Beats Solo Pro Wireless Headphones Review

The Apple AirPods Max Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and depending on your usage, you may prefer one over the other. While both headphones are very well-built, the Apple are more comfortable, have a virtual surround feature, and block out more ambient noise. They also have a standby feature to conserve battery life when they aren't being used. However, the Beats have a more stable fit.

The Apple AirPods Pro Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Apple are in-ears that are easier to take with you on the go. They have a more comfortable and stable fit, a better noise isolation performance, and a longer total battery life. However, some users may prefer the Beats' on-ear design.

The Sony WH-1000XM3 Wireless are more versatile than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Sony's over-ear design and amazing ANC feature block out a lot of noise, which is better for commuting or at the office. They're also noticeably more comfortable and have a better battery life. Their app also offers more customization and plenty of controls. On the other hand, the default sound profile of the Beats is more neutral, but you can't EQ them like you can with the Sony.

The Bose QuietComfort 35 II/QC35 II Wireless 2018 are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Bose are more comfortable, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and a significantly better noise isolation performance. They also have a better overall battery performance and can be paired with up to two devices at a time. However, the Beats are better built.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are a nice upgrade over the Beats Solo3 Wireless. They have active noise cancelling, which is very useful in public transit or at the office. However, the Pro are a bit too tight for some, and the Solo3 feel more comfortable. On the other hand, the Pro feel more high-end and more durable. They both have a fairly similar sound profile, but the Pro are a bit more neutral.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Anker Soundcore Life Q20 Wireless are similarly performing headphones. The Beats are better built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their ANC can block out more ambient noise around you. That said, the Anker are more comfortable and have longer continuous battery life. You can also use them passively with their 1/8" TRS cable.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Anker Soundcore Life Q30 Wireless are casual-use headphones with different strengths. The Beats are better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and leak less audio. However, the Anker have a more comfortable fit, a better battery performance, and their ANC has a better full range noise isolation performance. You can also customize their sound profile using their companion app's graphic EQ and presets, and you can pair them with up to two devices at a time.

The JBL Live 460NC Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The JBL are more comfortable and have a slightly more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. Their battery performance is better, and they have a companion app with a parametric EQ and presets so that you can tweak their sound to your liking. However, the Beats are better-built and more stable. They also have a better noise isolation performance.

The JBL Live 660NC Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The JBL are over-ear headphones that are more comfortable and have a better battery performance. Their companion app also offers a parametric EQ and presets so that you can tweak their sound, and you can pair them with up to two devices at a time. However, the Beats are better built on-ears and have a better noise isolation performance. They also have an H1 chip to seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Beats are wireless on-ear headphones with a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have superior noise isolation performance, thanks to their active noise cancelling system. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the HyperX are over-ears designed for gaming. They're more comfortable and have a significantly better overall boom mic performance.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better headphones for most uses than the Apple AirPods (2nd generation) Truly Wireless. The Beats have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer; an active noise cancelling system that blocks out a great amount of ambient noise; and a better battery performance. However, the Apple are more comfortable.

The Jabra Elite 85h Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Jabra are more comfortable, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and better overall mic performance. Their battery performance is better, and their companion app offers a graphic EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats are better-built, and their ANC system does a significantly better job of blocking out noise around you.

Depending on your listening habits, you may prefer either the Beats Solo Pro Wireless or the JBL Tune 760NC Wireless. The Beats are better built, and they have better noise isolation and leakage performances. However, the JBL are more comfortable, and they have a longer continuous battery life and a better mic performance. You can also use them wired, unlike the Beats.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Philips SHP9500 have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The Beats are wireless on-ears designed for casual use. They're better built, more stable, and thanks to their ANC system, they can block out more ambient noise around you. However, the Philips are audiophile headphones. These over-ears are more comfortable and have a neutral sound profile. Since they have an open-back design, they also have a more immersive passive soundstage.

The SteelSeries Arctis Pro GameDAC and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, so you may prefer either. The SteelSeries are much more comfortable over-ear gaming headphones. Their boom mic has a significantly better overall performance and they come with a DAC that allows you to easily switch EQ or surround sound settings while you game. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile Bluetooth headphones. They have a great ANC feature, leak much less sound, and have a significantly better onboard control scheme. 

The SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The SteelSeries are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a significantly better boom mic performance, and have longer-lasting continuous battery life. Their companion software also offers more robust customization features like a graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are more versatile headphones. They have an ANC system that helps blocks out more background noise when you're on the go and come with a carrying case.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are slightly better headphones than the AKG N60NC Wireless. The Beats feel noticeably better-built and have a better control scheme. Their ANC features are both great, but the sound profile of the Beats is a bit more neutral while the AKG can sound a bit sharper.

The Sennheiser HD 599 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Sennheiser are open-back over-ears designed for audiophiles. They're more comfortable and have a more neutral, open, and spacious passive soundstage. However, the Beats are better suited for casual use. They have an ANC system that can block out more background noise, a wireless design, and an integrated mic so that you can take calls when you're on the go.

The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The Audio-Technica are for audiophiles. They're more comfortable and have a better passive soundstage performance. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They're better built and have an ANC system that can block out a good amount of background noise. They also have a wireless design and an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Beats Powerbeats Pro Truly Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Powerbeats Pro have a more comfortable and stable fit suitable for sports, and their integrated mic offers better overall performance. They also have a better battery performance. However, the Solo Pro are better-built, have an ANC system that can block out more background noise, and their continuous battery life is longer.

The Bose 700 Headphones Wireless are better than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Bose over-ear design is noticeably more comfortable and isn't as tight as the Beats. Their ANC feature is also better for blocking out sound in noisy environments and their microphone has a better recording quality and noise handling capability. On the other hand, the Beats have a longer continuous battery life from a single charge, although they don't have a power-saving feature. The Beats take advantage of the H1 chip, which may result in better overall connectivity performance, but we couldn't test this. 

The Jabra Elite 75t Truly Wireless are better headphones for most uses than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Jabra have a more comfortable and stable fit, their companion app offers a graphic EQ and presets so that you can customize their bass-heavy sound profile to your liking, and you can pair them with up to two devices at a time. However, the Beats' ANC can block out more ambient sound around you, and they have longer continuous battery life.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Sennheiser HD 560S have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Sennheiser are open-back over-ear designed for audiophiles. They have a more comfortable fit, neutral sound profile, and a natural-sounding, open, and spacious passive soundstage. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. The Beats are better built, have an ANC system that isolates significantly more noise around you, and an integrated mic, so you can take calls on the go. They also have a wireless design and last roughly 24 hours continuously.

The Sennheiser HD 6XX are better for neutral sound than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Sennheiser are open-back headphones with a more neutral, well-balanced sound profile and a more speaker-like, spacious sound stage. They're also much more comfortable. On the other hand, the Beats block much more ambient sound, thanks to their impressive ANC feature, and they have a more bass-rich sound profile, which some listeners may prefer. They also have a significantly better build quality.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better than the JBL Tune 510BT Wireless. The Beats have a more breathable and stable fit, noticeably better build quality, and an ANC system that enables them to block out an impressive amount of ambient noise. Meanwhile, the JBL have longer battery life and multi-device pairing capability, so you can stream music from your phone while remaining connected to your computer. They can also be folded up into a smaller form factor, though they lack a carrying pouch.

The Anker Soundcore Life Q35 Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Anker are more comfortable, have a customizable sound profile thanks to their companion app's graphic EQ and presets, and have a better performing ANC. Their mic also does a better job of recording your voice, even in noisy environments, and they have a better battery performance. However, the Beats are better-built and have a more neutral sound profile out-of-the-box.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the JBL Tour One Wireless are similarly performing headphones and depending on your usage, you may prefer either one. The Beats are on-ear headphones that are better-built and have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have a better noise isolation performance and have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. In contrast, the JBL are over-ears that are more comfortable and have a longer continuous battery life. They also support multi-device pairing, and have a companion app that offers a parametric EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Apple AirPods (3rd generation) Truly Wireless are very different, and you may prefer either depending on what you're looking for. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a longer continuous battery life and a more accurate bass response, which some may prefer. They also have a significantly better noise isolation performance. On the other hand, the Apple are much more portable earbuds. Their design lets you hear ambient sound, and their total battery life is longer, thanks to their charging case.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better headphones for most uses than the Beats Fit Pro True Wireless. While both headphones have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices, the Solo Pro are on-ears that are better built, and a longer continuous playback time. However, the Fit Pro are in-ears with a more stable fit, and they support Apple's Spatial Audio on iOS devices. Their ANC also has a better noise isolation performance.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better on-ears than the Skullcandy Riff Wireless 2. While both headphones are fairly comfortable, the Beats have a significantly better build quality, a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and ANC, meaning they can block out a superior amount of background noise. They also have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices. However, the Skullcandy have a better battery performance, and are more customizable, thanks to their companion app. They also support multi-device pairing with up to two devices at a time.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better headphones than the 1More Piston Classic. The Beats are better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have an ANC system that can block out a great amount of ambient noise around you. Some users may prefer their wireless design, and their H1 chip allows you to pair them with other Apple devices. However, the 1More are more comfortable.

The Superlux HD 681 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are for different uses. The Superlux are designed with audiophiles in mind. They have a semi-open enclosure, which helps improve their passive soundstage performance, a neutral and accurate sound profile, are more comfortable, and their passive soundstage performance is better. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They have a wireless design, are better-built, and have an ANC system that can out a great amount of ambient noise around you. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Logitech G432 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either, depending on your needs. The Logitech are gaming headphones with a more comfortable fit and a mic with a much better overall performance. They can be used wirelessly or wired with the included 1/8" TRRS cable, and you can customize their sound profile with a graphic EQ and presets in a companion app. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile on-ear headphones with a great ANC feature. They have a more stable fit, a better build quality, and more onboard controls, including call and music control.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Astro A50 Gen 4 Wireless 2019 are for different uses. The Astro are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a better passive soundstage performance, and their boom mic does a significantly better job of recording your voice, even in noisy environments. Their battery performance is better too. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have more versatile controls and have an ANC system to help block out a great amount of noise around you.

The HiFiMan HE-400i are better headphones for neutral sound than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The HiFiMan are planar magnetic headphones with an open-back design. They're much more comfortable and have a significantly better passive soundstage performance. However, the Beats are more versatile wireless headphones. They have a closed-back design, a much better build quality, and a great ANC feature. They also have onboard controls and an integrated mic, unlike the HiFiMan. 

The AKG K240 MKII and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different uses. The AKG are designed for audiophiles. They're more comfortable and have better passive soundstage performance. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have a wireless design, a better build quality, and a mic so that you can take calls on the go. They also have an ANC system that can block out a great amount of noise around you and a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer.

The Beyerdynamic DT 880 are better for neutral sound than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Beyerdynamic are much more comfortable, and their passive soundstage is perceived as much more open and spacious. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile since they have an integrated mic, onboard controls, and an ANC feature that blocks out an impressive amount of noise.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the 1More Triple Driver. The Beats are better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, and their ANC is able to block out a lot more background noise. They also have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the 1More are more comfortable, and their in-line mic offers a better overall performance. 

The Sennheiser Game One Gaming Headset and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The Sennheiser are gaming headphones with an open-back design. They're more comfortable and have a significantly better passive soundstage as well as overall microphone performance. In contrast, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They have a wireless, closed-back design, feel better-built, and have an ANC system that can block out a significant amount of noise around you.

The Logitech G433 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are headphones designed for different uses. The Logitech are for wired gaming. They're more comfortable, have a better overall boom mic performance, and you can customize their sound profile using their companion software's graphic EQ and presets. Conversely, the Beats are better-suited for casual use. They're better-built, have an ANC system that can block out more background noise, and have a wireless design.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Marshall MID ANC Wireless are two decent pairs of on-ear headphones. The Beats have a noticeably better ANC feature that blocks out more noise and have longer battery life on a single charge. On the other hand, the Marshall have a more comfortable fit, and you can use them wired, even if the battery is dead.

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the Beats Solo Pro have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Beyerdynamic are over-ears designed for audiophiles. They're more comfortable and have a more immersive passive soundstage. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have an ANC system and can significantly block out more background noise. They also have a wireless design and have an H1 chip, so you can pair them with other devices in your Apple ecosystem.

The HyperX Cloud Stinger and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The HyperX are for wired gaming. They're more comfortable and have a better overall mic performance. However, the Beats are more versatile. They have a wireless design, are better-built, and have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The HiFiMan Sundara 2018 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are for different uses. The HiFiMan are more comfortable audiophile headphones, have a neutral sound profile, and a more spacious and immersive passive soundstage. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have a wireless design, which some users may prefer, are better-built, and have an ANC, which can help cut down a significant amount of ambient noise around you.

The Corsair HS70 Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The Corsair are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a virtual soundstage feature, and their boom mic offers a better overall performance. They also have a longer continuous battery life and their companion app offers a graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are better-suited for casual use. They have an ANC system that's able to significantly block out more ambient noise around you. They also support Bluetooth and have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with other Apple devices.  

The KZ ZSN and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The KZ are in-ear monitors with a balanced armature transducer. They have a more comfortable and stable fit. However, if you're looking for versatility, check out the Beats instead. They're on-ears with a more neutral sound profile and an ANC system that offers a great overall noise isolation performance.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the Sony MDR-7506. The Beats have a much better build quality and an ANC feature that blocks out an impressive amount of ambient noise. They also have a much more stable fit, so they're less likely to slide off your head during light physical activity like walking. On the other hand, the Sony are wired headphones with a more neutral sound profile, which some listeners may prefer.

The HyperX Cloud Alpha and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The HyperX are gaming headphones. They're more comfortable and better built, and their boom mic has a significantly better overall performance. However, the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile. They're wireless, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have an ANC system, making them significantly better at isolating you from background noise.

The Beyerdynamic DT 1990 PRO and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths. The Beyerdynamic are wired open-back headphones with a well-balanced sound profile. Their soundstage is perceived as bigger and more spacious and they have a more comfortable fit. On the other hand, the Beats are wireless closed-back headphones that have a more versatile performance. Their ANC feature blocks out an impressive amount of ambient sound and they have an integrated mic and onboard controls. 

The Razer Nari Ultimate Wireless are better for gaming than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Razer are more comfortable, and their mic has a much better overall performance. They have a more bass-heavy default sound profile that some listeners may prefer, and unlike the Beats, their companion software gives you access to a graphic EQ and presets. You can use them either wirelessly or with a wired connection. On the other hand, the Beats are Bluetooth-only headphones with much longer continuous battery life. They have an ANC feature with an impressive performance and onboard controls that are easier to use.

The Astro A40 TR Headset + MixAmp Pro 2019 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Astro are more comfortable gaming headphones, have a virtual soundstage feature, and their boom mic offers better overall performance. Their companion software also has a graphic EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking. However, some users have encountered issues using it. Conversely, the Beats are better for casual use. They have a wireless design, have a more neutral sound profile that some users may prefer, and have an ANC system that can block out more ambient noise around you.

The HyperX Cloud Flight and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are for different uses. The HyperX are better for gaming as they have a more comfortable fit, a superior overall microphone performance, and a longer continuous battery life. However, the Beats are better suited for casual use. They have a wireless design, which some users may prefer, a better build quality, and an ANC system to help reduce a significant amount of ambient noise around you.

The SteelSeries Arctis 7 2019 Edition Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are for different purposes. The SteelSeries are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable and have a superior mic performance. They also have a better battery performance and you can customize their sound profile using their companion software's graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. The Beats have better controls, a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and an active noise cancelling system that blocks out a significant amount of noise around you. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Razer Kraken X and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are for different uses. The Razer are wired gaming headphones that are more comfortable. Their boom mic also offers a significantly better overall performance, and their passive soundstage performance seems more open and spacious. However, the Beats are better-suited for casual use. They have a wireless design, a better build quality, and a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have an ANC system that can block out a great amount of background noise.

The AKG K702 are better for neutral sound than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The AKG are much more comfortable over-ear headphones. Thanks to their open-back design, their passive soundstage is perceived as much more open and spacious. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile Bluetooth-only headphones. They have a much better build quality and an ANC feature that does a great job blocking out ambient sound. They're also more stable, so they're less likely to slide off your head during light physical activity like a walk.

The SteelSeries Arctis 5 2019 Edition and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes, and you may prefer either one. The SteelSeries are for wired gaming. They're more comfortable, have a significantly better overall microphone performance, and have companion software that offers a graphic EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They're wireless, have great build quality, a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and an ANC system that can block out more background noise.

The AKG K712 PRO and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The AKG are over-ears that are suitable for neutral sound. They have a comfortable fit, a better passive soundstage performance, and come with a coiled audio cable, which some users may prefer. However, the Beats are better-suited for casual use. These wireless on-ears feel better-built, have a more neutral default sound profile, and their ANC can significantly block out more background noise. They also leak less audio at high volumes, have a mic so that you can take calls on the go, and their H1 chip allows you to pair them with your Apple devices.

The Logitech G Pro Gaming Headset and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are headphones designed for different uses and depending on your usage, you may prefer either one. The Logitech are wired gaming headphones. They're more comfortable, and have a significantly better overall microphone performance. However, the Beats are more versatile. They're better-built, have a wireless design as well as a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their ANC is able to block out a lot more ambient noise. They also have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. 

The SteelSeries Arctis 3 2019 Edition Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either depending on your usage. The Beats are more versatile on-ear headphones with ANC. They're more breathable and portable, and are also equipped with an H1 chip for seamless pairing with Apple devices. On the other hand, the SteelSeries are over-ear gaming headphones with a significantly better overall mic performance and a much longer continuous battery life. They have lower latency over Bluetooth and work with PCs, PS4, and Xbox One via analog connection, unlike the Beats. 

The Sennheiser HD 598 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either. The Beats are more versatile Bluetooth-only headphones. They have a better build quality and a more stable, breathable fit. They have a great ANC feature, leak much less sound, and also have a more bass-rich sound profile, which some may prefer. On the other hand, the Sennheiser are wired headphones with an open-back design and a much better passive soundstage performance. 
 

The SteelSeries Arctis 9X Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The SteelSeries are wireless gaming headphones. They're more comfortable, have a virtual soundstage feature, and a significantly better overall boom mic performance. They also have a longer continuous battery life, a customizable sound profile thanks to their companion software, and they support Xbox Wireless for a lower latency connection suitable for gaming. Conversely, the Beats are casual use headphones. They have an ANC system that's able to block out more ambient noise, and they have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. 

The Logitech G Pro X Gaming Headset and the Beat Solo Pro Wireless are headphones designed for different uses. The Logitech are wired gaming headphones that are more comfortable, and have superior microphone performance. They also have a more customizable sound profile, thanks to their companion software's graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are better-suited for casual use. They have a more stable fit, have an active noise cancelling system that significantly blocks out more ambient sound, and have a wireless design. They also have an H1 chip, which allows you to pair these headphones to your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the SteelSeries Arctis 1 have different strengths, and you may prefer either. The SteelSeries are wired gaming headphones. They don't feel as tight, which may be more comfortable, and they have a much better overall mic perfomance. On the other hand, the Beats are Bluetooth-only headphones. They have a much better build quality, a more stable fit, and a more neutral sound profile that some may prefer. They isolate you from much more ambient sound too, thanks to their ANC feature. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless headphones are more versatile than the Audio-Technica ATH-M20x. The Beats are better built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have a significantly better noise isolation performance, thanks to their ANC system. They also have an integrated mic, a wireless design, and an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the Audio-Technica are more comfortable and have a better passive soundstage performance.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless SE are for different purposes. The Corsair are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a virtual soundstage feature, a significantly better mic performance, and you can use them wired. Their companion software also allows you to adjust their sound using their graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have a more neutral sound profile, an ANC system that can block out more ambient noise, and longer continuous battery life.

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The Sennheiser over-ears are designed for audiophiles. They're more comfortable, have a neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have a wider, more immersive passive soundstage. However, the Beats are wireless on-ears that are better built and have great noise isolation, thanks to their ANC system. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with Apple devices.

The Sennheiser HD 650 are better for neutral sound than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. Thanks to their open-back design, the Sennheiser's soundstage is perceived as more open and spacious. Their over-ear fit is also much more comfortable. On the other hand, the Beats are Bluetooth-only on-ear headphones with a great ANC feature. They're more versatile since they don't leak as much audio, have good onboard controls, and are equipped with an integrated mic.

The Sennheiser HD 800 S and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are designed for different purposes. The Sennheiser are wired audiophile headphones with a well-balanced, neutral sound profile. Their passive soundstage is perceived as wide and spacious, thanks partly to their open-back design. They're also better built and more comfortable. On the other hand, the Beats are wireless headphones with a closed-back design. They're more versatile since they leak much less audio, have onboard controls and an integrated mic, and have an ANC feature that does a great job of isolating you from ambient sound.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Sony WH-XB900N Wireless. The Beats are better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their ANC can significantly block out more ambient noise. However, the Sony are more comfortable, you can customize their sound profile using their companion app's graphic EQ and presets, and you can use them wired.

The Sony WF-1000XM3 Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Sony are in-ears that are more comfortable, portable, and have a more neutral sound profile out-of-the-box, which some users may prefer. They have longer-lasting total battery life, and their companion app has a graphic EQ and presets to help adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats have a better noise isolation performance and an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with other Apple devices.

The Sennheiser Momentum 3 Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Sennheiser are more comfortable and have a better battery and noise isolation performance. Their microphone also offers better overall performance, and their companion app has a parametric EQ and presets to help adjust their sound to your liking.

The Sennheiser PXC 550-II Wireless are better than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless for most purposes. The Sennheiser are much more comfortable, stable, and portable. They can be used wirelessly or wired with the included 1/8" TRRS cable, (although this connection only supports audio) and their mic has a much better overall performance. They support multi-device pairing and work with an app that has sound customization options. On the other hand, the Beats have a more neutral default sound profile, which some listeners may prefer. They also have longer continuous battery life and a much better build quality.

The Anker SoundCore Liberty Air 2 Truly Wireless are better headphones for most uses than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Anker have a more comfortable and stable fit, and their mic offers a better recording quality. You can also customize their sound profile. The Beats are better-built, and they have longer continuous battery life. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better for most purposes than the AKG K371. The Beats are wireless headphones that have a significantly better build quality and a much more stable fit. They isolate you from much more ambient sound, thanks to their ANC feature. On the other hand, the AKG have a more neutral sound profile that some listeners may prefer. They're also much more comfortable.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds+ Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Samsung are in-ears that have a more comfortable and stable fit. They have a more neutral sound out of the box, which some users may prefer, EQ presets so that you can adjust their sound to your liking, and better battery performance. However, the Beats are better-built and have an ANC system that can isolate you from a greater amount of background noise.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the Philips Fidelio X2HR. The Beats are wireless on-ears that feel better-built, come with a carrying case to help protect them when you're on the go and have an ANC system that helps block out a great amount of noise. They also have an integrated mic so you're able to take calls, and an H1 chip, which allows you to seamlessly pair them with other Apple products. However, the Philips are over-ears with an open-back design, making them better suited for neutral sound. They're more comfortable, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their passive soundstage is larger, more natural-sounding, and spacious.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 2 have different strengths, and you may prefer either depending on your usage. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a much better ANC performance, a much longer continuous battery life, and a more bass-rich default sound profile, which some may prefer. They're also equipped with an H1 chip for easier pairing with Apple devices. On the other hand, the Sennheiser are much better for sports, thanks to their in-ear design, more stable fit, and IPX4 rating for water resistance, although we don't test that currently. Unlike the Beats, their sound profile can be customized using their companion app. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the JBL CLUB 700BT Wireless are both decent Bluetooth on-ear headphones. The JBL are more comfortable as they don't clamp nearly as tightly. They also have a significantly longer battery and a better-dedicated companion app with a parametric EQ. On the other hand, the Beats feel more durable, have a more neutral default sound profile, much better noise isolation thanks to their ANC feature, and offer seamless pairing to Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the HyperX Cloud Alpha S are designed for different uses. The HyperX are gaming headphones. They're more comfortable, are better built, and have a virtual soundstage feature, and their microphone offers better overall performance. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They have a wireless design, a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, an ANC system that helps block out a significant amount of noise, and an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with Apple devices.

The Razer Opus Wireless 2020 are better for most uses than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Razer are more comfortable, have a more neutral sound profile out-of-the-box, which some users may prefer, and their ANC does a significantly better job of blocking out ambient noise around you. They also have longer-lasting continuous battery life, and their companion app has EQ presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the SteelSeries Arctis 1 Wireless have different strengths. The SteelSeries are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a better overall boom microphone, and longer continuous battery life. Their companion software also offers a graphic EQ and presets so that you can adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They're better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their ANC helps them block out a lot more ambient noise.

The Sony WH-H910N/h.ear on 3 Wireless are slightly better than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Sony are comfier, slightly more portable, have significantly longer battery life, and can be used for passive audio playback thanks to their included 1/8" TRS cable. Their companion app also has a much broader range of sound customization features and their ANC offers a better overall performance. Meanwhile, the on-ear Beats feel better-built, deliver audio more consistently, and leak less audio.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better for most purposes than the Sennheiser HD 450BT Wireless. The Beats have much better onboard controls and a more premium look and feel. Their ANC feature does a much better job of isolating you from ambient sound. They also have a much more neutral sound profile, which some listeners may prefer. On the other hand, you can use the Sennheiser wirelessly or wired, so you can listen to audio passively when you run out of battery. They also offer multi-device pairing, and you can customize their sound profile with a graphic EQ and presets in the companion app.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Razer BlackShark V2 X have different strengths, and you may prefer either one, depending on your needs. The Razer are wired gaming headphones. They're much more comfortable, and their boom mic has a significantly better overall performance. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile truly wireless headphones. They have a better build quality and an ANC feature that blocks out a great amount of ambient sound. They also have much better onboard controls.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the Razer BlackShark V2. The Beats are truly wireless headphones with a great ANC feature. They have a more neutral sound profile, which some listeners may prefer, and significantly better build quality. On the other hand, the Razer are for wired gaming. They're much more comfortable, and their detachable boom mic has a significantly better recording quality and noise handling performance than the Beats' integrated mic. You can also customize their sound profile with a graphic EQ and presets in the app.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Logitech G PRO X WIRELESS LIGHTSPEED Gaming Headset are two headphones designed for different uses. The Logitech are wireless gaming headphones that are more comfortable and have a significantly better mic performance. They also have a better battery performance, a customizable sound profile, thanks to their companion software's graphic EQ and presets, and low enough wireless latency for gaming. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They feel better built, and they have better controls, a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and an ANC system that blocks out a great amount of background noise.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and Bowers & Wilkins PX5 Wireless have different strengths. The Bowers & Wilkins are better-built, more comfortable, and have an easier to use control scheme as well as a more comprehensive companion app. They also offer multi-device pairing and wired audio playback, neither of which the Beats support. However, the Beats provide more consistent and neutral sound profile, charge faster, feel more stable, and have a much longer wireless range.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile on-ear headphones than the Grado The Hemp Headphone. The Beats are more comfortable, they have controls so that you can answer calls as well as manage music, and they feel significantly better-built. They're more stable, and their sound profile is more neutral. The Beats also have a great ANC feature as well as a mic, and since they're wireless, they have 24-hour continuous battery life. However, the Grado have a much better passive soundstage, thanks to their open-back design.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better than the Sony WH-CH710N for most uses. The Beats are sturdier and have a more neutral sound profile, which some may prefer. Their ANC feature is also much better at blocking out ambient sound. However, the Sony have a much more comfortable fit. They support NFC pairing and can be used wirelessly or with a wired connection. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Logitech G733 LIGHTSPEED WIRELESS are for different uses. The Logitech are wireless gaming headphones. They're more comfortable, their boom mic delivers superior overall performance, and you can customize their sound profile using the companion software's graphic EQ and presets. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They're better built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have an ANC system that's able to block out a significant amount of ambient noise. They also have longer continuous battery life.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the Philips SHP9600. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a closed-back design, better build quality, an impressive ANC feature, an integrated mic, and good onboard controls. On the other hand, the Philips are wired open-back headphones. They have a much more comfortable fit, and their soundstage is perceived as much larger and more spacious, which helps make them more suitable for neutral sound.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Razer BlackShark V2 Pro Wireless 2020 are designed for different uses. The Razer are gaming headphones. They're more comfortable, have a virtual soundstage feature, and their boom mic offers better overall performance. They also have a better battery performance, and you can customize their sound using their companion app's graphic EQ and presets. They also have low non-Bluetooth latency. However, the Beats are more suitable for casual use. They're better-built, have a more neutral default sound profile, and their ANC system can block significantly more background noise.

The Bose QuietComfort Earbuds Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Bose are more comfortable, their ANC can block out more background noise, and they have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. However, the Beats have a better battery performance and an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the SteelSeries Arctis 7P Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one, depending on your needs. The SteelSeries are gaming headphones. They have a more comfortable fit and a boom mic with a much better overall performance. They can be used wirelessly or wired with the included 1/8" TRRS cable, allowing you to use the headphones while they're charging. On the other hand, the Beats are more versatile headphones with an integrated mic. They have an ANC feature that blocks out an impressive amount of noise.

The Jabra Elite 85t Wireless Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Jabra have a more stable and comfortable fit, have a longer total battery life, and their integrated mic has a better recording quality. Their companion app also offers a graphic EQ and presets so you can adjust their sound to your liking, and they can be paired with up to two devices at a time. However, the Beats' ANC has a better noise isolation performance. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Corsair HS70 Bluetooth have different strengths and depending on your needs, you may prefer one over the other. The Beats are better for mixed use, as they have a more neutral sound profile suitable for a variety of audio content. They also have a great active noise cancelling feature that can help block out ambient sound during your commute or workday. However, the Corsair are designed for gaming, even though their wireless design ensures that they can be used more casually too. They have a better-performing boom mic and a companion app so you can tweak their sound to your liking.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better for most purposes than the Cooler Master MH751. The Beats are truly wireless headphones with ANC. They have a much better build quality and a more bass-rich sound profile, which some may prefer. They're also less prone to inconsistent bass and treble delivery. On the other hand, the Cooler are wired over-ear headphones with a much better passive soundstage performance. Also, their detachable boom mic has a much better overall performance than the Beats' integrated microphone. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Creative Outlier Air V2 True Wireless are two different pairs of headphones, and depending on your usage habits, you may prefer one over the other. The Creative are in-ear headphones with a more portable, comfortable, and stable design. Their app offers more sound customization features, including head mapping and a graphic EQ with presets. However, the over-ear Beats are better-built with a longer continuous battery life and better noise isolation. Also, the Beats' sound profile is more neutral than the Creative's v-shaped sound, which some users may prefer.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II Wireless are for different uses. The HyperX are better suited for gaming. They're more comfortable and have a virtual soundstage feature, and their boom mic does a significantly better job of recording your voice, even in noisy environments. They also have a longer-lasting continuous battery life and low non-Bluetooth latency. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, their ANC system can block out a great amount of background noise, and their H1 chip allows you to pair them to your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better headphones than the Skullcandy Hesh ANC Wireless. The Beats are better built and have a more neutral sound profile, and their active noise cancelling feature can reduce the ambient noise around you. They also leak more noise. However, the Skullcandy are more comfortable and have a more stable fit. They also support passive playback if you want to use them wired.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and Astro A20 Gen 2 Wireless are wireless over-ear headphones that are good for different uses. The Beats are designed for casual day-to-day use, as they're Bluetooth-compatible and can be easily paired with your phone. They're also better-made, a little easier to carry around, and block out a lot more ambient noise courtesy of their ANC system. Meanwhile, the Astro aren't Bluetooth-compatible but offer lower wireless audio latency when using their wireless USB dongle, which is good for gaming. Their boom mic also delivers superior recording quality and noise handling capability than the Beats' integrated unit.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Drop + THX Panda Wireless are for different uses. The Drop are audiophile over-ear headphones that are more comfortable, have a significantly better battery performance, and can pair with up to two devices at a time. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They have better build quality, a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and active noise cancelling, which can help block noise around you.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro Truly Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Samsung are more comfortable, stable, and portable. They also work with a companion app that gives you access to an EQ and presets.  However, the Beats feel better built and have a more neutral sound profile. Their ANC is also able to block more noise. 

Depending on your preferences, you may prefer either the Beats Solo Pro Wireless or the Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones. The Beats are on-ear headphones, which some users may like, are better-built, and sound more neutral out-of-the-box. However, the Wyze are more comfortable, have a better battery performance, and have a graphic EQ plus presets. Their ANC also does a slightly better job of cutting down ambient noise around you. 

The HiFiMan Arya are better headphones for neutral sound, but the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile. The HiFiMan are more comfortable, have more consistent audio reproduction, and their passive soundstage is wider and more immersive. However, the Beats have a more stable fit, a great ANC which helps to cut down noise around you, and an integrated mic so that you can take calls on-the-go. They also have a wireless design, which some users may prefer.

The EarFun Air Pro True Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The EarFun have a more comfortable fit, their ANC can block out more bass-range noise like the rumble of bus or plane engines, and their integrated mic does a better job of recording your voice. They also have a better battery performance. However, the Beats are better built.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Focal Clear Mg have different strengths and, depending on your usage, you may prefer one over the other. The Beats are more suitable for casual use as they're closed-back headphones with an active noise cancelling feature, which can reduce a great amount of noise around you. They also have a wireless design, a more neutral sound profile than the Focal, and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with Apple devices. However, they can't be used wired. The Focal, in comparison, are audiophile headphones with superior comfort and build quality. They also have more consistent audio delivery and their passive soundstage seems more spacious and immersive. Thanks to their wired design, they have negligible latency, too.

Depending on your listening habits, you may prefer either the Beats Solo Pro Wireless or the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal. The Beats have a more stable fit, a more neutral sound profile out-of-the-box, and a better noise isolation performance. Their continuous battery life is also longer. However, some users may prefer the gaming-oriented design of the Bang & Olufsen, which are more comfortable and have a better microphone performance. They're more customizable thanks to their graphic EQ and presets, and you can use them with Xbox and PlayStation consoles.

The Logitech G333 are better headphones for gaming than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. They have a bass-rich sound profile that emphasizes sound effects in games, an in-line mic with a much better recording quality, and use a wired 1/8" TRRS connection, so they have virtually no latency. They're also much more portable because of their more compact in-ear design. On the other hand, the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are Bluetooth over-ear headphones. They have a more neutral sound profile, which some listeners may prefer, and a great ANC feature that blocks out an impressive amount of mid-range noise like conversations. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Skullcandy Dime True Wireless are differently designed headphones; depending on your usage, you may prefer one over the other. While both headphones have a fairly neutral sound profile, the Beats are on-ear headphones that are better built and have an ANC feature that can block out a lot of noise. They also have around 24 hours of continuous playback time and have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the Skullcandy are in-ears that are more portable and stable.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the JBL Live Pro+ TWS True Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The Beats are on-ear headphones that are better-built. Their ANC can reduce slightly more background noise, and they have longer continuous battery life. However, the JBL are in-ears that are more comfortable and stable. They also have a companion app that offers a parametric EQ and presets so that you can tweak their sound to your liking.

The Bowers & Wilkins Pi7 True Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Bowers & Wilkins are more portable and have a significantly better noise isolation performance. They also have a more stable fit, are rated IP54 for dust and water resistance, although we don't currently test for this, and you can use their carrying case as a wireless transmitter. However, the Beats have longer continuous battery life and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with Apple devices.

The Drop + Sennheiser/EPOS PC38X and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths and depending on your usage, you may prefer either one. The Drop are wired gaming headphones that are more comfortable, have a wider, more spacious passive soundstage, and their boom mic delivers a better overall performance. However, the Beats are better for casual use. They're better-built, are wireless, which some users may prefer, and they have ANC, which helps block out a great amount of noise around you. 

The JBL Live Free NC+ TWS True Wireless are more versatile headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The JBL are in-ears that are more comfortable, stable, and neutral-sounding, which some users may prefer. They also have a companion app that offers a parametric EQ and presets so that you can customize their sound to your liking. However, the Beats are better-built, and their ANC does a better job of cutting down more ambient noise around you. They also have longer-lasting total battery life.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Turtle Beach Recon 500 are designed for different purposes. The Beats are wireless on-ears that are better suited for casual use. They're better-built, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have active noise cancelling, so they're able to block out a good amount of ambient sound around you. They also have an H1 chip, so you're able to seamlessly pair them with other devices in your Apple ecosystem. Conversely, the Turtle Beach are wired gaming headphones. They have a significantly better overall microphone performance and a more comfortable fit. 

The Corsair VIRTUOSO RGB Wireless XT are better for gaming while the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better for casual use. The Corsair are more comfortable, have a virtual soundstage feature, and their boom mic offers a significantly better overall performance. They also have companion software that offers a graphic EQ and presets to adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have active noise cancelling and are able to block out a great amount of ambient noise around you.

The SteelSeries Arctis Prime are better for wired gaming while the Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more suitable for casual use. The SteelSeries are over-ears that are more comfortable, have a more immersive passive soundstage, and can connect to consoles via analog with full audio and mic compatibility. Their boom mic also offers better overall performance. However, the Beats are on-ears with a wireless design, which some users may prefer. They're better-built, have a great noise isolation performance thanks to their ANC, and have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The ROCCAT Syn Pro Air Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either. The ROCCAT are better for wireless gaming. They have a detachable boom mic, companion software with more features, and full compatibility with PCs, PS4, PS5, and Android phones and tablets via non-Bluetooth wireless. On the other hand, the Beats are Bluetooth headphones with an on-ear design. They have much better build quality, an ANC feature, and an H1 chip for easier pairing with Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are somewhat better headphones than the Google Pixel Buds A-Series Truly Wireless. The Beats are better-built, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and can isolate you from significantly more ambient noise. They also have a better battery performance and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices. However, the Google earbuds are more comfortable.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Sony WF-1000XM4 Truly Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. While both headphones are well-built and have very good ANCs, the Beats are on-ears with a more neutral sound profile, which some users may like, and longer continuous battery life. They also have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your other Apple devices. However, the Sony are more comfortable, their companion app has a graphic EQ and presets to help adjust their sound, and they have a better battery performance.

The Jaybird Vista 2 Truly Wireless are somewhat better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The Jaybird are more comfortable, stable, and have a customizable sound profile, thanks to their companion app's parametric EQ and presets. However, the Beats' ANC helps cut down significantly more ambient noise. They also have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.

The JBL Tour Pro+ TWS True Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The JBL are more comfortable, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and their companion app offers a parametric EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking. However, the Beats have a better noise isolation performance and a longer continuous battery life. They also have an H1 chip that allows you to seamlessly pair them with Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Studio Buds True Wireless. The Solo Pro have a better build quality, better ANC, and a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have longer continuous battery life, and an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the Studio Buds are more comfortable and lightweight.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Razer Opus Wireless are similarly performing headphones. The Beats are on-ears that feel better-built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and are able to block out more background noise. They also have an H1 chip which allows you to seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the Razer are over-ears that are more comfortable, have a significantly longer continuous battery life and their companion app offers EQ presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking. 

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and Sennheiser CX True Wireless are different types of headphones that suit different purposes. The Beats are wireless on-ears with a much longer continuous battery life. They're also equipped with an ANC system that helps them block out a good amount of ambient noise. Meanwhile the Sennheiser are truly wireless in-ears that are significantly more portable and have a more breathable fit. They also leak less audio and have a more consistent sound delivery.

Depending on your listening habits, you may prefer either the Beats Solo Pro Wireless or the EPOS Sennheiser GSP 600. The Beats are more versatile wireless on-ears that offer better noise isolation. They have a more balanced sound profile out-of-the-box, and they have better frequency response consistency. However, the EPOS are designed for wired gaming. These over-ears are more comfortable, and they're compatible with more gaming consoles. They also have a better mic performance.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Skullcandy Push Active True Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a better build quality and a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have a very good noise isolation performance thanks to their ANC system, a longer continuous battery life, and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices. However, the Skullcandy are in-ears that are more comfortable and have a stable ear-hook design, making them a solid choice for sports. Their companion app also offers a graphic EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound and smart commands.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Nothing Ear (1) Truly Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Nothing are in-ears with a more comfortable as well as stable fit, a slightly better noise isolation performance, and have EQ presets in their companion app. However, the Beats are on-ear headphones that are better built, have a longer continuous battery life, and have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Sony WH-XB910N Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Beats are on-ears that feel better built, have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and block out slightly more ambient noise. They also have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices. However, the Sony have a more bass-heavy sound profile that you can customize using their companion app's graphic EQ and presets. They also have significantly better battery performance and support multi-device pairing.

The Jabra Elite 7 Active True Wireless and the Βeats Solo Pro Wireless are very different, and you may prefer either, depending on what you're looking for. The Jabra are truly wireless earbuds designed for sports. They're more compact, have a more stable fit, and have an IP57 rating for dust and water resistance. They also work with an app that has sound customization features. On the other hand, the Βeats are wireless, on-ear headphones with much better build quality and longer continuous battery life.

The Jabra Elite 7 Pro True Wireless and the Βeats Solo Pro Wireless are very different, and you may prefer either, depending on what you’re looking for. The Βeats are on-ear headphones with much better build quality. Their ANC feature blocks out more ambient noise, and they have longer continuous battery life. On the other hand, the Jabra are much smaller, more portable earbuds. Their app also includes sound customization features, unlike the Βeats.

The AKG N700NC M2 Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. The AKG are more comfortable, have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have a companion app that offers a parametric EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound. They also have a better noise isolation performance, support passive playback, and can be paired with up to two devices at the same time. However, the Beats are better built and have an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices.

Depending on your usage, you may prefer either the Beats Solo Pro Wireless or the JBL Tune 130NC TWS Truly Wireless. The Beats are on-ear headphones that are better built, have a significantly better noise isolation performance, and have longer continuous battery life. They also have an H1 chip to seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the JBL are in-ears that are more comfortable and have a more neutral default sound profile that you can adjust to your liking using their companion app's parametric EQ and presets.

The Jabra Elite 4 Active True Wireless and the Beats Solo Pro Wireless have different strengths, and you may prefer either, depending on what you're looking for. The Jabra headphones' in-ear design makes them much more portable and stable. They're also more customizable since their app includes a graphic EQ and presets. On the other hand, the Beats are on-ear headphones with a significantly better noise isolation performance and much longer continuous battery life.

The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Sony LinkΒuds Truly Wireless are very different, and you may prefer either, depending on what you're looking for. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a good noise isolation and a more neutral sound profile with a much more accurate bass response. They also have a longer continuous battery life. They're designed to not block your ears and let you hear your surroundings. They struggle to reproduce bass, but are more customizable, since they have a graphic EQ and presets in their app.

The Razer Opus Wireless 2021 are slightly better headphones than the Beats Solo Pro Wireless. While both headphones are well-built, the Razer are over-ears that are more comfortable and have a better battery performance. Their companion app also offers EQ presets to help you adjust their sound to your liking, and their integrated mic has a better overall performance. Their ANC is also able to block out significantly more ambient sound. However, the Beats have an H1 chip so that you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices.