The most popular panel type on monitors is OLED. They have individual pixels that can turn on and off, which helps them display perfect blacks in dark rooms without any haloing around bright objects. Besides their superior picture quality versus LCD displays, they're beneficial for gaming as they have a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. There are different OLED sub-types, including WOLED and QD-OLED, with various sizes, resolutions, and refresh rates. Since many models use the same panel as their competitors, choosing one over another can come down to features, price, and availability. They're also available at different price points, including new entry-level models coming out.
However, there are downsides to using an OLED, as they're prone to burn-in when exposed to the same static elements over time, like if you only use it for work all day, every day. They also don't get as bright as many LCD monitors, and OLEDs have VRR flicker with changing frame rates. Although QD-OLEDs generally offer the best picture quality with more vivid colors than WOLEDs, their black levels rise in bright rooms. However, a downside of WOLEDs is that they tend to have a gamma shift at low refresh rates, causing a loss of details in dark scenes. This means any OLED panel type has its flaws.
We've bought and tested more than 390 monitors, and below are our picks for the best OLED monitors available. See our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors, the best HDR monitors, and, alternatively, the best Mini LED monitors. Check out the best OLED TVs and learn about the best monitor brands.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best OLED Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessResponse TimeColor AccuracySize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzNative Resolution3840 x 2160See all our test resultsScreen FinishThe best OLED gaming monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It's a QD-OLED that combines a 4k resolution with a 240Hz refresh rate. This makes it ideal for gamers who want a responsive feel and a detailed image. It has everything you'd expect from a premium OLED gaming monitor, like a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also takes full advantage of gaming consoles and modern graphics cards because it supports both HDMI and DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth. It even has remarkable HDR picture quality with vivid colors and bright highlights, which is what you should expect with a QD-OLED. One of its advantages is its high pixel density, which results in sharp images and text.
This monitor is part of a group of 27-inch, 4k QD-OLEDs that all perform similarly. This particular model is worth getting over other options because it has some extra features, like a USB hub and a KVM switch. It also supports Dolby Vision, which is a nice touch for a gaming monitor. However, you can also check out the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM if you want something bigger, but it tends to cost more and lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range OLED Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessResponse TimeColor AccuracySize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeWOLEDMax Refresh Rate720 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440See all our test resultsScreen FinishIf you don't need a premium OLED at a high price, there are plenty of 1440p OLEDs you can get for a bit less, like the LG 27GX790B-B. It's worth getting when it's on sale. The lower resolution results in less-sharp, less-detailed images than on the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. That said, the LG has a higher 540Hz native refresh rate for a smoother feel, and it has a dual-mode feature to boost it to 720Hz with a lower 720p resolution. This gives it versatility for playing different types of games.
Besides the lower resolution, it has a few other differences in picture quality. It uses a Tandem OLED panel whose colors aren't as vivid as on the ASUS. However, it has a few advantages: it maintains lower black levels better in bright rooms, and it gets much brighter than the ASUS. This means highlights pop, and it fights glare well. Its matte coating absorbs light well, which is something to consider if you want to use it in a well-lit room. However, you may prefer the glossy ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQWP-W if you want something similar with clearer images. That said, it tends to cost more than the LG.
-
Best Mid-Range OLED Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessResponse TimeColor AccuracySize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate360 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440See all our test resultsScreen FinishIf you're looking for the best OLED gaming monitor at a lower cost without getting into budget models, look into the Dell Alienware AW2725DF. It differs from the LG 27GX790B-B in that it has a lower 360Hz refresh rate and doesn't have a dual-mode feature. This means gaming feels less smooth, but motion still looks sharp thanks to its near-instantaneous response time. Sadly, it doesn't have high-bandwidth HDMI and DisplayPort 2.1 ports like the LG, so you can only reach the max refresh rate with compression over a DisplayPort connection.
Another difference versus the LG is that this Dell is a QD-OLED, so colors are more vivid. You still get all the benefits of an OLED with perfect blacks against bright highlights, but the black levels rise in bright rooms, making them look purple. This means you need to use it in a dark space to get the best picture quality. If you want an OLED that performs better in well-lit rooms, the LG 27GX700A-B is a solid option with a Tandem OLED panel that gets bright. However, it tends to cost more unless you can find it on sale.
-
Best Lower Mid-Range OLED Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessResponse TimeColor AccuracySize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440See all our test resultsScreen FinishThere are more entry-level OLEDs coming out, which are great choices if you want the benefits of an OLED panel without premium features. If that's what you're interested in, the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q is a solid choice with good value. It's a step down from the Dell Alienware AW2725DF because it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate, which is still fast enough for most gamers. Plus, it offers all the benefits of an OLED, including the same deep blacks and sharp motion. That said, it's dimmer than the Dell, so highlights aren't as bright, and colors aren't as vivid.
On the plus side, it actually has some advantages over the Dell, mainly due to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. This means it can take full advantage of HDMI 2.1 graphics cards, including reaching its max refresh rate over HDMI. While it also works well with gaming consoles, it doesn't support downscaled 4k @ 120Hz signals with a PS5 or Xbox Series X|S. You can check out the LG 27GX704A-B if you want better console compatibility, but it uses a WOLED panel with less vivid colors, and it sometimes costs more.
-
Best Budget OLED Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessResponse TimeColor AccuracySize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440See all our test resultsScreen FinishAlthough there aren't many budget-friendly OLEDs out there, the Dell Alienware AW2726DM offers good value at a lower cost than most other options. It has the same screen specs as the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q, with a 27-inch size, 1440p resolution, and 240Hz refresh rate. It also has a QD-OLED panel that performs similarly for the most part, but there are a few trade-offs for this cheaper model. It doesn't get as bright and has worse out-of-the-box accuracy, which is something to consider if you want accurate images without any sort of calibration. Its stand doesn't come with typical swivel adjustment, either, which is a downside for co-op gaming with someone next to you.
Another thing to consider if you want to get this monitor is that it lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth like on the HyperX. This means you can't reach the monitor's max refresh rate over HDMI with a gaming PC. That said, it supports the same signals with gaming consoles, including VRR with a PS5, so it performs the same as the HyperX if you need something for console gaming.
Notable Mentions
-
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG is a premium 4k, 240Hz display with a 1080p, 480Hz dual mode. Consider this over the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM if you want more versatility for different types of games. Plus, the XG32UCWMG has a glossy WOLED panel that retains low black levels in bright rooms. However, its colors aren't as vivid as on the PG27UCDM.
See our review -
Dell Alienware AW2725Q:
The Dell Alienware AW2725Q is a 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED that competes with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. The Dell is usually cheaper, but it has some notable trade-offs, as it lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG is 1440p, 360Hz QD-OLED that competes with the Dell Alienware AW2725DF. It performs similarly for the most part and has a few extra features, like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it tends to cost more than the Dell.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG is a mid-range OLED that gets brighter than the Dell Alienware AW2725DF thanks to its Tandem OLED panel. That said, it has a lower refresh rate, and its colors aren't as vivid.
See our review -
Dell S3225QC:
The Dell S3225QC is an entry-level OLED with a higher 4k resolution than the Dell Alienware AW2726DM. The S3225QC is a good choice if you want detailed images, like for console gaming, but it has a lower 120Hz refresh rate and tends to cost more than the AW2726DM.
See our review
Recent Updates
May 13, 2026:
We added the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q as the 'Best Lower Mid-Range OLED Monitor' to give another option, and we replaced the Dell S3225QC with the cheaper Dell Alienware AW2726DM in the budget category. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG and added the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG and the S3225QC.
Apr 14, 2026:
We made sure all the monitors are available to buy, and the article is consistent with other articles.
Mar 20, 2026:
We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3425DW with the Dell Alienware AW2725DF as it's cheaper. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the Gigabyte MO27Q28G and replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the Dell Alienware AW2725Q.
Feb 27, 2026:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG with the LG 27GX790B-B, which has a higher refresh rate. We also replaced the LG 27GX700A-B with the cheaper Dell Alienware AW3425DW. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the Gigabyte MO27Q28G and we added the XG27ACDNG.
Feb 03, 2026:
We restructured the article to better focus on each OLED monitor's market position. We removed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG and renamed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG to 'Best Upper Mid-Range OLED Monitor.' We also replaced the LG 27GX790A-B with the LG 27GX700A-B and renamed it to the 'Best Mid-Range OLED Monitor.' We removed the Dell Alienware AW3425DW and added the Dell S3225QC as the 'Best Budget OLED Monitor.' In the Notable Mentions, we removed the MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED, the Sony INZONE M10S, and the LG 45GX950A-B, and added the XG32UCWMG and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best OLED monitors currently available, including the best OLED gaming monitor. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our OLED monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.