Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We're proud to introduce Test Bench 2.0, which overhauls our audio measurements, with new tests and usages. There's even a brand new multi-target graphing tool! You can read all about this in our changelog, featuring commentary from our Test Designer, Pierre. We'll also be holding an AMA on our Discord Channel on May 1.

Turtle Beach Atlas Air Headphones Review

Tested using Methodology v1.8
Reviewed Aug 28, 2024 at 01:21 pm
Latest change: Writing modified Mar 26, 2025 at 02:21 pm
Turtle Beach Atlas Air Picture
7.7
Neutral Sound
6.1
Commute/Travel
7.0
Sports/Fitness
6.6
Office
8.0
Wireless Gaming
8.2
Wired Gaming
7.5
Phone Calls
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Turtle Beach

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are open-back gaming headphones. Turtle Beach claims their floating ear cups and headband conform "to the contours of your head," providing a lightweight, comfortable fit. They come with the gaming-friendly niceties we expect from the brand, like Bluetooth compatibility, a flip-up-to-mute microphone, and a fully-featured companion app. But how do they play out in practice? Read on to find out.

Our Verdict

7.7 Neutral Sound

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are good for neutral sound. They have a generally flat sound profile out of the box with a healthy dose of brightness thrown in. Like many open-backed headphones, they lack a little low bass, so explosions are missing some rumble, but a peak in the high bass keeps effects like footsteps feeling immersive. A small boost across the high-mids and low-treble means dialogue is always clear and detailed, even during busy cutscenes, but a peak in the mid-treble renders sibilants and cymbals piercing. That said, their app lets you EQ their sound to your taste. Their open-back design means they have a decent passive soundstage that feels open and enveloping. While they do a good job contouring around glasses, people with thick hair might notice a drop in bass.

Pros
  • Decent passive soundstage due to open-back design. 

  • Companion app with graphic EQ and presets.
Cons
  • People with thick hair might notice a drop in bass.
6.1 Commute/Travel

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are mediocre for commuting and traveling, but they're not designed for those purposes. Although these headphones are comfortable and have a long battery life, you'll find it difficult to transport these bulky over-ears either on your person or in a bag. They're also very bad at blocking out street noise and the sounds of airplanes. If that doesn't bother you, other people might be bothered by you, as these cans leak a lot of audio.

Pros
  • Great mic recording quality.
  • Comfortable memory foam ear pads.
Cons
  • Terrible noise isolation, by design.
  • Not very portable.
7.0 Sports/Fitness

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air aren't the best choice for sports and fitness. Like many over-ear headphones, their bulky design means they're not easy to throw into a bag. They're also only reasonably stable, so they'll likely fall off if you take them for a jog. Their open-back design means you'll hear the clangs of people dropping weights at the gym along with your audio, while anyone nearby will hear your audio. On the plus side, they're comfortable, have good controls, and have good build quality, so they'll do the job of accompanying you on a long walk in a pinch. That is, if you can stand the confused glances coming your way.

Pros
  • Comfortable memory foam ear pads.
Cons
  • Not very stable.
6.6 Office

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are alright for office use. Their great microphone recording quality means they're useful for calls, and the person on the other end of the line will hear you clearly. Still, you probably want to be in a quiet room so as not to bother coworkers with the audio leaking from the headset's ear cups. Their open-back design means they leak a lot of audio and don't block out the sounds of people talking or typing. Still, they're comfortable headphones, and their battery life will easily get you through a few days of work without having to recharge.

Pros
  • Great mic recording quality.
Cons
  • Terrible noise isolation, by design.
8.0 Wireless Gaming

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are great for wireless gaming, though they won't work wirelessly with your Xbox. When connected via their wireless dongle, they provide a low latency connection suitable for gaming, and their comfortable fit and long battery life means you can enjoy several gaming marathons between recharges. They have a generally flat sound out of the box with a big dose of brightness thrown in for good measure. Though they lack a little low bass, which can rob explosions of some thump, their sound is still warm, thanks to a boost in the high bass. Dialogue is clear even during busy cutscenes, although sibilants can be piercing. Fortunately, you can customize their sound using their excellent companion app. Their mic has a great recording quality, so anyone you're gaming with online will hear you clearly, even if you're gaming by an open window and a train passes by. That said, they do a poor job blocking out external sounds, so you might not enjoy gaming in noisy environments as you'll hear what's happening around you.

Pros
  • Decent passive soundstage due to open-back design. 

  • Great mic recording quality.
  • Excellent microphone noise handling.
Cons
  • Terrible noise isolation, by design.
8.2 Wired Gaming

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are great for wired gaming. You can plug their included analog cable into your gaming rig's TRRS port for full audio and microphone capabilities. It's also the only way to connect these headphones to an Xbox. When connected this way, there's virtually no latency. By default, their sound is mostly flat with a bit of added brightness. Explosions lack a little rumble, but these headphones provide plenty of boom, making sound effects exciting. Dialogue is clearly audible even against dramatic scores, although sibilants like S and T sounds are piercing. These cans have a great mic, so anyone you're gaming with will hear you, even if you're gaming in a noisy environment. However, since their open-back design means these headphones don't block out much audio, you probably won't want to game in noisy environments as you'll hear everything around you.

Pros
  • Decent passive soundstage due to open-back design. 

  • Great mic recording quality.
  • Excellent microphone noise handling.
Cons
  • Terrible noise isolation, by design.
7.5 Phone Calls

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are good for phone calls. Their microphone has great recording quality and excellent noise handling, so whoever you're talking to will hear you clearly, even if you're in a busy room or calling near an open window with rumbly car engines driving past. You probably won't want to make any calls from a noisy environment because these cans do a terrible job blocking out external noise: you'll hear the car engines even if your conversation partner won't. However, these will work well if you call from a quiet, private room.

Pros
  • Great mic recording quality.
  • Excellent microphone noise handling.
Cons
  • Terrible noise isolation, by design.
  • 7.7 Neutral Sound
  • 6.1 Commute/Travel
  • 7.0 Sports/Fitness
  • 6.6 Office
  • 8.0 Wireless Gaming
  • 8.2 Wired Gaming
  • 7.5 Phone Calls

Changelog

  1. Updated Mar 26, 2025:

    We added a reference to the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX3000 in the Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance box.

  2. Updated Dec 19, 2024:

    Several Sound tests have been updated following Test Bench 1.8. There have also been text changes made throughout the review, including to the Usages and Product Comparisons to match these results.

  3. Updated Dec 16, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.8, which updates our target curve and Sound tests. You can read more about this in our changelog.
  4. Updated Nov 06, 2024:

    We added a link to our recommendation article on the Best Turtle Beach Headphones in the product comparisons section of this review.

  5. Updated Aug 28, 2024: Review published.
  6. Updated Aug 22, 2024: Early access published.
  7. Updated Aug 12, 2024: Our testers have started testing this product.
  8. Updated Jul 10, 2024: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  9. Updated Jul 04, 2024: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

There's only one variant of the Turtle Beach Atlas Air. You can view our model's label here. If you come across another variant, let us know in the comments.

Compared To Other Headphones

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are open-back gaming headphones, of which there aren't many on the market. The Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X and the Corsair VIRTUOSO PRO are both open-backs and good for wired gaming, but you can't use them wirelessly like the Atlas Air. On the other hand, the SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7 Wireless are good for wireless gaming but are closed-back and have a passive soundstage that feels less immersive and spacious than the Atlas Air.

In Turtle Beach's own lineup, the Atlas Air are a step up both in quality and price from the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless. Not only can you use them via a wired connection with full audio and microphone functionality, unlike the Stealth 600 (Gen 3), but they also have better build quality and deliver more consistent audio from wear to wear. For more, check out our article on the best Turtle Beach headphones.

If you're looking for more headphones, check out our recommendations for the best gaming headsets, the best open-back headphones, and the best wireless gaming headsets.

SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7 Wireless [7, 7P, 7X]

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are better gaming headphones for most people than the SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7 Wireless. The Turtle Beach are open-back headphones  that have a noticeably better mic than that of the SteelSeries. On the other hand, because of their open-back design, they leak more audio and do a worse job blocking out noise, although neither pair of headphones does a good job isolating you from sounds in your environment. The SteelSeries come in three variants, so get the version that matches your gaming platform. That said, they support Xbox Wireless if you get the 7X version. The Turtle Beach only support PC and PlayStation wirelessly, though you can always use the wired connection with other consoles.

Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3)

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are better gaming headphones than the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) in most circumstances. The Atlas Air have a superior build quality and deliver audio more consistently with each wear. They can also be used via a wired connection, unlike the Gen 3. On the other hand, the Atlas Air cannot be used wirelessly with Xbox, unlike the Xbox version of the Gen 3. While the Atlas Air have a more spacious and immersive passive soundstage, that also means they leak more audio and are worse at blocking out noise, which could be important if you game in a shared space. That said, the Atlas Air are significantly more expensive.

Corsair VIRTUOSO PRO

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air and the Corsair VIRTUOSO PRO are both open-back gaming headphones. The Corsair's passive soundstage feels more immersive and speaker-like, delivering audio more consistently from wear to wear. On the other hand, the Turtle Beach can connect to your PC and PlayStation wirelessly, have a better mic, and come with a companion app to tweak their sound to your liking.

Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X

The Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X and the Turtle Beach Atlas Air are both open-back gaming headphones with decent passive soundstages. You can only use the Drop headphones via a wired connection, but they're more comfortable and have superior imaging that demonstrates better quality control. On the other hand, the Turtle Beach can be used wirelessly with PCs and PlayStations, have a companion app to adjust their sound profile, and have a better-performing microphone system.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Type Over-ear
Enclosure Open-Back
Wireless Yes
Transducer Dynamic

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are open-back gaming headphones. They have a somewhat futuristic style thanks partly to their floating ear cup design. Turtle Beach calls the ear cups 'floating' because they're held in place with elastic bands, which they say leads to increased comfort. Their frame is made of dark grey plastic with black accents, and the floating plate on the back of each ear cup's driver is shiny grey plastic. The ear pads are filled with soft memory foam and covered in dark grey fabric. Around the top of the plastic headband, there's a black mesh and elastic suspension headband. The microphone is detachable and comes with a black windshield. Turtle Beach sells brightly-colored 'mod packs' consisting of a replacement headband strap and ear pads if all this grey and black is getting you down.

7.5
Design
Comfort
Weight 0.6 lbs
Clamping Force
0.6 lbs

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air are comfortable headphones. The large ear cups will fit most people, and the ear pads are covered in a nice, soft cloth with a leatherette trim. The headphones feel light with a gentle clamping force, and the headband spreads the weight of the headphones evenly across your head. Unfortunately, the headband isn't very adjustable: you can only adjust the soft mesh covering and not the plastic headband itself, which isn't very intuitive. You might find the fit a little snug if you have a larger head. But these fit people who wear glasses well, thanks to their memory foam ear cups, which contour around glasses nicely.

7.6
Design
Controls
OS Compatibility
Not OS specific
Ease Of Use Good
Feedback Good
Call/Music Control Yes
Volume Control Yes
Microphone Control Mute/Unmute
Channel Mixing
Yes
Noise Cancelling Control No
Talk-Through
No
Additional Controls Bluetooth + Multi function

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have good controls. The controls are all in easy-to-access, intuitive locations, and the most commonly used controls (like volume, pairing, and input-switching) all have their own buttons or dials, with less commonly used controls as secondary functions. Unfortunately, the buttons all have the same circular design, so they can be tricky to identify just by touch. They're also slightly stiff, so pushing them can move the headset around on your head. There's no button to mute the detachable microphone, but that doesn't matter, as flipping up the microphone mutes it. The headphones play tones to indicate when the minimum and maximum volumes have been reached, when pairing with new devices, and when powering the headphones on or off. There are also tones for switching between connection modes and EQ presets. The tones are generally helpful but sound similar to one another, which can make identifying their meaning a little tricky.

Unlike the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless, channel mixing can only be achieved through the companion app. There's also no dedicated button for call and music controls. To control calls and music, you use the multifunctional Bluetooth pairing button. These controls work when connected to a source via Bluetooth or the wireless dongle but not when connected via analog cable. You can see a diagram with a list of controls here.

5.2
Design
Portability
L 8.1" (20.5 cm)
W 7.5" (19.1 cm)
H 3.9" (10.0 cm)
Volume 238.94 in³ (3,915.50 cm³)
Transmitter Required No

Like most over-ear gaming headphones, the Turtle Beach Atlas Air aren't very portable—but they're not designed to be. They don't fold flat like the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless, and they won't fit in smaller bags, but that's okay as most gamers will probably store them near their gaming rig, and the headphones won't leave the house often.

6.5
Design
Case
Type Pouch
L N/A
W N/A
H N/A
Volume N/A

Unlike the Turtle Beach Stealth 500 Wireless, which don't have a case, the Turtle Beach Atlas Air come with an okay case. It's made of fine-thread polyester and will reasonably protect the headphones from scratches, but it won't protect them from drops or heavy spills. The toggles on the drawstring are good at keeping the case closed, and the drawstrings double up as carry cables.

7.5
Design
Build Quality

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have good build quality. The plastic used throughout feels solid and is a notch above the plastic used in the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless. There are also no conventional hinges to break. Instead, the headphones adjust the ear cups using a six-point suspension system. The downside of this design is that it allows only limited rotational adjustment, though the elastic bands themselves feel very sturdy. You adjust the headband fit via velcro, which won't crack like conventional plastic but allows only limited size adjustment and can come under stress at the maximum allowed size. The memory foam ear cups are built to accommodate your glasses and, as such, are covered in soft fabric that won't scratch them. These headphones don't have an IP rating against dust or water exposure, but that's okay since they probably won't travel far from your gaming rig.

6.5
Design
Stability

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have okay stability. These headphones aren't designed for exercise, so don't expect to take them for a run or to the gym and have them remain on your head. But they'll stay on for most gaming sessions, so long as you're not a super active gamer who headbangs when your favorite metal tunes come on the loading screen. Regardless, so long as you're using Bluetooth or wireless dongle connections, you won't have to worry about getting a cable snagged on anything.

Design
Headshots 1
Design
Headshots 2
Design
Top
Design
In The Box

  • Turtle Beach Atlas Air headphones
  • Detachable microphone (with removable windscreen)
  • USB-A dongle (compatible with PC, PlayStation, and Nintendo Switch)
  • 1/8" (3.5mm) TRRRS to TRRS analog cable (78.75 in/2 m)
  • USB-A to USB-C charging cable (78.75 in/2 m)
  • Quick Start guide

Sound
Sound
Sound Profile
See details on graph tool
Normalization Frequency
1,050 Hz
Bass Amount
-2.0 dB
Treble Amount
2.2 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have a generally flat sound profile that trends bright. Like many open-backs, they lack a little low bass, so explosions are robbed of some rumble. A boost in the high bass makes up for this a little, keeping effects like footsteps feeling immersive and soundtracks warm and enveloping. The mid-mids are a touch recessed, which could make voices feel a bit distant if not for the broad boost across the high-mids and low-treble that keeps dialogue clear and detailed even during busy fight scenes. However, a big peak in the mid-treble renders sibilants like S and T sounds piercing.

The frequency response is almost identical when connected via Bluetooth or their wireless dongle, but activating the microphone shelves off the highest treble frequencies. As you can see in this graph, the vocal boost preset amplifies mid-range frequencies, while the bass and treble boost preset amplifies the mid-bass as well as the low- and mid-treble. You can see the effect different Superhuman Hearing presets have on the sound in this graph. Superhuman Hearing presets are designed to make it easier for FPS gamers to hear enemy movements like footsteps.

7.8
Sound
Frequency Response Consistency
See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool
Avg. Std. Deviation
0.44 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have very good frequency response consistency. Their memory foam ear cups do a good job contouring around different shaped heads, ensuring you'll get a similar sound with each wear, even if you wear glasses. If you have thick or bushy hair, you might notice a drop-off in the bass range, leading to explosions sounding a little more anemic than they would otherwise. In that case, it's worth brushing your hair out of the way as much as possible to ensure the ear cups form a good seal with your head.

Sound
Raw Frequency Response
See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool
8.1
Sound
Bass Profile: Target Compliance
See details on graph tool
RMS Deviation From Target
4.0 dB
Low-Frequency Extension
27.89 Hz
Low Bass
-5.39 dB
Mid Bass
-0.05 dB
High Bass
1.2 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have impressive bass compliance. Like many open-backed headphones, the low bass is rolled off, so explosions lack some rumble. The mid-bass is well-balanced, so cinematic taiko drums sound punchy without overwhelming the mix. A small boost in the high-bass adds warmth to epic orchestral soundtracks and ensures sound effects like footsteps are easy to hear.

8.4
Sound
Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance
See details on graph tool
RMS Deviation From Target
1.57 dB
Low Mid
-0.32 dB
Mid-Mid
-1.97 dB
High Mid
1.21 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have great mid-range target compliance. The low mids are virtually flat, ensuring busy cutscenes don't sound too cluttered. A small dip in the mid-mids that might make dialogue sound a little distant is made up for somewhat by gently exaggerated high-mids. Voices will sound clear and present even against loud soundtracks. If mid-range accuracy is important to you, consider the audiophile-grade Audio-Technica ATH-ADX3000.

7.7
Sound
Treble Profile: Target Compliance
See details on graph tool
RMS Deviation From Target
2.7 dB
Low Treble
2.53 dB
Mid Treble
1.69 dB
High Treble
2.12 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have good treble compliance. The moderate peak in the low treble is a continuation of the slightly elevated high mids and ensures dialogue is always clear and comprehensible, although you might find it a little harsh. A big peak in the mid-treble makes sound effects like clashing swords in games like Mordhau sound piercing.

7.3
Sound
Peaks/Dips
See details on graph tool
Peaks
1.5 dB
Dips
2 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have decent peaks and dips performance. That means these headphones do a satisfactory job of controlling their own sound profile. A small dip in the low bass is to be expected from open-back headphones, but it does rob explosions of some exciting rumble. The rest of the bass range up through the mid-range is well controlled. But the treble is more inconsistent. A few peaks and dips in the low- and mid-treble mean voices can sound harsh or piercing depending on their pitch.

6.1
Sound
Imaging
See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool
Weighted Group Delay
1.13
Weighted Phase Mismatch
21.3
Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
2.32
Weighted Frequency Mismatch
1.8

These headphones have passable imaging performance, indicating mediocre quality control and ergonomics. That's a little surprising from Turtle Beach, a brand we've come to expect better from. Even their budget-tier Turtle Beach Stealth 500 Wireless headset had excellent imaging when we tested it. With the Atlas Air, group delay in the bass range is audible. Kick drums don't sound tight, and effects like explosions sound muddy. It's most obvious with bass-heavy content like EDM-based game soundtracks. On the other hand, the mid and treble range group delay falls below the audibility threshold, producing a transparent treble.

The big peak across the treble range in the phase response graph is an artifact of our testing process and won't be audible to you. The corrections we attempted to make for this did not realistically demonstrate the sound of these headphones, so we chose to use the graph with the big treble peak. That said, imaging varies between units.

7.1
Sound
Passive Soundstage
See details on graph tool
PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
4.05 dB
PRTF Size (Avg.)
5.34 dB
PRTF Distance
7.11 dB
Openness
9.1
Acoustic Space Excitation
6.9

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have a satisfactory passive soundstage. Their open-back design means the audio can interact with the space around you, producing a more spacious sound than closed-back headphones like the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless. Audio feels more like it comes from two speakers in a room than inside your head.

4.1
Sound
Virtual Soundstage
Head Modeling
On/Off
Speaker Modeling
On/Off
Room Ambience
No
Head Tracking
No
Virtual Surround
Dolby Atmos

These headphones come with Waves 3D Audio virtual surround sound capabilities, so long as you use the Swarm II app. They're also compatible with Windows Sonic, Dolby Surround Sound, and PlayStation 5's Tempest 3D. You'll have to purchase third-party apps separately.

7.8
Sound
Weighted Harmonic Distortion
See details on graph tool
WHD @ 90
0.267
WHD @ 100
0.123

These headphones have very good weighted harmonic distortion performance. While there are a couple of peaks in the high-mid and mid-treble ranges, they won't be audible at normal listening volumes. The rest of the frequencies fall within good limits, which results in clear and pure audio reproduction.

Sound
Test Settings
Firmware
V6.96.1480
Power
On
Connection
Wireless (Proprietary)
Codec
PCM, 24-bit, 48kHz
Test Instrument Audio Precision APx517B
EQ
Turtle Beach Signature Sound
ANC
No ANC
Tip/Pad
Default
Microphone
Boom

These are the settings used to test these headphones. Our results are only valid when used in this configuration.

Isolation
1.9
Isolation
Noise Isolation - Full Range
See details on graph tool
Noise Cancelling No
Overall Attenuation
-4.25 dB
Bass
0.71 dB
Mid
1.13 dB
Treble
-16.19 dB

These headphones do a terrible job of blocking out noise around you. That's normal for their open-back design. Since the ear cups aren't sealed, noise in your environment easily seeps into your audio, so these aren't the headphones to wear when gaming in a shared space or by an open window. They block out no bass- or mid-range sounds and only reduce treble-range sounds like the whine of a fan a little. Of course, the tradeoff is the more immersive passive soundstage these provide. It's worth noting that the peak in the low bass is an artifact of our testing process and not something you'll hear when you use them.

2.1
Isolation
Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios
See details on graph tool
Airplane Noise Attenuation
-3.57 dB
Airplane Noise Isolation Audio
Office Noise Attenuation
-4.16 dB
Office Noise Isolation Audio
Street Noise Attenuation
-3.72 dB
Street Noise Isolation Audio

These headphones do just as awful a job blocking out more realistic everyday sounds as steady-state noise. Bass-range sounds like the rumble of plane engines will definitely make their way into your audio, as will ambient chatter from an office and street noise like car horns. They'll reduce higher-pitched sounds like A/C whine a little, but their open-back design isn't intended for anyone gaming in a noisy space. Again, the peak in the low bass is an artifact of our testing process. The small peak across the mid- and high-treble is only slightly audible with real-world content when gaming in an extremely quiet room. It's not something to be concerned about.

Isolation
Noise Isolation - Voice Handling
Female Voice 1
Male Voice 1
Female Voice 2
Male Voice 2
Isolation
ANC Wind Handling
ANC Wind Noise
N/A
4.1
Isolation
Leakage
See details on graph tool
Leakage Audio
Overall Leakage @ 1ft
53.53 dB

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have bad leakage performance. That's to be expected, given their open-back design, which allows your audio to leak into your environment. Most of the leakage is concentrated in the high-mid and low-treble range, which means audio that does leak out will contain a lot of vocal detail and be intelligible to people nearby. These aren't the headphones to wear if you don't want to disturb anyone around you.

Microphone
Microphone
Microphone Style
Integrated
No
In-Line
No
Boom
Yes
Detachable Boom
Yes
Mic Yes
8.3
Microphone
Recording Quality
See details on graph tool
Recorded Speech
LFE
132.62 Hz
FR Std. Dev.
1.16 dB
HFE
6,267.15 Hz
Weighted THD
0.257
Gain
9.94 dB

This microphone's recording quality is great. Like the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 (Gen 3) Wireless, the mic's response is generally flat across the human vocal range. This means your voice will sound natural to whoever you're speaking with. The response is shelved off in the mid-bass and mid-treble, but that can help vocal intelligibility as these parts of the spectrum are where distracting sounds like engine rumble and AC whine can be found. If you like to tweak your mic's sounds, use the companion Swarm II app. You can adjust the mic's noise gate and EQ settings. We tested the mic at its default noise gate setting of 50%.

8.5
Microphone
Noise Handling
See details on graph tool
SpNR
62.15 dB
Noise Gate
On/Off Toggle
Speech + Pink Noise Handling
8.5
Speech + Pink Noise Audio Sample
Speech + Subway Noise Handling
8.5
Speech + Subway Noise Audio Sample

The mic has excellent noise handling. Even if you're gaming in a noisy environment, the people on the other end of the line can hear you clearly. A loud train going past your open window will barely affect your voice's audio quality, and quieter background sounds will be almost inaudible.

Active Features
9.5
Active Features
Battery
Battery Type
Rechargable
Continuous Battery Life
57 hrs
Additional Charges
0.0
Total Battery Life
57 hrs
Charge Time
1.75 hrs
Power-Saving Feature
Auto-Off Timer
Audio While Charging
Yes
Passive Playback
Yes
Charging Port USB-C

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have remarkable battery life. Turtle Beach advertises them as having a continuous battery life of 50 hours, and we measured 57 hours. That's a superb result that'll see you through a few gaming marathons without needing to recharge. In our tests, it took 1.75 hours for the headphones to fully charge. They also have an auto-off timer you can configure to switch off after 5, 10, 20, or 30 minutes of inactivity. It's worth noting that the headphones can deliver audio while charging, but only if connected wirelessly.

8.5
Active Features
App Support
App Name Swarm II
iOS Yes
Android Yes
macOS No
Windows Yes
Equalizer
Graphic + Presets
ANC Control
No
Mic Control Adjustable Level
Room Effects
Yes
Playback Control
No
Button Mapping No
Surround Support
Yes

The Turtle Beach Swarm II app is excellent. It works on PC, Android, and iOS and allows you to see at a glance things like your headphones' connection status, battery life, connection mode, and whether there's an update ready to be installed. The app also lets you tweak the audio level, EQ, game/chat mix, and settings related to the microphone, like noise gate, sensitivity, monitoring, chat boost, and mic EQ. You can also manage power options, LED brightness, surround sound type, and hotkey configuration (only on PC). You can tweak voice and tone signals (like those signifying you've reached the maximum volume) and configure macros if your games support them. Finally, Swarm II gives you access to Superhuman Hearing, which is designed to make it easier to hear things like the footsteps of a competitor creeping up on you. You can see a video of how the app works here.

Connectivity
9.9
Connectivity
Wired Connection
Analog Audio
Yes
USB Audio
No
Detachable
Yes
Length
6.56 ft (2.00 m)
Connector
1/8" TRRRS
Latency - Analog
0.1 ms
Latency - USB
N/A
Recorded Latency
Recorded Latency Connection Analog

You can use the Turtle Beach Atlas Air via their 78.75 in (2 m) analog cable with full audio and microphone capabilities. The cable connects to your headphones via a TRRRS jack, and you plug the TRRS jack into your gaming rig. When connected this way, the headphones automatically switch to passive playback mode. You only use the 78.75-inch (2 m) USB cable they come with for charging the headphones.

8.1
Connectivity
Bluetooth Connection
Bluetooth Version
5.2
Multi-Device Pairing
Bluetooth + Console/Non-BT Wireless
Quick Pair (Android)
No
Quick Pair (iOS)
No
Line Of Sight Range
334.65 ft (102.00 m)
Latency - SBC
180 ms
Latency - aptX
N/A
Latency - aptX Adaptive (High Quality)
N/A
Latency - aptX Adaptive (Low Latency)
N/A
Latency - LDAC
N/A
Recorded Latency
Recorded Latency Codec SBC
AAC Support
No

These headphones have great Bluetooth compatibility. They support Bluetooth 5.2; you can pair them with Bluetooth-compatible devices like your phone. Unfortunately, you can't hear audio from both sources simultaneously: you press their QuickSwitch button to swap between the dongle and Bluetooth connections. The headphones don't crossfade between the two sources, and the process takes about three seconds.

While you can use the Bluetooth connection to game via your PC or PlayStation, the latency is much higher than when connected via the USB dongle. Most gamers will find the Bluetooth latency unusable. Still, since some devices and video-playing apps compensate for latency by delaying the video to coincide with your audio, you might find watching videos is feasible.

8.4
Connectivity
Wireless Connection (Dongle)
Line Of Sight Range
150.92 ft (46.00 m)
Latency - Dongle
38 ms
Recorded Latency

The Turtle Beach Atlas Air have impressive non-Bluetooth wireless connectivity via their USB-A dongle. With a low latency of 38 ms, you won't notice a delay between your game audio and video.

Connectivity
PC Compatibility
Analog
Audio + Microphone
Wired USB
No
Non-BT Wireless
Audio + Microphone

These headphones are compatible with your PC via their wireless dongle connection and analog cable. Your computer must have a port that can accept TRRS connections to connect via analog cable. When connected to your PC via their USB-A dongle, these headphones can deliver audio in 24-bit at a 96kHz sampling rate.

Connectivity
PlayStation Compatibility
PS4 Analog
Audio + Microphone
PS4 Wired USB
No
PS4 Non-BT Wireless
Audio + Microphone
PS5 Analog
Audio + Microphone
PS5 Wired USB
No
PS5 Non-BT Wireless
Audio + Microphone

You can connect these headphones to your PlayStation via their wireless USB dongle or analog cable (as long as you connect the cable to a TRRS port).

Connectivity
Xbox Compatibility
Xbox One Analog
Audio + Microphone
Xbox One Wired USB
No
Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
No
Xbox Series X|S Analog
Audio + Microphone
Xbox Series X|S Wired USB
No
Xbox Series X|S Non-BT Wireless
No

These headphones aren't compatible with Xbox Wireless, but you can plug them into your controller's TRRS port and use them via their wired connection.

3.4
Connectivity
Base/Dock
Type
Wireless USB Dongle
USB Input
Yes
Line In
No
Line Out
No
Optical Input
No
RCA Input
No
Dock Charging
No
Power Supply
USB

These headphones don't have a dock but come with a wireless USB dongle. Connect your device to the headphones using the dongle to ensure a low-latency connection for gaming.

Recommended Articles

Comments

  1. Product

Turtle Beach Atlas Air: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Can you update the tv recommendation tool to only show 2.0+ bench TVs?

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Unfortunately not, no. We don’t anticipate updating more than those 86 reviews to our newest methodology. Sorry about that!

    While I understand, i do think the philips x2 should be added, since it scores so well

  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    We don’t test CAD with backlight strobing on because not all monitors have it, and our tests are meant to easily compare monitors using the same test conditions. That said, we have the Backlight Strobing box dedicated to testing the feature, although we don’t measure CAD with it on.

    you should at least add a cad score for it

  4. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Why dont you test CAD with DYAC2 (backlight strobing) turned on? That’s the whole point of the feature

  5. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    w!

  6. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Hi greyschemer, Thanks for all of those suggestions. I’m taking note of it and adding them to our internal tracking. I can’t promise anything about when these might get implemented but if we bring updates to switches we’ll definitely reconsider this.

    can you do loudness and hz pitch? In other words, the same 2 things you do for the smoothness test, except for actually hitting the switch.

  7. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I think this result shows that you need to add an iem target curve. harman has a 3.5db additional boost for iems because of how iems measure

    of course, yall are switching to either the gras or 5128 soon so it should be fine eventually. By the way, oratory was graphing diffuse field tilt curves and found that diffuse field with a -14db tilt has a 100% preference score using haman’s preference score

    So the best way forward could be diffuse field -14db on the 5128

  8. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Its app has bass and treble, what settings makes it the most accurate to your speaker target curve?

  9. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Actually I just saw that you guys ordered the gras and 5128 systems. That should fix the issue

    Sean Olive also has the 5128 now. Perhaps use the Gras until Harman makes a curve for the 5128?

  10. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    the difference seems to be mostly in the 2k-10k range (other than 4db bass for IEMs)

    Edited 1 year ago: add more stuff
  11. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hi Alumnicesar, However, we are definitely interested to know more about what your thoughts on the importance of passive soundstage and whether or not it should be dissociated from something called “neutral sound”.

    currently, iems score really low in neutral sound. That’s proof that soundtsage is weighted too highly. I’m not saying to disregard soundstage to the point that iems become king, but rather a small boost should be more representative of how a person who values neutral sound would rate them.

    Would you be interested in a usage score that accounts only for sound characteristic that are objectively quantifiable like Distortion, imaging, peaks/dips and possibly soundstage, but exclude sound profile accuracy?

    That would definitely be a useful additional score to have

    Would you be interested in “Neutral sound”-like usages that would specifically target users who are looking for good soundstage while another “Neutral sound”-like usage could exclude soundstage completely?

    I dont believe that would be useful

    Do you think a neutral sound usage should be based on a more objectively flat target curve and not our current target?

    I would argue that Harman’s elevated bass is accurate. In a tone generator, 100 hz on harman sounds to be the same volume as 1000 hz

  12. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Thanks again for the very detailed feedback. I totally understand the point you are making about soundstage being too heavily weighted in a score about neutrality. While readjusting the scores and keep improving them overtime with feedback like yours is something we will always seek to do, we are internally thinking about broadening what is considered “accurate” since scoring headphone with one definition of accuracy or neutrality will always cause issues with others that do not agree with that definition. For example, at the moment the neutral sound score is the only usage score that is 100% about sound (only includes sound measurement metric) making it the score that people associate with “good sound” for some while for others it’s about how truly neutral the sound is. This one example of disconnect in interpretation will always stay no matter how we change the weight of the current neutral score usage so we need to consider other approaches to make it more clear and useful for more people. Different target curve, more sound oriented usage scores, redefining what we want to expose with our neutral sound score are things we have to explore to try and fix those definition issues to provide better interpretation of what we measure, but also cover a broader spectrum of sound preference and if those ideas sparks suggestions or concerns we would be very happy to hear them as we shape our mind on how to approach those issues. As for the graph readability issues, those are all good proposition that we will look into implementing when we start working on the next test bench as I agree that it suffers a lot from readability issues. Having community feedback like yours really helps guide the direction of what needs to be improved to push the quality of our reviews forward so thanks a lot.

    I agree that soundstage should be weighted less. But not so low that it’s at 5%

  13. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey! We actually tested the mouse at the lowest possible debounce setting (4ms). If that’s not what you’re referring too though, feel free to clarify and I’ll reach out to our testers! :)

    I’m pretty sure they have a 1ms setting now

    Edited 3 years ago: Typo
  14. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    It’s been updated now, you should see the full tables with all graphs and charts. The overshoot isn’t that noticeable in Ultra Fast on our motion photo, but this can vary between different content. If that’s the mode that works best for your usage, then that’s what I’d stick with. On Fastest the overshoot is definitely noticeable on our motion photo, so I wouldn’t really recommend that setting. Right now, Rtings has their “Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate” scoring as: 33% Rise/Fall and 33% Total Response Time.

    Subjectively speaking, comparing the “Fast” picture and “Ultra Fast” picture, Ultra Fast is clearer. Perhaps, Rise/Fall should be weighted higher than Total Response Time

  15. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Major thanks

  16. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I’ll try to update the review later today with the new tables. We don’t usually rewrite older reviews to include this info, but I’ll make an exception in this case as it’s still a pretty popular monitor. Awesome!! Thanks so much :)

  17. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    We actually recommend ‘Faster’ for this monitor. We don’t recommend the higher settings on this model, as they have almost no impact on the actual response times, but significantly increase overshoot. When choosing the best mode, it is a bit subjective, but we always try and balance performance gains versus overshoot. There have been cases where our recommended settings has a bit more overshoot than some people are comfortable with.

    can you add pictures and charts like with your recent tests? I went on ufotest and see no ghosting except for on the “fastest” setting.

    because of that, i put it on ultrafast. what’s the response time difference?

  18. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I also was wondering why we haven’t had reviews in a long while haha

    Edited 3 years ago: Better wording
  19. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I think many will agree when I say this, In-ears, should have different score weighting from on-ear and over-ear headphones. For headphones, I found 25% Soundstage, 25% treble accuracy, 15% bass accuracy, 15% mid accuracy, 8% imaging, 7% weighted harmonic distortion, 5% freq response consistency to accurately rank the headphones with PEQ in mind. Some minor tweaking is still necessary. I also have noticed that your weighted harmonic distortion is very lenient when compared to amirm’s measurements of the same headphones. A good example of this is the he-400i 2016 version. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/hifiman-he400i-review-planar-headphone.18544/ the distortion here is horrendous, but on rtings he 400i is a top score for whd.

    I disagree, I think the scoring should be the same

  20. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey! This is something we are looking into for sure. Thanks for the suggestion!

    any chance you can retest the apex pro with its switches in the 0.4mm setting? its score in input lag looks way slower than what it should be. It would be useful to see how it compares to the top of the list

    Edited 4 years ago: fix
  21. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Actually, we did add latency testing with our most recent test bench update.

    Best update ever

  22. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I seriously doubt latency differences among switches will show up in a test measuring latency of the entire keyboard input chain (switch, controller, transmission, computer actually reading it)

    They will

  23. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello, The main reason why we don’t test for it right now is not the difficulty, but because we test all of our products the exact same way for comparison purpose. What it means for speaker is that we try to do our testing with a mode that is similar for as many products as possible to be able to have a better comparison between them. This is the first iteration of our test bench and we will be looking in the future to improve it. We could look at a way to incorporate testing with mutiple modes and still be comparable between products. I’ll bring this up with the test development team.
    Thank you for your feedback.

    Wouldn’t it be possible to just test it the same way but with the mode on? Just treat it like an eq mode or something.

    Thanks for all the work y’all do btw

  24. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    That makes more sense. I think smoothing it to 9kHz would be better. Thanks for taking the time to make sure everything is correct!

  25. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    High treble is actually not included in the calculation, only the value between 20Hz and 9kHz are taken into account as described in the tooltip of the Sound Profile box. We are leaving the data on the graph since some people are interested and like to see them.

    There might be misunderstanding on how the value is calculated. We are obtaining this value by doing the average of the trebles minus the average of the mids based on a smoothed version of the frequency response curve we obtained. In a simple way, the smoothed version removes the peaks and dips from the frequency response curve you see on the review. Those peaks and dips are taken into account in its own box. This is not perfect and can be improved with time how it is presented but that still give good information on the sound profile of the headphone in comparison to the target curve.

    That’s weird, if you look at the mid accuracy and treble accuracy of the blackshark v2, it doesn’t make sense how its treble amount would be negative

  26. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Keyboard latency is the only thing I care about when it comes to keyboards honestly

    Edited 4 years ago: Typo
  27. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Thirding this, this should be a major priority

  28. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    oh yeah there is also bluetooth speakers. Mics for gaming/music setups. there should probably be a vote of all of these options

    Edited 4 years ago: more
  29. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Thanks! Let us know if you have any suggestions for new categories, or if you have any ideas on ways we can improve the existing categories!

    Computer speakers, mousepad dynamic and static friction tests

  30. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Also I recommend making a custom rating with this:

    Bass amount: 90% Peaks/Dips: 5% Passive Soundstage: 5%

    You can also try 80% with 10%’s

  31. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    That’s the peaks/dips measurement

  32. 4
    3
    2
    3
    0

    Unfortunately, we do not plan to test standalone/ add-on mics. That said, we are always looking for new types of products to test. We will keep it in mind for future categories.

    I believe Mics will be a worthwhile addition to rtings reviews, better than printers

  33. 5
    4
    3
    4
    0

    I would like to chime in and say the best solution is to have both! I enjoyed the previous implementation but the addition of peaks/dips is great

    I also have used the bass heavy sound profile filter. I would prefer to have both systems though

  34. 3
    2
    1
    7
    -5

    Do Ads!!!!

  35. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Awesome thanks

  36. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Awesome thanks so much