HDR brightness measures how bright a TV can get when displaying HDR content. Higher peak brightness produces brighter highlights that stand out more effectively.
For these tests, we measure the brightness of several white rectangles in HDR, each covering different portions of the screen. These measurements are given in cd/m² (also known as nits). We also display real-world content and measure specific points on the screen to determine how well the TV handles bright highlights in real content.
Our HDR Brightness test was last updated in Test Bench 1.7. Before this update, we had a similar test, although it did not include the three HDR real-scene tests. Additionally, we did not calibrate the HDR white point to 6500K before measuring brightness, so the results are not directly comparable with subsequent test benches. Furthermore, our PQ EOTF Tracking test was originally part of the HDR Brightness test suite until Test Bench 1.8, after which we gave it its own dedicated test. Learn more about how our test benches and scoring system work.
1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.10 | 1.11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Three HDR real-scene tests | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Calibration prior to taking measurements | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
While SDR brightness mainly matters in bright rooms to help counteract glare, a higher peak brightness in HDR is more about overall picture quality. This extra brightness allows a TV to display brighter highlights and often more vivid colors, making it important to choose a bright TV for an authentic HDR experience. Learn more about HDR.
For our tests, we measure how bright a TV can get when displaying HDR content in two ways. First, we use static test slides representing different content types to measure brightness levels. Second, we measure the brightness of specific points of light in real content. We also evaluate how precisely the TV follows the PQ EOTF (Perceptual Quantizer Electro-Optical Transfer Function), which you can read more about in the Additional Information section of this article.
We conduct two sets of peak brightness measurements when evaluating HDR brightness on TVs. The first set uses five different test slides, displayed in the TV's most accurate HDR Picture Mode, with the backlight at its maximum setting and the white point calibrated to 6500K.
These five test slides help us determine the TV's peak brightness under various content conditions. We also observe whether the TV maintains its brightness or dims over time. The slides are sent from a computer, and we take measurements using a Colorimetry Research CR-100.
We also take three measurements using real scenes provided by our Murideo 7G generator. These three tests form the core of our scoring because, unlike our TV testers, most people don't spend all day watching test patterns. Each scene varies significantly in its average picture level (APL)—the scene's overall brightness—pushing the TVs to their limits in handling both bright scenes and small bright highlights in relatively dim settings.
Although we have permission to use these source clips for testing and to publish our results, legal restrictions prevent us from sharing the original files. For these measurements, we use a Konica Minolta LS-100 Luminance Meter.
For our first real scene test, we display a bright hallway shot. We measure the peak brightness of the two overhead lights and record the higher value. These small highlights are designed to be very bright, so they should measure around 1,950 cd/m² on an ideal TV. Beyond these highlights, the entire scene should also appear bright, like it is on the Samsung QN90D QLED below.
However, on TVs without local dimming or those with low peak brightness—such as the Hisense A7N shown to the right of the Samsung—everything can look dim, making it difficult to see fine details in the darker areas.
For the skyscraper scene test, we display a nighttime cityscape and measure the peak brightness of the bright yellow skyscraper near the bridge's arch. Ideally, this highlight should reach about 700 cd/m². Interestingly, because this scene has a relatively low average picture level (APL), many of the brightest TVs render this highlight brighter than intended, even those that don't meet the target brightness in our other real scene tests.
Comparing the Samsung QN90D QLED to the Hisense A7N below, you can see that the Hisense image's overall detail is more difficult to discern, and the skyscraper doesn't stand out much from the surrounding buildings.
For the landscape real scene test, we measure the peak brightness of a small triangle on the pool along the bottom edge. On an ideal TV, this should measure around 300 cd/m².
Continuing with the Samsung QN90D QLED and Hisense A7N examples, you can see the advantage of the brighter Samsung here, although it's not nearly as big of a difference as with the other photos. Still, if you focus on the clouds, you can see them looking faded and hazy on the Hisense, while they're noticeably brighter on the Samsung.
In our peak window tests, we measure the maximum brightness of a white rectangle that covers a specific percentage of the TV's screen. This illustrates how bright, small highlights—like the sun or a distant explosion—can appear, while larger windows simulate broader bright regions, such as a bright sky.
We use five different slides at 2%, 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% Average Picture Level (APL). A Konica Minolta LS-100 Luminance Meter, connected to a PC, records the luminance of the rectangle over time. This allows us to determine the TV's peak brightness and track its sustained brightness for subsequent tests.
We measure HDR sustained brightness using the same test images from our HDR peak window tests, but the key difference is that we take our measurements after the window has been displayed for a few seconds. This allows the TV's brightness to stabilize and better represents content with bright areas that remain on screen for longer periods, like a hockey broadcast.
Unlike in SDR mode, it's not unusual for TVs to dim over time when displaying HDR content. This behavior is due to the fact that HDR highlights are generally meant to be short bursts of intense brightness—such as an explosion—rather than sustained levels of high brightness.
Most TVs employ algorithms to limit overall brightness, especially for large bright areas like those in our 100% peak window test. This is done to prevent the TV from becoming too bright and potentially damaging its internal components. As a result, small bright areas are generally brighter than large bright areas, and we measure the difference between them. Our Automatic Brightness Limiter (ABL) coefficient takes this difference into account by normalizing for perceptible variations using the Perceptual Quantizer (PQ) EOTF. Essentially, we only calculate the brightness differences that viewers can actually see.
A TV with an ABL of 0 indicates that it doesn't alter brightness based on the size of bright areas. Conversely, TVs with high ABL—often OLEDs—have noticeably lower brightness in large bright areas. It's also possible for small highlights to appear dimmer than larger areas on certain TVs due to frame dimming.
We also repeat the real scene and slide tests in Game mode to measure HDR brightness under gaming conditions. Our testing process is identical—we use the same videos and slides—but the TV is set to 'Game' mode. On some TVs, 'Game' mode simply reduces input lag, whereas on others, it represents an entirely different picture mode compared to the one used in our standard HDR tests. Most TVs don't become noticeably dimmer in 'Game' mode, but certain models, such as the LG C4 OLED, do. As a result, the HDR experience can vary when gaming.
The PQ Electro-Optical Transfer Function (PQ EOTF) is a mathematical formula that translates the digital signal from HDR content into on-screen brightness. In simpler terms, it converts the 1s and 0s that define how bright a scene should be into the actual light output you see on your TV. Although not part of our HDR brightness testing, the PQ EOTF is crucial to achieving proper HDR image quality. We measure it as a separate test and present the results in a graph.
For the ABL calculation to be meaningful, it needs to reflect how we perceive different brightness levels. Our eyes are much more sensitive to small changes in darker areas than in brighter ones, so a drop from 25 cd/m² to 20 cd/m² is more noticeable than going from 100 cd/m² to 95 cd/m². We use the PQ EOTF to linearize these measurements, ensuring they account for perceptual differences, as shown below.
PQ (Perceptual Quantizer) is a function that maps luminosity to perceived differences in brightness. In a 12-bit system, the PQ curve is divided into 4,096 steps, each represented by a horizontal dotted line. The first step in each segment corresponds to a greater change in perceived brightness than the last step. We use this curve to linearize all of our luminosity measurements for the ABL calculation, ensuring they match how we actually perceive brightness changes.
Some TVs offer different highlight brightening settings, and often, these settings require enabling local dimming. This combination can lead to light blooming off bright highlights, like a glowing effect when there are small light sources in a dark scene. This can get distracting and negatively impact the picture quality.
For that reason, you should choose the highlight setting that you enjoy the best. This may mean getting the brightest highlights your TV is capable of, or it might mean settling for slightly dimmer highlights that come with less blooming.
You're the one watching your TV, so if you want to make the image brighter, do whatever it takes to make it look better for your viewing experience. These are just generalized recommendation settings, and they change between TVs. We use the most accurate Picture Mode in our settings, but you might prefer some of the brighter, less accurate ones, especially if you're watching TV in a well-lit room.
A TV's brightness indicates how bright images can get on the screen. TVs with high brightness help deliver a better HDR experience, as they allow for highlights to stand out the way the creator intended. We test for a TV's brightness to know exactly how bright it can get, but also to see if it remains a consistent brightness level across different content.
What do you think of our article? Let us know below.
Want to learn more? Check out our complete list of articles and tests on the R&D page.
I see that Apple Ipad Pro and Pro Display XDR monitor have 1000 nits 100% sustained brightness ? But some of the best OLED HDR TVs have it around 200-300 nits (some QLEDs have above 650). Also the weightage for 100% sustained brightness, in your tests, is very low. Wanted to understand why would some displays aim for high 100% sustained brightness if its not that imp ?
The difference is due to how and where those types of displays are used . With something like an iPad, high brightness is needed to overcome glare, as you’re often moving around with it and won’t always be in a place where you can control the ambient light. You might even be outdoors, so the ability to crank up the peak brightness is essential for a device like that.
With the XDR monitor, well that mainly targets content creators. When mastering video you want to be able to see the full range of brightness in the content you’re mastering, so it’s important to have a display that exceeds the maximum brightness you want to encode.
With TVs, however, the usage is a bit different. In HDR, for example, the vast majority of content is under 300 nits. Small specular highlights often get significantly brighter than that, but these are usually very small areas of the screen. So you don’t need a TV that can sustain 1000+ nits on the entire screen, as the content won’t need that, anyway, and it would be very uncomfortable to watch something like that.
I see that Apple Ipad Pro and Pro Display XDR monitor have 1000 nits 100% sustained brightness ? But some of the best OLED HDR TVs have it around 200-300 nits (some QLEDs have above 650). Also the weightage for 100% sustained brightness, in your tests, is very low.
Wanted to understand why would some displays aim for high 100% sustained brightness if its not that imp ?