Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Shape
    3. Portability
    4. Build Quality
    5. Weight
    6. Comfort Of Use
    7. Palm Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    8. Claw Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    9. Fingertip Grip: Hand Size Recommendation
    10. Wireless Versatility
    11. Cable
    12. Mouse Feet
    13. In The Box
  5. Control
    1. Buttons
    2. Click Latency
    3. CPI
    4. Sensor Specifications
    5. Mouse Wheel
    6. Noise
  6. Operating System And Software
    1. Compatible Software Option
    2. Mouse Compatibility
  7. Comments

BenQ ZOWIE EC2 vs Sharkoon Light² 200

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

BenQ ZOWIE EC2
Sharkoon Light² 200

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Jul 25, 2024 03:36 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.0

Updated Apr 25, 2022 08:14 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
BenQ ZOWIE EC2 Picture
Sharkoon Light² 200 Picture

Variants

  • BenQ Zowie EC2 (Black)
  • Light² 200 (Black)
  • Light² 200 (White)

Our Verdict

BenQ ZOWIE EC2

Sharkoon Light² 200

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Sharkoon Light² 200 have a very similar shape that's best suited for a palm or claw grip for most hand sizes. The Sharkoon has a honeycomb cutout design on its sides and palm rest that makes it much lighter, and it also comes with an alternate solid palm rest if you prefer. Also, it has a lower lift-off distance and a wider CPI range with a CPI that you can adjust in precise increments. You can reprogram all the buttons using the dedicated software, and the CPI switching button is on the top of the mouse instead of on the underside like the BenQ, making it easier to adjust your CPI mid-game. The BenQ has a more straightforward design with no RGB or customization software and has much lower click latency.

0