Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Shape
    3. Portability
    4. Build Quality
    5. Weight
    6. Comfort Of Use
    7. Palm Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    8. Claw Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    9. Fingertip Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    10. Wireless Versatility
    11. Cable
    12. Mouse Feet
    13. In The Box
  5. Control
    1. Additional Buttons
    2. Click Latency
    3. CPI
    4. Sensor Latency
    5. Sensor Specifications
    6. Mouse Wheel
    7. Noise
  6. Operating System And Software
    1. Compatible Software Option
    2. Mouse Compatibility
  7. Comments

ROCCAT Kain 200 AIMO vs ROCCAT Kone Pro Air

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

ROCCAT Kain 200 AIMO
ROCCAT Kone Pro Air

Tested using Methodology v1.0

Updated May 29, 2023 03:11 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.3

Updated Oct 11, 2022 03:50 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
ROCCAT Kain 200 AIMO Picture
ROCCAT Kone Pro Air Picture

Variants

  • Kain 200 AIMO (Black)
  • Kain 202 AIMO (White)
  • Kone Pro Air (Black)
  • Kone Pro Air (White)

Our Verdict

ROCCAT Kain 200 AIMO

ROCCAT Kone Pro Air

The ROCCAT Kone Pro Air is a better wireless gaming mouse than the ROCCAT Kain 200 AIMO. The Kone Pro Air is significantly lighter, and its feet glide more smoothly. It also feels sturdier and has a thumb rest. Its charging cable is more flexible and has a USB-C port. Performance-wise, it has a broader CPI range, a more precisely adjustable CPI, and lower click latency. It also supports Bluetooth and has storage for its USB receiver. On the other hand, the Kain 200 AIMO has a wireless receiver extender, which the Kone Pro Air lacks. Both mice are almost universally well-suited for all grip types and hand sizes.

0