort in mind, the GLIDERIDE MAX is a bit lighter and has some added features, like a rocker and a partial EVA plate, that give it a slightly smoother ride. It's also got a more premium foam which is softer in the heel.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
4.2
Design
Weight
Weight
301.9 g (10.65 oz)

This isn't a particularly lightweight shoe, making it less suited to up-tempo runs and races.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
42.1 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
33.2 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm

The shoe's PureGEL midsole insert was displaced when cutting it, but we've included a picture of the PureGEL beneath the shoe so you can see what it looks like.

Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
84 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
115 mm (4.5")
Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
96 mm (3.8")

ASICS shoes typically run slightly longer than most other brands, and this model follows that trend—something to consider when selecting your size.

Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
Performance
0.5
Performance
Heel Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Heel Energy Return
69.9%

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has terrible energy return in the heel. While the addition of PureGEL material adds some comfort, it evidently doesn't help with energy return, resulting in minimal rebound.

0.9
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
See details on graph tool
Forefoot Energy Return
71.2%

There's a bit more energy return in the forefoot, but it's still bad overall. The foam in the midsole simply doesn't allow for very propulsive toe-offs. It's notably firmer than a more well-rounded shoe like the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 and doesn't return enough energy for a more responsive ride.

6.9
Performance
Heel Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
1.07 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
3.33 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
6.25 J

The cushioning at the heel is okay. It does an especially good job of absorbing energy at higher forces, making it a good fit for heavier runners or heel strikers who want a bit more protection underfoot.

7.6
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
See details on graph tool
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.97 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.84 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
5.01 J

The shoe has good impact absorption, with sufficient cushioning at the forefoot, which is good for heavier runners or forefoot strikers. However, if you prefer to have more ground feel, a less cushioned daily trainer like the HOKA Clifton 9 might be a better fit.

6.8
Performance
Heel Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
39.5 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
59.2 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
77.7 N/mm

The foam in the heel is reasonably firm, but it feels softer at higher forces. It provides enough stability for easier runs and forefoot strikers, though heavier runners and heel strikers will find it less rigid.

8.4
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
See details on graph tool
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
44.0 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
71.4 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
104.0 N/mm

The forefoot is even more firm than the heel, ensuring a stable ride and more controlled toe-offs, especially for forefoot strikers.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. This product has been merged with ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 26 Running Shoes, 10.5, Fren. Follow the discussion here.

You have 9/10 free reviews left
To access
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
and
other exclusive site features
Become an Insider