Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: TV 2.0 is finally here! With this massive update, we've completely revamped the way we test and score TVs, with an emphasis on how a TV performs in a bright room. You can read about all the changes in our 2.0 changelog.
Notice: Improving our reviews takes a huge amount of time and effort. We're hiring writers and testers. Apply now!
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Picture Quality
- Motion
- Inputs
- Sound Quality
- Smart Features
- Comments
Samsung S95C OLED vs Sharp AQUOS FS1 OLED
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Samsung S95C OLED
Sharp AQUOS FS1 OLED
Tested using Methodology v1.11
Updated Apr 16, 2025 04:02 PM
Searching
Finding storeTested using Methodology v1.11
Updated Oct 16, 2024 02:24 PM
Searching
Finding store
Resolution4k
TypeOLED
Sub-TypeQD-OLED
Resolution4k
TypeOLED
Sub-TypeWOLED
Variants
- QN55S95CAFXZA (55")
- QN65S95CAFXZA (65")
- QN77S95CAFXZA (77")
- 4T-C55FS1UR (55")
- 4T-C65FS1UR (65")
Our Verdict
Samsung S95C OLED
Sharp AQUOS FS1 OLED
The Samsung S95C OLED is better than the Sharp AQUOS FS1 OLED. The Samsung has much better SDR brightness, so it can overcome much more glare in a room with lights on. HDR brightness is also significantly better on the Samsung, so highlights in HDR content pop much more than on the Sharp. The Samsung also has a much wider viewing angle, better pre-calibration accuracy, much less banding, a BFI feature, HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on all four ports, and much better image processing.