The Razer Pro Click Mini is a small, wireless-only mouse designed for portability and productivity. It feels well-built and solid, and it has an ambidextrous shape and low profile that easily fits into most laptop bags. It features two buttons on the left side, a scroll wheel that unlocks for free scrolling, and L/R tilts for navigating spreadsheets or documents horizontally. It connects wirelessly with a USB receiver or via Bluetooth, and you can pair it with up to four devices. There's also a storage compartment for its USB receiver under the palm rest panel. Despite its small size, it's on the heavier side because it uses disposable batteries for power. Unfortunately, it's too small for users with larger hands to use comfortably with any grip type.
The Razer Pro Click Mini is a great mouse for office use. It feels well-built, and its ambidextrous shape is comfortable to use. You can reprogram nearly all its buttons using the companion software and even assign a Hypershift button for more programmable inputs. It connects wirelessly with a USB receiver or via a Bluetooth connection. Unfortunately, due to its small size, it's not suitable to use with a palm grip, and those with larger hands may have difficulty using it.
The Razer Pro Click Mini is an impressive mouse for FPS gaming. Although marketed as a productivity mouse, it still has great gaming features. It has excellently low click latency and a moderately wide CPI range, within which you can adjust the CPI in increments of 100. It also has PTFE feet that glide very smoothly across desks and mousepads. It can be on the heavier side if you opt to use two AA batteries for power; however, you can use the mouse with only one battery to reduce the weight. It's also too small for extra-large hands to use comfortably with any grip type.
The Razer Pro Click Mini is a very good mouse for MMO gaming. While it doesn't have as many buttons as dedicated MMO mice, it feels well-built and comfortable to use with a fingertip grip. It has excellently low click latency, a wide CPI range, within which you can adjust the set CPI by increments of 100, and a low minimum lift-off distance. You can also assign a Hypershift button using the companion software to enable a second layer of commands for more programmable inputs. Unfortunately, it's too small for users with larger hands to use comfortably with any grip type.
The Razer Pro Click Mini has outstanding Raw Performance. Despite being a mouse designed for productivity, both its sensor and click latency are low. It also has a maximum polling rate of 1000Hz when connected with its USB receiver, providing a visibly smoother and more consistent feeling of cursor movements and better gaming performance than most productivity-focused mice that typically have polling rates of only 125Hz.
The Razer Pro Click Mini we tested is matte white. It has no other variants. You can see the label of our unit here.
The Razer Pro Click Mini is the latest entry into Razer's Pro lineup designed for office and productivity purposes rather than gaming. It has a similar design and build to the Razer Pro Click, but it's much smaller for portability. Unlike the Razer Pro Click, it doesn't have rechargeable batteries and uses up to two AA batteries instead. It's very similar to other small-sized productivity mice, like the Logitech MX Anywhere 3, but the Pro Click Mini has L/R tilt scrolling, and a manual switch behind the scroll wheel allows you to switch from notched scroll to free scroll.
For more options, see our recommendations for the best wireless mouse, the best ergonomic mouse, and the best mouse for MacBook Pro.
The Razer Orochi V2 and the Razer Pro Click Mini are similarly performing mice, but the Orochi V2 is better suited for gaming, while the Pro Click Mini is designed for productivity and office tasks. That said, the Pro Click Mini has a scroll wheel with L/R tilts and a switch to use in free scroll mode. It also has more programmable inputs and silent switches that won't disrupt your neighbors if you're working at an office. On the other hand, the Orochi V2 is lighter and suitable for smaller hands with a palm or claw grip. It also has a lower minimum lift-off distance and better PTFE feet.
The Razer Pro Click Mini and the Logitech MX Anywhere 3S are compact wireless productivity mice designed with portability in mind. The Razer is more lightweight and has quieter click buttons. It also has higher-quality mouse feet, better overall sensor performance and click latency, and its scroll wheel supports left and right tilt inputs, a feature the MX Anywhere 3S lacks.
The Logitech MX Anywhere 3 and the Razer Pro Click Mini are very similar performing mice designed for travel and productivity uses. The Razer has more programmable inputs, a higher max polling rate, better feet, and L/R tilts on the scroll wheel. It also has a storage compartment for the USB receiver, which the Logitech lacks. On the other hand, the Logitech has a rechargeable battery, and its sensor works on glass.
The Razer Pro Click and the Razer Pro Click Mini are both mice designed for productivity uses. The Pro Click Mini is a smaller version of the Pro Click that uses two AA batteries for power rather than a rechargeable one. It has an ambidextrous design and better feet. Also, it has a free scroll mode, which the Pro Click lacks. On the other hand, the Pro Click has a right-handed ergonomic shape with a thumb rest for extra support, and it's suitable for use with a palm or claw grip for small to large hands. Both mice connect wirelessly using a USB receiver or a Bluetooth connection.
The Razer Pro Click Mini and the Logitech M317 are both small, wireless mice designed for travel use. The Logitech is a very basic mouse with limited features, so the Razer is a better choice if you need side buttons, a free scrolling mode on the scroll wheel, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Cooler Master MM720 and the Razer Pro Click Mini are mice designed for different uses. The Cooler Master performs better as a gaming mouse thanks to its lower click latency, lower lift-off distance, wider CPI range, and better quality PTFE feet. It also has a unique ergonomic shape with a ring finger rest. However, it's wired-only. On the other hand, the Razer is designed for office use. It has a scroll wheel that you can unlock for free scrolling, and its solid, plastic body feels better built. Also, it's heavier and wireless-only.
The Razer Viper 8KHz and the Razer Pro Click Mini are designed for different uses. The Viper 8KHz is better suited for gaming, while the Pro Click Mini is better suited for office use. The Viper 8KHz has lower click latency, a higher maximum polling rate, and it feels more comfortable to use. On the other hand, the Pro Click Mini is wireless-only, has Bluetooth compatibility, and has a scroll wheel that unlocks for infinite scrolling.
The Razer Pro Click Mini and the GLORIOUS Model D are mice designed for two different uses. The Razer is better suited for office use and features such as a scroll wheel that unlocks for free scrolling, Bluetooth compatibility, and a storage compartment for its USB receiver. It's also much smaller and more portable than the GLORIOUS and has many more programmable inputs. On the other hand, the GLORIOUS is better suited for ultra-light gaming. It has a lightweight body that feels better built, and its lift-off distance is lower. You can only use it with a wired connection, but its paracord-like cable doesn't cause drag on surfaces. It also has RGB lighting and higher-quality feet.
The Razer Atheris and the Razer Pro Click Mini are very similar mice, but the Pro Click Mini performs better overall. Although the Atheris is designed for gaming, the Pro Click Mini has lower click latency, a wider CPI range, and more programmable inputs. It feels better-built and more comfortable to use, and it offers a better gliding experience. Also, since it's an office mouse, its scroll wheel unlocks to a free-scrolling mode. On the other hand, the Atheris comes in more colors if you want to match your setup.
The Logitech M240 and the Razer Pro Click Mini are compact wireless mice. The M240 is a basic model with no side buttons. It connects via Bluetooth. On the other hand, the Razer has two side buttons and connects via Bluetooth or its included USB receiver. It also has significantly more extensive productivity features, including programmable side buttons, a scroll wheel with a free-scrolling mode and L/R tilt inputs, support for gesture commands, and multi-device pairing with up to three devices simultaneously.
This mouse has an ambidextrous design with a low profile. It comes with a matte white plastic shell, matte silver buttons, and a silver scroll wheel. Its sleek aesthetic matches the rest of Razer's Pro lineup. Notably, it lacks Razer's snake logo, opting for a text logo on the back, and has no RGB lighting.
The Razer Pro Click Mini's build quality is great. It has a solid, plastic shell and textured rubber grips on the sides and scroll wheel for extra control. Since the scroll wheel has L/R tilt capabilities, it has a bit of wobble and slightly rattles. Also, the body is made of one large piece of removable plastic, so the L/R click buttons slightly wobble side-to-side, which won't be noticeable in everyday use.
Despite the small size, this mouse is fairly heavy if you use two AA batteries for power. You can use this mouse with only one battery to lighten it. Alternatively, you can use a battery adapter that lets you use a single AAA lithium battery, which is how we obtain the Lowest Weight.
The Razer Pro Click Mini is comfortable but lacks the right-handed slant and the thumb rest of the Razer Pro Click. Its small size and short length make it best suited for a fingertip grip. Its buttons are well-placed and easy to reach, and the textured rubber side grips feel good. Although the mouse has an ambidextrous shape, the two side buttons are on the left side, meaning it may be better suited for right-handed use.
You can connect this mouse wirelessly to up to four devices simultaneously (one with the USB receiver and up to three via Bluetooth.) You can also use one or two AA batteries to power this mouse. With two batteries, Razer advertises a battery life of up to 465 hours using a USB receiver connection or up to 725 hours with a Bluetooth connection.
This is a wireless-only mouse that doesn't have a cable.
The PTFE feet on the Razer Pro Click Mini are very good and a bit thicker than average. They offer a good gliding experience with minimal scratching on mousepads or desks. However, there aren't any third-party replacement feet available to buy.
This mouse's left- and right-click buttons use non-specified Razer silent mechanical switches. Note that these switches are much quieter than typical mechanical switches. For a sound test, check out the Noise section.
You can reprogram nearly all of the buttons on this mouse. On the bottom of the mouse, there's a switch to set the connection type, and the device pairing button, which you can't reprogram. There's also an additional switch behind the scroll wheel to manually change the wheel from notched mode to free scroll. Also, using the software, you can assign a Hypershift button to enable a second layer of commands.
The Razer Pro Click Mini has remarkably good wireless click latency when connected with its USB receiver. Note that the latency is higher over Bluetooth, which is normal as Bluetooth uses less power but delivers lower gaming performance. This difference isn't an issue when using this mouse for everyday browsing or productivity tasks, and you won't notice any delays using either connection mode. This is only of concern if you want to use this mouse for gaming and get the best performance possible.
The Razer Pro Click Mini offers remarkable CPI performance overall. It does, however, have a somewhat high precision error between CPI, but this is only an issue if you're interested in using this mouse for competitive gaming. You won't notice any accuracy issues when using this mouse for everyday browsing, work, or gaming.
The Razer Pro Click Mini has excellent sensor latency. It reacts very quickly when you move your mouse, and these movements closely match the cursor's timing on-screen.
The Razer Pro Click Mini has three polling rate options: 125Hz, 500Hz, and 1000Hz. Although its CPI range isn't as wide as some of Razer's gaming offerings, it's wide enough for productivity-related tasks.
The scroll wheel has a textured rubber grip for extra control. Behind the scroll wheel, a manual switch allows you to unlock the wheel from notched mode to free scrolling. Unfortunately, the wheel feels loose and not as precise when in notched mode, and the step definition isn't as clear.
Thanks to its silent switches, the Razer Pro Click Mini is very quiet and won't bother others around you.
The Razer Synapse 3 software offers good customization options, including profile creation, button remapping, and sensor adjustments. The software is easy to use and has a clean and straightforward layout. Unfortunately, the software isn't available on macOS. However, thanks to the onboard memory, you can configure settings on Windows and carry them over to a different device. Programmed macros and profiles don't save to the onboard memory and require the other computer to have Synapse 3 to work properly.
Similar to the software options from other major manufacturers, this software is the source of criticism from the broader community. While we didn't experience any issues during the testing of this mouse, many users online criticize this software for requiring frequent updates and taking up disproportionate system resources, among other complaints. This software may be frustrating if you prefer more lightweight software options or no software at all.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
HI! This is the TV that I am looking forward to the most Sony_A95l
Its maybe the best tv in 2023 overall
Waiting for this review. You guys are the best. I am keeping the subscription maximum months as possible for your honesty.
Waiting for Sony A95L QD Oled
I am from Brazil but waiting here!
Looking forward!!!!
Pre-orders start August 21st. Will you be pre-ordering the TV?
Hello, this TV is definitively the 2023 hit, we need a review by your team ! Thanks for your work
Unfortunately, we probably won’t be pre-ordering it. We have a few other TVs in our queue that we have to buy first, so we will most likely just end up buying it once it’s released! That makes sense. I just hope this TV gets some priority when it comes to testing due to its popularity. We can’t wait to hear more about it from you guys!
I preordered the 77” today from Crutchfield. I’m so excited!
It looks like the estimated shipping date for the A95L is in October in some places. Does that change your decision about not wanting to pre-order?
It looks like the estimated shipping date for the A95L is in October in some places. Does that change your decision about not wanting to pre-order?
On our end, we have a release date in September, so that when it’ll be marked as available in the “product picker”. Since we already have a large queue of TVs, we don’t plan to make any changes to the above statement. Sorry about that!
I just bought one based on months of pouring over Rtings data and info. This sony seems to hit all the points i really care about. cant wait to get the TV but also see how it fares in Rtings testing
Hey Rtings, Best buy has 8 A95L 65 inch in stock ready to ship!
C'mon guys, please..
Looking forward to a review of this so that we can see how good it is among the competition. Will probably wait for a discount before buying one though.
The Sony A95L line is now released, please update the status in the polling table.
We’ve purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.
Good job, thank you guys!
Yess, thanks!! When can we expect a review?
Well, thank you !
Really struggling to decide between x95l 85” and A95l 77”. The room has a fair amount of light and I watch both day and night. I sit 19’ from where the TV will be. Currently watching a 10 year old 55” Samsung, so either will be a huge upgrade. Would love some advice.
The A95L may be the best TV ever. Two reviews compared the A95L to the Sony BVM-HX310 $30,000 Professional Broadcast Monitor. “ The A95L often got uncannily close to this pro display.” “The A95L might be the next best thing to [the BVM-HX310].”
BUT, the 31" BVM-HX310 can reproduce a consistent 1000 nits across the whole screen indefinitely; the A95L can not.
This was clearly a demo put on by Sony for reviewers. Besides the BVM-HX310, the demo also had the A95K, Samsung 95C and LG G3. Except for noting that the Sony L was much brighter than the K, the reviewers ignored the Samsung and LG. I guess they assumed the comparison with the BVM-HX310 was enough.
In 10/11 Sound & Vision, in a brief test, the the A95L beat the Samsung 95C and LG G3 for HDR and SDR.
I recently installed an X95L in a friend’s house in a bright room (calibrated to rting’s settings), and the contrast looked fine to me and it was bright.
To the poster: wondering between the 85X95L and the 77A95L notwithstanding the accolades for the A95L, given my experience with the X95L in a bright room, and the 85", I’d go with the X85L. Also, you have a viewing distance of 19’ I have a viewing distance of 13’ from a 75" screen. According to all the charts, the maximum my eyes can resolve is 720p/1080i. If you are 6’ more, you’d resolve even less. Go with the bigger screen.
I have an X95k. I would love to get an A95L. But because of the peculiarities of Sony’s dealer agreements, my (high end) dealer can get EVERY Sony TV EXCEPT the A95L, and that is not because of short supply. That’s just the way it is (apologies to Walter Cronkite, if anyone remembers him).
Really struggling to decide between x95l 85” and A95l 77”. The room has a fair amount of light and I watch both day and night. I sit 19’ from where the TV will be. Currently watching a 10 year old 55” Samsung, so either will be a huge upgrade. Would love some advice.
See the post above (or below) on the A95L. The X95l 85" is $4500; the A95L 77" is $5000.
Really struggling to decide between x95l 85” and A95l 77”. The room has a fair amount of light and I watch both day and night. I sit 19’ from where the TV will be. Currently watching a 10 year old 55” Samsung, so either will be a huge upgrade. Would love some advice.
Hello!
For help with personalized buying advice, this is something our experts offer only via our insider forums. Otherwise, we have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that may be useful!
Like so many others, I’m considering both X95L and A95L For me reflection handling is extremely important so I’m very curious about that.
1, Sony tax is so extravagant; 2, 77’‘ is too much of a limitation; 3, QD-OLED panel cost cannot stay like this forever. Therefore I am gonna wait till 85-98’‘ QD OLEDs come out, and hopefully proportionally cheaper.
comment deletedI had the opportunity to see this tv in person and I was not that impressed with it. it could be that was not calibrated right, but even the LG C3, looked a lot better, none of the Sony tv’s at the store looked better than LG or Samsung tv’s.
All TVs at the store were probably in the store demonstration mode which makes it difficult to compare them for home circumstances. Besides, how a TV looks is to some extent a matter of taste. Thus, I am looking forward to Rtings test results.
this tv is arguable the best tv of 2023. why is this tv not in the lab yet?!?
comment deletedI had the opportunity to see this tv in person and I was not that impressed with it. it could be that was not calibrated right, but even the LG C3, looked a lot better, none of the Sony tv’s at the store looked better than LG or Samsung tv’s.
I don’t think ANY TV is properly calibrated at stores. Most don’t even use them with out of the box settings. Stores make the TVs as bright as they can because, after all, you are generally seeing them in a bright light. This, in turn has a detrimental effect on contrast. I am sure that is why all he Sony TVs you saw looked bad. Sonys are not bad TVs after all. As to the ones you mention, in three reviews the Sony A95L beat out the LG C3 and Samsung 95C But no trngs review yet
The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
appreciate your amazing work!
Our testers have started testing this product; is there anything specific you’re looking to see? Let us know in this thread.
How good is the built in sound system as compared to a soundbar? Could the purchase of a soundbar be delayed and still fully enjoy movies?
Would like to see real life picture of 0-10 % uniformity
Is the software buggy (related to android os tv)?
Some people on the web said that the audio pass threw was glitchy.
Also, hows the colors desaturation a low luminance level this year??
Thanks
Tone mapping (both Gradation Preferred and Brightness Preferred) can’t handle very bright highlights and fills them with with blue/grey colour instead. Example: the shine on the car at the beginning of Mad Max: Fury Road. Confirmed by several owners, me included.
Dolby Vision Dark has multiple bugs discovered and reported by Classy Tech.
There is a pink tint to low luminance colours. Visible in Ahsoka, Episode 1 between like 8:09 and 11:30.
Many owners have reported issues with audio delay, random restarts, choppy video, etc.
My set and many others (incl. Classy Tech’s, AVForums’ and Vincent’s) have faint dark streaks across the panels.
Do you even test things like these if they don’t fall in your fixed categories?
It was reported that Sony has asked for a delay in reviews until a new firmware is released in early November (which is probably why Vincent from HDTVtest still hasn’t posted his).
UPDATE: Vincent posted his review, confirming DV issues, low luminance issues, excessive audio delay, dark streaks across the panel, etc.
I’d like to know how SDR brightness compares with previous OLED models like A95K and current Mini LED models like X93L as well as any image retention you may notice.
For me it’s 1440p VRR and if it’s still restricted to 10-point white balance calibration. YouTuber AllAboutTKK says that 1440p VRR is working through his PC (a first for Sony), but not his PS5 (lol).
It looks like reviews on YouTube are up, from Digital Trends and AVForums.
Need this review ASAP, especially with black Friday around the corner
Asap for you? Mmm
I have the A95K model. I really wanted a larger TV but really like the quality of a Sony TV. Is the “L” going to be a significant upgrade to the “K” or am I just going to get a size increase?
Can I change the volume on my AVR without a distracting onscreen display? I’m thinking of upgrading from a Samsung, and they’re the absolute worst about that.
I have the A95K model. I really wanted a larger TV but really like the quality of a Sony TV. Is the “L” going to be a significant upgrade to the “K” or am I just going to get a size increase?
Hello! Help with personalized buying advice is something our experts offer only via our insider forums. Otherwise, we do have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that may be helpful!
I have the A95K model. I really wanted a larger TV but really like the quality of a Sony TV. Is the “L” going to be a significant upgrade to the “K” or am I just going to get a size increase?
According to 3 reviews so far the L is much brighter than the K. In two of the reviews the A95L was judged as being very close to a $30,000 broadcast monitor
1. Tone mapping (both Gradation Preferred and Brightness Preferred) can’t handle very bright highlights and fills them with with blue/grey colour instead. Example: the shine on the car at the beginning of Mad Max: Fury Road. Confirmed by several owners, me included.
- Dolby Vision Dark has multiple bugs discovered and reported by Classy Tech.
- There is a pink tint to low luminance colours. Visible in Ahsoka, Episode 1 between like 8:09 and 11:30.
- Many owners have reported issues with audio delay, random restarts, choppy video, etc.
- My set and many others (incl. Classy Tech’s, AVForums’ and Vincent’s) have faint dark streaks across the panels. Do you even test things like these if they don’t fall in your fixed categories? It was reported that Sony has asked for a delay in reviews until a new firmware is released in early November (which is probably why Vincent from HDTVtest still hasn’t posted his). UPDATE: Vincent posted his review, confirming DV issues, low luminance issues, excessive audio delay, dark streaks across the panel, etc.
Hey there,
I just wanted to jump in here, and thank you all for your suggestions. While I can’t make any guarantees, we do make sure to review this thread and the suggestions during the testing process. We do go outside our methodology so that we can catch issues that will matter to users, and we will make sure to keep all of these suggestions in mind! Furthermore, we test as is, report, and if /when a FW update comes out we retest to uncover any major changes that were implemented or reported.
Thanks for reaching out.
Can I change the volume on my AVR without a distracting onscreen display? I’m thinking of upgrading from a Samsung, and they’re the absolute worst about that.
While testing Audio passthrough, i checked to see if there was a pop up. if you adjust the volume with the TV remote, there is a small pop up for the volume (albeit not very distracting). But adjusting the volume using the AVR remote i got no pop up on screen. Hope that helps!