BenQ ZOWIE S2 Mouse Review

The BenQ ZOWIE S2 is a better gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The S2 feels better built, and its feet glide better since it has no sharp edges. Also, its sensor is more consistent than the EC2. However, the EC2 feels more comfortable, its cable is more flexible, and its click latency is marginally lower.

The BenQ ZOWIE S1 and the BenQ ZOWIE S2 are the two mice that make up BenQ ZOWIE's S series. Both have nearly identical performance and symmetrical designs with shorter bodies, but they're different sizes. The S1 is larger and well-suited for larger hands using any grip type; however, any hand size should feel comfortable using it with a palm grip. The S2 is smaller, significantly lighter, and has a slightly better click latency. It's well-suited to larger hands and all grip types. Although it's smaller, it isn't suitable for those with small hands.

The BenQ ZOWIE FK1-B and BenQ ZOWIE FK1-B are very similar wired gaming mice with nearly identical performance but different shapes. The S2 is shorter and has a symmetrical shape that's well suited for all grip types but isn't suitable for small hands. That said, the FK1-B has a low profile and a symmetrical shape that's great for palm or claw grip, but only larger hands will likely find a fingertip grip comfortable. It also has a lower click latency, but it's unlikely to be a noticeable difference for most people.

The Vaxee XE and BenQ ZOWIE S2 are both wired gaming mice with symmetrical shapes. The Vaxee is considerably lighter, has a more flexible cable you can detach from the mouse itself, and offers better raw performance. On the other hand, the BenQ feels more sturdily built than the Vaxee we tested.

The BenQ ZOWIE S2 and the SteelSeries Rival 3 are very similarly-shaped mice, but the SteelSeries is lighter and has access to software for customization options. The SteelSeries also has RGB lighting, and you can create multiple profiles and easily switch between them. You can also be a bit more precise with the CPI settings than with the BenQ, as it only has four presets.

The Fnatic BOLT and the BenQ ZOWIE S2 are gaming mice with similar symmetrical shapes but the Fnatic performs better overall. The Fnatic connects wirelessly with a USB receiver or via Bluetooth. It's significantly lighter and feels slightly better built, and its feet glide somewhat more smoothly. Performance-wise, it also has lower click latency, lower lift-off distance, a much broader CPI range, and the ability to set your own custom CPI settings, while the BenQ only allows you to cycle between CPI presets. Additionally, the Fnatic has customization software, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ feels sturdier.

The Gamesense Meta and the BenQ ZOWIE S2 have a similar ambidextrous shape, but the Gamesense performs better overall. The Gamesense is much lighter, and it has a more flexible paracord-like cable and better quality mouse feet. Also, it has a lower lift-off distance, programmable buttons, and you can adjust the CPI in increments of 100, thanks to its customization software. On the other hand, the BenQ doesn't have software, and you can only cycle between four CPI preset settings. However, some people may prefer the BenQ's more straightforward design, with no RGB lighting or software.

The BenQ ZOWIE S2 and the Gigabyte AORUS M5 are both wired gaming mice. The BenQ has a straightforward design, with no RGB or customization software, which some people may prefer. It has a lighter weight, a sturdier-feeling build, smoother-gliding mouse feet, and a lower click latency. You can only cycle between four CPI presets using a button on the underside. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has a wider CPI range, and you can adjust the CPI precisely in increments of 50. You can program all its buttons and customize the RGB lighting using the companion software available on Windows.

The HK Gaming Mira-S is a better wired gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE S2. The HK Gaming is lighter and has a more flexible cable. It has mouse feet that glide more smoothly, a wider CPI range, and a CPI you can adjust by increments of 100. It also has RGB lighting and customization software, both of which the BenQ Zowie lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ ZOWIE has lower click latency. However, it only has four CPI presets. Both mice are suitable for all grip types,  but on the whole, the BenQ ZOWIE is better suited for larger hands, while the HK Gaming is better suited for smaller ones.

The Vaxee OUTSET AX and the BenQ ZOWIE S2 are both similarly-shaped, wired gaming mice, but the Vaxee is a better mouse overall. The Vaxee is slightly lighter, has a slightly taller hump, a wider back, and a sturdier-feeling build quality. It also has a more flexible cable, a lower click latency, and a lower lift-off distance. Unfortunately, since both mice lack companion software, none of the buttons are reprogrammable, and both mice only have four default CPI settings onboard.

The Razer Pro Click is significantly better than the BenQ ZOWIE S2. The Razer is a wireless mouse with multi-device pairing, has more programmable buttons, and better build quality. The Razer has much better performance, more customization options, and the scroll wheel can tilt for horizontal scrolling. The BenQ is much lighter, and its ambidextrous shape is more comfortable for left-handed use.

The Endgame Gear XM1 is a better mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE S2. The Endgame Gear is lighter, feels more solid, has a noticeably better cable, and has software that allows for more precise CPI adjustments. However, if you like having a higher back hump, then go for the BenQ.

The GLORIOUS Model O is slightly better than the BenQ ZOWIE S2; it's lighter and feels better-built. Most people should find the BenQ more comfortable, but it depends on your hand size and grip preference. The GLORIOUS' lightweight and flexible cable is noticeably better than the BenQ's stiff non-braided cable. On the other hand, if you don't like RGB, the BenQ doesn't have any.