One of the latest advancements in monitor technology is OLED panels, which have recently become more popular and accessible. They're different from other panel technologies because instead of having a backlight, they have individual pixels that can turn on and off. This helps them display perfect blacks next to bright highlights without any blooming. Besides their superior picture quality, most OLEDs are beneficial for gaming. They have a near-instantaneous response time, so motion looks crisp.
However, there are downsides to using an OLED, as they're prone to burn-in when exposed to the same static elements over time. This means they aren't great to use only for work purposes, but there's less of a risk of burn-in if you use the monitor for varied usage.
Many new OLED monitors came out in 2024, and more will be released in 2025, including both QD-OLED and WOLED models in various sizes, resolutions, and refresh rates. Generally speaking, QD-OLEDs offer the best picture quality with more vivid colors. However, blacks look purple in a bright room on those monitors, so a WOLED may be a better choice if that bothers you. Since many models use the same panel as their competitors, choosing one over another can come down to features, price, and availability, which we consider for this recommendation. Luckily, we put each OLED that we buy through our extensive testing, which includes nearly 400 tests to recognize these minor differences and help you make a buying decision.
We've bought and tested more than 340 monitors, and below are our picks for the best OLEDs available. See our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors, the best HDR monitors, and, if you're concerned about the risk of burn-in, the best Mini LED monitors. Check out the best OLED TVs, too, and learn about the best monitor brands.
The best OLED monitor we've tested is the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED. It's a QD-OLED that combines a 4k resolution with a 240Hz refresh rate, making it ideal for gamers who want a responsive feel and a detailed image. It has everything you'd expect from a premium OLED gaming monitor, like a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also takes full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so it's a great choice no matter the type of gamer you are. It even has remarkable HDR picture quality with vivid colors and bright highlights.
The MSI is part of a group of 32-inch, 4k QD-OLEDs that came out in 2024 and all perform similarly. Besides price and availability, choosing one over the other comes down to features and personal needs. What makes this particular OLED worth getting over other options is that it has some extra features, like a USB hub and KVM switch, and it costs less than the competition, too. That said, you may not like its glossy coating if you want to use it in a bright room, as reflections from strong light sources can get distracting. The Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 is an alternative with matte coating that does a better job at reducing glare, but it also costs more than the MSI.
If you find the 32-inch screen of the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED too big, there are some great smaller OLEDs with 27-inch screens, like the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's a QD-OLED like the 321URX, but it's different because it has a lower 1440p resolution, so images aren't as detailed. However, it has a 360Hz refresh rate, so it's a good sweet spot between detailed images and a responsive feel, and it's a fantastic choice for PC gaming.
As expected, motion looks sharp, and this monitor has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to fully take advantage of HDMI 2.1 graphics cards. It delivers picture quality similar to that of the 321URX, with vivid colors and bright highlights. It competes against other monitors with the same specs, but what makes it better is that it has a few useful features like a KVM switch and USB-C port.
There are other 27-inch OLED gaming monitors you can get for less than the MSI, which helps if you're on a more limited budget. One is the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, which has a WOLED panel. It's brighter than most OLEDs, which is great if you want to use it in a well-lit room, but it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate than the MSI, and colors aren't as vivid.
If you're looking for the best OLED gaming monitor and need the highest refresh rate possible, there are some 480Hz gaming OLEDs, like the Sony INZONE M10S. It's a 1440p monitor like the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, but the higher refresh rate is ideal if you want the smoothest and most responsive feel possible. One difference with the MSI is that it isn't a QD-OLED, so colors are less vivid, and instead it has a WOLED panel. That means you still get all the benefits of an OLED with perfect blacks against bright highlights, and incredibly sharp motion.
It supports HDMI 2.1 and DP 2.1 bandwidth with UHBR10 speeds, which is great if you have a high-end graphics card that can take advantage of that. While a 1440p, 480Hz OLED like this one is ideal for PC gaming, it isn't so versatile for console gaming. Instead, you can look into the LG 32GS95UE-B if you want a more versatile option. It's a native 4k, 240Hz monitor with a Dual-Mode feature that switches to a 1080p resolution with a 480Hz refresh rate, so it's fantastic no matter the gamer you are. That said, it also costs more than the Sony.
Although most OLEDs have a 16:9 aspect ratio, like the monitors mentioned above, there's a different class of OLEDs with a 21:9 aspect ratio. These 34-inch ultrawide displays offer more horizontal screen space, which is great for immersion while playing atmospheric games. If you're interested in that, check out the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED. It has a QD-OLED panel, so colors are more vivid than on the Sony INZONE M10S, and while it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate, it's still good enough even for competitive gamers.
Like the other MSI monitors mentioned, it has a few handy features, like a USB hub and a KVM switch that makes it easy to switch sources. However, if you don't need these perks and prefer something cheaper, check out the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF. It's another QD-OLED with similar picture quality, and it's something to consider if you find the MSI too expensive. However, it also has a lower 165Hz refresh rate.
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG is a 27-inch QD-OLED that competes with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's a cheaper alternative that gets brighter in SDR, but it also has slightly worse motion handling.
See our reviewThe ASUS ROG Swift OLED P32UCDM is a competitor of the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED. It has some extra perks, like Dolby Vision, but it also costs more for minimal difference in performance.
See our reviewThe Dell AW3225QF is an alternative to the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED if you want a curved QD-OLED. It performs similarly, but only consider it if you're fine with getting a curved display, and the fact that it costs more.
See our reviewThe Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 is a 1440p, 360Hz QD-OLED that competes with and performs similarly to the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. Because they perform so similarly, you can't go wrong with either, and you should get whichever you can get for cheaper, but the Gigabyte tends to cost more.
See our reviewFeb 19, 2025: We replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 with the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED for consistency with other recommendations, as the MSI is cheaper. We also replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the Sony INZONE M10S and renamed it the 'Best 480Hz Monitor' to represent the current market better. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3. We introduced a new format to the recommendation and updated the text to reflect these changes.
Dec 18, 2024: We replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 and the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED and the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED, respectively, for consistency with other recommendations. We replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95 with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP in the Notable Mentions.
Oct 07, 2024: We updated the recommendation to reflect the current OLED monitor market. We replaced the Dell Alienware AW2725DF with the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 for consistency with other recommendations and because the Gigabyte has more features. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 and the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED with the AW2725DF, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF to reflect changes in the recommendation.
Aug 26, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 as the 'Best OLED Monitor' for consistency with other recommendations. We also added the LG 32GS95UE-B as the 'Best Esports OLED Monitor.' Lastly, we replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G85SB S34BG85 and the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 and the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED to better reflect the current OLED market.
Jun 05, 2024: Verified that the recommended monitors are still valid and updated the text to reflect the current OLED market.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors with an OLED panel currently available, including the best OLED gaming monitor. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our OLED monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.
What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
Update: We’ve added the Audeze MM-100 and Beyerdynamic DT-990 PRO as Notable Mentions and checked to ensure all our picks remain in stock.
What do you think of these changes? Let us know