Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Superlux HD 681  Headphones Review

Review updated Jun 28, 2023 at 03:29pm
Writing modified Jul 29, 2025 at 03:45pm
Tested using methodology v1.8 
Superlux HD 681
7.9
Neutral Sound 
4.1
Commute/Travel 
5.1
Sports/Fitness 
4.8
Office 
4.3
Wireless Gaming 
6.2
Wired Gaming 
1.8
Phone Calls 
 6
  1. Recommended in:
  2. Open-Back
  3. Under $50

The Superlux HD 681 are budget-friendly, entry-level audiophile headphones. They stand out from the crowd thanks to their semi-open-back design, which helps them create an immersive audio experience. At the same time, they leak less audio than fully open-back headphones, which is handy if you don't want to disturb others around you. However, their build quality reflects their bargain price, so don't expect very durable headphones.

Our Verdict

7.9
Neutral Sound 

The Superlux HD 681 are very good for neutral sound. These headphones have a semi-open-back design, allowing audio to escape from the ear cups and interact with your environment, creating a natural and immersive audio experience. While they lack low-bass rumble, their mid-range response has fantastic compliance with our target curve, so vocals and lead instruments sound clear and natural. Their treble range compliance is more inconsistent, though, and sibilants, like cymbals, can sound harsh and overly-bright.

Pros
  • Natural and open passive soundstage.
  • Deliver audio consistently.
Cons
  • Non-detachable audio cable.
4.1
Commute/Travel 

The Superlux HD 681 aren't intended for commuting or traveling. They have a semi-open-back design designed to leak audio and let in ambient sound. That means that you'll hear everything that's going on around you while passengers can also hear your audio. The headphones aren't very well-built either and have a bulky design that's hard to transport. However, they have a comfortable fit.

5.1
Sports/Fitness 

The Superlux HD 681 aren't a very good choice for sports and fitness. They're audiophile headphones and can easily fall off of your head with moderate movement. Their audio cable can also snag on something and yank them from your head.

4.8
Office 

The Superlux HD 681 are poor for office use. They leak audio by design, so others around you will hear what you're listening to, and they don't block out background noise, meaning you'll hear all the details of chatty coworkers talking. On the upside, they're comfortable enough for long days at the office.

4.3
Wireless Gaming 

The Superlux HD 681 are wired headphones; you can't use them wirelessly.

6.2
Wired Gaming 

The Superlux HD 681 are passable for wired gaming, so long as you don't need mic support or if you have your own standalone mic. They have a comfortable fit, and their neutral sound ensures that dialogue and instruments are accurately reproduced. Thanks to their semi-open-back design, they can also create a wide and natural soundstage, which can immerse you in your gameplay.

Pros
  • Natural and open passive soundstage.
  • Deliver audio consistently.
Cons
  • Disappointing build quality.
  • Not intended to block out background noise.
  • No mic.
1.8
Phone Calls 

The Superlux HD 681 can't be used for phone calls by default since they don't have a mic. However, if you have a separate mic, these headphones have a comfortable fit, and their neutral sound ensures that speech is natural and clear.

  • 7.9
    Neutral Sound
  • 4.1
    Commute/Travel
  • 5.1
    Sports/Fitness
  • 4.8
    Office
  • 4.3
    Wireless Gaming
  • 6.2
    Wired Gaming
  • 1.8
    Phone Calls
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 29, 2025: 

      We've updated the Sound Profile box with a link to a downloadable folder of EQ settings that will help you match these headphones' frequency response to different target curves available in our Graph Tool.

    2.  Updated Dec 09, 2024: 

      The following test groups have been updated following Test Bench 1.6 and 1.7: Wired Connection, Noise Isolation - Full Range, Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios, and ANC Wind Handling. In addition, several Sound tests have been updated following Test Bench 1.8. There have also been text changes made throughout the review, including to the usages and product comparisons to match these results.

    3.  Updated Dec 02, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.8, which updates our target curve and Sound tests. You can read more about this in our changelog.
    4.  Updated Nov 27, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.7, which updates our Noise Isolation test. We've also expanded the scope of this test to include Common Scenarios in addition to Voice Handling and Wind Handling.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    The Superlux HD 681 come in one color variation: 'Black'. Please let us know in the forums if you encounter another variant of these headphones.

    Popular Headphones Comparisons

    If you're looking to dip your toes into high-res audio without breaking the bank, these cans have a semi-open-back design that helps create an open and natural soundstage that makes for a more immersive audio experience. Their sound profile is also neutral enough for a variety of audio content, although they sound a lot brighter than the Superlux HD 681 HD EVO. They're more comfortable than the Superlux HD 668B, which is good if you want to use them for long listening sessions. However, their plasticky build quality reflects their affordable price.

    Check out our recommendations for the best headphones under $50, the best budget wireless headphones, and the best wired headphones.

    Samson SR850

    The Superlux HD 681 are better for neutral sound than the Samson SR850. Both headphones have a similar semi-open design, but the Superlux have a more balanced sound profile, which some may prefer. They're also much more comfortable and breathable. However, the Samson have a significantly better build quality.

    Superlux HD 668B

    The Superlux HD 668B and the Superlux HD 681 are both very good headphones if you like a balanced sound. While they both can sound quite harsh and sharp, the HD 668B feature a slightly bassier default sound. While both have a similarly disappointing build quality, the HD 681 are a fair bit more comfortable to wear.

    Superlux HD 681 EVO

    While the Superlux HD 681 and the Superlux HD 681 EVO are similarly performing headphones, the HD 681 are better for neutral sound. They have a more balanced sound and a more natural passive soundstage. However, the HD 681 EVO have slightly better build quality and are a bit more stable on your head.

    Philips SHP9500

    The Philips SHP9500 are somewhat better for neutral sound than the Superlux HD 681. The Philips are more comfortable, more breathable open-back headphones with a considerably better build. Sound is perceived as much more open and spacious as well. They share a similar sound profile that features balanced and articulate mids at the expense of bass extension and an overly-bright treble range.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    TypeOver-ear
    EnclosureSemi-Open
    WirelessNo
    TransducerDynamic

    The Superlux HD 681 look very similar to the AKG K240 MKII, thanks to the double wire headband and ski-band headband design. Their ear cups are nearly identical to the Superlux HD 668B, with the same circular enclosure design, but have red detailing to help it stand out from other budget-friendly headphones on the market. However, due to their plasticky build, their red and black color scheme looks cheap.

    7.5
    Comfort
    Weight0.5 lbs
    Clamping Force
    0.9 lbs

    These headphones fit comfortably and are even more comfortable than the Superlux HD 668B. They're just as lightweight but have a better headband design that extends further and doesn't feel as tight on the head. They also have large ear cups that fit well around most listeners' ears. Unfortunately, the ear cup padding feels a bit stiff and can cause a bit of uneven pressure. While the padding isn't particularly uncomfortable, it's noticeable after wearing them for a while.

    0.0
    Controls
    OS Compatibility
    No Controls
    Ease Of UseNo Controls
    FeedbackNo Controls
    Call/Music ControlNo
    Volume ControlNo
    Microphone ControlNo
    Channel Mixing
    No
    Noise Cancelling ControlNo
    Talk-Through
    No
    Additional ControlsNo
    6.8
    Breathability
    Avg.Temp.Difference4.8 °C

    These cans have fair breathability. Thanks to their semi-open-back design, they allow some airflow to circulate within the ear cup. While they won't cause you to sweat if you wear them for long periods, they're not as breathable as open-backs like the Philips SHP9500.

    5.4
    Portability
    L8.0" (20.3 cm)
    W7.2" (18.3 cm)
    H3.5" (8.9 cm)
    Volume201.00 in³ (3,293.79 cm³)
    Transmitter RequiredNo

    These headphones have a lightweight design but are still bulky and cumbersome. The ear cups don't fold or lay flat, making them difficult to carry around if you don't have a bag.

    5.5
    Case
    TypeNo case
    LN/A
    WN/A
    HN/A
    VolumeN/A

    They come with a somewhat rugged pouch that'll shield them from scratches, minor water exposure, and dust. However, it won't protect them against drops and impacts.

    5.5
    Build Quality

    These cans have a disappointing build quality, though it's to be expected from at this price point. Like the Superlux HD 668B, they're made of low-grade plastic with no metal components and even feel like a cheaper version of the AKG K240 MKII. They won't break if you accidentally drop them once or twice. However, they don't feel like durable headphones.

    6.0
    Stability

    These cans aren't as tight on the head as the Superlux HD 668B and are slightly less stable. It won't be a problem if you're listening to audio at your desk, but if you like to bop your head to the music, the ear cups can change in positioning. The audio cable isn't detachable either, so if it gets snagged on something, the headphones will be pulled from your head.

    Headshots 1
    Headshots 2
    Top
    In The Box

    • Superlux HD 681 headphones
    • 1/8" to 1/4" adapter
    • Carrying pouch
    • Manual

    Sound
    Sound Profile
    See details on graph tool
    Normalization Frequency
    1,500 Hz
    Bass Amount
    -4.2 dB
    Treble Amount
    1.6 dB

    These cans have a neutral sound with bright sibilants. Even though they're semi-open-back headphones, they can reproduce a lot of low-bass, ensuring that tracks get adequate thump, rumble, and boom. Vocals and instruments also sound clear, natural, and accurate. Sibilants like cymbals are piercing, though.

    If you'd like to tame the treble, boost the bass, or otherwise bring the frequency response of these headphones into line with one of the target curves shown on our Graph Tool, this downloadable folder of EQ presets will help.

    7.8
    Frequency Response Consistency
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Avg. Std. Deviation
    0.44 dB

    These headphones have good consistency performance. If you have thick hair or wear glasses, you may notice a drop in bass, as these features can disrupt the ear cups' seal on your head. However, once you achieve a good fit, you'll experience more consistent audio delivery.

    Raw Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    7.4
    Bass Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    5.5 dB
    Low-Frequency Extension
    27.29 Hz
    Low Bass
    -7.23 dB
    Mid Bass
    -2.34 dB
    High Bass
    -1.53 dB

    These headphones do a decent job of complying with our bass range target. The response is underemphasized across the entire range, though it's tilted in such a way that the low-bass is particularly lacking. As a result, there's not much in the way of bass-range rumble, though this is to be expected from semi-open-back headphones.

    9.1
    Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    1.01 dB
    Low Mid
    -1.12 dB
    Mid-Mid
    -0.96 dB
    High Mid
    0.38 dB

    These cans have excellent mid-range compliance with our target curve. The response is pretty flat and neutral, so vocals and instruments are present, natural, and detailed in mixes. In songs like My Sharona by The Knack, male vocalists sound detailed and clear throughout the track.

    6.9
    Treble Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    3.39 dB
    Low Treble
    -0.24 dB
    Mid Treble
    4.05 dB
    High Treble
    -1.81 dB

    The Superlux HD 681 have fair treble compliance with our target. A dip in the low-treble weakens the upper harmonics of vocals and lead instruments. However, the mid-treble is much more overemphasized, and sibilants like cymbals are piercing. In songs like Stairway to Heaven by Led Zeppelin, the electric guitar is overpowered by piercing snares, which are overly present in the track.

    7.7
    Peaks/Dips
    See details on graph tool
    Peaks
    1.1 dB
    Dips
    2.39 dB

    The peaks and dips performance of these headphones is good. The peaks and dips are fairly minor in the bass and mid ranges, with a dip in the mid-mid nudging vocals and instruments to the back of the mix. However, there's a peak between the high-mid to low-treble, making vocals and instruments sound harsh. A dip in the low-treble affects both drivers and removes some of the harmonic richness from vocals and lead instruments. However, the peaks in the mid-treble make sibilants, like hi-hats, sound piercing.

    8.1
    Imaging
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted Group Delay
    0.26
    Weighted Phase Mismatch
    12.02
    Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
    0.76
    Weighted Frequency Mismatch
    1.71

    The imaging performance of these headphones is great. Even though we haven't tested very many Superlux headphones, those we have tested display solid imaging, which is an indicator of ergonomics and quality control. Imaging varies between units, though. That said, our unit's L/R drivers are well-matched in group delay, amplitude, frequency, and phase response, ensuring the accurate localization of sound objects like instruments in the stereo image. Peaks in the phase's response's high-treble range aren't audio with real-life content either, especially since they affect narrow frequency bands, and we lose sensitivity to this range over time.

    7.8
    Passive Soundstage
    See details on graph tool
    PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
    1.58 dB
    PRTF Size (Avg.)
    6.36 dB
    PRTF Distance
    11.68 dB
    Openness
    9.2
    Acoustic Space Excitation
    6.7

    The passive soundstage performance of these cans is very good. Their semi-open-back design allows them to create a wide, open, and natural soundstage that's more immersive than the Superlux HD 681 EVO.

    0.0
    Virtual Soundstage
    Head Modeling
    No
    Speaker Modeling
    No
    Room Ambience
    No
    Head Tracking
    No
    Virtual Surround
    No App
    7.6
    Weighted Harmonic Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    WHD @ 90
    0.145
    WHD @ 100
    0.313

    The weighted harmonic distortion performance is good. At normal volumes, you'll experience clean and pure audio reproduction. However, if you push these cans to a high volume, there's some distortion present in the high-bass to low-mid range. It's hard to hear with real-life content, though.

    Test Settings
    Firmware
    No Firmware
    Power
    Passive
    Connection
    Wired
    Codec
    PCM, 24-bit, 48kHz
    Test InstrumentAudio Precision APx517B
    EQ
    No EQ
    ANC
    No ANC
    Tip/Pad
    Default
    Microphone
    No Microphone

    These are the settings used to test these cans. Our results are only valid when used in this configuration.

    Isolation
    2.6
    Noise Isolation - Full Range
    See details on graph tool
    Noise CancellingNo
    Overall Attenuation
    -5.95 dB
    Bass
    0.18 dB
    Mid
    -0.14 dB
    Treble
    -19.85 dB

    The Superlux HD 681 have bad full-range noise isolation by design. They're not meant to block out background noise as they have a semi-open-back design, so if you're using them near an open window with traffic outside or next to people talking, you'll hear everything. They attenuate slightly better against treble range noises, but these sounds will still be audible.

    2.8
    Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios
    See details on graph tool
    Airplane Noise Attenuation
    -5.04 dB
    Airplane Noise Isolation Audio
    Office Noise Attenuation
    -5.31 dB
    Office Noise Isolation Audio
    Street Noise Attenuation
    -5.59 dB
    Street Noise Isolation Audio

    These headphones have a poor noise isolation performance in common scenarios. They provide very little attenuation regardless of the situation, whether it's an aircraft cabin, busy street, or office environment. Their design will slightly muffle the treble range of external noise, but there's practically no attenuation against bass and mid-range frequencies.

    Noise Isolation - Voice Handling
    Female Voice 1
    Male Voice 1
    Female Voice 2
    Male Voice 2
    ANC Wind Handling
    ANC Wind Noise
    N/A
    4.3
    Leakage
    See details on graph tool
    Leakage Audio
    Overall Leakage @ 1ft
    52.9 dB

    These headphones are meant to leak audio by design to create a more immersive audio experience. Even at regular volumes, people around you will hear your audio.

    Microphone
    Microphone Style
    Integrated
    No
    In-Line
    No
    Boom
    No
    Detachable Boom
    No
    MicNo
    0.0
    Recording Quality
    Recorded Speech
    N/A
    LFE
    N/A
    FR Std. Dev.
    N/A
    HFE
    N/A
    Weighted THD
    N/A
    Gain
    N/A
    0.0
    Noise Handling
    SpNR
    N/A
    Noise Gate
    No
    Speech + Pink Noise Handling
    N/A
    Speech + Pink Noise Audio SampleN/A
    Speech + Subway Noise Handling
    N/A
    Speech + Subway Noise Audio SampleN/A
    Active Features
    0.0
    Battery
    Battery Type
    No Battery
    Continuous Battery Life
    N/A
    Additional Charges
    N/A
    Total Battery Life
    N/A
    Charge Time
    N/A
    Power-Saving Feature
    No
    Audio While Charging
    No
    Passive Playback
    Passive Headphone
    Charging PortNone
    0.0
    App Support
    App NameNo App
    iOSNo
    AndroidNo
    macOSNo
    WindowsNo
    Equalizer
    No
    ANC Control
    No
    Mic ControlNo
    Room Effects
    No
    Playback Control
    No
    Button MappingNo
    Surround Support
    No
    Connectivity
    9.1
    Wired Connection
    Analog Audio
    Yes
    USB Audio
    No
    Detachable
    No
    Length
    8.00 ft (2.44 m)
    Connector
    1/8" TRS
    Latency - Analog
    0.2 ms
    Latency - USB
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    Recorded Latency ConnectionAnalog

    These headphones have a non-detachable 1/8" TRS cable. Their latency via this connection type is very low, so you won't experience any sync issues between your audio and video.

    0.0
    Bluetooth Connection
    Bluetooth Version
    No Bluetooth
    Multi-Device Pairing
    No
    Quick Pair (Android)
    No
    Quick Pair (iOS)
    No
    Line Of Sight Range
    N/A
    Latency - SBC
    N/A
    Latency - aptX
    N/A
    Latency - aptX Adaptive (High Quality)
    N/A
    Latency - aptX Adaptive (Low Latency)
    N/A
    Latency - LDAC
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    N/A
    Recorded Latency CodecNo Bluetooth Audio
    AAC Support
    No
    0.0
    Wireless Connection (Dongle)
    Line Of Sight Range
    N/A
    Latency - Dongle
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    N/A
    PC Compatibility
    Analog
    Audio Only
    Wired USB
    No
    Non-BT Wireless
    No

    You can connect these headphones to your PC via analog, but you'll only receive audio. They don't have a mic.

    PlayStation Compatibility
    PS4 Analog
    Audio Only
    PS4 Wired USB
    No
    PS4 Non-BT Wireless
    No
    PS5 Analog
    Audio Only
    PS5 Wired USB
    No
    PS5 Non-BT Wireless
    No

    These headphones only support audio via analog if you plug their TRS cable into your controller's AUX port. They don't have a mic, though.

    Xbox Compatibility
    Xbox One Analog
    Audio Only
    Xbox One Wired USB
    No
    Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
    No
    Xbox Series X|S Analog
    Audio Only
    Xbox Series X|S Wired USB
    No
    Xbox Series X|S Non-BT Wireless
    No

    You can only receive audio via analog on Xbox consoles, as these headphones don't have a mic.

    0.0
    Base/Dock
    Type
    No Base/Dock
    USB Input
    No
    Line In
    No
    Line Out
    No
    Optical Input
    No
    RCA Input
    No
    Dock Charging
    No
    Power Supply
    No Base/Dock

    Recommended Articles

    Comments

    1. Product

    Superlux HD 681: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hey there! I’m not sure where you’re getting those numbers, but that’s not what the good value is set at for the 100% window. The threshold for a good value is the same for 50% and 100%, it’s 700 nits on both. This does tend to change with test methodology updates, so those numbers apply to anything tested on 2.0 and 2.0.1 only.

      Hi thanks for your response! I feel like I’m going crazy because at the time of posting my comment I had checked many different TV review pages and they all stated that the good value for Peak 100% Window was 1,000cd/m². Not sure what caused this other than me reading the data incorrectly. Either way you’re right! I can see it shows 700cd/m², which clears my confusion. Thanks a lot.

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      In the HR Peak Window tests, the good value rating goes: | Metric | Good value: | |—————–|—————-| | Peak 2% Window | 1000 cd/m² | | Peak 10% Window | 1000 cd/m² | | Peak 25% Window | 800 cd/m² | | Peak 50% Window | 700 cd/m² | | Peak 100% Window | 1000 cd/m² | I can see the logic behind the good value decreasing as you fill a greater % of the screen, where becomes more difficult for the display to sustain high brightness levels. So why then, is the good value for Peak 100% not lower than the good value for Peak 50%? This seems counterintuitive. I also note that even the TCL QM851G - seemingly the TV with the highest ever score in this metric - is not hitting the good value threshold, sitting at 967 cd/m² in HDR Brightness. Is this a typo? Or is there some more technical reasoning behind this inconsistency? Thanks!

      Hey there! I’m not sure where you’re getting those numbers, but that’s not what the good value is set at for the 100% window. The threshold for a good value is the same for 50% and 100%, it’s 700 nits on both. This does tend to change with test methodology updates, so those numbers apply to anything tested on 2.0 and 2.0.1 only.

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      In the HR Peak Window tests, the good value rating goes:

      Metric Good value:
      Peak 2% Window 1000 cd/m²
      Peak 10% Window 1000 cd/m²
      Peak 25% Window 800 cd/m²
      Peak 50% Window 700 cd/m²
      Peak 100% Window 1000 cd/m²

      I can see the logic behind the good value decreasing as you fill a greater % of the screen, where becomes more difficult for the display to sustain high brightness levels. So why then, is the good value for Peak 100% not lower than the good value for Peak 50%?

      This seems counterintuitive. I also note that even the TCL QM851G - seemingly the TV with the highest ever score in this metric - is not hitting the good value threshold, sitting at 967 cd/m² in HDR Brightness.

      Is this a typo? Or is there some more technical reasoning behind this inconsistency?

      Thanks!

    4. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I see that Apple Ipad Pro and Pro Display XDR monitor have 1000 nits 100% sustained brightness ? But some of the best OLED HDR TVs have it around 200-300 nits (some QLEDs have above 650). Also the weightage for 100% sustained brightness, in your tests, is very low. Wanted to understand why would some displays aim for high 100% sustained brightness if its not that imp ?

      The difference is due to how and where those types of displays are used . With something like an iPad, high brightness is needed to overcome glare, as you’re often moving around with it and won’t always be in a place where you can control the ambient light. You might even be outdoors, so the ability to crank up the peak brightness is essential for a device like that.

      With the XDR monitor, well that mainly targets content creators. When mastering video you want to be able to see the full range of brightness in the content you’re mastering, so it’s important to have a display that exceeds the maximum brightness you want to encode.

      With TVs, however, the usage is a bit different. In HDR, for example, the vast majority of content is under 300 nits. Small specular highlights often get significantly brighter than that, but these are usually very small areas of the screen. So you don’t need a TV that can sustain 1000+ nits on the entire screen, as the content won’t need that, anyway, and it would be very uncomfortable to watch something like that.

    5. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I see that Apple Ipad Pro and Pro Display XDR monitor have 1000 nits 100% sustained brightness ? But some of the best OLED HDR TVs have it around 200-300 nits (some QLEDs have above 650). Also the weightage for 100% sustained brightness, in your tests, is very low.

      Wanted to understand why would some displays aim for high 100% sustained brightness if its not that imp ?