The Shark Rocket Corded is an entry-level corded stick vacuum. Compared to pricier models like the Shark APEX UpLight or newer alternatives like the Shark Stratos UltraLight, it's pretty bare-bones in overall design, with relatively few convenience features, a fairly rudimentary single-roller floorhead, and a somewhat cheap-feeling plastic construction. That said, it's highly affordable and very maneuverable.
The Shark Rocket performs satisfactorily on bare floors. It does a decent job of cleaning most kinds of debris, though it might struggle slightly with larger ones. It's reasonably easy to maintain and has few recurring costs, which is nice. Unfortunately, it has sub-par build quality, with plastic elements that feel a little fragile.
Struggles with larger debris.
The Shark Rocket is okay for low-pile carpet use. It does a poor job of tackling pet hair as well as fine and large debris. Moreover, smaller material can easily get caught in its floorhead's wheels, making it difficult to roll around smoothly. On the upside, its overall maneuverability is good, and the vacuum has few recurring costs.
Struggles with some debris.
The Shark Rocket is not bad for use on high-pile carpets. It has a dedicated setting for high-pile carpets, though this doesn't change its height, so it can still get stuck on plusher rugs. It also struggles to suck up some particles on this surface. That said, it's still reasonably easy to maintain and doesn't have many recurring costs.
Struggles with some debris.
The Shark Rocket is okay for handling pet hair. It does an alright job of sucking up pet hair on low-pile carpets, but it leaves some pet hair around the two brush roll guards. It does a better job on bare floors, though. There's an indicator light to warn you when your brush head becomes clogged, which can be handy when you have a heavily shedding pet. However, there's no pet grooming brush or a HEPA filter to seal in allergens.
Pet hair can get missed around the two brushroll guards.
The Shark Rocket is decent for use on stairs. It's portable, and you can quickly reconfigure it as a handheld vacuum. It also has good performance on bare floors, which is great if you have hardwood stairs. Unfortunately, its power cord is somewhat short, making it challenging to clean taller staircases.
The Shark Rocket is okay for cleaning cars. The HV302 variant comes with a Home & Car Detail kit to clean tight spots; you can also use it as a handheld vacuum by detaching the extension wand. Unfortunately, it has sub-par performance on low-pile carpets, as it can miss some debris of various sizes. Also, its power cord is short, so you'll probably need an extension cord to reach every part of your car's interior.
The Shark Rocket is poor for workshop cleaning, though that isn't its intended use. It can't deal with liquid spills, and heavy-duty debris like wood or metal shavings could damage its internals.
We've added text to this review for the new tests added in Test Bench 1.3.
The Shark Rocket Corded, sometimes referred to as the Shark Rocket Ultra-Light, is available in a few different models.
Model Number | Color | Included Brushes and Tools | Notes |
HV300/HV300C | Blue | Wide upholstery tool, crevice tool, soft-bristle dusting brush | HV300C is the Canadian designation for this model |
HV301 | Orange | Upholstery tool/Hard bristle brush, crevice tool | |
HV302 | Orange | Upholstery tool/Hard bristle brush, crevice tool, Home & Car Detail Kit | |
CS110/CS110GN | Red, Green | Crevice tool | CS110GN is exclusive to Amazon |
Let us know in the discussions if you encounter another variant of this vacuum.
The Shark Rocket Corded is a corded stick/handheld vacuum. It has a lightweight, easy-to-use design and has excellent performance on bare floors. However, its build quality is unimpressive compared to the other vacuums in Shark's lineup, especially newer models like the Shark Stratos UltraLight, and is lacking in terms of convenience features.
If you're shopping for an alternative, take a look at our list of recommendations for the best corded vacuums, the best bagless vacuums, and the best vacuums for tile floors.
The Dyson V8 is a better stick/handheld vacuum for cleaning low- and high-pile carpets than the Shark Rocket Corded. The Dyson has a HEPA filter, is easier to store, and, most importantly, is cordless, so its range is limited only by the remaining charge. You can also adjust its power level, which is nice. However, the Shark performs a bit better on bare floors, and it's easier to maintain.
The Shark APEX Upright is a better performing vacuum than the Shark Rocket Corded. The APEX Upright feels slightly better built, it has a bigger dirt compartment, and it comes with a turbo brush for helping you clean fabric-covered furniture. It cleans a mix of surfaces in a more efficient way than the Rocket. On the other hand, the Rocket Corded weighs less, it's easier to maintain, and it has fewer recurring costs. However, its cable is a little bit shorter than the APEX Upright.
The Dyson V11 is a better overall vacuum than the Shark Rocket Corded. The Dyson stores easier, has a bigger dirt compartment, and is cordless, so you can go anywhere with it. It can also adjust its power level to better suit the mess, and it comes with several tools that help to clean more specific objects like blinds, which is nice. On the other hand, the Shark is corded, so you never have to worry about running out of battery life or recharging it.
Both the Shark Rocket Pet Pro and Shark Rocket Corded vacuums have advantages; one may suit you better than the other, depending on your needs. The Pet Pro is a cordless stick vacuum that allows you to clean far away from any electrical outlets. It's also better built, easier to store, and more maneuverable, and it delivers slightly better performance on all surface types. Meanwhile, the Rocket is a corded vacuum with a virtually indefinite runtime and practically no recurring costs. There are also fewer parts that need regular cleaning.
The Shark Vertex UltraLight Corded and Shark Rocket Corded have different advantages, so depending on your needs, one might suit you better than the other. The Vertex feels better built and has a longer overall range. However, the Rocket is a little bit easier to maintain.
The Shark Stratos UltraLight is better than the Shark Rocket Corded. The Stratos feels sturdier, takes up less room when not in use, is fitted with an onboard HEPA filter, has a longer range, and has a more powerful suction motor, resulting in better performance on most surfaces. However, the Rocket is a little lighter.
The Shark ION F80 Cord-Free MultiFLEX is a better overall vacuum than the Shark Rocket Corded. As a cordless vacuum, the ION F80 has an unlimited range, and it's only just a bit heavier than the Rocket. It also feels slightly better built, and there are even variants of this vacuum with more included tools, which is nice too. However, you'll need to replace the post-motor filter of the ION F80 every six months.
The Shark APEX UpLight is better overall than the Shark Rocket Corded. It has a better build quality, a bigger dirt compartment, and a longer range. The Rocket, instead, is easier to maintain and lighter to hold.
Build quality is mediocre. While the vacuum itself doesn't flex or creak while in use, the plastic used in its construction feels cheap. It's especially problematic since this vacuum doesn't stay upright on its own and is prone to falling over when you try to lean it on something. The wheels under the main head also don't always roll very smoothly. Fortunately, an indicator light lets you know if there's a blockage in the brush head or if the vacuum is overheating. If you want a corded stick/handheld vacuum that feels better built, consider the Shark Vertex UltraLight Corded.
This vacuum has a couple of parts that need periodic cleaning.
This vacuum incurs virtually no recurring costs. As per the manufacturer, the filters will last the vacuum's lifetime. However, you can buy a full replacement set of filters to maintain performance and extend the lifespan of the vacuum.
This vacuum is a little tricky to store. To keep the vacuum upright, you'll have to detach the main compartment from the wand and rest it on the vacuum head. This helps keep it from tipping over, but it's not very intuitive, and the vacuum still takes up quite a bit of space. You also can't store any of the included brushes or tools on the vacuum, but it does come with a bag for carrying around its accessories.
The dirt compartment is acceptable. It's small, so it needs emptying fairly often. Thankfully, it's easy to see through the clear plastic, and there's a clearly marked max fill line to let you know when you need to empty it.
The HV302 variant of this vacuum comes with all of the above components, along with:
The range is somewhat short. The cord extends up to just over 25 feet, which likely isn't long enough for you to go from room to room without swapping outlets. You could consider the Shark Stratos UltraLight if you want a corded stick vacuum with a longer range. Alternatively, if you don't want to worry about staying close to a power outlet, the Shark Pet/Rocket Pro Cordless is a good option that delivers similar overall performance in a cordless package.
The hose included in the detail kit also only has a reach of 2.5 feet, which may not be enough when trying to access hard-to-reach spots in your home or car.
This vacuum is quite portable. It's heavier than many cordless stick vacuums but still weighs less than other corded stick vacuums like the Shark APEX UpLight. However, you may want to consider the upright/handheld BISSELL Featherweight Stick if you want something lighter.
This is a corded vacuum without a battery.
This vacuum has a few additional features to make it easier to use. While you can't adjust the vacuum's power level, you can toggle between two surface type settings manually: setting 'I' is for bare floor and area rugs, while setting 'II' is for high-pile carpets. This only changes the brushroll speed, though, not its height.
This vacuum comes with several different tools, brushes, and accessories. There's a hard-bristle brush that clips onto the upholstery tool. The main crevice tool and the under-appliance wand can be used directly with the vacuum or attached to the main wand.
Note: The "Home & Car Detail Kit" of the HV302 model we tested includes a small hose, a miniature crevice tool, and a handful of differently-shaped adapters. If you lose or damage one of these parts, then some of the detailing accessories are no longer usable.
Real-world suction performance is poor. This vacuum's suction inlet is positioned too high above the ground to get a tight seal.
This vacuum has decent airflow performance, though it might not offer the same power level as a corded upright like the Shark Rotator Lift-Away ADV. Still, it's similar to mid-range cordless models like the Dyson V8 in its ability to generate air movement. As such, it won't have too much trouble dealing with heavy debris.
This vacuum is a little on the louder end of the scale. It makes more noise than a comparably priced cordless model like the JASHEN V16; that being said, it won't be too disruptive for people nearby if you're vacuuming a room away.
This vacuum has good maneuverability. The under-appliance wand makes cleaning underneath couches and low tables a breeze—you don't have to crouch, so you can maintain full mobility even when cleaning under very large pieces of furniture. The upholstery tool is also easy to use and maneuver around. However, this vacuum tends to suck up rug tassels due to the lack of height adjustment. The main head also can't make very sharp turns either, meaning you need to watch out for obstructions like chair or table legs and coat racks.
This vacuum does an excellent job of cleaning pet hair on furniture. Even when compared to other vacuums that come with a turbo brush attachment like the Dyson V8, the Shark's simple pure-suction upholstery nozzle is remarkably effective for this kind of task. That said, the dustbin's vertical orientation and protruding shape make using the vacuum in a handheld configuration somewhat cumbersome.
This vacuum is reasonably effective in trapping small particles, though it doesn't have a HEPA-rated post-motor filter.
This vacuum does a mediocre job of handling debris in cracks and crevices. Compared to newer Shark vacuums, like the Shark Stratos UltraLight, it doesn't have a secondary soft roller to help lift debris from cracks on hard floors.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
Update: We uploaded the brightness measurements and uniformity photos after running the TV for four months in our Accelerated Longevity Test.
Hay un error en la actualización del degradado de la A80J, o esta correcto, estaba en 9.3 y ahora en 5.8, se equivocaron al publicar la actualización?
A huge gap btw A80J’s HDR Native Gradient and previous SDR Gradient, far way off my viewing HDR/DV expearance on 55A80J . Will you pls provide the test video to check!
A huge gap btw A80J’s HDR Native Gradient and previous SDR Gradient, far way off my viewing HDR/DV expearance on 55A80J . Will you pls provide the test video to check!
This is actually something we’ve looked into it and it looks like their may have been an issue with the pattern, so we’re retaking the gradient on a handful of tv’s that were affected by the bug. We’ll get our review updated ASAP!
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
El Gradiente nativo HDR de la Sony 80j está bien la medición anterior de 9.3. o la actual de 5.8 ? aunque en mi experiencia personal no veo un resultado tan malo
El Gradiente nativo HDR de la Sony 80j está bien la medición anterior de 9.3. o la actual de 5.8 ? aunque en mi experiencia personal no veo un resultado tan malo
Esto está relacionado con una actualización reciente de nuestra parte. Pero si no notas ningún problema, está bien. Si te gusta la experiencia, ¡eso es lo único que importa!
Esto está relacionado con una actualización reciente de nuestra parte. Pero si no notas ningún problema, está bien. Si te gusta la experiencia, ¡eso es lo único que importa!
Gracias pero me gustaría más a fondo lo sucedido ya es resultado final ya no van a corregir nada o está en proceso y si me pudiera explicar el cambio muchas gracias ya que a mí me fascina su pagina
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
What’s the Score for Movies? There isn’t one visible, only the HDR one.
Simplemente en todas las demás análisis de internet de el. 55 a 80j no lo califican mal en las películas hdr me gustaría que con una imagen real de un estudio me enseñen el porque de su calificación de 5.8? Degradado hdr gracias saludos
Referente a la. 55a80j. la compare contra la 55a80k junto con un experto y checo que el degradado hdr es igual en las 2 y la 55a80k está calificada mucho mejor en su análisis ojalá me pudieran explicar con una imagen real de su calificación baja para el. 55a80j? gracias
When will you guys update the text of this whole review? It feels very jarring to see a 5.8 score for HDR native gradient, and then a text that says “Gradients look fantastic on the Sony A80J, with very little visible banding aside from a bit in the grays and greens. The Smooth Gradation feature can help even out gradients in low-quality content.”
When will you guys update the text of this whole review? It feels very jarring to see a 5.8 score for HDR native gradient, and then a text that says “Gradients look fantastic on the Sony A80J, with very little visible banding aside from a bit in the grays and greens. The Smooth Gradation feature can help even out gradients in low-quality content.”
Hey there, thanks for bringing this up, you’re right that some of these reviews aren’t in a great state at the moment. We have limited writing resources and rarely have the time to rewrite older reviews, but we’ll be updating a few of them in the next few weeks. I know you’ve asked this question on a few reviews, but we haven’t decided which ones we’ll be updating yet.
Update: We’ve updated the text in the review to reflect our latest test methodology updates and to add information about the Accelerated Longevity Test.
Hey there, thanks for bringing this up, you’re right that some of these reviews aren’t in a great state at the moment. We have limited writing resources and rarely have the time to rewrite older reviews, but we’ll be updating a few of them in the next few weeks. I know you’ve asked this question on a few reviews, but we haven’t decided which ones we’ll be updating yet.
Thanks for answering! And I’m happy to see the text in the Sony A80J review has been updated! I hope that the text in the Samsung AU8000 gets updated too!
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
Dicen que el degradado nativo hdr puede haber salido tan bajo bajo después de que había salido muy bien entonces podrían ejemplificarlo con imagines en las 2 situaciones de la Sony 80j porque sino hay confusión en el estudio Gracias
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
Yo tengo este tv y tengo exactamente un año y medio con el y no tiene ninguna marca d retención de imagen ya que sigo los consejos del fabricante al pie d la letra y aparte el degradado hdr es perfecto como al principio puedo pensar que la tv de este modelo que les dieron a probar estaba con alguna falla particular
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
Beware of Sony TVs: Defective Products and Violations of Consumer Protection Laws
SONY CASE #: 100050326 I purchased a Sony TV (model #XR77A80J) from Best Buy for over $3,000, trusting Sony’s reputation for high-quality electronics. After just two years, the TV stopped turning on with no damage or external cause, a clear sign of a defect.
When I contacted Sony customer support on 11/21/2024 , I was transferred through four departments, spending hours trying to resolve the issue. Despite my efforts, Sony refused to repair or replace the defective TV. This model is notorious for widespread defects, as evidenced by hundreds of online reviews, yet Sony continues to sell it without taking responsibility for its failures.
Their refusal to act violates key consumer protection laws, including:
Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), which prohibits deceptive business practices. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which requires companies to honor warranties and ensure defective products are repaired or replaced. I filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to hold Sony accountable. The case number is [insert case number here], and I encourage others facing similar issues to file their own complaints.
As a U.S. Navy veteran, I expected better from Sony. Instead, I was left with a $3,000 defective product and abysmal customer service. Their refusal to address a known issue shows a shocking lack of integrity and accountability.
If you’re considering a Sony TV, especially model #XR77A80J, I urge you to think twice. Sony’s failure to honor warranties and unethical business practices are unacceptable. There are better, more reliable brands that value their customers and stand behind their products.
Don’t make the same mistake I did. Sony’s actions are a warning to all consumers.
Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.