Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Performance
- Automation
- Comments
iRobot Roomba 675 vs Shark AI Robot
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
iRobot Roomba 675
Shark AI Robot
Tested using Methodology v0.6
Updated Mar 20, 2025 06:43 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v0.7
Updated Dec 03, 2024 05:56 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Vacuum TypeRobot
BaglessYes
CordlessYes
Anti-Allergy Filter (HEPA)Yes
Wet CompatibleNo
Vacuum TypeRobot
BaglessYes
CordlessYes
Anti-Allergy Filter (HEPA)No
Wet CompatibleNo
Variants
- Roomba 675 (Black)
- Roomba 671 (Black)
- RV2001 (Black/Silver)
- AV2001 (Gray)
Our Verdict
iRobot Roomba 675
Shark AI Robot
The Shark AI Robot is better than the iRobot Roomba 675. The Shark has a more advanced navigation system that allows for room mapping and smart-pathing. It also incurs lower costs of ownership than the iRobot, has a larger dustbin, lasts longer on a charge, and does a better job of maneuvering itself. On the other hand, the iRobot feels slightly sturdier, recharges a lot faster, and does a better job of dealing with debris in cracks, like grout lines on a tile floor.
Check Price
Black
Roomba 675
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comBlack/Silver
RV2001
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comBlack
Roomba 671
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comGray
AV2001
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comNotice:
Two or more of the products selected have been tested with different test methodologies, so some of the results below aren't directly comparable.
Learn how our test benches and scoring system work, and read more about the latest changes to our
robot vacuums test methodology.
Read more
Main Differences forBare Floor
Bare Floor
Threshold
Bare Floor
7.1
6.8
Bare Floor Performance (Hardwood, Laminate, Tiles)
8.7
7.6
Maneuverability
7.0
8.0
Portability
8.9
8.0
Cracks
5.0
4.0
Full Comparison
Design
Build Quality
8.0
7.5
Vacuum Type
Robot
Robot
Build Quality Picture
User Maintenance
4.5
4.5
Maintenance Picture
Brushroll Cleaning Video
Recurring Cost
5.0
6.0
Recurring Cost Picture
Bag Part Number
No bag
No bag
Filter Part Number
4636450
XFRV2000WD
HEPA Filter Part Number
No HEPA Filter
No HEPA Filter
Storing
8.9
9.0
Storing Picture
Height
3.94" (10.0 cm)
5.31" (13.5 cm)
Width
13.39" (34.0 cm)
12.40" (31.5 cm)
Depth
15.83" (40.2 cm)
14.76" (37.5 cm)
Cord Storing
Not Needed
Not Needed
On-Board Tool Storage
Not needed
Not needed
Vacuum Rack/Station
Yes
Yes
Dirt Compartment
5.9
6.2
Dirt Compartment Picture
Bagless
Yes
Yes
Volume
0.07 gal (0.25 L)
0.08 gal (0.30 L)
Full Indicator
No
No
Bag Included
No Bag Needed
No Bag Needed
In The Box
In The Box Picture
Range
10
10
Cordless
Yes
Yes
Cord Length
N/A
N/A
Hose Length
N/A
N/A
Minimum Wand Length
N/A
N/A
Maximum Wand Length
N/A
N/A
Total Range
N/A
N/A
Portability
8.9
8.0
Total Weight
7.59 lbs (3.44 kg)
6.97 lbs (3.16 kg)
Weight In Hand
0.00 lbs (0.00 kg)
0.00 lbs (0.00 kg)
Carrying handle
Yes
No
Battery
9.4
9.3
Minimum Battery Life
121 min
90 min
Maximum Battery Life
121 min
203 min
Recharge Time
120 min
232 min
Recharge Dock
Yes
Yes
Battery Life Indicator
Yes
Yes
Removable Batteries
Yes
Yes
Quality Of Life Features
Picture Of Controls
Rotating Head
No
No
Power Adjustment
No
Yes
Self-Propelled
Yes
Yes
Headlights
No
No
Easy On/Off
Yes
Yes
Head Surface Type Adjustment
Only Automatic
None
Tools And Brushes
Tools And Brush Picture
Brushroll
Yes
Yes
Brushroll On/Off
No
No
Removable Brushroll
Yes
Yes
Turbo Brush
No
No
Crevice Tool
No
No
Upholstery Tool
No
No
Soft Bristle Brush
No
No
Hard Bristle Brush
No
No
Extension Wand
No
No
Ceiling Fan Tool
No
No
Pet Grooming Tool
No
No
Alternative Configuration
Alternative Configuration Photo 1
Alternative Configuration Photo 2
Blower Mode
No
No
Performance
Bare Floor Performance (Hardwood, Laminate, Tiles)
8.7
7.6
Setting Used
"Clean"
"Normal"
Bare Floor Large Debris Graph
Large Debris at 0 gal (0L)
100%
85%
Large Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
44%
45%
Large Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
Bare Floor Small Debris Graph
Small Debris at 0 gal (0L)
99%
98%
Small Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
≈ 98%
99%
Small Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
Low-Pile Carpet Performance
3.6
5.9
Setting Used
"Clean"
"Normal"
Low Carpet Large Debris Graph
Large Debris at 0 gal (0L)
60%
65%
Large Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
≈ 59%
60%
Large Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
Low Carpet Small Debris Graph
Small Debris at 0 gal (0L)
5%
35%
Small Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
≈ 4%
34%
Small Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
High-Pile Carpet Performance
6.0
6.4
Setting Used
"Clean"
"Normal"
High Carpet Large Debris Graph
Large Debris at 0 gal (0L)
64%
54%
Large Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
≈ 63%
51%
Large Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Large Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
High Carpet Small Debris Graph
Small Debris at 0 gal (0L)
9%
29%
Small Debris at 0.07 gal (0.25L)
≈ 8%
28%
Small Debris at 0.2 gal (0.75L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.4 gal (1.5L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 0.8 gal (3L)
N/A
N/A
Small Debris at 1.6 gal (6L)
N/A
N/A
Pet Hair Floor Performance
6.1
5.9
Pet Hair Graph
Bare Floor
52%
77%
Low-Pile Carpet
93%
61%
High-Pile Carpet
79%
56%
Suction
0.0
0.0
Suction Video
Maximum Hose Suction
N/A
Maximum Head Suction
0.0 inH₂O (0.01 kPa)
0.0 inH₂O (0.01 kPa)
Setting Used For Maximum
"Clean"
Normal Head Suction
0.0 inH₂O (0.01 kPa)
0.0 inH₂O (0.00 kPa)
Setting Used For Normal
"Clean"
"Normal" (App)
Hose Diameter
N/A
N/A
Airflow
2.5
Maximum Airflow Video
Maximum Hose Airflow
12.3 CFM (0.3 m³/min)
Noise
9.2
9.1
Noise Video
Bare Floor
63.0 dBA
63.6 dBA
Low-Pile Carpet
61.5 dBA
64.8 dBA
Maneuverability
7.0
8.0
Maneuverability Video
Pet Hair Furniture Performance
0.0
0.0
Sofa Pickup Video
Sofa Pickup Post Test
Air Quality
Sealing Quality Video
Anti-Allergy Filter (HEPA)
Yes
No
Cracks
5.0
4.0
Cracks Video
Wood Cracks Post Test
Stains
1.0
1.0
Stain Video
Stain Pickup Post Test
Water
0.0
0.0
Wet Compatible
No
No
Water Video
Water Pickup Post Test
Automation
Physical Automation
6.5
6.3
Automatic Recharging
Yes
Yes
Automatic Bag Emptying
No
No
Pathing Algorithm
Random
Smart
Physical Boundary Markers
No
No
Scheduled Start Buttons
No
No
Cycle Control Buttons
Onboard Only
No
Navigation Control Buttons
Return to Base Only
Return to Base Only
Companion App Automation
7.5
7.0
Companion App Screen Grabs
App Name
iRobot HOME
SharkClean
iOS Availability
Yes
Yes
Android Availability
Yes
Yes
Software Boundary Markers (No Go Zones)
No
Yes
App Scheduled Start
Yes
Yes
App Cycle Control
Yes
Yes
Navigation Control within App
No
No
Check Price
Black
Roomba 675
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comBlack/Silver
RV2001
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comBlack
Roomba 671
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comGray
AV2001
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
iRobot Roomba 675
Shark AI Robot
Comments
iRobot Roomba 675 vs Shark AI Robot: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.