Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Sony X95K  TV Review

Reviewed Jun 28, 2022 at 10:48am
Tested using methodology v1.11 
Sony X95K
8.4
Mixed Usage 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.2
TV Shows 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.3
Sports 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.7
Video Games 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.3
HDR Movies 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.7
HDR Gaming 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.6
PC Monitor 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

 7
 TV Settings
Notice: This TVs was replaced by Sony X95L

The Sony X95K is Sony's first 4k Mini LED TV. It replaces the Sony X95J, and instead of having a traditional backlight, the Mini LED technology introduces many smaller backlights that have greater control over the local dimming feature and allow the TV to get brighter. It's Sony's flagship 4k LED TV in their 2022 lineup, so it has a bunch of features like hands-free voice control, the S-Center speaker input, support for ATSC 3.0, and it has their high-end Cognitive Processor XR, so you get the features associated with it like XR Sound and XR Picture. For gamers, it has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and variable refresh rate (VRR) support. Like past Sony TVs, it has Google TV as its smart platform, which is user-friendly and has a ton of apps available to download. It's been replaced in 2023 by the Sony X93L, which offers nearly identical performance at a slightly lower launch price.

Our Verdict

8.4
Mixed Usage 

The Sony X95K is great for most uses. It looks great both in dark rooms for watching movies or bright rooms for watching sports or TV shows as it displays deep blacks with a great local dimming feature, and it gets bright enough to fight a ton of glare, and there's very little blooming around bright objects. HDR content also looks impressive as it makes highlights pop and displays a wide range of colors. Lastly, it's excellent for gaming thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, variable refresh rate (VRR) support, and great motion handling for a smooth gaming experience.

Pros
  • Local dimming helps it display deep blacks.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Excellent reflection handling.
Cons
  • Image looks washed out from really wide angles.
8.2
TV Shows 

The Sony X95K is great for watching TV shows in well-lit rooms. Visibility isn't an issue because it easily gets bright enough to fight glare, and it has excellent reflection handling. It's also a decent choice if you have a wide seating area because it has an okay viewing angle that makes the image look consistent as you move off-center, but colors looked washed out from wide angles. It doesn't have trouble upscaling content if you watch shows from a cable box, and if you stream your shows, the Google TV platform is user friendly.

Pros
  • No upscaling issues.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Excellent reflection handling.
Cons
  • Image looks washed out from really wide angles.
8.3
Sports 

The Sony X95K is great for watching sports. It performs very well in bright rooms as it has excellent reflection handling, and it gets bright enough to fight glare from strong light sources. If you want to watch the game with a few friends, it has an okay viewing angle, but it still isn't ideal for very wide seating areas. Also, fast-moving players and balls look smooth thanks to the quick response time. It has good gray uniformity with minimal dirty screen in the center, but the edges are a bit darker, which is noticeable with sports with large playing surfaces.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Excellent reflection handling.
  • Great motion handling.
Cons
  • Image looks washed out from really wide angles.
  • Some distracting uniformity issues.
8.7
Video Games 

The Sony X95K is excellent for gaming. It's ideal to use with the Xbox Series X and PS5 as you can take full advantage of the consoles thanks to the HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and variable refresh rate support, but it doesn't support FreeSync if you also want to use it for PC gaming with AMD graphics cards. Motion looks smooth thanks to the quick response time, and it has low input lag. It also looks great in dark rooms as it has a great local dimming feature.

Pros
  • Local dimming helps it display deep blacks.
  • Great motion handling.
  • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and VRR support.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
None
8.3
HDR Movies 

The Sony X95K is impressive for watching HDR movies. It has a great local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks, and there's very little blooming around bright objects. It also has incredible HDR peak brightness, enough to make highlights pop, and it displays a wide range of colors in HDR as they look vivid. It removes 24p judder from movies, which helps with the appearance of motion.

Pros
  • Local dimming helps it display deep blacks.
  • Removes 24p judder.
  • Displays a wide range of colors.
  • Makes highlights pop.
Cons
None
8.7
HDR Gaming 

The Sony X95K is excellent for HDR gaming. It has a few gaming features to enhance your gaming experience, like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and VRR support to reduce screen tearing, and gaming feels responsive thanks to its quick response time and low input lag. It supports 4k gaming in Dolby Vision, but only up to 60 fps. HDR content looks great as it makes highlights pop, and it displays deep blacks and vivid colors, and there's very little blooming around bright objects.

Pros
  • Local dimming helps it display deep blacks.
  • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and VRR support.
  • Makes highlights pop.
Cons
None
8.6
PC Monitor 

The Sony X95K is impressive to use as a PC monitor. It displays proper chroma 4:4:4 to help make text look clear, and your desktop movements and actions feel responsive, thanks to the low input lag. It also has excellent reflection handling and fantastic peak brightness if you want to use it in a well-lit room. It has an okay viewing angle that makes the image remain fairly consistent at the sides if you sit close, but the edges will look washed out if you get a larger size.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Excellent reflection handling.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Image looks washed out from really wide angles.
  • 8.4
    Mixed Usage
  • 8.2
    TV Shows
  • 8.3
    Sports
  • 8.7
    Video Games
  • 8.3
    HDR Movies
  • 8.7
    HDR Gaming
  • 8.6
    PC Monitor
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 08, 2025: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
    2.  Updated Apr 17, 2025: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
    3.  Updated Feb 11, 2025: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.
    4.  Updated Nov 20, 2024: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.

    Check Price

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 65-inch Sony X95K, and the results are valid for the 75-inch and 85-inch models. Unlike the Sony X90K/X90CK, it isn't available at warehouse retailers under a different name, and the model code shouldn't vary between regions. The three sizes all have the same features, with the only difference being dimming zones and the VESA mount size on the back.

    Size Model Number Dimming Zones
    65" XR-65X95K 432
    75" XR-75X95K 600
    85" XR-85X95K 768

    If you come across a different type of panel or your Sony X95 doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. Some tests, like the gray uniformity, may vary between individual units.

    Our unit was manufactured in April 2022; you can see the label here.

    Popular TV Comparisons

    The Sony X95K is a great TV that performs well for what it is, a premium TV with great picture quality in bright and dark rooms. It gets brighter than the Sony X95J thanks to its Mini LED backlighting, but its local dimming feature isn't as good. Although it's great overall, you can get better options in the same price range. It's even outperformed by some cheaper mid-range TVs, like the Hisense U8/U8H.

    See our recommendations for the best TVs for watching movies, the best smart TVs, and the best 65-inch TVs.

    Sony X95L

    The Sony X95L is better than its predecessor, the Sony X95K. The X95L features a much improved local dimming feature, resulting in deeper blacks, much better black uniformity, and less blooming around bright highlights. The X95L also has better reflection handling, but it's not a significant improvement.

    Sony X93L/X93CL

    The Sony X93L and the Sony X95K are extremely similar overall, but the newer X93L is slightly better. Sony has tweaked the local dimming algorithms, so there's less blooming around bright highlights in dark scenes on the X93L.

    Sony X90L/X90CL

    The Sony X95K is better than the Sony X90L/X90CL. The X95K has significantly better reflection handling, so it's a better choice for a bright living room as there's less glare from bright lights or windows. The biggest difference is the X95K's Mini LED backlight, which delivers much deeper blacks, significantly less blooming around bright objects, and significantly improved zone transitions with no flickering as bright objects move across the screen.

    Sony X95J

    The Sony X95K is the newer model of the Sony X95J, and it's a noticeable improvement. The X95K uses a new Mini LED backlight, delivering much brighter highlights and finer control of the local dimming zones. The X95K also has significantly better colors and can display a much wider color gamut with HDR content.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    CurvedNo

    The Sony X95K has a premium design with a unique checkerboard pattern on the back. It has an adjustable stand and panel covers for cable management to keep your setup clean, so you don't have too many cables dangling around.

    Accelerated Longevity Test
    Uniformity Pictures
    50-gray-28
    Month 28
    50% Gray
    See details on graph tool
    Stand

    The Sony X95K has straight metal feet that hold the TV very well. You can adjust them in three different positions: a narrow position if you have a small table, a low position if you want minimal space between the screen and the table, and a high position to accommodate soundbars. You need to unscrew the feet when you want to change positions. You can see the dimensions of the 65-inch TV below (W x D x H) to the bottom of the screen:

    Back
    Wall MountVESA 300x300

    The back has a similar checkerboard design as past Sony TVs, but the squares are smaller. It's entirely plastic and it has covers to help with cable management. It also has a zip tie and clips to help route your cables to the inputs. Using the plastic covers to hide the cables is only beneficial if you have the TV on a table because they're hard to remove if you have it mounted on a fixed bracket. If that's the case, it's better to leave them off, and the side-facing inputs are easy to access, but the down-facing ones aren't.

    Borders
    Borders0.31" (0.8 cm)
    Thickness
    Max Thickness2.40" (6.1 cm)
    8.5
    Build Quality

    The Sony X95K has excellent build quality. The borders and feet are metal, while everything else is plastic and feels solid, but there's a bit of flex on the back panel. The TV is very stable on the stand, and even though it wobbles a bit more with the stand in the higher position, it's still good. The biggest issue is that the cable management covers fall off at times and are hard to put in, which is why the TV doesn't feel as well-built as other premium TVs.

    Picture Quality
    8.7
    Contrast
    Contrast
    101,000 : 1
    Native Contrast
    2,065 : 1

    The Sony X95K has excellent contrast, resulting in deep blacks and bright highlights in dark scenes. The native contrast with local dimming disabled is lower than usual for this type of TV, but that's due to the X-Wide Viewing Angle feature. As long as you leave local dimming enabled, dark scenes look excellent overall.

    7.5
    Blooming

    The Sony X95K has good blooming performance. Bright lights bleed out into surrounding darker areas due to the size of the dimming zones and the TV's algorithms. The TV turns on more zones than it needs to, creating some blooming but reducing the harshness of bright lights.

    7.0
    Lighting Zone Transitions
    Local Dimming
    Yes
    Backlight
    Full-Array
    Dimming Zones Count Of Tested TV
    432

    The lighting zones have a decent response time to changing scenes. There's almost no trailing halo behind fast-moving objects, and it's quick enough to turn on zones that the leading edge of bright objects isn't dark. There's also no noticeable flicker as zones turn on and off.

    8.5
    Contrast And Dark Details In Game Mode

    The Sony X95K's local dimming feature looks the same in Game Mode as outside of it.

    8.5
    HDR Brightness
    Hallway Lights (~1950 cd/m²)
    673 cd/m²
    Yellow Skyscraper (~700 cd/m²)
    409 cd/m²
    Landscape Pool (~300 cd/m²)
    218 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    1,232 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,423 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    1,455 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    940 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    707 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    1,196 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,361 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    1,407 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    933 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    689 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.038

    The Sony X95K has incredible HDR peak brightness. It really makes highlights pop for a satisfying HDR experience. Although it gets almost as bright as the Hisense U8/U8H with most test slides, it's not as bright with real content.

    These measurements are in the 'Custom' HDR Picture Mode with the Brightness at its max, Contrast at '90', Color Temperature set to 'Expert 2', Auto Local Dimming and Peak Luminance on 'High', and HDR Tone Mapping on 'Gradation Preferred'. Setting Auto Local Dimming to 'Medium' results in a slightly dimmer image, but it isn't enough to be noticeable.

    If you find the image too dim, use the same settings but adjust Contrast to its max, Gamma to its max, HDR Tone Mapping to 'Brightness Preferred', and Advanced Contrast Enhancer to 'High'. This results in a noticeably brighter image, as you can see in this EOTF, but it doesn't change the peak luminosity.

    8.5
    HDR Brightness In Game Mode
    Hallway Lights (~1950 cd/m²)
    705 cd/m²
    Yellow Skyscraper (~700 cd/m²)
    412 cd/m²
    Landscape Pool (~300 cd/m²)
    223 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    1,202 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,429 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    1,176 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    868 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    696 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    1,168 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,379 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    1,155 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    861 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    691 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.036

    The Sony X95K has fantastic HDR brightness in Game Mode. It's very similar to outside of Game Mode, and there visually isn't much of a difference. It was tested with the same settings as outside of Game Mode, but with the Picture Mode set to 'Game'.

    8.9
    PQ EOTF Tracking
    See details on graph tool
    600 Nit Tracking Delta
    0.0073
    1000 Nit Tracking Delta
    0.0073
    4000 Nit Tracking Delta
    0.0087

    The EOTF tracks the target PQ curve perfectly, which means that it displays scenes at their correct brightness. There's a smooth roll-off for content mastered below 4000 nits, so you don't lose details in bright scenes with most content.

    9.0
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene Peak Brightness
    782 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    1,165 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,223 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    1,217 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    881 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    639 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    1,133 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,186 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    1,188 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    873 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    633 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.036

    The Sony X95K has fantastic SDR peak brightness. It easily gets bright enough to fight glare from bright light sources, and even though larger areas are dimmer, it's still very bright.

    These results are from the 'Custom' Picture Mode with the Brightness at its max, Contrast at its default of '90', Color Temperature set to 'Expert 1', and Peak Luminance on 'High'. If you want the brightest image possible, set Auto Local Dimming to 'High' because it gets about 40 nits brighter than 'Medium'.

    If you don't care about image accuracy and want the brightest image possible, use the 'Vivid' Picture Mode with the Brightness, Contrast, and Gamma each at their max, and Advanced Contrast Enhancer, Auto Local Dimming, and Peak Luminance all on 'High'. This results in a peak brightness of 1,312 cd/m² in the 25% window.

    8.4
    Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI P3 xy
    93.56%
    DCI P3 uv
    95.94%
    Rec 2020 xy
    70.75%
    Rec 2020 uv
    76.02%

    The Sony X95K has an impressive HDR color gamut and is much better than the Sony X95J. It has incredible coverage of the commonly-used DCI-P3 color space, and it's somewhat future-proof as it has decent coverage of the Rec. 2020 color space as more content will start to use it. Tone mapping is good between both color spaces, meaning colors look accurate in HDR, but some cyans and blues are off in Rec. 2020.

    8.5
    Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI P3 Coverage ITP
    86.9%
    10,000 cd/m² Rec 2020 Coverage ITP
    41.2%
    White Luminance
    1,136 cd/m²
    Red Luminance
    207 cd/m²
    Green Luminance
    673 cd/m²
    Blue Luminance
    69 cd/m²
    Cyan Luminance
    770 cd/m²
    Magenta Luminance
    282 cd/m²
    Yellow Luminance
    1,024 cd/m²

    The Sony X95K has excellent color volume. It displays most bright colors well, but it still struggles with some brighter blues and reds. It also displays some darker colors well due to its high contrast.

    7.4
    Pre Calibration
    White Balance dE
    3.64
    Color dE
    2.12
    Gamma
    2.22
    Color Temperature
    7,158 K
    Picture Mode
    Custom
    Color Temp Setting
    Expert 1
    Gamma Setting
    0

    The Sony X95K has decent out-of-the-box accuracy in SDR. Colors are accurate, and gamma almost follows the 2.2 target for moderately-lit rooms perfectly. However, the color temperature is on the cold side, giving the image a blue tint, and the white balance is off.

    9.5
    Post Calibration
    White Balance dE
    0.29
    Color dE
    1.03
    Gamma
    2.19
    Color Temperature
    6,519 K
    White Balance Calibration
    10 point
    Color Calibration
    Yes

    The Sony X95K has fantastic accuracy after calibration to the D65 white point. Any remaining inaccuracies can't be spotted by the naked eye. It's easy to calibrate the white balance, but some colors like blue are still difficult to fix.

    You can see the settings for our calibration here.

    7.8
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    3.188%
    50% DSE
    0.158%
    5% Std. Dev.
    0.470%
    5% DSE
    0.104%

    The Sony X95K has okay gray uniformity. The edges of the screen are noticeably darker, which is distracting if you want to use it as a PC monitor. There's also a bit of dirty screen effect in the center, but it isn't enough to be too distracting while watching sports.

    7.3
    Black Uniformity
    Std. Dev.
    1.109%
    Native Std. Dev.
    1.146%

    The Sony X95K has decent black uniformity. Without the local dimming feature, the screen looks blue. The local dimming helps further deepen any blacks, but it also causes blooming around bright objects.

    6.6
    Viewing Angle
    Color Washout
    39°
    Color Shift
    38°
    Brightness Loss
    46°
    Black Level Raise
    39°
    Gamma Shift
    19°

    The Sony X95K has an okay viewing angle thanks to Sony's 'X-Wide Angle' technology. It's fine for watching TV shows or sports with a few people around, but the image starts to lose consistency from really wide angles.

    8.6
    Reflections
    Screen Finish
    Semi-gloss
    Total Reflections
    2.8%
    Indirect Reflections
    1.1%
    Calculated Direct Reflections
    1.8%

    The Sony X95K has excellent reflection handling. There aren't too many distracting reflections coming from the screen, but the light scattering across causes a rainbow-like effect. It's noticeable in darker scenes but gets bright enough to fight glare with brighter scenes.

    8.3
    HDR Native Gradient
    100% Black to 50% Gray
    8.0
    50% Gray to 100% White
    10
    100% Black to 50% Red
    8.0
    50% Red to 100% Red
    6.0
    100% Black to 50% Green
    8.0
    50% Green to 100% Green
    8.0
    100% Black to 50% Blue
    10
    50% Blue to 100% Blue
    8.0

    The Sony X95K has great gradient handling. There's some noticeable banding in bright reds, but everything else looks great.

    8.4
    Low-Quality Content Smoothing
    Smoothing
    8.5
    Detail Preservation
    8.0

    This TV does a great job smoothing out low-quality content. Macro-blocking and pixelization issues are smoothed out well, and there's very little loss of fine details.

    9.0
    Upscaling: Sharpness Processing

    The Sony X95K does a fantastic job upscaling low-resolution and low-bitrate content, like DVDs or cable TV channels. The image is crisp, with no over-sharpening, and fine details are easy to make out.

    The optimal settings for a sharp image with the least amount of over-sharpening are as follows:

    • Sharpness: 60
    • Reality Creation Auto

    Pixels
    Subpixel Layout
    BGR
    TypeLED
    Sub-Type
    VA

    The Sony X95K uses a BGR subpixel layout. It doesn't affect picture quality but can cause blurry text in some applications when using it as a PC monitor. You can read more about it here.

    Motion
    8.4
    Response Time
    80% Response Time
    4.0 ms
    100% Response Time
    9.9 ms

    The Sony X95K has an impressive responsive time. There's minimal blur trail behind fast-moving objects, but because it has a slow response time with dark transitions, there's a bit of black smearing.

    9.5
    Flicker-Free
    Flicker-Free
    No
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    720 Hz

    The Sony X95K uses pulse width modulation to dim its backlight. It always flickers at 720Hz in all picture modes, which is high enough that it isn't noticeable or distracting.

    Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    Optional BFI
    Yes
    Min Flicker For 60 fps
    120 Hz
    60Hz For 60 fps
    No
    120Hz For 120 fps
    Yes
    Min Flicker for 60 fps in Game Mode
    120 Hz

    The Sony X95K has an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion. It only flickers at 120Hz, which causes image duplication with 60 fps content. The BFI score is based on the flicker frequency and not the actual performance. Also, you can't enable BFI at the same time as VRR.

    Motion Interpolation
    Motion Interpolation (30 fps)
    Yes
    Motion Interpolation (60 fps)
    Yes

    The Sony X95K can interpolate lower-frame-rate content up to 120 fps. Like most TVs, it works well with slower scenes, but there are noticeable artifacts with fast-moving scenes. Even though the images above have a red tint with the motion interpolation feature enabled, it isn't noticeable with real content.

    6.6
    Stutter
    Frame Hold Time @ 24 fps
    32.8 ms
    Frame Hold Time @ 60 fps
    7.8 ms

    The Sony X95K has some stutter because of the quick response time as each frame is held on longer, but the motion interpolation feature can help reduce that.

    10
    24p Judder
    Judder-Free 24p
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via 60p
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via 60i
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via Native Apps
    Yes

    The Sony X95K removes 24p judder from any source, which helps with the appearance of motion in movies.

    9.4
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    120 Hz
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    HDMI Forum VRR
    Yes
    FreeSync
    No
    G-SYNC Compatible
    Yes
    4k VRR Maximum
    120 Hz
    4k VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    1080p VRR Maximum
    120 Hz
    1080p VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    1440p VRR Maximum
    N/A
    1440p VRR Minimum
    N/A
    VRR + Local DimmingYes

    The Sony X95K supports variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing. HDMI Forum VRR and G-SYNC compatibility work over the entire refresh rate range, and it supports Low Framerate Compensation to continue working with low frame rates.

    VRR works with 1440p @ 60Hz signals, but the TV is upscaling 1440p to 4k, so it's not a real 1440p signal, which is why we set the 1440p VRR range to N/A.

    Inputs
    9.2
    Input Lag
    1080p @ 60Hz
    18.0 ms
    1080p @ 60Hz Outside Game Mode
    161.1 ms
    1080p @ 120Hz
    9.4 ms
    1080p @ 144Hz
    N/A
    1440p @ 60Hz
    N/A
    1440p @ 120Hz
    N/A
    1440p @ 144Hz
    N/A
    4k @ 60Hz
    17.9 ms
    4k @ 60Hz + 10-Bit HDR
    17.9 ms
    4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
    17.9 ms
    4k @ 60Hz Outside Game Mode
    144.1 ms
    4k @ 60Hz With Interpolation
    136.6 ms
    4k @ 120Hz
    10.0 ms
    4k @ 144Hz
    N/A
    8k @ 60Hz
    N/A

    The Sony X95K has low input lag in Game Mode for a responsive feel. You can enable the motion interpolation feature in Game Mode, but it also increases the input lag too much for gaming.

    8.6
    Supported Resolutions
    Resolution4k
    480p @ 59.94Hz (Widescreen)
    Yes
    720p @ 59.94Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 144Hz
    No
    1440p @ 60Hz
    No
    1440p @ 120Hz
    No
    1440p @ 144Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
    Yes
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 120Hz @ 4:4:4
    Yes
    4k @ 144Hz
    No
    8k @ 30Hz or 24Hz
    No
    8k @ 60Hz
    No

    The Sony X95K supports most common signals up to 4k @ 120Hz with HDMI ports 3 and 4. It displays proper chroma 4:4:4 with 1080p and 4k signals, which helps with text clarity when using it as a PC monitor. HDMI ports 1 and 2 are limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth, so they're limited in the signals they support, and if you want to take full advantage of the TV's HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, use ports 3 and 4.

    PS5 Compatibility
    Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM)
    Yes
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    No
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    HDR
    Yes
    VRR
    Yes

    The Sony X95K works well with the PS5 and Xbox Series X. You need to use HDMI ports 3 and 4 for HDMI 2.1 bandwidth if you want to take full advantage of the consoles. It only supports Dolby Vision up to 4k @ 60Hz on the Xbox Series X. It has an Auto Low Latency Mode that switches the TV into Game Mode automatically for low input lag, and you don't need to change any settings for it to work with the PS5. It also supports Auto HDR Tone Mapping with the PS5 that optimizes the HDR picture settings.

    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM)
    Yes
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    No
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    HDR
    Yes
    VRR
    Yes
    Inputs Specifications
    HDR10
    Yes
    HDR10+
    No
    Dolby Vision
    Yes
    HLG
    Yes
    HDMI 2.0 Full Bandwidth
    Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
    HDMI 2.1 Class Bandwidth
    Yes (HDMI 3,4)
    CECYes
    HDCP 2.2Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
    ATSC Tuner
    3.0 (NEXTGEN TV)
    USB 3.0
    Yes (1)
    Variable Analog Audio OutNo
    Wi-Fi SupportYes (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz)

    HDMI ports 3 and 4 support the full 48 Gbps bandwidth of HDMI 2.1, while HDMI 1 and 2 are limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth. However, because HDMI 3 is an HDMI 2.1 and eARC port, you lose an HDMI 2.1 slot if you connect a receiver, so you can't use HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on multiple devices at the same time unless the receiver also supports it. Also, the tuner supports ATSC 3.0, allowing you to stream over-the-air 4k channels.

    Input Photos
    Total Inputs
    HDMI4
    USB2
    Digital Optical Audio Out1
    Analog Audio Out 3.5mm0
    Analog Audio Out RCA0
    Component In0
    Composite In1 (adapter required, not incl.)
    Tuner (Cable/Ant)1
    Ethernet1
    DisplayPort0
    IR In1

    Unlike the Sony X95J, the Sony X95K doesn't have an analog audio output, so you can't connect headphones.

    Audio Passthrough
    ARC/eARC Port
    eARC
    eARC: Dolby Atmos Over Dolby Digital Plus
    Yes
    eARC: Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    eARC: LPCM 7.1 Over Dolby MAT
    Yes
    eARC: Dolby TrueHD 7.1
    Yes
    eARC: DTS:X Over DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    eARC: DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1
    Yes
    eARC: LPCM Channels (Bitstream)
    7.1
    ARC: Dolby Digital 5.1
    Yes
    ARC: DTS 5.1
    Yes
    Optical: Dolby Digital 5.1
    Yes
    Optical: DTS 5.1
    Yes

    The Sony X95K supports eARC, allowing you to pass high-quality, uncompressed audio to a compatible receiver through an HDMI cable. You can also connect a compatible Sony soundbar to the S-Center speaker input and use the TV's speakers as a center channel.

    Sound Quality
    7.6
    Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    Low-Frequency Extension
    84.76 Hz
    Std. Dev. @ 70
    1.81 dB
    Std. Dev. @ 80
    1.58 dB
    Std. Dev. @ Max
    3.97 dB
    Max
    89.0 dB SPL
    Dynamic Range Compression
    3.92 dB

    The Sony X95K has a good frequency response. It has a well-balanced sound profile that makes dialogue sound clear, but like most TVs, it doesn't produce much bass.

    7.7
    Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted THD @ 80
    0.049
    Weighted THD @ Max
    0.214
    IMD @ 80
    0.49%
    IMD @ Max
    4.36%

    The Sony X95K has good distortion handling. There aren't too many distortion artifacts at moderate listening levels, and even if there's more at the max volume, it isn't too bad.

    Smart Features
    8.0
    Interface
    Smart OSGoogle TV
    Version10
    Ease of Use
    Average
    Smoothness
    Very Smooth
    Time Taken to Select YouTube
    2 s
    Time Taken to Change Backlight
    2 s
    Advanced Options
    Many

    The Sony X95K has the same Google TV smart platform as past Sony models. It's user-friendly, and navigating through the interface feels smooth.

    0.0
    Ad-Free
    Ads
    Yes
    Opt-out
    No
    Suggested Content in Home
    Yes
    Opt-out of Suggested Content
    No

    Unfortunately, like most TVs, there are ads throughout the interface. You can opt-out of personalized ads, but that means you'll get non-targeted ads instead.

    9.0
    Apps and Features
    App Selection
    Great
    App Smoothness
    Very Smooth
    Cast Capable
    Yes
    USB Drive Playback
    Yes
    USB Drive HDR Playback
    Yes
    HDR in Netflix
    Yes
    HDR in YouTube
    Yes

    The Google Play Store has tons of apps available to download, and they run very smoothly. It has Google Chromecast built-in, meaning you can cast content from your phone. You can also connect the Bravia webcam for video calls.

    8.5
    Remote
    Size
    Small
    Voice Control
    Many Features
    CEC Menu Control
    Yes
    Other Smart Features
    No
    Remote AppAndroid TV

    The redesigned Sony remote is small as it doesn't have a numpad, but you can bring up a virtual numpad on the screen with the '123' button. There are mics in the remote and built into the TV, and they allow you to ask it to search for content, change settings, and open apps.

    TV Controls

    There's a single button on the back left side to turn it On/Off, change channels, adjust the volume, or switch inputs. There's also a switch to turn off the mic on the TV if you're concerned about privacy. However, these controls are set into the TV and hard to access with it wall-mounted, especially if you have the wall-mounted, and the plastic covers block access to the buttons.

    In The Box

    • Remote
    • 2x AAA Batteries
    • Manuals and user guides

    Misc
    Power Consumption80 W
    Power Consumption (Max)206 W
    FirmwarePKG6.5770.0680NAA

    Comments

    1. Product

    Sony X95K: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.

      Show More Updates
    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      So I’m going to post a comment, I think there are millions of people who must be in my case, that is to say now only using the TV as a player to watch movies of streaming content is connected to its HD hard drive directly to the TV. If I explain this to you, it’s because I’m always going through a player, or an NVIDIA shield box to play all my 4K HDR movies with audio tracks in DTS HD or Dolby HD today I didn’t want to bother with having several devices because the native treatment of the TV is really great and as well as the NVIDIA shield, however I encounter a problem that I can’t solve to this day, that is to say that this TV is in 2.1 HDMI earc so it must decode as it is all the sounds and HD tracks Audio, my TV, Sony X 95k and perfectly connect to my sony str-dh790 amp which is also in HDMI 2.1 earc and despite this perfect configuration, I can never have an HD audio signal passing natively and directly through my TV, I discussed it with a Seller friend who has been working for years. We did some tests and we hallucinated because we think that if there is no player or box between the TV and the audio receiver the HD direct signals coming from the TV do not decode because on my amp I only have normal signals that is to say dts and Dolby surround, while everything is connected perfectly with a single hdmi 2.1 certified cable but I can’t enjoy all my movies stored on hard drive with HD signals as before with my NVIDIA shield. If you finally have a solution, or a confirmation, simply that despite the characteristics of the TV, it cannot natively decode HD sound tracks? Thank you, I look forward to your response and your return because I have the impression that a lot of people are in the dark while they buy hdmi 2.1 certified equipment 🤷🏻‍♂️

      I understand your frustration, these sorts of issues can be difficult to troubleshoot. Unfortunately, this is a common issue, though, and it’s a limitation of the software you’re using to play back those files. You would be better of using an external player that is known to support the formats you need. Even well-known software like Plex doesn’t always implement the necessary codecs to properly play back the HD audio in these files.

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      So I’m going to post a comment, I think there are millions of people who must be in my case, that is to say now only using the TV as a player to watch movies of streaming content is connected to its HD hard drive directly to the TV. If I explain this to you, it’s because I’m always going through a player, or an NVIDIA shield box to play all my 4K HDR movies with audio tracks in DTS HD or Dolby HD today I didn’t want to bother with having several devices because the native treatment of the TV is really great and as well as the NVIDIA shield, however I encounter a problem that I can’t solve to this day, that is to say that this TV is in 2.1 HDMI earc so it must decode as it is all the sounds and HD tracks Audio, my TV, Sony X 95k and perfectly connect to my sony str-dh790 amp which is also in HDMI 2.1 earc and despite this perfect configuration, I can never have an HD audio signal passing natively and directly through my TV, I discussed it with a Seller friend who has been working for years. We did some tests and we hallucinated because we think that if there is no player or box between the TV and the audio receiver the HD direct signals coming from the TV do not decode because on my amp I only have normal signals that is to say dts and Dolby surround, while everything is connected perfectly with a single hdmi 2.1 certified cable but I can’t enjoy all my movies stored on hard drive with HD signals as before with my NVIDIA shield. If you finally have a solution, or a confirmation, simply that despite the characteristics of the TV, it cannot natively decode HD sound tracks? Thank you, I look forward to your response and your return because I have the impression that a lot of people are in the dark while they buy hdmi 2.1 certified equipment 🤷🏻‍♂️

    4. Update: We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test.

      Show More Updates
    5. 4
      3
      2
      3
      0

      Just a suggestion. With the comparison against the U8H, you wrote “It’s even outperformed by some cheaper mid-range TVs, like the Hisense U8H.” My wording would have been “It’s even outperformed in several categories by some cheaper mid-range TV,s like the Hisense U8H”. I say this because for many of us that watch sources like Youtube and YoutubeTV, the U8H does not perform better than the X95K for lower quality sources which is confirmed by your scoring. Playing devil’s advocate, it’s really weird to scan through the details of the scores doing a comparison of the U8H and the X95K where for the first 2/3rds or more of the scores, the U8H does better, yet, the overall category scores are lower except for gaming and PC use. It makes me wonder if in methodology 1.12 if the weights will be adjusted to better reflect the detailed scores (contrast, color volume, etc.) when compared against the summary scores (Mixed Viewing, TV, Movies, etc). Anyway, seeing the relatively good results of the U8H and the U8K make me excited to see what you folks do with the 85" UX which will hopefully be purchased soon, as that is one of my top 4 choices when I need to purchase a TV in mid November.

      Thanks for the suggestion, we appreciate it!

      As for the weights and comparisons, when making our recommendations we look beyond the individual scores and compare the TVs based on our experience and other feedback that doesn’t necessarily show up in our scores. Weighting updates are planned for 1.12, but that test bench is currently on hold, so it’ll be a while.

    6. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      Just a suggestion. With the comparison against the U8H, you wrote “It’s even outperformed by some cheaper mid-range TVs, like the Hisense U8H.” My wording would have been “It’s even outperformed in several categories by some cheaper mid-range TV,s like the Hisense U8H”. I say this because for many of us that watch sources like Youtube and YoutubeTV, the U8H does not perform better than the X95K for lower quality sources which is confirmed by your scoring.

      Playing devil’s advocate, it’s really weird to scan through the details of the scores doing a comparison of the U8H and the X95K where for the first 2/3rds or more of the scores, the U8H does better, yet, the overall category scores are lower except for gaming and PC use. It makes me wonder if in methodology 1.12 if the weights will be adjusted to better reflect the detailed scores (contrast, color volume, etc.) when compared against the summary scores (Mixed Viewing, TV, Movies, etc). Anyway, seeing the relatively good results of the U8H and the U8K make me excited to see what you folks do with the 85" UX which will hopefully be purchased soon, as that is one of my top 4 choices when I need to purchase a TV in mid November.

      Edited 1 year ago: Clarification on my suggestion for methodology 1.12
    7. Update: We reevaluated the TV’s blooming performance relative to other, more recent TVs on the market. We updated the Blooming score and text for consistency.