The Sennheiser HD 560S are wired open-back headphones meant for listening to audio in quiet environments. They deliver a flat sound profile that should suit most musical genres and deliver audio consistently. They're also very comfortable, with a relatively lightweight design and plenty of plush padding. Like most open-backs, they're poorly suited for use on the go, with terrible noise isolation, high levels of audio leakage, and a bulky construction. Otherwise, if you're looking for a pair of comfortable headphones with an immersive soundstage, they're a great choice.
The Sennheiser HD 560 S are passable for sports and fitness, though they aren't meant for this purpose. While they offer a surprisingly stable fit, they're still quite bulky and don't have any sort of on-board controls to make playback adjustments. Their audio cable can also snag on something while you're on the go.
The Sennheiser HD 560S headphones are poor for commuting and traveling. They're very bulky and barely block out any noise, so you're likely to hear the rumble of bus and plane engines as well as the chatter of fellow commuters. Thankfully, they're very comfortable, even during extended listening sessions.
The Sennheiser HD 560S headphones are a poor choice for office use. They don't block out much background noise and leak a lot of audio. Their wired-only connection also limits their range of connectivity. Thankfully, they're comfortable enough to wear throughout the entire workday, so if you work in a private, enclosed room and don't need to make calls, these will work well enough.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are wired-only headphones and aren't suitable for this use.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are an okay choice for wired gaming, as long as you don't plan on using a mic, or have an external one. They're very comfortable and have a flat sound profile that gives equal emphasis to both sound effects and in-game dialogue. The left and right drivers are very well matched, so you can pinpoint enemy fighters accurately in the stereo field. Their sound is also very consistent from wear to wear, and their wired-only connection guarantees latency-free audio.
The Sennheiser HD 560S have great audio reproduction accuracy. They deviate very little from their flat sound profile, apart from a few unruly peaks in the treble range that can render cymbals alternately dull or piercing. Their left and right drivers are also very well matched in terms of phase and frequency, so objects are accurately located in the stereo field. The group delay in the low-bass is a little high, which can render sounds like 808 kick drums a touch flabby, but mid-range and treble range sounds like acoustic guitar pick transients are reproduced accurately and precisely. In general, you can expect impressive audio reproduction, with a tame and slightly loose bass.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are bad at blocking out noise around you. Whether it's the low rumble of a bus engine driving past your open window, a chatty roommate, or the whine of a nearby PC, you'll hear most of the sound around you.
The Sennheiser HD 560S don't have a built-in microphone.
The Sennheiser HD 560S have great frequency response consistency. You likely won't perceive significant deviations from the headphones' measured sound signature, even if you wear glasses or have thick hair.
This review has been updated to Test Bench 2.0, which adds the following tests: Stereo Mismatch, Group Delay, Cumulative Spectral Decay, PRTF, Harmonic Distortion, and Electrical Aspects. We've added new performance usages and updated the text throughout the Sound tests and side-by-sides.
The following test groups have been updated after Test Bench 1.8: Sound Profile, Raw Frequency Response, Bass Profile: Target Compliance, Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance, Treble Profile: Target Compliance, and Peaks/Dips. Associated text changes have been made to match results from Test Bench 1.7 to Noise Isolation - Full Range and Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios. Text changes have also been made throughout the review to match these results. PC Compatibility and PlayStation Compatibility boxes now have text.
The Sennheiser HD 560S only come in one variant: 'Black.' Our unit's label is available to see here.
If someone comes across a different variant of these headphones, let us know in the comments below so that we can update our review.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are open-back headphones designed for neutral listening. Their sound profile is generally flat, and they're comfortable enough to wear for extended periods of time without discomfort. That said, they do lack a little low bass. To an extent, that's par for the course with open-back headphones, but alternatives like the Sennheiser HD 490 PRO and HiFiMan Edition XS have a thumpier bass. All three of those options are quite bulky and don't have any sort of on-board playback controls, but if casual use is your priority, you'd be better off checking out headphones like the Sony WH-1000XM4 Wireless or the Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless, which can work wirelessly and offer features such as ANC (active noise cancellation). Finally, if price is a priority, the Philips SHP9500 cost a fraction of the 560S, but they have even less bass.
If you're looking for alternatives, check out our recommendations for the best audiophile headphones, the best headphones for music, and the best open-back headphones.
Both the Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the Sennheiser HD 560S share open-backed designs. They also have broadly similar sound profiles, with the Beyerdynamic offering a bit more low-end, while the Sennheiser have a more even top-end, but some may prefer the high-frequency sheen on the Beyerdynamic. The Beyerdynamic feel better built and comfortable, though they clamp a bit harder. On the other hand, the Sennheiser have a lighter-feeling fit, so choosing between them may come down to your personal taste.
The Sennheiser HD 560S and the Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO are meant for different applications, so which is better is determined by your needs. The Sennheiser are open-back headphones with a much better PRTF accuracy, which is indicative of a wider soundstage. They're much more comfortable and have a more consistent bass delivery. On the other hand, the Beyerdynamic have a closed-back design, which supplies more low-end. The headphones leak less audio, and they isolate you from a bit more ambient sound, so you can wear them in noisier spaces than the Sennheiser. They also have a significantly better build quality.
The Sennheiser HD 560S and the Philips SHP9500 have different strengths, and you may prefer either. Both models are great open-back headphones for their open and spacious listening experiences, but the Sennheiser are more stable to wear. On the other hand, the Philips are a bit more comfortable, so they can feel less fatiguing to wear for long listening sessions.
The Sennheiser HD 560S and the HiFiMan Edition XS are similarly-priced audiophile headphones with a balanced sound that suits a variety of audio content. The Sennheiser's recessed treble lends them a warmer sound, while the HiFiMan have more shimmer. The HiFiMan also put out more low-bass, which fans of EDM may prefer. But if you like to EQ your headphones, the Sennheiser are the better pick, because their frequency response is more controlled, with fewer peaks and dips.
The HiFiMan Sundara 2020 are slightly more premium than the Sennheiser HD 560S. The HiFiMan deliver audio more consistently with a bit more low-end. They also have a much better build quality. However, the Sennheiser are more stable fitting, weigh less, and offer more mid-range presence, which you may prefer.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are better headphones if you want a better PRTF performance, which can be indicative of a more immersive sound. The Sennheiser are open-back headphones that are more comfortable and have significantly better-matched L/R drivers. However, the Audio-Technica are closed-back headphones that are better built and more versatile if you need headphones that don't leak sound and provide some passive isolation.
Depending on your preferences, you may want to check out either the Sennheiser HD 560S or the HiFiMan HE400se, which are both comfortable audiophile headphones. The Sennheiser are dynamic headphones and are a bit lighter, with a more even treble, which you may prefer. However, the HiFiMan are planar magnetic headphones with better build quality. They can also create a wider, more natural-feeling passive soundstage to help immerse you in your audio.
The Sennheiser HD 490 Pro and the Sennheiser HD 560S are both open-back, over-ear headphones that perform similarly. Both headphones have balanced sound profiles; the HD 490 Pro have a stronger bass response, but the HD 560S provide more detail in the mid-range, and their L/R drivers are better matched in terms of phase and amplitude. However, the HD 490 Pro have swappable pads that subtly alter the sound profile depending on what you're working on. Both are comfortable enough to wear for long periods.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are slightly better for most people than the Sennheiser HD 600. The HD 560S are more comfortable and deliver audio more consistently with a slightly weightier bass response. However, the HD 600 are better built and used in more professional audio settings.
For most people, the Sennheiser HD 560S are slightly better headphones than the Sennheiser HD 6XX, but it depends on usage. The 560S are more comfortable and don't require a headphone to drive them adequately. However, the 6XX are better built and may appeal to those who want audio professional-style headphones since they resemble the studio staple Sennheiser HD 650.
The Sennheiser HD 560S and the Sennheiser HD 660 S are similar-performing open-back, over-ear headphones, with the HD 560S slightly better for most listening applications than the HD 660 S. The HD 560S feel notably more comfortable, but the HD 660 S are better built and come with an extra cable.
Though they look similar, the biggest difference between the Sennheiser HD 560S and the Sennheiser HD 620S is that the former are open-back and the latter are closed-back headphones. As a result, the HD 560S supply a much more immersive and open passive soundstage. They're also lighter in weight, and they deliver a more consistent sound. Of course, they don't isolate noise like the HD 620S. The HD 620S are slightly more premium in build with a metal-reinforced headband, but they clamp tighter. Their fit is much more fussy and is more likely to deliver inconsistent sound. Overall, they provide a fuller, but less even, bass response, though that depends on your taste.
Whether the Sennheiser HD 560S are better than the Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X depends on whether you need a microphone because they're very similarly voiced headphones. While both headphones are comfortable, the HD 560S have a bit more upper register emphasis compared to the warm treble of the PC38X. However, the PC38X are better if you like to game with others. They have a flippable boom mic with excellent recording quality and feel better built.
Whether the Sennheiser HD 560S are better than the Beyerdynamic DT 880 depends on your tastes and priorities. The Sennheiser can be used without a headphone amp and are much more stable on your head. On the other hand, the Beyerdynamic have a significantly better build quality and come with a soft case to protect them from minor scratches and splashes. However, they need an amp to drive them.
The Sennheiser HD 560S are better audiophile headphones than the Audio-Technica ATH-R70x. Although both open-backed headphones are comfortable to wear, the Sennheiser are slightly more stable with more space to fit your ears. However, the Audio-Technica create a bit more of an open and immersive passive soundstage. That said, they're both broadly similar sounding, so you may prefer the more conventional headband design of the Sennheiser cans.
The Sennheiser HD 560S have a flat sound profile with balanced treble. They closely resemble the SoundGuys.com Studio Curve, designed to mirror the preferences of audio professionals for mixing use.
The frequency response consistency is great. Aside from a little bit of variance in the treble range, you should be able to achieve a consistent listening experience on separate occasions, even if you have long hair or wear glasses.
The headphones' bass target compliance is good. The entire range de-emphasizes low frequencies with a roll-off that's common in open-backs. Still, the high-bass is flat and close to our target, supplying a good amount of boom to the pulse of the kick and synth bass in tracks like Cerrone's Supernature. However, it's not exactly going to translate to feeling the full-bodied thump of deep bass due to that roll-off in the lower bass regions.
If you're looking for a pair of open-backs with a more prominent bass response, it's worth checking out the Sennheiser HD 490 PRO instead.
These over-ears have superb mid-range target compliance. Vocals and lead instruments should sound full-bodied, present, and clear in the mix, absent of any thinness. There's a touch of emphasis in the high-mids, which pushes vocals up slightly in the mix.
The treble's target compliance is outstanding. The low-treble sits a bit above our target, highlighting the details and articulation of vocals and lending a slightly bright sound. The mid-treble is more uneven, with a dip in the center bookended by small peaks. This causes harmonics of elements like cymbals to sound either dark and a little hollow or a bit piercing, depending on the pitch.
The peaks and dips performance is very good. Most of the headphones' range is even, indicating they control their sound profile very well. The tiny dips and peaks in the bass and mids are virtually imperceptible. In the treble range, a series of peaks and dips can render sounds like cymbals dull or piercing, depending on their pitch.
These headphones' L/R drivers are remarkably well-matched in terms of amplitude and phase across the frequency range. The only notable deviations in amplitude and phase occur in the high treble, where sounds like the very top of an airy vocal can feel slightly pulled to one side. That said, while we could hear this issue when listening to test tones, it was very hard to pick up on while listening to regular audio content. We don't expect it to be an issue for most people. And many people's hearing doesn't reliably reach those high frequencies, anyway.
These headphones have alright group delay performance. While there's little group delay in the mids and treble, ensuring sounds like clap transients are reproduced accurately, higher group delay in the low- and mid-bass means sounds like kick drums feel just a touch flabby.
These PRTF measurements show a passable level of interaction between your audio and pinna. That lends your audio a sense of space and depth, but they still fall short of sounding like a pair of angled reference speakers in a room. If you're looking for open-back headphones with a more immersive-feeling soundstage, check out the Audio-Technica ATH-R70x.
The Sennheiser HD 560S deliver outstanding harmonic distortion performance, reproducing audio cleanly across the entire frequency spectrum without any noticeable coloration even at extremely high volumes.
These headphones don't require an amp to drive them and can play back audio at high listening levels on mobile devices.
These are the settings used to test the Sennheiser HD 560S. Our results are only valid when they're used in this configuration.
These headphones share a passing resemblance to other headphones in the manufacturer's HD 5 lineup, like the Sennheiser HD 598 and Sennheiser HD 599. Similar features include its swept-back ear cup mounts and oval-shaped ear cups.
These headphones are very comfortable. The headband and ear cups feature liberal amounts of plush padding. They feel quite lightweight and shouldn't apply too much pressure to the sides of the head, even for people who wear glasses. Overall, they should be comfortable enough to wear for extended listening sessions.
These over-ears aren't very portable. While their audio cable does detach, which reduces the chances of the plug getting caught on something, the ear cups don't swivel flat, and the headband doesn't fold, so they have a pretty bulky footprint.
These headphones are decently well-built. Their headband and ear cups are made of dense matte plastic, and the audio cable is detachable and replaceable. Unfortunately, the yokes and ear cup hinges feel a little flimsy and represent weak points in their overall construction. If you're looking for better-built audiophile headphones, check out the Meze Empyrean or the Beyerdynamic DT 900 PRO X.
Like most open-back headphones, the Sennheiser HD 560S have terrible noise isolation. They let in ambient noise across the frequency spectrum, so you should hear everything from the low rumble of bus engines to the higher-pitched whine of a computer fan, not to mention the chatter of people nearby. These are headphones meant to be worn in quiet spaces, like a mixing room, or at home alone while listening to your music collection.
In common scenarios, their noise isolation is terrible, which is expected of open-backed headphones that lack passive isolating materials. Consequently, only the highest frequencies, like the upper harmonics of street construction outside your window, receive a nearly unnoticeable bit of attenuation. In all, you don't want to take these with you to the office to focus because you'll hear all the chit-chat and keystrokes of your colleagues.
These over-ears leak a lot of noise, which is normal for open-back headphones. You're likely to disturb people nearby if you listen to your music in a crowded room.
These headphones don't have a microphone. If you're looking for Sennheiser headphones with a mic for gaming, check out the Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X.
The Sennheiser HD 560S have a 1/8" TRS to 1/4" TRS cable for latency-free audio. They also come with with a 1/4" TRS to 1/8" TRS adapter.
You can connect these headphones to your PC's headphone output port for audio playback. However, they lack a microphone, so you'll need an outboard mic for gaming and work meetings.
These headphones can connect to your PS console's controller to receive audio, but they don't have a mic. You'll need a separate microphone if you want to chat with teammates.
These headphones only receive audio when you plug their 1/4" TRS cable into an Xbox controller.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
HD560s sounds really muddy and not clear after my beloved dt770 pro 250ohm. This is not a critical listening headphone. Nope. Dt770 scores 7.9 but hd560s scores 8.2? What a joke. Soundstage not wide enough either. PS. I have a dampening mod inside the dt770 to make it sound more open and detailed from customcans.co.uk. For me, no comparison between the 2. 770 is way ahead.
Hi, thanks for sharing your feedback with us. Was there anything specific you can pinpoint that gave you the impression that the HD 560S were muddier than the DT 770? From my experience, elevated treble (which incidentally tends to be the case with Beyerdynamics) can sometimes give me the impression of precision. As sound goes pretty deep into preference, it’s not unexpected that you might disagree with our scoring.
Looking at both headphones, the DT 770 PROs run into some issues with their group delay, contributing to the bass range notch, affecting their peaks and dips scoring. If you like how the headphones sound and where notches in their frequency response are placed, that’s ultimately more important, especially since there aren’t any glaring issues with the headphones.
We only review our headphones stock, so I’m curious about how you found the modding (and what you might recall before and after).
Update: This review has been updated to Test Bench 2.0, which adds the following tests: Stereo Mismatch, Group Delay, Cumulative Spectral Decay, PRTF, Harmonic Distortion, and Electrical Aspects. We’ve added new performance usages and updated the text throughout the Sound tests and side-by-sides.
HD560s sounds really muddy and not clear after my beloved dt770 pro 250ohm. This is not a critical listening headphone. Nope. Dt770 scores 7.9 but hd560s scores 8.2? What a joke.
Soundstage not wide enough either.
PS. I have a dampening mod inside the dt770 to make it sound more open and detailed from customcans.co.uk.
For me, no comparison between the 2. 770 is way ahead.
I purchased these headphones as a replacement for my Philips Fidelio X2HR which I lost on vacation. I was disappointed to discover they don’t have a detachable cable and found their soundstage remarkably flat. I also did not find them very comfortable.
Update: The following test groups have been updated after Test Bench 1.8: Sound Profile, Raw Frequency Response, Bass Profile: Target Compliance, Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance, Treble Profile: Target Compliance, and Peaks/Dips. Associated text changes have been made to match results from Test Bench 1.7 to Noise Isolation - Full Range and Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios. Text changes have also been made throughout the review to match these results. PC Compatibility and PlayStation Compatibility boxes now have text.