Tested using Methodology v1.11
Updated Nov 07, 2024 06:40 PM
Tested using Methodology v1.11
Updated Nov 26, 2024 09:37 PM
Samsung S95D OLED
Samsung S90D/S90DD OLED (QD-OLED)
The Samsung S90D/S90DD OLED and the Samsung S95D OLED are very similar TVs, but there are some differences. The S90D has less banding in colors due to its better HDR gradient handling and better pre-calibration SDR accuracy. On the other hand, the S95D has better PQ EOTF tracking and slightly better color volume, so HDR content is closer to the content creator's intent, and the TV can display colors a bit brighter. The S95D also comes with Samsung's Slim One Connect Box, so it's more versatile if you need quicker access to its ports, and its matte screen finish does an amazing job at essentially eliminating reflections caused by glare, albeit at the expense of picture quality.
Samsung S95D OLED
Samsung S90D/S90DD OLED (QD-OLED)
Comments
Samsung S95D OLED vs Samsung S90D/S90DD OLED (QD-OLED): Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
we need a review for the hp, people said sound different, !
we need a review for the hp one
I’d also like some help, mainly for Foobar2000 where the equalizer isn’t very in depth. I’m using this currently: https://i.imgur.com/Q8EuvGM.png I’d also like a better ffmoeg superequalizer preset for MPV. Not too comfortable using system-wide presets.
Hey and thanks for this question! We’ve heard a lot of reports about changes to the HyperX Cloud II since HP acquired HyperX. Obviously there have been some cosmetic differences: the interior logo has changed, the HyperX logo is now embossed rather than embroidered, the colours are slightly different and there’s no case. Some users also report changes in comfort due to a new headband design and even claim that the sound profile is significantly different. The official line from HyperX is that the product is exactly the same, save for the logo changes. We don’t have the data to corroborate this and haven’t tested the HP version so it’s hard to see beyond the subjectivity of individual user reports. That said, the quantity of these reports is concerning and it’s something we’d like to look into. We’ll update the review if we get more information.
However, we do feel that there’s value in our review of the Kingston version. There are still plenty of these available on the used market and they can occasionally be found on shelves. The Kingston version was made from 2015-2021, so there’s quite a few in circulation still.
Update: We’ve corrected ‘Detachable Cable’ from ‘Yes’ to ‘No’ in Wired.
Hi phongvu99,
You are correct. The cable is not detachable. We are currently bringing these headphones to our latest TB 1.6 Latency. Once that is done, we will update the “Detachable” connection to a “No” as this is a mistake in the review.
Dagobiet
Update: We’ve converted this review to Test Bench 1.6, which updates how we measure latency. We’ve updated and renamed the following test groups: Wired Connection, Bluetooth Connection, and Wireless Connection (Dongle). We’ve also added new codec latency measurements and provided an audio sample of recorded latency.
The cable is not detachable, yet in the Wired section, it is “Yes” with a 9.7 score?