Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Shape
    3. Portability
    4. Build Quality
    5. Weight
    6. Hand Size Recommendation
    7. Wireless Versatility
    8. Cable
    9. Mouse Feet
    10. In The Box
    11. Palm Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    12. Claw Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    13. Fingertip Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
  5. Control
    1. Main Button
    2. Additional Buttons
    3. Click Latency
    4. CPI
    5. Sensor Latency
    6. Sensor Specifications
    7. Mouse Wheel
    8. Noise
  6. Operating System And Software
    1. Configuration Software
    2. Mouse Compatibility
  7. Comments

Sharkoon Light² 200 vs Razer Viper Mini

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

Sharkoon Light² 200
Razer Viper Mini

Tested using Methodology v1.0

Updated Apr 25, 2022 08:14 PM

Searching
Finding store

Tested using Methodology v1.5

Updated Feb 21, 2024 09:11 PM

Searching
Finding store
Sharkoon Light² 200 Picture
Razer Viper Mini Picture

Variants

  • Light² 200 (Black)
  • Light² 200 (White)
  • Viper Mini (Black)

Our Verdict

Sharkoon Light² 200

Razer Viper Mini

The Razer Viper Mini and the Sharkoon Light² 200 are both ultra-light gaming mice. The Razer is slightly lighter, and it has smoother gliding mouse feet and significantly lower click latency. Also, it has more programmable inputs thanks to its HyperShift feature, which enables a second layer of commands. On the other hand, the Sharkoon has a more precisely adjustable CPI within a wider CPI range, a more consistent sensor, and a lower lift-off distance. The Razer's small, ambidextrous body is better suited for smaller hands using a claw or fingertip grip, while people with larger hands may prefer the Sharkoon's larger, right-handed design for a palm or claw grip.

0