Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Accelerated Longevity Test
    3. Stand
    4. Back
    5. Borders
    6. Thickness
    7. Build Quality
  5. Picture Quality
    1. Contrast
    2. Blooming
    3. Lighting Zone Transitions
    4. Contrast And Dark Details In Game Mode
    5. HDR Brightness
    6. HDR Brightness In Game Mode
    7. PQ EOTF Tracking
    8. SDR Brightness
    9. Color Gamut
    10. Color Volume
    11. Pre Calibration
    12. Post Calibration
    13. Gray Uniformity
    14. Black Uniformity
    15. Viewing Angle
    16. Reflections
    17. HDR Native Gradient
    18. Low-Quality Content Smoothing
    19. Upscaling: Sharpness Processing
    20. Pixels
  6. Motion
    1. Response Time
    2. Flicker-Free
    3. Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    4. Motion Interpolation
    5. Stutter
    6. 24p Judder
    7. Variable Refresh Rate
  7. Inputs
    1. Input Lag
    2. Supported Resolutions
    3. PS5 Compatibility
    4. Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    5. Inputs Specifications
    6. Input Photos
    7. Total Inputs
    8. Audio Passthrough
  8. Sound Quality
    1. Frequency Response
    2. Distortion
  9. Smart Features
    1. Interface
    2. Ad-Free
    3. Apps and Features
    4. Remote
    5. TV Controls
    6. In The Box
    7. Misc
  10. Comments

LG C3 OLED vs Samsung S95C OLED

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

LG C3 OLED
Samsung S95C OLED

Tested using Methodology v1.11

Updated Mar 17, 2025 03:26 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.11

Updated Apr 16, 2025 04:02 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
LG C3 OLED Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Picture

Variants

  • OLED42C3PUA (42")
  • OLED48C3PUA (48")
  • OLED55C3PUA (55")
  • OLED65C3PUA (65")
  • OLED77C3PUA (77")
  • OLED83C3PUA (83")
  • QN55S95CAFXZA (55")
  • QN65S95CAFXZA (65")
  • QN77S95CAFXZA (77")

Our Verdict

LG C3 OLED

Samsung S95C OLED

The Samsung S95C OLED is better than the LG C3 OLED. The Samsung is brighter than the LG and can hold onto its brightness much better than the LG in Game Mode. The Samsung has a much wider color gamut than the LG; it can output bright, vibrant colors, making the TV pop. It also has much better HDR gradient handling than the LG, so you won't notice annoying banding in scenes with color gradients. The LG does have better low-resolution upscaling, so it will do a better job with low-resolution content or streaming content at low bitrates. The LG also supports every audio format, including DTS, so it's the better overall TV for a home entertainment setup.

1 

Check Price

42"
 
48"
 
55"
QN55S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
65"
QN65S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
77"
QN77S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
83"
 

Main Differences for
Mixed Usage

Threshold 

0.10

Mixed Usage 

9.0
9.0

Low-Quality Content Smoothing 
 

8.6
6.8

Full Comparison

Design

Style  

Design Picture  

LG C3 OLED Design Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Design Picture

Curved  

No
No
Show Text 

Accelerated Longevity Test 
 

Uniformity Pictures  

50-gray-22
Month 22
50% Gray

Longevity Graph  

LG C3 OLED Longevity Graph
See details on graph tool
Show Text 

Stand  

Stand Picture  

LG C3 OLED Stand Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Stand Picture
Show Text 

Back  

Back Picture  

LG C3 OLED Back Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Back Picture

Wall Mount  

VESA 300x200
VESA 400x400
Show Text 

Borders  

Borders Picture  

LG C3 OLED Borders Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Borders Picture

Borders  

0.22" (0.6 cm)
0.28" (0.7 cm)

Thickness  

Thickness Picture  

LG C3 OLED Thickness Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Thickness Picture

Max Thickness  

1.77" (4.5 cm)
0.47" (1.2 cm)
Show Text 

Build Quality 
 

9.0
9.0

Build quality picture  

LG C3 OLED Build quality picture
Samsung S95C OLED Build quality picture
Show Text 
Picture Quality

Contrast 
 

10
10

Contrast Picture  

LG C3 OLED Contrast Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Contrast Picture

Contrast 
 

Inf : 1
Inf : 1

Native Contrast 
 

Inf : 1
Inf : 1
Show Text 

Blooming 
 

10
10

Blooming Photo  

LG C3 OLED Blooming Photo
Samsung S95C OLED Blooming Photo
Show Text 

Lighting Zone Transitions 
 

10
10

Preferred LD Video, Moving Object  

Local Dimming 
 

No
No

Backlight 
 

No Backlight
No Backlight

Dimming Zones Count Of Tested TV 
 

8,294,400
8,294,400
Show Text 

Contrast And Dark Details In Game Mode 
 

9.5
9.5

Blooming Photo In Game Mode  

LG C3 OLED Blooming Photo In Game Mode
Samsung S95C OLED Blooming Photo In Game Mode

Preferred LD Video, Moving Object In Game Mode  

Game Transitions With VRR And Preferred LD  

Show Text 

HDR Brightness 
 

8.1
8.5

HDR Hallway Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Hallway Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Hallway Photo

HDR Cityscape Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Cityscape Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Cityscape Photo

HDR Landscape Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Landscape Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Landscape Photo

Hallway Lights (~1950 cd/m²) 
 

729 cd/m²
1,050 cd/m²

Yellow Skyscraper (~700 cd/m²) 
 

581 cd/m²
670 cd/m²

Landscape Pool (~300 cd/m²) 
 

326 cd/m²
265 cd/m²

Peak 2% Window 
 

801 cd/m²
1,229 cd/m²

Peak 10% Window 
 

815 cd/m²
1,213 cd/m²

Peak 25% Window 
 

522 cd/m²
536 cd/m²

Peak 50% Window 
 

311 cd/m²
280 cd/m²

Peak 100% Window 
 

153 cd/m²
234 cd/m²

Sustained 2% Window 
 

784 cd/m²
1,190 cd/m²

Sustained 10% Window 
 

781 cd/m²
1,140 cd/m²

Sustained 25% Window 
 

477 cd/m²
496 cd/m²

Sustained 50% Window 
 

311 cd/m²
274 cd/m²

Sustained 100% Window 
 

150 cd/m²
230 cd/m²

Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL) 
 

0.101
0.109
Show Text 

HDR Brightness In Game Mode 
 

7.4
8.6

HDR Hallway Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Hallway Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Hallway Photo

HDR Cityscape Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Cityscape Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Cityscape Photo

HDR Landscape Photo  

LG C3 OLED HDR Landscape Photo
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Landscape Photo

Hallway Lights (~1950 cd/m²) 
 

776 cd/m²
1,128 cd/m²

Yellow Skyscraper (~700 cd/m²) 
 

434 cd/m²
765 cd/m²

Landscape Pool (~300 cd/m²) 
 

175 cd/m²
334 cd/m²

Peak 2% Window 
 

806 cd/m²
1,232 cd/m²

Peak 10% Window 
 

808 cd/m²
1,203 cd/m²

Peak 25% Window 
 

394 cd/m²
584 cd/m²

Peak 50% Window 
 

269 cd/m²
300 cd/m²

Peak 100% Window 
 

184 cd/m²
234 cd/m²

Sustained 2% Window 
 

786 cd/m²
1,207 cd/m²

Sustained 10% Window 
 

780 cd/m²
1,189 cd/m²

Sustained 25% Window 
 

367 cd/m²
558 cd/m²

Sustained 50% Window 
 

268 cd/m²
298 cd/m²

Sustained 100% Window 
 

147 cd/m²
230 cd/m²

Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL) 
 

0.105
0.107
Show Text 

PQ EOTF Tracking 
 

9.2
9.6

PQ EOTF Graph  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

600 Nit Tracking Delta 
 

0.0056
0.0029

1000 Nit Tracking Delta 
 

0.0054
0.0025

4000 Nit Tracking Delta 
 

0.0051
0.0022
Show Text 

SDR Brightness 
 

7.9
7.7

Real Scene Peak Brightness 
 

474 cd/m²
385 cd/m²

Peak 2% Window 
 

409 cd/m²
632 cd/m²

Peak 10% Window 
 

412 cd/m²
632 cd/m²

Peak 25% Window 
 

396 cd/m²
634 cd/m²

Peak 50% Window 
 

379 cd/m²
312 cd/m²

Peak 100% Window 
 

216 cd/m²
248 cd/m²

Sustained 2% Window 
 

405 cd/m²
618 cd/m²

Sustained 10% Window 
 

407 cd/m²
616 cd/m²

Sustained 25% Window 
 

390 cd/m²
592 cd/m²

Sustained 50% Window 
 

375 cd/m²
308 cd/m²

Sustained 100% Window 
 

214 cd/m²
243 cd/m²

Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL) 
 

0.041
0.064
Show Text 

Color Gamut 
 

8.7
9.4

Wide Color Gamut 
 

Yes
Yes

Color Gamut DCI-P3 Picture  

LG C3 OLED Color Gamut DCI-P3 Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Color Gamut DCI-P3 Picture

DCI P3 xy 
 

98.72%
99.35%

DCI P3 uv 
 

99.51%
99.53%

Color Gamut Rec.2020 Picture  

LG C3 OLED Color Gamut Rec.2020 Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Color Gamut Rec.2020 Picture

Rec 2020 xy 
 

72.79%
84.99%

Rec 2020 uv 
 

76.01%
89.78%
Show Text 

Color Volume 
 

7.9
9.1

P3 Color Volume ITP Picture  

LG C3 OLED P3 Color Volume ITP Picture
Samsung S95C OLED P3 Color Volume ITP Picture

1,000 cd/m² DCI P3 Coverage ITP 
 

73.8%
97.3%

2020 Color Volume ITP Picture  

LG C3 OLED 2020 Color Volume ITP Picture
Samsung S95C OLED 2020 Color Volume ITP Picture

10,000 cd/m² Rec 2020 Coverage ITP 
 

34.1%
53.7%

White Luminance 
 

856 cd/m²
1,223 cd/m²

Red Luminance 
 

92 cd/m²
272 cd/m²

Green Luminance 
 

298 cd/m²
882 cd/m²

Blue Luminance 
 

34 cd/m²
65 cd/m²

Cyan Luminance 
 

325 cd/m²
950 cd/m²

Magenta Luminance 
 

118 cd/m²
336 cd/m²

Yellow Luminance 
 

363 cd/m²
1,151 cd/m²
Show Text 

Pre Calibration 
 

8.9
8.8

Pre White Balance Picture  

LG C3 OLED Pre White Balance Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Pre White Balance Picture

Pre Gamma Curve Picture  

LG C3 OLED Pre Gamma Curve Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Pre Gamma Curve Picture

Pre Color Picture  

LG C3 OLED Pre Color Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Pre Color Picture

White Balance dE 
 

1.50
1.96

Color dE 
 

1.30
1.16

Gamma 
 

2.24
2.16

Color Temperature 
 

6,305 K
6,767 K

Picture Mode 
 

Expert (Dark Space)
Movie

Color Temp Setting 
 

Warm 50
Warm 2

Gamma Setting 
 

2.2
2.2
Show Text 

Post Calibration 
 

9.6
9.6

Post White Balance Picture  

LG C3 OLED Post White Balance Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Post White Balance Picture

Post Gamma Curve Picture  

LG C3 OLED Post Gamma Curve Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Post Gamma Curve Picture

Post Color Picture  

LG C3 OLED Post Color Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Post Color Picture

White Balance dE 
 

0.18
0.32

Color dE 
 

0.87
0.59

Gamma 
 

2.20
2.19

Color Temperature 
 

6,495 K
6,523 K

White Balance Calibration 
 

22 point
20 point

Color Calibration 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Gray Uniformity 
 

8.5
8.6

50% Uniformity Picture  

LG C3 OLED 50% Uniformity Picture
Samsung S95C OLED 50% Uniformity Picture

50% Std. Dev. 
 

1.288%
1.396%

50% DSE 
 

0.134%
0.117%

5% Uniformity Picture  

LG C3 OLED 5% Uniformity Picture
Samsung S95C OLED 5% Uniformity Picture

5% Std. Dev. 
 

0.350%
0.430%

5% DSE 
 

0.100%
0.118%
Show Text 

Black Uniformity 
 

10
10

Black Uniformity Picture With Preferred Local Dimming  

LG C3 OLED Black Uniformity Picture With Preferred Local Dimming
Samsung S95C OLED Black Uniformity Picture With Preferred Local Dimming

Std. Dev. 
 

N/A
N/A

Native Black Uniformity Picture  

LG C3 OLED Native Black Uniformity Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Native Black Uniformity Picture

Native Std. Dev. 
 

0.093%
0.168%
Show Text 

Viewing Angle 
 

9.3
10

Viewing Angle Video  

Chroma Graph  

LG C3 OLED Chroma Graph
Samsung S95C OLED Chroma Graph

Color Washout 
 

63°
70°

Hue Graph  

LG C3 OLED Hue Graph
Samsung S95C OLED Hue Graph

Color Shift 
 

34°
70°

Lightness Graph  

LG C3 OLED Lightness Graph
Samsung S95C OLED Lightness Graph

Brightness Loss 
 

70°
70°

Black Level Raise 
 

70°
67°

Gamma Shift 
 

70°
70°
Show Text 

Reflections 
 

9.5
9.5

Reflections Picture  

LG C3 OLED Reflections Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Reflections Picture

Average Room Off Picture  

LG C3 OLED Average Room Off Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Average Room Off Picture

Bright Room Off Picture  

LG C3 OLED Bright Room Off Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Bright Room Off Picture

Screen Finish 
 

Glossy
Glossy

Total Reflections 
 

1.1%
1.0%

Indirect Reflections 
 

0.2%
0.7%

Calculated Direct Reflections 
 

0.9%
0.4%
Show Text 

HDR Native Gradient 
 

7.8
9.3

HDR Gradient Picture  

LG C3 OLED HDR Gradient Picture
Samsung S95C OLED HDR Gradient Picture

100% Black to 50% Gray  

6.0
8.0

50% Gray to 100% White  

8.0
10

100% Black to 50% Red  

8.0
10

50% Red to 100% Red  

10
10

100% Black to 50% Green  

8.0
10

50% Green to 100% Green  

6.0
8.0

100% Black to 50% Blue  

8.0
10

50% Blue to 100% Blue  

8.0
8.0
Show Text 

Low-Quality Content Smoothing 
 

8.6
6.8

Low-Quality Content Smoothing Picture  

LG C3 OLED Low-Quality Content Smoothing Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Low-Quality Content Smoothing Picture

Smoothing 
 

9.0
6.0

Detail Preservation 
 

7.5
8.5
Show Text 

Upscaling: Sharpness Processing 
 

8.0
7.5

Sharpness Picture - 480p  

LG C3 OLED Sharpness Picture - 480p
Samsung S95C OLED Sharpness Picture - 480p
Show Text 

Pixels 
 

Pixels Picture  

LG C3 OLED Pixels Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Pixels Picture

Subpixel Layout 
 

RWBG
Triangular RGB

Type  

OLED
OLED

Sub-Type 
 

WOLED
QD-OLED
Show Text 
Motion

Response Time 
 

9.9
9.9

Motion Blur Picture  

LG C3 OLED Motion Blur Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Motion Blur Picture

Response Time Chart  

LG C3 OLED Response Time Chart
Samsung S95C OLED Response Time Chart

80% Response Time 
 

0.2 ms
0.2 ms

100% Response Time 
 

2.3 ms
1.7 ms
Show Text 

Flicker-Free 
 

10
10

Backlight chart 
 

LG C3 OLED Backlight chart
Samsung S95C OLED Backlight chart

Flicker-Free 
 

No
No

PWM Dimming Frequency 
 

0 Hz
0 Hz
Show Text 

Black Frame Insertion (BFI) 
 

BFI Picture  

LG C3 OLED BFI Picture
Samsung S95C OLED BFI Picture

BFI Frequency Picture  

LG C3 OLED BFI Frequency Picture
Samsung S95C OLED BFI Frequency Picture

Optional BFI 
 

Yes
Yes

Min Flicker For 60 fps 
 

60 Hz
60 Hz

60Hz For 60 fps 
 

Yes
Yes

120Hz For 120 fps 
 

No
No

Min Flicker for 60 fps in Game Mode 
 

60 Hz
60 Hz
Show Text 

Motion Interpolation 
 

Motion Interpolation (30 fps) Picture  

LG C3 OLED Motion Interpolation (30 fps) Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Motion Interpolation (30 fps) Picture

Motion Interpolation (30 fps) 
 

Yes
Yes

Motion Interpolation (60 fps) Picture  

LG C3 OLED Motion Interpolation (60 fps) Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Motion Interpolation (60 fps) Picture

Motion Interpolation (60 fps) 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Stutter 
 

5.0
4.8

Frame Hold Time @ 24 fps 
 

39.4 ms
40.0 ms

Frame Hold Time @ 60 fps 
 

14.4 ms
15.0 ms
Show Text 

24p Judder 
 

10
10

Judder-Free 24p 
 

Yes
Yes

Judder-Free 24p via 60p 
 

Yes
Yes

Judder-Free 24p via 60i 
 

Yes
Yes

Judder-Free 24p via Native Apps 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Variable Refresh Rate 
 

9.4
9.5

Native Refresh Rate 
 

120 Hz
144 Hz

Variable Refresh Rate 
 

Yes
Yes

HDMI Forum VRR 
 

Yes
Yes

FreeSync 
 

Yes
Yes

G-SYNC Compatible 
 

Yes (NVIDIA Certified)
Yes

4k VRR Maximum 
 

120 Hz
144 Hz

4k VRR Minimum 
 

< 20 Hz
< 20 Hz

1080p VRR Maximum 
 

120 Hz
144 Hz

1080p VRR Minimum 
 

< 20 Hz
< 20 Hz

1440p VRR Maximum 
 

120 Hz
144 Hz

1440p VRR Minimum 
 

< 20 Hz
< 20 Hz

VRR + Local Dimming  

No Local Dimming
No Local Dimming
Show Text 
Inputs

Input Lag 
 

9.7
9.7

1080p @ 60Hz 
 

10.4 ms
9.3 ms

1080p @ 60Hz Outside Game Mode 
 

89.7 ms
82.1 ms

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

5.7 ms
5.1 ms

1080p @ 144Hz 
 

N/A
4.6 ms

1440p @ 60Hz 
 

10.5 ms
9.4 ms

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

5.4 ms
5.2 ms

1440p @ 144Hz 
 

N/A
4.2 ms

4k @ 60Hz 
 

10.3 ms
9.6 ms

4k @ 60Hz + 10-Bit HDR 
 

10.5 ms
9.4 ms

4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 
 

10.2 ms
9.6 ms

4k @ 60Hz Outside Game Mode 
 

89.6 ms
63.0 ms

4k @ 60Hz With Interpolation 
 

77.5 ms
19.4 ms

4k @ 120Hz 
 

5.5 ms
5.1 ms

4k @ 144Hz 
 

N/A
4.2 ms

8k @ 60Hz 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Supported Resolutions 
 

9.6
9.6

Resolution  

4k
4k

480p @ 59.94Hz (Widescreen) 
 

Yes
Yes

720p @ 59.94Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 144Hz 
 

No
Yes

1440p @ 60Hz 
 

Yes (forced resolution required)
Yes

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 144Hz 
 

No
Yes (forced resolution required)

4k @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 120Hz @ 4:4:4 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 144Hz 
 

No
Yes

8k @ 30Hz or 24Hz 
 

No
No

8k @ 60Hz 
 

No
No
Show Text 

PS5 Compatibility 
 

PS5 Screenshot  

LG C3 OLED PS5 Screenshot
Samsung S95C OLED PS5 Screenshot

Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

HDR 
 

Yes
Yes

VRR 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Xbox Series X|S Compatibility 
 

Xbox Series X Screenshot  

LG C3 OLED Xbox Series X Screenshot
Samsung S95C OLED Xbox Series X Screenshot

Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) 
 

Yes
Yes

4k @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

HDR 
 

Yes
Yes

VRR 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Inputs Specifications  

HDR10 
 

Yes
Yes

HDR10+ 
 

No
Yes

Dolby Vision 
 

Yes
No

HLG 
 

Yes
Yes

HDMI 2.0 Full Bandwidth 
 

Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)

HDMI 2.1 Class Bandwidth 
 

Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)

CEC  

Yes
Yes

HDCP 2.2  

Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)

ATSC Tuner 
 

1.0
3.0 (NEXTGEN TV)

USB 3.0 
 

No
No

Variable Analog Audio Out  

No
No

Wi-Fi Support  

Yes (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz)
Yes (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz)
Show Text 

Input Photos  

Side Inputs Picture  

LG C3 OLED Side Inputs Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Side Inputs Picture

Rear Inputs Picture  

LG C3 OLED Rear Inputs Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Rear Inputs Picture
Show Text 

Total Inputs  

HDMI  

4
4

USB  

3
3

Digital Optical Audio Out  

1
1

Analog Audio Out 3.5mm  

0
0

Analog Audio Out RCA  

0
0

Component In  

0
0

Composite In  

0
0

Tuner (Cable/Ant)  

1
1

Ethernet  

1
1

DisplayPort  

0
0

IR In  

0
0

Audio Passthrough 
 

ARC/eARC Port 
 

eARC
eARC

eARC: Dolby Atmos Over Dolby Digital Plus 
 

Yes
Yes

eARC: Dolby Digital Plus 7.1 
 

Yes
Yes

eARC: LPCM 7.1 Over Dolby MAT 
 

Yes
Yes

eARC: Dolby TrueHD 7.1 
 

Yes
Yes

eARC: DTS:X Over DTS-HD MA 
 

Yes
No

eARC: DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1 
 

Yes
No

eARC: LPCM Channels (Bitstream) 
 

7.1
7.1

ARC: Dolby Digital 5.1 
 

Yes
Yes

ARC: DTS 5.1 
 

Yes
No

Optical: Dolby Digital 5.1 
 

Yes
Yes

Optical: DTS 5.1 
 

Yes
No
Show Text 
Sound Quality

Frequency Response 
 

6.9
7.0

Frequency Response  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Low-Frequency Extension 
 

80.00 Hz
106.79 Hz

Std. Dev. @ 70 
 

1.14 dB
2.45 dB

Std. Dev. @ 80 
 

1.98 dB
2.41 dB

Std. Dev. @ Max 
 

5.55 dB
2.44 dB

Max 
 

85.9 dB SPL
85.3 dB SPL

Dynamic Range Compression 
 

5.31 dB
2.41 dB
Show Text 

Distortion 
 

6.9
7.4

Total Harmonic Distortion 
 

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Weighted THD @ 80 
 

0.085
0.511

Weighted THD @ Max 
 

0.545
0.868

IMD @ 80 
 

4.49%
0.77%

IMD @ Max 
 

8.04%
0.94%
Show Text 
Smart Features

Interface 
 

8.5
8.5

Smart TV Picture  

LG C3 OLED Smart TV Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Smart TV Picture

Smart OS  

webOS
Tizen

Version  

23
2023

Ease of Use 
 

Easy
Easy

Smoothness 
 

Average
Very Smooth

Time Taken to Select YouTube 
 

2 s
2 s

Time Taken to Change Backlight 
 

3 s
5 s

Advanced Options 
 

Many
Many
Show Text 

Ad-Free 
 

0.0
0.0

Ads Picture  

LG C3 OLED Ads Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Ads Picture

Ads 
 

Yes
Yes

Opt-out 
 

No
No

Suggested Content in Home 
 

No
Yes

Opt-out of Suggested Content 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Apps and Features 
 

8.0
8.5

Apps Picture  

LG C3 OLED Apps Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Apps Picture

App Selection 
 

Great
Great

App Smoothness 
 

Average
Average

Cast Capable 
 

Yes
Yes

USB Drive Playback 
 

Yes
Yes

USB Drive HDR Playback 
 

Yes
Yes

HDR in Netflix 
 

Yes
Yes

HDR in YouTube 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Remote 
 

9.0
8.5

Remote Picture  

LG C3 OLED Remote Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Remote Picture

Size 
 

Large
Small

Voice Control 
 

Many Features
Many Features

CEC Menu Control 
 

Yes
Yes

Other Smart Features 
 

Yes
Yes

Remote App  

LG ThinQ
Samsung SmartThings
Show Text 

TV Controls  

Controls Picture  

LG C3 OLED Controls Picture
Samsung S95C OLED Controls Picture
Show Text 

In The Box  

In The Box Picture  

LG C3 OLED In The Box Picture
Samsung S95C OLED In The Box Picture
Show Text 

Misc  

Power Consumption  

95 W
142 W

Power Consumption (Max)  

239 W
398 W

Firmware  

03.10.85
1100

Check Price

42"
 
48"
 
55"
QN55S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
65"
QN65S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
77"
QN77S95CAFXZA
Searching
Finding store
83"
 

LG C3 OLED

Samsung S95C OLED

Comments

  1. Comparison

LG C3 OLED vs Samsung S95C OLED: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey PapaJ,

    Thanks for your questions. The vast majority of air fryer basket and crisper trays are listed as dishwasher safe, however we always recommend hand washing them, as the harsh conditions inside a dishwasher can have a negative impact on the nonstick coating lifespan. Whether they will fit inside the dishwasher is primarily dependent on the air fryer capacity; 2-4 qt. models will easily fit while larger, 6 - 8qt. models can take up a lot of room.

    As for materials, the outer housing of most air fryers are constructed of heat-resistant thermoplastics like polypropylene or ABS. Air fryers make use of a secondary fan that circulate air within the walls of the plastic housing, which helps to cool external surfaces and keeps them within safe limits - that being said, some models do get noticeably warmer to the touch than others.

    The surfaces that touch the food (the basket and crisper tray) are typically made of carbon steel and coated with PTFE or a sol-gel ceramic coating for non-stick properties. The safety and durability of these coatings is a valid concern in the community, and it’s definitely something we plan to explore further in future testing. There are models available that use glass cooking chambers.

    I’ve taken note of your questions, and we will consider them as we further refine our testing methodology. Don’t hesitate to reach out with more!

    Thank you, Tristan

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Usually mixed or individual vegetables ranging from broccoli, corn, carrots, peas, cauliflower, and water chestnuts. Additionally vegan nuggets, personal pizzas, and empanadas. I’ve also baked cut up chicken breast as well as a whole chicken breast from frozen to ready to eat in about 40 minutes. Not the best use but it worked. The next closest adventurous thing has been some flounder which turned out great. I tried out the air fry a couple times but only really use it for the nuggets

    That’s really interesting! The DZ550 lowers its fan speed significantly when set to the Bake function, although it cannot turn off its fan completely. It sounds like the foods you baked respond well to having a lower level of forced convection. We’ve tried baking more sensitive foods like cake and cookies in air fryers, and even with the lower fan speed, these types of foods tend to do better without any forced convection at all. I’ll have to try baking some of the foods you mentioned. Thanks for the information!

    Tristan

  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Man, I wish I knew this before Christmas or had thought to about it then. I got the Ninja air fryer DZ550 and use it as an oven for my day to day cooking since it heats up so much faster. Baking is so much easier. The preheat and air fry measurements tell me the DZ550 is superior to the Ninja Foodi DT201.

    Hey Heiro78,

    Thanks for taking the time to check out the article! I’m curious to hear about your experience baking with the DZ550—what types of foods do you usually bake in it?

    Thanks, Tristan

  4. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Can you add something along the lines of repairability as an add on or something like that as I had a - Instant Pot 140-4004-01 Omni Pro Air Fryer Toaster Oven, 19QT - and the touch screen broke and was offered no real fix for it so I spent 300$ for something that lasted me only 1 year 11 months. I loved the thing but the fact it couldn’t last that long for that price was disappointing the fact I couldn’t repair it made me never want to buy that oven again or anything like it from Instant Pot even though I love the pressure cooker.

    Hey ARating2024,

    That’s a real bummer that the control panel failed so quickly. Unfortunately, repairability is tough to assess since many countertop appliance manufacturers don’t sell replacement parts, especially for electronic or internal components. I had a look online but was unable to find anything for your particular model.

    Generally, mechanical dials and pushbuttons tend to outlast touchscreens, which can be vulnerable to failure via moisture buildup during cooking if not properly sealed.

    I hope that helps. Tristan

    Edited 2 months ago: Formatting
  5. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Your description is incorrect. You mention that the nonstick coating on the cooking tray and cooking chamber surfaces is ceramic. The manufacturer website says: “The baskets are made of aluminum with a PTFE nonstick coating. The crisper plate has a PTFE-free ceramic nonstick coating.”

    Hi deepgroove,

    That’s a great catch - sorry we missed that. I’ve updated the description on the nonstick coating type to be specific to the cooking tray. The same applies to the Ninja DZ071, SL201, DZ401 and DZ201.

    Thank you!

    • Tristan
  6. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Excellent article. As I read each section, I thought: “Well, what about … . ” And then you covered that topic in the following sections. Except for - how does the shape of the air fryer affect its performance. Some have a smooth circular shape which I suspect is better than the rectangular ones. However, the almost infinite variations in shape would be time consuming to test and would probably involve complicated aerodynamics. I suspect the middle 85% of designs would perform so similarly that consumers would find other features more important (e.g., how does it look on my counter, was it discounted). We are still counting on you to identify extreme examples of poor design that overwhelm the positive features. Please resolve the debate about preheating air fryers. Some say preheating is important. Others say don’t bother. It is obvious that pulling out the drawer to load food at the end of the preheat phase greatly offsets the benefit of preheating. Your graphs above show that temperature recovery can take a long time. Should we just load all food at the start? Or should we preheat only when food crispiness is essential - like french fries?

    Hi RocketSurgeon,

    Thanks for your insightful reply. I’m glad you found the article informative!

    Air fryers use a centrifugal style fan, pulling air through the center and expelling it radially and down towards the food. The desired air pattern is a vortex that is constantly circulating and heating the air as it passes through the heater (you may have seen marketing graphics showing this airflow). I agree that simulating or even just trying to record the airflow is a complex task. In theory, I also agree that a circular basket shape would promote this airflow pattern. In practice however, the food inside the basket creates so much obstruction that it’s hard to imagine anything other than a very turbulent flow. Manufacturers are more frequently choosing a square basket shape to maximize the surface area available - as opposed to growing the basket in height to save counterspace. A good example of a bad design would be the Dash 2qt Air Fryer; while it’s small capacity warrants a small surface area, the surface area could have been maximized instead of having a taller, narrower basket (it also has a circular basket shape and has some of the worst air frying performance we’ve tested).

    As for preheating, I think it depends on preference. We tested our air fryers this way because during our research, we found that the majority of users do tend to preheat. The large drop you see in the temperature stability graph is partially due to the thermal mass of the air leaving the system upon opening, but it’s mostly due to adding the frozen food. If you didn’t add the food before reinserting the basket, the temperature recovery time would be a fraction of what it is. In addition, the metal basket and cooking tray are what retain most of the energy from the preheat. Notably, food sizzles immediately once it’s added to a preheated basket, which could produce crispier results by immediately transferring energy to the surface of the food, instead of gradually bringing the chamber and food up to temperature together.

    I hope you find this information helpful.

    Thanks! Tristan

  7. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hi rdclark,

    Thanks for your insightful comment. You’ve highlighted an important point: toaster oven / air fryer combos are becoming very popular as the do-it-all countertop appliance. It raises a valid question about the necessity of a dedicated appliance when multifunctional ones are available.

    The Ninja DCT-451 is especially interesting as, in its lower chamber, it houses a heating element right next to its fan - like an air fryer. Many toasters ovens simply add a fan to circulate air inside the cooking chamber, which is more akin to a conventional convection oven than an air fryer.

    We’re also curious about their air frying performance, and diving into these products and questions would certainly be interesting and relevant for many people.

    Thanks! -Tristan

  8. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Is air fryer better for health?

    Hey tentes,

    Thanks for your comment! Air fryers are marketed as a healthier alternative due to their ability to cook with less fat. This comparison is mostly drawn against other cooking methods that use a lot of fat or oil, like deep frying. While it may be possible to achieve similar crispy results in an air fryer without needing lots of fat, the healthiness depends on what type of food and how much oil you add.

    I hope that helps clear things up. -Tristan

  9. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Nice to see a window … but … there are others. We have a Kalorik with a 12 x 12" footprint, full window and air fryer/oven settings. Shoulda looked at that one.

    Hi TuckerDog,

    Thank you for your comment. Our initial launch included 20 of the most popular models, and focused mostly on basket-style air fryers. That being said, we are always open to testing more products in the future. If you’d like to share us the link to the product, we will consider buying and testing it!

    Thanks, -Tristan

    Edited 7 months ago: Grammar
  10. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I don’t understand. In the general overview, this model was used as the example of how two baskets can make things worse: https://www.rtings.com/air-fryer/learn/research/basket-size#two-baskets-doesn-t-mean-twice-the-speed. But it gets a great review and I don’t see any of the issues (e.g., slow temperature rise, long cook times) noted in the review.

    Hi felzenmat,

    Thanks for your comment - that’s a great point. When testing our dual-basket air fryers, we only use a single zone for the cooking speed and temperature stability tests. In this configuration, they operate similarly to any other single-basket air fryer. However, for dual-basket air fryers, a test with both cooking chambers operating simultaneously could be a great addition and we will consider it moving forward!

    I hope that helps clear things up. -Tristan

  11. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I’m sure you all have thought of this already, but ease of cleaning is a huge component I’d love to see tested and ranked. I love my current air fryer for cooking, but I don’t use it simply because the bottom of the basket has sharp metal edges that cut my hand every time I try to clean it.

    Hey mugabuga,

    Thank you for your suggestion! Cleanability is something we investigated in depth, and found that the majority of basket-style air fryers are extremely similar in terms of ease of cleaning. Notably, PTFE-coated baskets were easier to clean when it came to removing stuck-on food, compared to models with ceramic coatings.

    Which model of air fryer do you have? We didn’t notice any particularly sharp edges in our cleanability analysis, but its possible that sharp edges could become exposed with extended use. Have you noticed any flaking or damage to the nonstick coating?

    Thanks! -Tristan