Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Vaxee XE Wireless vs BenQ ZOWIE U2
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Vaxee XE Wireless
BenQ ZOWIE U2
Tested using Methodology v1.5
Updated Oct 15, 2024 04:24 PM
SEARCH
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.5
Updated Jun 18, 2024 07:15 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
ConnectivityWireless
TypeStandard
Default Weight76.3 g
AmbidextrousShape Only
ConnectivityWireless
TypeStandard
Default Weight61.2 g
AmbidextrousShape Only
Variants
- XE Wireless (Black)
- XE B Wireless (Blue)
- XE O Wireless (Orange)
- XE P Wireless (Pink)
- XE W Wireless (White)
- XE Y Wireless (Yellow)
- ZOWIE U2 (Black)
Our Verdict
Vaxee XE Wireless
BenQ ZOWIE U2
The Vaxee XE Wireless and the BenQ ZOWIE U2 are wireless gaming mice aimed at competitive gamers. Both mice have a symmetrical shape. The Vaxee is a bit smaller, and its side flares out toward the bottom. It's best suited for palm or claw grip types, while the BenQ has narrower sides and is designed for claw grip. The BenQ is also somewhat lighter and has better build quality. However, the Vaxee offers better raw gaming performance and supports a higher maximum polling rate with the separate purchase of Vaxee's VXD02 Receiver.
Check Price
Black
XE Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeBlue
XE B Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeOrange
XE O Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storePink
XE P Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeWhite
XE W Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeYellow
XE Y Wireless
Searching
Finding storeMain Differences forWork
Work
Threshold
Work
6.2
6.6
Build Quality
7.0
8.5
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Type
Standard
Standard
Coating
Matte
Matte
Lighting Color
No Lighting
No Lighting
Shape
3D Model
Length
4.9" (125 mm)
4.8" (123 mm)
Width
2.6" (66 mm)
2.5" (64 mm)
Height
1.5" (39 mm)
1.5" (39 mm)
Grip Width
61 mm
56 mm
Ambidextrous
Shape Only
Shape Only
Left-Handed Friendly
Yes
Yes
Finger Rest
No
No
Portability
5.6
5.7
Portability picture
Box Volume
19.65 in³ (322 cm³)
18.43 in³ (302 cm³)
Receiver Storing
No
No
Build Quality
7.0
8.5
Build quality picture
Weight
7.8
8.9
Minimum Weight Picture
Lowest Weight
76.3 g
61.2 g
Default Weight
76.3 g
61.2 g
Weight Distribution
Centered
Centered
Extra Weights
No
No
Hand Size Recommendation
Palm Grip Hand Recommendation
Claw Grip Hand Recommendation
Fingertip Grip Hand Recommendation
Wireless Versatility
7.2
7.3
Maximum Of Paired Devices
1
2
Bluetooth
No
No
Receiver
Yes
Yes
Battery Type
Rechargeable
Rechargeable
Use When Charging
Yes
Yes
On/Off Activation
Auto Off And On/Off Switch
Auto Off And On/Off Switch
Receiver Extender
Yes
Yes
Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cable
9.0
9.0
Cable Video
Connectivity
Wireless
Wireless
Cable Length
6.6 ft (2.0 m)
7.1 ft (2.2 m)
Cable Type
Paracord-like
Paracord-like
Permanent Kink
Yes
Yes
Port Type: Mouse End
USB-C
USB-C
Port Type: PC End
USB
USB
Mouse Feet
8.5
8.0
Mouse Feet picture
Gliding Experience
Ok
Very Good
Material
Virgin Grade PTFE
PTFE
Extra Included
No
Yes
In The Box
In the box picture
Control
Main Button
Actuation Graph
Force/Distances Graph
Switch Type
Mechanical
Mechanical
Switch Model
Huano 70g
Huano Transparent Blue Pink Dot
Additional Buttons
4.4
4.3
Buttons Picture
Total Number Of Buttons
9
7
Number Of Side Buttons
2
2
Number Of Programmable Inputs
0
0
Profile Switching Button
No
No
Gesture Support
No
No
Click Latency
9.3
8.6
Latency Testing While Gaming
Latency Data
Expected Connection
3.1 ms
5.5 ms
Wired
3.8 ms
5.1 ms
Receiver
3.1 ms
5.5 ms
Bluetooth
N/A
N/A
CPI
9.6
8.7
CPI Video
SRAV Close-Up
SRAV @ 1600 CPI
-0.17%
-0.27%
SRAV @ 800 CPI
-0.21%
-0.21%
SRAV @ 400 CPI
-0.25%
0.33%
SRAV @ Fixed CPI
N/A
N/A
Precision Error Between Speeds
0.41%
1.62%
Precision Error Between CPI
0.40%
1.64%
Worst Tracking Error
2.88%
-7.50%
Minimum CPI
400 CPI
400 CPI
Maximum CPI
3,200 CPI
3,200 CPI
CPI Adjustment Steps
N/A
N/A
Sensor Latency
9.7
8.4
Sensor Latency Demonstration
Sensor Latency Transition Graph
Sensor Latency CPI Graph
Delay To Start Of Movement
11.3 ms
18.8 ms
Delay At Half Movement
1.2 ms
4.8 ms
Delay To End Of Movement
0.5 ms
7.0 ms
Sensor Specifications
Sensor Technology
Optical (LED)
Optical (LED)
Sensor Model
PixArt PAW3395
PixArt PAW3395
Works On Glass
No
No
Minimum Lift Off Distance
1.2 mm
1.2 mm
Maximum Polling Rate
4000 Hz
1000 Hz
Mouse Wheel
Mouse wheel picture
Scroll Wheel Type
Notched Wheel
Notched Wheel
Scroll Wheel Steps
24 Steps
24 Steps
Scroll Wheel Tilt
No
No
Thumb Wheel Type
No
No
Thumb Wheel Steps
No Thumb Wheel
No Thumb Wheel
Noise
Noise Video
Click Noise
Quiet
Loud
Operating System And Software
Configuration Software
Software Tour
Software Name
No software
No software
Software Windows Compatibility
No
No
Software macOS Compatibility
No
No
On-Board Memory
No
No
CPI (DPI) Adjustment
No
No
Polling Rate Adjustment
No
No
Profile Configuration
No
No
Profile Auto-Switching
No
No
RGB On/Off
No
No
Mouse Compatibility
10
10
Windows Compatibility
Fully
Fully
macOS Compatibility
Fully
Fully
Check Price
Black
XE Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeBlue
XE B Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeOrange
XE O Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storePink
XE P Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeWhite
XE W Wireless
Searching
Finding storeBlack
ZOWIE U2
Searching
Finding storeYellow
XE Y Wireless
Searching
Finding store
You have 10/10 free reviews left
To access
and
Become an Insider
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices
other exclusive site features
Vaxee XE Wireless
BenQ ZOWIE U2
Comments
Vaxee XE Wireless vs BenQ ZOWIE U2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.