The TCL QM7K is a mid-range TV released in 2025 and replaces the 2024 TCL QM7/QM751G QLED. It supports both 4k @ 144Hz and 1080p @ 288Hz with VRR on its two HDMI 2.1 ports. It also has two HDMI 2.0 ports, one of which doubles as an eARC port with full Dolby and DTS advanced audio passthrough. The TV supports both Dolby Vision HDR and HDR10+ formats and runs version 12 of the popular Google TV smart interface, so it also has smart features like voice control and is loaded with a ton of streaming apps. We bought and tested the 65-inch model, but it's available in five sizes total: 55, 65, 75, 85, and 98 inches.
The TCL QM7K is a very good mixed-usage TV. It's very bright, especially in SDR, so it's easily capable of overcoming glare from well-lit rooms. While it struggles a bit with glare from direct sources of light, it admirably handles glare from ambient sources, so it's truly a bright room standout, like when watching sports. It also excels in darker rooms due to its fantastic contrast and decent HDR brightness, even with its noticeable blooming; blacks are extremely deep on this TV even when bright highlights are on screen. It's a colorful TV, although it's not very accurate in HDR; color purists might want to get this TV calibrated for the best possible experience. Its processing is good overall, so it handles sub-optimal content quite well.
Great black levels deliver deep blacks no matter the room context.
Quite colorful, especially in HDR.
HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, up to 4k @ 144Hz or 1080p @ 288Hz, and VRR support.
Easily bright enough in SDR for well-lit rooms.
Black levels and colors stay deep and punchy in brighter rooms.
Sub-par HDR pre-calibration accuracy.
Some visible glare when placed directly opposite bright lights or windows.
The TCL QM7K is very good for home theater use. While there's a bit more blooming around highlights than you'd like, the TV's contrast is otherwise fantastic. The contrast leads to extremely deep blacks even when bright HDR highlights are on screen, which easily compensates for the TV's decent but unexceptional HDR brightness. The TV is also very colorful in HDR, although, unfortunately, it's not very accurate; color purists will want to get this TV calibrated. Thankfully, accuracy isn't an issue when dealing with how bright HDR content is, as it mostly follows the content creator's intent, even if it's a bit uneven. It also removes macro-blocking from movies streamed from apps and online sources very well, and it's also decent when upscaling low-resolution content. Stutter is kept to a minimum on this TV, although those sensitive to it will notice some. Finally, the TV supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+ and passes through both DTS and Dolby audio formats, making it very versatile.
Great black levels deliver deep blacks no matter the room context.
Great color volume in HDR.
Solid low-quality content smoothing.
Follows the content creator's intent very well.
Sub-par HDR pre-calibration accuracy.
The TCL QM7K is a very good TV for brighter rooms. It's very bright and colorful in SDR, and it's impressive when placed in rooms with mixed lighting sources; it really diminishes the impact of most of that glare. Plus, the TV's black levels barely raise in brighter rooms. That said, avoid placing any lights directly opposite the panel, as it doesn't deal as well with those, although it still lessens their impact somewhat.
Colorful in SDR content.
Easily bright enough in SDR for well-lit rooms.
Black levels and colors stay deep and punchy in brighter rooms.
Some visible glare when placed directly opposite bright lights or windows.
The TCL QM7K is a very good TV for sports. It's very bright in SDR, and its reflection handling in indirect lighting conditions is impressive; it really diminishes the impact of most lights. Unfortunately, it doesn't fare as well with lights placed directly opposite it, but it's passable. You're in luck if you like to watch your sports from streaming services, as the TV really excels when smoothing out low-bitrate content; it's hard to notice any macro-blocking, although there's some minor loss of detail. It doesn't fare as well when upscaling low-resolution content, like when watching sports from cable, so sports won't appear as clean-looking as you'd like. The TV's SDR color volume is good, so jerseys look lively and colorful, and they also look exactly as they should due to the TV's great SDR accuracy. Unfortunately, like many LED TVs, its viewing angle isn't the best for wide-angle viewing since the image noticeably dims when viewed from the sides. There's also some noticeable dirty screen effect, although it's more noticeable in dim scenes, of which there are few in sports.
Colorful in SDR content.
Easily bright enough in SDR for well-lit rooms.
Solid low-quality content smoothing.
Black levels and colors stay deep and punchy in brighter rooms.
Image degrades somewhat when viewed from extreme angles.
Some visible glare when placed directly opposite bright lights or windows.
The TCL QM7K is a solid TV for gamers. Its input lag is very low, and it supports every VRR mode and has a ton of supported resolutions, including 4k @ 144Hz and 1080 @ 288Hz. Its pixel transitions are decent, but they're fast for an LED, so any gamer who is used to gaming on that panel technology will be happy with this TV's responsiveness. Still, those used to OLEDs are going to notice some obvious motion blur, especially at lower refresh rates. The TV is very colorful in HDR, and its black levels are great, leading to an impressive HDR presentation overall.
Very low input lag.
Great black levels deliver deep blacks no matter the room context.
Great color volume in HDR.
HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, up to 4k @ 144Hz or 1080p @ 288Hz, and VRR support.
The TCL QM7K's brightness is very good overall, although it truly excels in SDR; it's easily bright enough to overcome glare in brighter rooms. Its HDR brightness is decent; highlights do still noticeably pop, however, partly due to the TV's fantastic contrast.
Easily bright enough in SDR for well-lit rooms.
The TCL QM7K's black level is great. Its contrast is fantastic; blacks always look extremely deep, even when very bright highlights are on screen. Its lighting zone precision, however, is decent; there's some noticeable blooming around bright highlights, and this is also noticeable on an entirely black background, but it's not too distracting.
Great black levels deliver deep blacks no matter the room context.
The TCL QM7K's color performance is good. Its HDR color volume is great, and its SDR volume is good, so it's definitely a colorful TV. Unfortunately, it falters a bit when it comes to HDR accuracy, as it's just sub-par. It's much more acurrate in SDR, however.
Great color volume in HDR.
Colorful in SDR content.
Sub-par HDR pre-calibration accuracy.
Note: We're in the process of improving our tests related to image processing, but this score should give you a general idea of how a TV performs overall with its image processing capabilities.
The TCL QM7K's image processing is good overall. It particularly excels when smoothing out macro-blocking from low bitrate content with its great low-quality content smoothing. Its PQ EOTF tracking is also great, if a bit uneven, as it mostly respects the content creator's intent. Its upscaling isn't quite as good, however; it's decent, but some details can be hard to make out. There's also some some noticeable banding in a few HDR color gradients, but it's not excessive.
Solid low-quality content smoothing.
Follows the content creator's intent very well.
The TCL QM7K is responsive in its Game Master mode, with its very low input lag, support for a variety of VRR modes, and a large number of supported resolutions. Its pixel transitions are also relatively fast for an LED TV, especially at 144Hz. Still, there's still some noticeable motion blur in many transitions, but it won't be noticeable to those used to gaming on an LED TV.
Very low input lag.
HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, up to 4k @ 144Hz or 1080p @ 288Hz, and VRR support.
We're in the process of fixing the way we evaluate a TV's overall motion handling. This section is currently broken, and the score isn't indicative of how well a TV handles motion overall.
We bought and tested the 65-inch TCL QM7K, and these results are also valid for the 55, 75, 85, and 98-inch models. The 98" model has two feet instead of a center stand as the smaller sizes have.
Note: TCL hasn't yet confirmed the number of dimming zones for each model size, although they did say that the model line has up to 2500 dimming zones on the bigger model.
Size | Model | Dimming Zones | Game Accelerator |
---|---|---|---|
55" | TCL 55QM7K | Unknown | 240 |
65" | TCL 65QM7K | 966 | 288 |
75" | TCL 75QM7K | Unknown | 288 |
85" | TCL 85QM7K | Unknown | 288 |
98" | TCL 98QM7K | ~2500 | 288 |
You can see our unit's label.
The TCL QM7K is a very good TV, with no real flaws. It has fantastic contrast, is very bright in SDR, and handles mixed reflections quite well. It's also a very good TV for gamers due to its relatively quick pixel transitions and plethora of gaming features. The TV is similar to 2024's TCL QM7/QM751G QLED and Hisense U7N, yet is a bit better overall due to its far superior contrast and better gaming features, so go for the QM7K over those if you can find it at a competitive price.
For more options, check out our recommendations for the best TVs, the best QLED TVs, and the best 4k gaming TVs.
The TCL QM7K is better than the TCL QM6K. The QM7K is brighter, has much better contrast, and is more colorful than the QM6K, delivering a much more impressive experience overall. The QM6K is, however, more accurate, but it doesn't do much to offset the QM7K's performance advantage.
The TCL QM7/QM751G QLED and the TCL QM7K are similar TVs, although the newer QM7K provides slightly better image quality due to its vastly improved contrast ratio. Still, the QM7 is brighter in HDR, sometimes delivering a more impactful HDR experience depending on the scene. While its contrast isn't as good overall, its black levels are comparable due to its slightly faster and more precise local dimming solution. It's also a bit more colorful than its successor. Gamers will appreciate the QM7K's slightly faster pixel transitions and 288Hz support at 1080p.
The TCL QM8/QM851G QLED is better than the TCL QM7K. While the QM7K has the better contrast, the QM8's local dimming solution is noticeably faster and more precise, giving the TV better overall black levels. The QM8 is also the more colorful TV overall. Unfortunately, the QM8's HDR brightness accuracy is quite poor, while the QM7K's is great, so it follows the content creator's intent much more closely.
The TCL QM7K is mostly better than the Hisense U7N. While the Hisense is brighter overall, the TCL's black levels are much better due to its vastly superior contrast ratio, giving it the more impactful image overall. Gamers will also appreciate the QM7K's 1080p @ 288Hz support, alongside noticeably faster pixel transitions than the Hisense.
The Hisense U8/U8N is better than the TCL QM7K. The Hisense delivers noticeably better image quality due to its higher peak brightness and more colorful panel. Its image processing is also generally better than the TCL, with the exception of PQ EOTf tracking; the TCL follows the content creator's intent much more closely than the Hisense. Gamers will also appreciate the TCL's 1080p @ 288Hz support.
The TCL QM7K's HDR brightness is decent. Highlights stand out during darker scenes, especially combined with its fantastic contrast.
We tested with Local Contrast set to 'High' as it makes for brighter highlights. Here are results with it set to 'Low':
Local Contrast 'Low,' Peak:
Local Contrast 'Low,' Sustained:
Here are measurements with Dynamic Tone Mapping (DTM) set to each of its three settings, all in the 'Movie' HDR Picture Mode:
Results with DTM set to Detail Priority:
Results with DTM set to Balance:
Results with DTM set to Brightness Priority:
The TV is a bit brighter when set to Game Master (the Game Mode equivalent).
Here are measurements with Dynamic Tone Mapping (DTM) set to each of its three settings, all in Game Master:
Results with DTM set to Detail Priority:
Results with DTM set to Balance:
Results with DTM set to Brightness Priority:
The TCL QM7K has amazing SDR brightness and is easily bright enough even for well-lit rooms.
The TV has decent lighting zone transitions. Still, there is some visible darkening on the leading edge of bright objects, with noticeable haloing.
The TV's black uniformity is good, although there's noticeable blooming around bright highlights when local dimming is enabled. With local dimming disabled, the screen is more uniform, yet blacks are noticeably raised, and there's some noticeable clouding and dirty screen effect on the right side of the screen.
The TCL QM7K's SDR color volume is good. It has great coverage of the commonly used DCI-P3 color space, although it can't quite fully display bright greens, yellows, and oranges. The TV's coverage of the wider BT.2020 space is alright; its color volume isn't quite good enough to fully display most colors, with the exception of some magentas.
Volume ΔE³ | DCI-P3 Coverage | BT.2020 Coverage |
---|---|---|
L10 | 94.65% | 71.91% |
L20 | 93.81% | 70.66% |
L30 | 94.86% | 71.53% |
L40 | 92.17% | 70.74% |
L50 | 90.30% | 69.94% |
L60 | 88.84% | 68.70% |
L70 | 87.87% | 63.34% |
L80 | 87.21% | 60.64% |
L90 | 87.05% | 60.28% |
L100 | 88.48% | 65.67% |
Total | 89.42% | 66.06% |
The TV has great HDR color volume. Dark saturated colors are displayed well due to the TV's fantastic contrast. The TV displays most colors at high luminance levels, but it does struggle a bit with magentas.
The TCL QM7K's SDR pre-calibration accuracy is great. All colors are slightly overrepresented in grays, but not by much, making the TV's color temperature just a tad too cold overall. Color accuracy is also great, with very minor color mapping issues throughout. Unfortunately, the TV's gamma is too bright in all scenes except the very darkest ones.
The TV's SDR image accuracy is fantastic after calibration. White balance is now almost perfect, and the TV's color temperature is now exactly on target, and so is gamma. Color accuracy is also vastly improved, as only some blues and cyans still have color mapping issues.
You can see our full calibration settings.
The TCL QM7K's HDR pre-calibration accuracy is sub-par. Blues are overrepresented in mid-grays and above, making the TV's color temperature very cold. Color accuracy is mediocre, with severe color mapping issues in most colors.
The TV's HDR accuracy after calibration is very good. White balance is now decent, although it still has some accuracy errors in mid-grays. Nevertheless, color temperature is now almost exactly on target. Color accuracy is also improved, although many colors are still off target.
The TCL QM7K has great PQ EOTF tracking, but it's rather inconsistent. All mastered content weaves below and above the curve, meaning that content is either overbrightened or underbrightened depending on how bright the content is. Still, overall, the TV stays close to the baseline curve.
The TV hard clips when it reaches its peak brightness with content mastered at 600 and 1000 nits, but no roll-off is necessary since the TV is bright enough to fully display most content mastered at those brightness levels. There's a roll-off near the TV's peak brightness to maintain details in highlights in content mastered at 4000 nits.
The TV's HDR native gradient handling is decent. Still, there's noticeable banding in dark grays and reds, and in brighter greens. Other color gradients have minimal banding.
The TV has very low input lag at all resolutions and refresh rate combinations when set to Game Master.
The TV supports all common resolutions up to 4k @ 144Hz on two of its four HDMI ports.
The TV supports all three types of variable refresh rate (VRR) technology to reduce screen tearing. Its VRR range caps out at 144Hz or 288Hz, depending on the resolution.
The TV's CAD at its maximum refresh rate is quite decent. There's a fair amount of overshoot when transitioning from black or dark shades to a brighter one, causing inverse ghosting. Still, overall, it provides consistent performance without excessive motion blur.
The TV's CAD at 120Hz is okay. Still, it has much more overshoot here than at its maximum refresh rate, leading to noticeable inverse ghosting.
The TV is fully compatible with everything the PS5 offers, like 1440p @ 120Hz and 4k @ 120Hz, as well as HDMI Forum VRR. It also supports Auto Low Latency Mode, so you don't have to worry about manually switching to Game Master to get the lowest input lag.
The TV is fully compatible with everything the Xbox Series X|S offers, including 1440p @ 120Hz, 4k @ 120Hz, HDMI Forum VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, and Dolby Vision gaming. It also supports Auto Low Latency Mode, so you don't have to worry about manually switching to Game Master to get the lowest input lag.
Due to the TV's relatively fast response time, there's some minor stutter when watching movies or TV shows, although most won't notice it.
The TV automatically removes judder from 24Hz sources and the internal apps. To remove judder from 60p and 60i sources, like a cable box, Motion Clarity needs to be set to 'On' with sliders set to '0.'
The TV has a great response time when watching content, although it's worse when coming out of dark states, leading to some motion blur. There's also noticeable overshoot in many transitions, leading to some inverse ghosting.
The TV has an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion. This feature is meant to reduce persistence blur and improve the appearance of motion. It works at both 60Hz and 120Hz, albeit with some obvious image duplication. Note that enabling this feature reduces the panel's overall brightness.
This TV has an optional motion interpolation feature to improve the clarity of motion, but it doesn't work very well. Even slower-moving scenes have some noticeable artifacts present. It really struggles with faster-moving scenes, and there are distracting artifacts and haloing.
The TCL QM7K's direct reflection handling is okay. It does somewhat diminish the intensity of direct light sources like a lamp placed opposite the screen, although it's not very effective. Still, it's a clear improvement over the TCL QM7/QM751G QLED.
Black levels barely raise on this TV in a room with ambient lighting, so you still get deep blacks regardless of your lighting conditions.
The TV has decent color saturation in a bright room. Still, there's some minor color degradation in well-lit contexts, but you're not likely to notice it.
The TCL QM7K isn't the best TV for a wide seating arrangement, but it'll do an alright job. As you move off-center, there's gamma shifting and brightness loss, and colors look increasingly washed out as you move further away to the sides. The TV does perform quite well when it comes to color shifting, however, so the colors don't hue shift (i.e., change colors) unless you're viewing the TV from a very wide angle.
The TV has okay gray uniformity, but there's some dirty screen effect towards the center of the screen, and the sides are a bit darker than the center. Its uniformity is a bit better on a very dark or near-black screen, but the sides of the screen are cloudy when compared to the center.
The TV uses a BGR (Blue-Green-Red) subpixel layout instead of the traditional RGB layout. This doesn't cause any issues for video or gaming content, but it can be a problem for PC monitor use as it impacts the text clarity, although not everyone will notice this.
The TV uses quantum dots to achieve high color peaks with excellent separation between blues, greens, and reds. This gives the TV great color purity and allows it to display a very color gamut.
The TCL QM7K has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on HDMI ports 1 and 2, with both supporting up to 4k @ 144Hz. HDMI 4 has eARC but is limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth, which is nice as you're not losing on an HDMI 2.1 port when you connect a soundbar to the TV. Unfortunately, the TV doesn't support ATSC 3.0, so over-the-air broadcasts are limited to 1080p.
The TV supports eARC, which lets you pass high-quality, uncompressed audio to a compatible receiver or soundbar through an HDMI cable. It supports all major audio formats, so you don't have to worry about compatibility with external sources.
The TV comes with an height adjustable center-mounted stand that doesn't require a large table to place the TV on. At its lowest position the stand lifts the TV about 2.2 inches above the table and 3.5 inches at its highest, which is high enough for almost any soundbar.
Footprint of the 65-inch stand: 15.47" x 14.49".
The back of the TV is made of plastic, with a grid-like pattern. All of the inputs except for the power connector are located on the right side of the TV when facing the front, and they're easy to access if you have the TV wall-mounted. The TV has clips on the back for cable management.
The TV has a sub-par frequency response. Its low-frequency extension response is bad, so there's very little bass. Its maximum volume is also quite low, so this isn't a good TV to use in a loud room. Otherwise, the TV's sound profile is quite balanced, as dialogue is very easy to understand.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
I recently bought the Sony X90L and absolutely love it (I’m upgrading from an old home projector). Unfortunately, the input lag is quite noticeable to me in fast-paced shooters. I can return it and pick up a TCL QM7K for roughly the same price. I’ve compared both models using the Rtings comparison tool, but the reviews I’ve found are pretty mixed.
In short, if you switch for the QM7K you’ll get slightly better picture quality overall and a more responsive gaming experience, but worse accuracy. If you care about creative intent and watch mainly movies in a dark room, you’ll probably be disappointed with the TCL. If you’re mainly gaming and enjoy a punchy image, the TCL is the better choice.
I recently bought the Sony X90L and absolutely love it (I’m upgrading from an old home projector). Unfortunately, the input lag is quite noticeable to me in fast-paced shooters. I can return it and pick up a TCL QM7K for roughly the same price. I’ve compared both models using the Rtings comparison tool, but the reviews I’ve found are pretty mixed.
Is Motion Right up there = HIGH ? I need this for Video Editing Via a USB Stick ? Is motion HIGH in this USB INPUT mode ?
We’ve just released a new video featuring the TCL QM7K here.
And I watched a lot of expert comparisons in the tube and the comparison of Fomo with Bravia 9. I think that Rtings has gone in a very wrong direction and here the comparisons are no longer appropriate. Incredibly high brightness ratings? And how do they see this brightness in movies? They put the TVs on 100% brightness and measure. If someone can stay w his OLED at 100% brightness, can you also play an LED TV, be it a mini LED, at 100% brightness? And watch a movie? Well, you might see a nice scene …and the rest, especially the dark ones, will be a wall of tears! This is exactly what we saw when Fomo tried to increase the brightness in the video comparing Bravia 7, Bravia 9, and last year’s TCL 8 series. The Sonys looked terrifying! I’m sorry that I can’t put a picture here so you can see exactly what I mean! In the comparison of the QM 7 with the SONY BRAVIA 9, there were very subtle differences, and in details that if you didn’t sit down to compare, you would never see. Also, this TV is now being released, and how many updates has the Bravia 9 had? 8 or 9 may be?
And yet, is there anyone who has ever watched a TV at 100% brightness, especially an expert in rtings?
And if this is really important, it is up to a certain limit! More? it is complete nonsense, except for showing muscles and justifying the high prices.
FYI …. Everytime you are watching HDR content on your tv, you’re watching the tv at 100% brightness. It switches back to whatever settings you had when SDR is again detected
I don’t mean to bring any side railing or negativity, but legit, I need to find a filter or block feature, because this guy you’re replying to talks in run-on sentences and all nonsense. Easier to ignore since it’s just YAPPING, and nothing that adds meaningful conversation. Use this thread to speak on your thoughts, experience, issues with the TCL QM7K. Ask for calibration like another member did, let the staff reply when they can, share disappointment and questions of “do I go with the QM751G over this since it’s measuring about the same?”– SOMETHING that is relevant. Having legible grammar helps when trying to make any point, too. Appreciate your comments here, though, meesbaker. When you said: “You get a more scientific approach here, cant argue with numbers. If you think the brightness measurements dont matter for you then I suggest ignore them, they do for most people.” I always say: people lie, numbers don’t. RTINGS is great for this. In a vacuum, the QM7K to me is great. To the point I question RTINGS’ numbers, because to my eyes, the QM7K on the home screen in Vivid, at 60 brightness, is AS bright and colorful as the Q750G I have downstairs in Vivid, at 100 brightness. In yet, the SDR scores in 100% windows are the same. Maybe It’s the smaller windows where this QM7K is well above it, but that’s what this portion of reviews are for. Questions, answers and just good conversation. Maybe I don’t understand it and could use some insights– From someone who can structure a legible response haha.
I hope someone from rtings will correct me if Im wrong here but iirc, how bright a tv is perceived is neither the peak brightness nor the 100% window measurement. Peak brightness should equate to HDR detail preservation and the 100% maximum full screen white. In the projector world we look at APL, average picture level. And most real content is comparable to something more like 20% there.
In not sure if the brightness measurenents for tvs can be applied equally here, but I do believe that the 20%-50% sustained numbers give you a better clue on how bright your TV feels. The 100% seems to be around 750 nits for all the better miniled/fald TVs but they surely dont look all the same bright - nowhere near!
And on that other homie , idk mate. Kinda cracks me up when someone complains about my tone who himself sounds disrespectful in every of his messages and types with …. and caps and shit like a child everywhere they go. If you deliver you gotta be able to take but yea- not relevant to the tv talk.
We all share a passion here - passion evokes emotion and stuff happens then when people talk its all cool and chill for me.
I think Im starting to get confused with what you are actually trying to say if there is anything. My whole point is simple, brightness is very important , not everyone will watch in a dark room thats why people measure it. What exactly are you criticising? And which TV are you saying has 180 zones and looks better than bravia 9? From all your comments from the beginning I think im no longer able to decipher the chaos but thats ok also I think 😂
I don’t mean to bring any side railing or negativity, but legit, I need to find a filter or block feature, because this guy you’re replying to talks in run-on sentences and all nonsense. Easier to ignore since it’s just YAPPING, and nothing that adds meaningful conversation. Use this thread to speak on your thoughts, experience, issues with the TCL QM7K. Ask for calibration like another member did, let the staff reply when they can, share disappointment and questions of “do I go with the QM751G over this since it’s measuring about the same?”– SOMETHING that is relevant. Having legible grammar helps when trying to make any point, too.
Appreciate your comments here, though, meesbaker. When you said: “You get a more scientific approach here, cant argue with numbers. If you think the brightness measurements dont matter for you then I suggest ignore them, they do for most people.”
I always say: people lie, numbers don’t. RTINGS is great for this. In a vacuum, the QM7K to me is great. To the point I question RTINGS’ numbers, because to my eyes, the QM7K on the home screen in Vivid, at 60 brightness, is AS bright and colorful as the Q750G I have downstairs in Vivid, at 100 brightness. In yet, the SDR scores in 100% windows are the same. Maybe It’s the smaller windows where this QM7K is well above it, but that’s what this portion of reviews are for. Questions, answers and just good conversation. Maybe I don’t understand it and could use some insights– From someone who can structure a legible response haha.