Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Picture Quality
- Motion
- Inputs
- Features
- Comments
Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Apr 15, 2024 06:45 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.1
Updated May 24, 2024 06:22 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Max Refresh Rate170 Hz
Size27"
Pixel TypeIPS
Variable Refresh RateYes
HDR10Yes
Native Resolution2560 x 1440
Max Refresh Rate165 Hz
Size32"
Pixel TypeIPS
Variable Refresh RateFreeSync
HDR10Yes
Native Resolution2560 x 1440
Variants
- Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx (27")
- XENEON 32QHD165 (32")
Our Verdict
Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx is a bit better than the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165. The Acer has a much better stand, with a wider range of ergonomic adjustments, including the ability to rotate to a portrait mode. The Acer also has a slightly faster refresh rate and slightly faster response time. Finally, the Acer's smaller screen results in a higher pixel density, so text is a bit clearer, and images are sharper.