Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Wi-Fi
- Wi-Fi Coverage
- Comments
TP-Link Deco BE63 vs TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
TP-Link Deco BE63
TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Oct 30, 2024 04:41 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Oct 30, 2024 04:55 PM
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
Variants
- Deco BE63 (White (1 Pack))
- Deco BE63 (White (2 Pack))
- Deco BE63 (White (3 Pack))
- Deco BE65 Pro (White (1 Pack))
- Deco BE65 Pro (White (2 Pack))
- Deco BE65 Pro (White (3 Pack))
Our Verdict
TP-Link Deco BE63
TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro
The TP-Link Deco BE63 and the TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro are both Wi-Fi 7 mesh routers in TP-Link's Deco lineup. They look nearly identical and perform similarly, but the BE65 Pro has one 2.5Gbps and two 5Gbps network ports, while the BE63 has four 2.5Gbps ports.
Check Price
White (1 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (1 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEARCH
Amazon.comWhite (2 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (2 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.comWhite (3 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (3 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.comMain Differences forApartment/Condo
Apartment/Condo
Threshold
Apartment/Condo
8.8
8.8
Full Comparison
Design
Dimensions
7.9
7.9
Dimensions Photo
Height
6.85" (17.4 cm)
6.85" (17.4 cm)
Width
4.21" (10.7 cm)
4.21" (10.7 cm)
Depth
4.21" (10.7 cm)
4.21" (10.7 cm)
Depth With Cables
5.51" (14.0 cm)
5.51" (14.0 cm)
Network Ports
8.6
8.6
Ports Photo
WAN Port Speed
2.5 Gbps
5.0 Gbps
LAN Port Count
3
2
10 Gbps Ports
0
0
2.5 Gbps Ports
4
3
1 Gbps Ports
0
0
10 Gbps Ports (SFP+)
0
0
USB Ports
USB-A 3.0 Ports
1
0
USB-A 2.0 Ports
0
1
USB-C Ports
0
0
USB-C Speed
N/A
N/A
In The Box
In The Box Photo
Wall/Ceiling Mount
0.0
0.0
Mount Photo
Mount Type
None
None
Wi-Fi
Interior Long Range
8.5
8.4
Long Range Graph
Lowest Speed
626 Mbps
578 Mbps
Average 5GHz Speed
772 Mbps
745 Mbps
Average 6GHz Speed
1,442 Mbps
1,300 Mbps
Interior Short Range
8.8
8.9
Short Range Graph
Highest Speed
2,300 Mbps
3,420 Mbps
Average 5GHz Speed
862 Mbps
465 Mbps
Average 6GHz Speed
1,863 Mbps
2,118 Mbps
Wi-Fi Specifications
9.4
9.4
Wi-Fi Version
Wi-Fi 7 (be)
Wi-Fi 7 (be)
6GHz Band
Yes
Yes
Multi Band
Tri-Band (2.4 / 5 / 6)
Tri-Band (2.4 / 5 / 6)
DFS Channels
Yes
Yes
Wi-Fi Coverage
Indoor Coverage - Same Story
Wi-Fi Coverage Map
Indoor Coverage - 1 Story Above
Wi-Fi Coverage Map
Wi-Fi Coverage Map (Dual Mesh)
Broad Coverage
Outdoor Coverage Map
Check Price
White (1 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (1 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEARCH
Amazon.comWhite (2 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (2 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.comWhite (3 Pack)
Deco BE63
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comWhite (3 Pack)
Deco BE65 Pro
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
TP-Link Deco BE63
TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro
Comments
TP-Link Deco BE63 vs TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
I’ve been struggling to find information on what exactly the differences were. I bought a 2-pack BE63 about 6 months ago and recently an additional 3 pack. Seeing BE65 on sale for less made me doubt my decision. But now seeing BE65 doesn’t have have USB3.0 port I’m glad I got what I did. Can just attach a hard drive to the router and have an easy media server.
Also FYI there’s a BE63 v1 and v2 to watch out for that there’s like zero publication on. When I bought the second set I wouldn’t have known any difference except they come with a 2.5A power supply vs 3.3A on original. Different firmware as well. Can’t find any information on what exactly changed internally. Was planning on leaving the power adapters in place since they’re in the attic feeding through wall so I’m glad I noticed.