The Shark ION Robot AV753 Series is a basic, budget-friendly robot vacuum. It has a rather rudimentary navigation system that relies on random navigation to move around its coverage area, without the room mapping capability found on pricier models in Shark's lineup like the Shark AI Ultra Robot.
The Shark ION Robot is alright for cleaning bare floors. It feels well-made and clears small and bulky material without too much of a hassle. However, it struggles noticeably with pet hair and is demanding in user maintenance. It also has somewhat rudimentary automation capabilities and a basic navigation system that could cause it to miss some parts of its coverage area.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum is a mediocre option for dealing with messes on low-pile carpet. It struggles with sucking up pet hair, which can become trapped in its brushroll, as well as fine debris on this surface type. It also incurs high recurring costs and has many parts that need regular cleaning. Its brushroll can also occasionally get trapped on rug tassels. Thankfully, it has a long battery life and feels well-built.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum is a passable option for dealing with debris on high-pile carpets. It struggles with pet hair and fine debris and clears only a passable amount of larger material. Recurring costs are high, and many parts need regular cleaning. That said, it can climb onto high-pile rugs without too much difficulty, has sufficient battery life for long cleaning tasks, and feels quite sturdy overall.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum is bad for cleaning up pet hair. Pet hair can get caught in its brushroll instead of being sucked into its dustbin, especially on carpeted surfaces. It has many parts that need periodic cleaning and incurs high recurring costs. It doesn't have a HEPA filter to trap allergens as it cleans, either, which could be an issue if you suffer from serious allergies.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum isn't designed for use on stairs.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum isn't designed to clean car interiors.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum isn't designed for use in workshops.
The Shark ION Robot AV753 Series comes in three color variants: 'White', 'Gray', and 'Black'. We tested the 'White' variant, and you can see its label here. The model numbers and corresponding colors are listed below.
Model Name | Color |
AV751 | Black |
AV752 | White |
AV753 | Gray |
If you come across a different variant, let us know in the discussions, and we'll update our review.
The Shark ION Robot AV753 Series is a simple budget robot vacuum. It feels well-made, and its long battery life should allow it to clean large areas without needing to be recharged. It performs best on bare floors but can have some trouble with messes on low-pile carpet or with cleaning up pet hair. Its range of automation features is more basic than those of pricier Shark robot vacuums like the Shark AI Robot.
If you're considering an alternative, take a look at our list of recommendations of the best robot vacuums for hardwood floors, the best budget robot vacuum cleaners, and the best robot vacuums for carpet.
The iRobot Roomba 694 is slightly better than the Shark ION Robot AV753 Series. The iRobot has fewer parts that need regular cleaning, incurs lower recurring costs, charges substantially faster, has an automatic surface-type adjustment function, and offers superior maneuverability. However, the Shark has a slightly larger dustbin.
The iRobot Roomba E5 and Shark ION Robot AV753 Series each have advantages, and one may suit you better than the other, depending on your needs. The iRobot is better-built, easier to maintain, more maneuverable, and struggles noticeably less on low-pile carpet, especially in regards to pet hair. Conversely, while it charges much faster than the Shark, it has much shorter battery life. The Shark also has a larger dirt compartment and superior performance on bare floors.
The Shark IQ Robot is a better option for most uses than the Shark ION Robot AV753 Series. The IQ clears debris more effectively on all surface types, uses smart-pathing to plot more efficient cleaning routes, and comes with boundary makers to prevent it from moving into certain areas. Meanwhile, the ION has a much longer battery life while taking less time to recharge.
The iRobot Roomba i3 is better than the Shark ION Robot AV753 Series. The iRobot feels better-built, has fewer parts requiring regular maintenance, comes with an allergen-trapping HEPA filter, maneuvers itself more effectively, and performs better on all surface types. It also has a far more advanced suite of automation features, most notably its self-emptying feature, which allows it to dump any accumulated debris into a larger dirtbin built onto its charging dock. It's also capable of resuming an in-progress cleaning session after returning to its dock to recharge. Conversely, the Shark is easier to store, incurs lower recurring costs, and has a much longer battery life, though the iRobot charges a lot faster.
The eufy RoboVac 11S and Shark ION Robot AV753 Series each have distinct advantages, and one may suit you better than the other, depending on your needs. The eufy clears pet hair more effectively on all surface types and struggles less on low-pile carpet. Meanwhile, the Shark is better-built, has a longer battery life, and does a much better job of dealing with bulkier debris like cereal. It also has a companion app, though it's somewhat limited in features and isn't especially intuitive.
The Shark ION Robot AV753 Series is better than the eufy RoboVac 30C. The Shark feels better built, has a longer battery life, and performs better on bare floors as well as low and high-pile carpet. Meanwhile, the eufy does come with a remote control that allows you to use it without an internet connection.
The Roborock E4 is a far more versatile robot vacuum than the Shark ION Robot AV753 Series. The Roborock feels better-built, is easier to maintain, maneuvers around obstructions more easily, and has lower recurring costs, not to mention a broader suite of automation features and a larger dust bin. It also offers superior cleaning performance on all surface types. Conversely, the Shark is a little lighter and more compact.
The Shark ION Robot AV753 Series is slightly superior to the ILIFE A4s. The Shark feels better-made, has a much longer battery life, and is more effective on bare floors and high-pile carpet, though it struggles more with pet hair than the ILIFE. The ILIFE is slightly smaller and lighter and does a marginally better job removing fine debris like baking soda from low-pile carpets.
The Shark EZ Robot Self-Empty is better than the Shark ION Robot AV753 Series for most uses. The EZ delivers better performance on bare floors and carpets, maneuvers itself with less difficulty, and has a broader range of automation features. Its external dustbin also gives it a larger, more effective debris capacity. However, the ION has fewer parts that need periodic replacing or maintenance and has a longer maximum battery life, though it does take notably longer to recharge than the EZ.
The Shark ION Robot has good build quality. It's mainly made of hard plastic with a matte finish, though its front bumper, drive wheel treads, and swiveling front wheel are made of rubber. It feels quite sturdy overall, though its dustbin feels somewhat fragile, and it could be damaged if you drop it. You may want to consider the iRobot Roomba 692 if you're looking for a better-built alternative.
Out-of-the-box assembly is a fairly simple process, requiring only that you snap the two included side brushes into place and plug in its dock station.
This vacuum has many parts that need regular cleaning, though, thankfully, they're easy to access.
The Shark ION Robot has many recurring costs.
You can purchase any one of these parts, as well as additional accessories, on Shark's website.
The Shark ION Robot has an acceptably-sized dust bin. However, like the Shark IQ Robot, it doesn't have a max fill sensor to let you know once it has reached peak capacity.
The Shark ION Robot's range is limited only by its remaining battery life and the room left in its dirt compartment. Unfortunately, it can't climb or descend stairs.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum is very portable. It doesn't weigh very much, but it lacks a carrying handle to make it easier to move around.
Battery performance is superb. There isn't a significant difference in runtime between running it continuously in its energy-efficient 'Eco' suction power mode and high-suction 'Max' mode, as it should last for about three hours on a single charge regardless of your choice of setting. This exceeds the continuous runtime of just 60 minutes specified in the vacuum's user guide. The three indicator lights quickly let you know how much battery life is left since they gradually turn off as the charge level drops.
This vacuum has a couple of quality-of-life features. You can swap between three power modes through its companion app: the energy-efficient 'Eco' mode, the default 'Normal' mode, and the high-suction 'Max' mode. Physical buttons on top of the vacuum allow you to select only the 'Max' or 'Normal' modes.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum has two side brushes that direct debris from the outer edges of the vacuum's path toward its main brushroll.
The Shark ION Robot has good performance on bare floors. It clears bulky and small debris, like cereal or rice, without difficulty. However, it has a very hard time dealing with pet hair on this surface type.
The Shark ION Robot Vacuum performs badly on low-pile carpet. Pet hair can get stuck in its brushroll rather than being sucked into its dustbin, and it picks up very little in the way of fine material like baking soda. However, it's reasonably effective in dealing with larger debris like sand.
This vacuum delivers good performance on high-pile carpet. It can clear away an impressive amount of larger debris like sand within a pass or two.
This vacuum's real-world suction performance isn't very strong. Its suction inlet is positioned too high above the contact surface to generate a tight seal on bare surfaces, though this is the norm for most robot vacuums, and isn't necessarily indicative of poor performance on most surfaces.
This vacuum is remarkably quiet. Even with the vacuum running in its 'Max' mode within the same room, you should be able to hear nearby conversations.
The Shark ION Robot is reasonably maneuverable. It uses random pathing to plot cleaning routes, meaning it does occasionally miss some areas or go over the same spot more than once. Thankfully, it's small enough to easily clean under low-lying furniture like tables or couches, and it can climb onto high-pile rugs without too much difficulty, though it can get caught on rug tassels. If you want a vacuum that does a better job of maneuvering itself, consider the iRobot Roomba 614.
Some allergens can escape from this vacuum's exhaust, though this isn't overly surprising given the lack of an on-board HEPA filter.
Physical automation features are limited. Unlike the Shark IQ Robot, it's incapable of mapping out its coverage area and relies instead on random pathing to navigate its coverage area, though this type of basic navigation system is common for a robot vacuum in this price range. Unfortunately, it isn't capable of recognizing magnetic boundary strips that could be used to prevent it from entering certain areas. There's no self-emptying capability either, so you can't pair it with an auto-empty dock to reduce hands-on maintenance requirements. Thankfully, you can enable voice control functions via Google Home or Amazon Alexa devices.
The three control buttons on top of the vacuum can be used to have the vacuum start a cleaning session, return to its dock, or to engage its 'Max' suction mode.
The SharkClean companion app is mediocre in terms of usability and features. You can use it to manually stop and start a cleaning job, change its power mode, send it back to its charging dock, and check previous cleaning history as well as remaining battery life. However, the vacuum's nonexistent mapping features mean that you can't view a coverage map of previous cleaning sessions, set up boundary lines, or send it to specific rooms in your home. Even worse, the app itself isn't especially pleasant to use, with inputs that don't always register and a confusing and convoluted menu system.